Brayden Delashmutt
Well-Known Member
I wonder how many more bear species the zoo could fit in if they got rid of the event pavilion, or the sculpture garden, maybe free up some elbow room by knocking out a few bathrooms? Playgrounds and splash pads are not compromises they are amenities, a necessary part of any institution that caters towards the public, especially children. However I also mentioned there could be a multitude of reasons Omaha decided to phase out certain species. They could have made the choice to thin out diversity as a means of focusing on other species the zoo wants to upkeep. The zoos collection is still stellar, you cannot definitively say the phase-outs were entirely unnecessary and has left Omaha worse off.
I do agree, however certain areas are lacking to say the least. Compared to other zoos of comparable size like Colombus and San Diego our carnivore collection is extremely lacking - no large canids, one bear, and no leopards, jaguars, cougars, etc. I am a volunteer at the zoo, and while I have been able to get intel on reasoning for some of the phase outs most could've been easily accommodated. If Glacier Bay and the splash park didn't exist, we probably could've had a fully fledged North American area