nanoboy
Well-Known Member
Try Captain America: Civil War then.
The day it comes out on BluRay/legal streaming, I will.
Though, come to think of it, The Amazing Spiderman (2012) is available on Netflix, so I should probably watch that first.
Try Captain America: Civil War then.
Though, come to think of it, The Amazing Spiderman (2012) is available on Netflix, so I should probably watch that first.
It's not the same Spider-Man, though I would still say the movie's worth watching. The sequel, not so much.
~Thylo![]()
What? I'm confused. Isn't it the same actor and same universe and storyline, like Thor having a couple movies and also being in Avengers etc?
The Amazing Spider-Man universe is separate from the Avengers (Iron-Man, Captain America, Thor, ect.) universe. After the second movie failed, Sony (the studio who owns the rights to Spider-Man movies) made a deal with Disney/Marvel and they're rebooting the character again. Civil War is the debut for the new incarnation (played by a new actor) and Marvel is currently in creative control over the new Spider-Man: Homecoming, which comes out in 2017 I think.
~Thylo![]()
what are you doing with your life man?We're watching everything with Ryan Reynolds in it these days.
what are you doing with your life man?
I only found out yesterday about the Pokemon thing going on!Not playing Pokemon, that's for sure!! I'll watch a Ryan Reynolds movie over that any day.
Not playing Pokemon, that's for sure!! I'll watch a Ryan Reynolds movie over that any day.
Jason Bourne
I have been looking forward to this movie. I love all three Bourne movies (the Jeremy Renner one doesn't count) and the trailer for Jason Bourne made the movie look just like the other three. And it is. Just like them.
There's really not a lot in the way of variation in the Bourne movies - Matt Damon can't remember who he is, he goes out for revenge, there's a main assassin opponent, a car chase, an awesome hand-to-hand combat scene using stationery, and at the end he deals to some old guy who was the mastermind behind it all. Jason Bourne is that. But for some reason they throw in a subplot about an app or something? Why does Hollywood put apps into every action movie now? Do the suits think that the kids like nanoboy need apps to make the action better?
This movie is getting a lot of bad reviews, although I'm not sure why. It isn't as good as the other three, but it is still a solid Bourne movie. And it is light-years away from the badness of the Jeremy Renner one. The car chases are cool - although the set-piece one near the end seems to go a bit far into "over the top" territory - and the fight scenes are great, although not as good as in the previous movies.
Some poor points for me were the casting of Tommy Lee Jones as the bad CIA guy (he is far too recognisable an actor and it just drew me out of the Bourne world), and Alicia Vikander seems far too young to be in her position at the CIA - basically she is the baby version of Joan Allen in the second and third movies.
Overall: good movie but not as good as the others, great action, some draggy boring bits to do with the social media subplot. It didn't really need to be made but do sequels ever need to be made? Well worth seeing.
pssh, Treadstone!? Get with the times man. Treadstone is old news. The new one is Ironhand.Does he ask about Treadstone in this one?
pssh, Treadstone!? Get with the times man. Treadstone is old news. The new one is Ironhand.