Movie review rant 2016

Status
Not open for further replies.

nanoboy

Well-Known Member
{Note from mods - thread continued from here: Movie review rant 2015}



I enjoyed the Judge Dredd remake from a couple years ago. Gritty, violent, humourless. It reminded me of the Indonesian film 'The Raid'.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I enjoyed the Judge Dredd remake from a couple years ago. Gritty, violent, humourless. It reminded me of the Indonesian film 'The Raid'.
my brief review of it from many pages back:

"I really liked the Judge Dredd movie of Sylvester Stallone. It is a long time since I have seen it so it may in fact have been a terrible movie but I hope to God that it wasn't as bad as this rendition. Some actors can pull off this sort of character without seeming like a complete drop-kick -- Stallone and Schwarzenegger do these characters brilliantly -- but Karl Urban cannot. It was just embarrassing watching him snarling his way through the movie, and the air-head partner he had did not help at all."
 
John Wick

I had put off watching this movie for a long time because Keanu Reeves and movies don't necessarily make the best companions. Some of his movies are great; most are not great. However, John Wick is a super-fantastic action movie! Perhaps Keanu's best movie ever.

The story is pretty standard - Russian mobsters kill Keanu's dog so he has to get revenge, and... well, actually that's the entire plot. No deep thinking required. Just as an action movie should be. As it turns out Keanu's character is a retired hitman who until five years prior had worked for the kingpin father of said dog-killing Russian mobster. Quite how this mobster does not know Keanu is the most feared hitman in all of history, especially when the dude worked for his own father, is not explained at all but we can let that slide on account of how cool the fight scenes are.


9 out of 10
 
I think I am watching too many movies lately. I watched two more today after John Wick.

Escape Plan
I liked this movie in a quite adequate sort of way. Stallone and Schwarzenegger together, with an escape plan. It isn't really an action movie, although there is plenty of fighting and gun-play, and so they pull it off well despite their collective age of 780. The story is that Stallone is some sort of super-genius who spends his life breaking out of high-security prisons to show the holes in their security systems, because his family was killed by an escaped prisoner or something. I couldn't really understand much of what he was mumbling to be honest. He ends up double-crossed in a super-duper high-security prison for the world's worst criminals, totally escape-proof by virtue of being on a boat, where he meets Schwarzenegger. The movie conveniently glosses over the fact that Arnold is a criminal in order to buddy the two up and allow them both to escape and live happily ever after. The movie also predicts the viewers' objection that the prisoners would know they were on a boat by cleverly having a scene where Arnold says "but we would know if we were on a boat" and Stallone replying with what amounts to "no you wouldn't." Everything is very contrived of course, in order to propel the plot along, and really none of the escape would have been possible without the complete lack of prisoner searches. Stallone and Schwarzenegger are constantly carrying around vital escape items which they have obtained either through obviously stealing them in full view of the guards or I guess through tooth-fairy wishes. Most surprising moment was when Stallone is in a hot-box, the door opens, and there is Sam Neil! I was like "whaaaaat??"


Spy
In completely the opposite direction from serious actiony movies like Escape Plan or John Wick or Spectre, is this movie. Comedy from start to finish, the story revolves around two CIA office-friends, Melissa McCarthy and Miranda Hart, who have to go on a mission after all the field agents are compromised. Melissa McCarthy is by turns self-deprecating and confident, while Miranda Hart sort of sticks with her awkward tv Miranda persona. Jason Statham plays a delusional field agent, simply by using his usual action character. Jude Law and Morena Baccarin are there as field agents as well. The star of the film for me is Rose Byrne as the villain, so diabolically withering in almost everything she says that she steals every single scene she is in. This may be one of those comedies that you either love or hate, but I loved it - and I am of course a taciturn humourless person, so that is saying something - and would rate it somewhere up around 7 out of 10. It is better than most other spy comedies out there. There is a tonne of cursing in it though.



Oh, completely unexpected connection between those two movies as well: they both somehow have a chap called "50 Cent" in them, which for those of you who don't know is a god-awful rapper.
 
John Wick

I had put off watching this movie for a long time because Keanu Reeves and movies don't necessarily make the best companions. Some of his movies are great; most are not great. However, John Wick is a super-fantastic action movie! Perhaps Keanu's best movie ever.

The story is pretty standard - Russian mobsters kill Keanu's dog so he has to get revenge, and... well, actually that's the entire plot. No deep thinking required. Just as an action movie should be. As it turns out Keanu's character is a retired hitman who until five years prior had worked for the kingpin father of said dog-killing Russian mobster. Quite how this mobster does not know Keanu is the most feared hitman in all of history, especially when the dude worked for his own father, is not explained at all but we can let that slide on account of how cool the fight scenes are.


9 out of 10

I went and saw this at the movies when it came out in late 2014, and was glad to see Keanu in a movie again. Apart from 'The Day the Earth Stood Still', which wasn't as good as I had hoped, he hasn't been in anything I liked since the the Matrix trilogy. And I was looking forward to seeing him in a good action movie. This one didn't disappoint.

I concur with everything Chlidonias said above, including the rating.

'John Wick 2' is currently filming and is due to be released later this year.

:p

Hix
 
John Wick - 7/10
A man's beloved dog gets killed in an unprovoked home invasion, and unfortunately for the dog-killers, the man (Keanu Reeves) happens to be a retired hitman, or as one of the mob bosses says "he's the man you send to kill the bogeyman". The movie is, of course, quite formulaic, but it's a riveting ride we are taken on as Keanu avenges his dog. Rent it now if you're in the mood for a good shoot-em-up action flick with a high body count!

I quite enjoyed John Wick when I saw it earlier in the year, so I'm not sure why I only gave it a 7. Hmmm...
 
I watched Escape Plan because I was nostalgic. I was yearning for the 80s and 90s when 'Rambo' and 'The Terminator' were flicks that boys and men loved. Unfortunately, I forgot how old Sly and Arnie are now, so it was a bit of a shock to see two geriatric action heroes trying to be young.

Which brings me to my next point: this was an enjoyable movie that would have been even more so if the protagonists were of a slightly younger vintage.

Two old dudes locked away in an off-the-grid prison sounds like B-movie material, but it was still incredibly fun. Yes there are a few plot holes, and the story made no sense whatsoever in a few places, but you kind of expect that from films that these guys star in. (Have you seen The Expendables??)

Rent this movie or watch it for free on TV, but don't put it too high on your list of priorities.

7/10

My review from a few pages ago. I'll watch it if it's on TV again while I'm flipping channels.
 
'John Wick 2' is currently filming and is due to be released later this year.
oh no! They're not going to kill the dog he stole from the pound at the end of the first movie are they?
 
my brief review of it from many pages back:

"I really liked the Judge Dredd movie of Sylvester Stallone. It is a long time since I have seen it so it may in fact have been a terrible movie but I hope to God that it wasn't as bad as this rendition. Some actors can pull off this sort of character without seeming like a complete drop-kick -- Stallone and Schwarzenegger do these characters brilliantly -- but Karl Urban cannot. It was just embarrassing watching him snarling his way through the movie, and the air-head partner he had did not help at all."

For the first time in this thread, I see myself agreeing with nanoboy's critique, not yours...
 
For the first time in this thread, I see myself agreeing with nanoboy's critique, not yours...
that's the start of a dangerous downhill slide. Go watch The Shawshank Redemption and you'll feel better.
 
nanoboy said:
I'll leave Chlidonias to write a much more exciting review when he sees the movie in about 5 years. If you liked the first two movies, then you should enjoy this one as well. Self-deprecating jokes abound , for example, when they rescue a strait-jacketed Wesley Snipes from a maximum security prison, he claims that he was incarcerated for tax evasion.

There are 80's and 90's stars aplenty including Stallone, Schwarzenneger, Snipes, Lundren, Jet Li, Antonio Banderas, Terry Crews, Randy Couture, Harrison Ford, Kelsey Gramer, Mel Gibson and Jason Statham. They introduced a new, unknown cast of young and upcoming 'expendables', who I assume are MMA fighters or wrestlers - I didn't recognise anyone. Look, just go rent the movie - you could do worse.
ha, it's only been one year!

The Expendables 3

Yes, they're back. I love writing Expendables reviews!

The Expendables was a fair enough movie if you grew up on 80s action movies and although dumb it was still quite fun to watch, even if it was mostly the Stallone-Statham show. The Expendables 2 lost the plot entirely and was no fun at all, just really stretched and insulting to anybody who paid to see it. The Expendables 3 manages to get the tone exactly right - just enough comedy to splice into the serious action, some cool fight scenes, lots of explosions, one-liners. It is vastly superior to the second movie and yet, even though I enjoyed it, it still fails overall.

One major flaw is that it doesn't seem to know who it is aimed at. It should be obvious that the target audience are the man-children in the 30/40+ age bracket who want real 1980s action movies instead of the watered-down 2000s action movies. That's what the first two movies were all about - 80s action stars doing what they do [did] best. In this movie Stallone decides to ditch the old crew and use a group of young bland-faces. Who wants to see that? Nobody, that's who.

For the young crew they didn't even use actual action stars and most of them aren't even real fighters. The only one I recognised was Ronda Rousey who is an MMA fighter and, incidentally, the absolute worst actor I have ever seen in a movie - her "sad face" when Stallone is supposed to be dead near the end is both hilarious and awful at the same time. I had to google the others. There's Victor Ortiz, a welterweight boxer, who doesn't throw a single punch in the whole movie. Seriously, that's like getting Jet Li but just making him sit in a helicopter with a machine gun! Ha ha ha h...oh, that's what they did do. Now I am sad. Then there's some guy named Glen Powell, and Kellan Lutz who was in all the Twilight movies. Okay, really? Is that some sort of joke?

Tying in with the "who is this movie for?" is this next problem - it is rated PG13. The first movie ran Hollywood dry of blood squibs so for the second one they had to use CGI blood splatter. For the third one they just went, "meh, let's make a movie for the kids; no blood this time round." Who the heck is going to want to watch a PG13 version of an 80s action movie? It'd turn out like the RoboCop remake ... dammit, I just made myself sad again.

The movie starts out with the remnants of the Expendables (Sylvester Stallone, Jason Statham, Dolph Lundgren and Randy Couture) breaking Wesley Snipes out of a prison train. Nothing is more secure than a prison train, what with its inability to go anywhere except where the track is. Apparently Snipes and Stallone were two of the original Expendables, which makes the other Expendables jealous, but they're all bros soon enough. The reason they had to break Snipes out was because they were one man short for their next job - presumably because Jet Li jumped out of a plane at the very start of the second movie and never came back - and so once they have him they head off to Somalia to meet up with Terry Crews. I'm not quite sure why they needed that extra man, or even what their plan was supposed to entail, but when the main villain arrives it turns out to be - dun dun DUN! - Mel Gibson! And then it turns out that Gibson and Stallone were - dun dun DUN DUUUN! - the two most original Expendables of them all!! Gibson is so evil that he shoots Terry Crews who then has to be put into a coma until the end of the movie so that Snipes can be the black guy. There can only be one of each non-white person at a time after all. There's an extended sad scene when Crews is shot and then again at the hospital, and I'm just sitting there thinking "The dude's not even an 80s action hero! Who cares?!"

Soon afterwards Stallone is contacted by the CIA guy B̶r̶u̶c̶e̶ ̶W̶i̶l̶l̶i̶s Harrison Ford who quite literally looks like he is about to drop dead on set. Ford wants Stallone to bring Gibson in for trial at The Hague for war crimes. Naturally Stallone immediately ditches his old team because what a hero, and goes to find that well-known action movie stalwart, Kelsey Grammar. The next half an hour is spent in a state of near-boredom watching Stallone and Grammar tripping around the world picking out youngsters to replace the old guard. This is right about where the movie turns in to The Expendables Babies; it's like The Muppet Babies or Baby Looney Tunes but less fun and with less reason to exist. There's also a bit to show how sad all the old Expendables are at being abandoned, so sad that they can't even be sad together. Saddest of all is Randy Couture. Why so sad, Sad Randy?

There is, of course, no need for Stallone to train the newbies in covert surveillance or anything dumb like that. They're fighters, they automatically know everything for special ops missions. I mean, the sole reason Stallone picked any of the new members was because one was a bouncer, one fell off a cliff, one took a dive in a fight, and one had some guns. That's pretty much it. Then they just winged the entire mission. There is an actual scene where Stallone doesn't have a plan and the computer guy says "hey, why don't I do this and this?" and Stallone is just like "yeah ok".

What happens next is pretty predictable. The kids are useless and Gibson escapes, kidnaps the newbies, etc etc, and all the old team have to get back together to break them free. However they have one new addition - Antonio Banderas, having a ball with his role and without a shadow of a doubt the best character in the movie. Absolutely bonkers, as he always is, bouncing around like a jerboa on a caffeine-rush and he gets the best fight scene in the whole thing alongside Ronda Rousey (she can't act but she moves real well). Ford turns up as well, in a helicopter, along with Schwarzenegger and Jet Li, and all together they blow the entire army of Asmanistan to kingdom come.

The final fight is reserved for Stallone and Gibson. Stallone is angry, but Gibson is mad. Not sure who would win in real life out of that combination, but in the movie it is Stallone. When Gibson says "What about The Hague?" Stallone replies "I am The Hague" before shooting him dead. I am The Hague. That really sounds like the kind of thing you say on the spur of the moment, thinking it sounds really cool, but as soon as it comes out of your mouth you know it sounded idiotic. I think that's probably the real reason he shot Gibson dead, so there would be no witnesses.

My burning question after watching the whole movie: where the heck was Charisma Carpenter??!
 
While I would never omit an excuse to watch Shawshank, I'd nevertheless like to remind you that the general critical consensus is rather in favour of "Dredd" than of "Judge Dredd".;)
I'm not a general critic, I'm an extraordinary critic!
 
is that meant to say "hubris"? Did it take you a week just to find that for a come-back? :p

In any case, as I'm sure you're aware as a fellow moviologist, I was paraphrasing Hans Gruber. I couldn't find a clip on youtube of the scene but Holly Gennero says "After all your posturing, all your speeches, you're nothing but a common thief" and Hans replies "I am an exceptional thief, Mrs. McClane. And since I'm moving up to kidnapping, you should be more polite".




I've seen a few more movies since my last reviews. I'll come back to those later - it'll give you some time to find meme links in preparation.
 
Commando
I bought a boxed set of six early Schwarzenegger movies last year and only just started watching them. Commando was made in 1985. It's about a retired black-ops team leader, Col. John Matrix, whose former team members (also retired) have just been killed off. Matrix lives in a remote log cabin on a mountain with his daughter (played by a 12-year-old Alyssa Milano) when both are kidnapped. It seems that sometime in the past Matrix's team deposed the barbaric President of Valverde (played by Dan Hedaya) and helped install a better leader, while the former warlord was exiled. He now wants Matrix to kill the current President, so he can reclaim his presidency. Matrix has 24 hours to kill the President or they kill his daughter.

As you would expect in a movie like this there are fight scenes, a car chase, lots of blazing guns, a rocket launcher, and a massive body count. Despite some plotholes, attempts at humour (that came across as just silly), Dan Hedaya's appalling fake accent, and the usual necessity to suspend belief in some scenes, I found the movie generally entertaining. It also stars Rae-Dawn Chong, Bill Duke (who later appeared with Schwarzeneggar in 'Predator', and Mel Gibson in 'Bird on a Wire'), and Australian actor Vernon Wells who wore a typical 80's badguy wardrobe of black leather pants and black sleeveless shirt with what appears to be a grey woollen crocheted vest.

6.5 - 7/10.

:p

Hix
 
Commando was such a good movie! They just don't make action movies like they did in the 80s. Completely over-the-top and absurd, with the corny one-liners and the throwing of phone boxes over the shoulder and the letting off of steam. Brilliant.

I have always wondered why Matrix's daughter doesn't have even a hint of her father's accent. Makes me think he's not her real dad, but maybe he killed some terrorist dictator and just took his daughter home for himself. I mean, he clearly shows in the movie that he has a penchant for kidnapping people. That would explain why they are hiding out in a log cabin in the middle of nowhere.

What are the other movies in your box set?
 
21 Jump Street

So I'll start this off by saying I do not like Jonah Hill at all, and I don't particularly like Channing Tatum either. For those who haven't seen this movie, Jonah Hill and Channing Tatum are the two lead actors. Strangely enough, however, I did like this movie. It was generally a fun ride about two high-school losers who become cops, the dumb one buddying up with the more nerdy one in order to graduate, and then because they suck at their job they get stuck in a trial programme where youthful-looking cops are sent undercover in high schools.

The original source material was a tv show from the late 1980s, where the lead character was played by a guy named Johnny Depp who gets off-loaded onto the Jump Street programme because he looks so young that the criminals just laugh at him when he tries to arrest them. This was a great show, although it only ran for five seasons, and despite what I just said in the last sentence it wasn't a comedy. Instead it was that typical 80s fun-drama brought to you by the likes of Stephen J. Cannell (think Riptide, The A Team, Magnum P.I., Knight Rider, Simon & Simon, shows like that).

There's this weird thing that movie studios do when remaking 70s and 80s tv shows. The shows themselves were fun but not comedies, yet the movie studios insist on turning them into straight-out comedies almost as if saying the old shows can't be taken seriously. Some go the opposite way very successfully (e.g. Mission: Impossible) but most go the way of Charlie's Angels or Starsky & Hutch or 21 Jump Street. I guess it's the Hollywood way to churn out movies which are only barely-memorable for the quick buck.

Which brings me directly to....

22 Jump Street

Yes, the sequel. This was not good. I found two parts funny, and that is not a high laugh-to-running-time percentage. One, the reaction of Captain Ice Cube when he finds out Jonah Hill is sleeping with his daughter; and two, I can't even remember now so it can't have been that funny. The "upcoming sequels" at the end were quite good too.

The movie is pretty much a literal remake of the first movie, except they are undercover in college instead of high school. The script makes a big deal about self-referencing this, but that doesn't actually make it better, it just means you've already seen the jokes.

Confusingly for me, I googled the movie afterwards to get some reactions and the overwhelming majority of critics loved it, saying it was wall-to-wall laughs, better than the first one, etc. After I watched 22 Jump Street I went onto youtube and watched the first few episodes of the tv show, and it was much better. Much better!

Random trivia: In the first movie there was an out-of-nowhere cameo from both Johnny Depp and Peter DeLuise (who both die), and also Holly Robinson earlier in the movie. In the second movie there were cameos from Dustin Nguyen and Richard Grieco. For you young people, they all became famous on the 21 Jump Street tv show.

Add-on: I just found nanoboy's review from a few years ago and this bit is worth repeating because he was dead right: "The storyline has been done in a hundred other movies, but this is a buddy-cop-comedy for this generation's kids. And herein lies one of my problems with the movie. Those who watched the TV series in the 80's would be in their 30's and 40's now, but this movie's target audience was not even born in the 80's!This movie, therefore, will not appeal to fans of the TV series as it does not stick to the topical/moral blueprint. The '21 Jump Street' brand will not appeal to the target audience because the TV series was not an integral part of their childhood. Instead, this film did not have to piggyback off the TV series - it could have easily been 'Superbad 2', with the usual cops, house parties, drugs, and making out."
 
A Birder's Guide To Everything

There's a thread on Zoochat all about http://www.zoochat.com/183/big-year-movie-264913/ from 2011, but this 2013 movie is so much better. It is about three teenage boys who run a Young Birders Society composed just of themselves. One of them (Kodi Smit-McPhee) unexpectedly sees a Labrador Duck in the middle of the street while out biking, and on the advice of veteran birder Ben Kingsley they set off on a cross-country trip to try and track it down again. The Labrador Duck plot shares time with Kodi coming to terms with his father remarrying after the death of his mother, and his attraction to Katie Chang who has joined in the quest because she has a telephoto lens. It is a quiet, funny, sweet movie. Totally recommended.

The trailer for it is here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94Q5ReCX8ME
 
is that meant to say "hubris"? Did it take you a week just to find that for a come-back? :p
Don't worry; you're not THAT important. Originally, I wanted to reply with "Memento mori", but thought it might come over as too morbid, so forgot about it.

The Orange Girl

On his 16th birthday, a Norwegian teenager gets three envelopes originally written by his father, who died ten years ago. They describe how the father met and fell in love with the titular Orange girl (named so for carrying oranges on their first initial meeting).

A nice movie with decent actors. Good date movie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top