Sacramento Zoo New master plan for Sacramento Zoo

DavidBrown

Well-Known Member
15+ year member
The Sacramento Zoo is embarking on a new effort to transform the aging 90 year old zoo into a 21st century zoo. This story outlines plans for change. The reptile house will be replaced with a "Biodiversity Center" featuring a Pacific pond turtle breeding program, a bee colony, and a South American rain forest exhibit. A new tiger exhibit will replace the outmoded big cat exhibits (lions will likely no longer be exhibited for space reasons). A new chimpanzee forest will be built.

Hopefully it will happen.

Goodbye reptile house. Sacramento Zoo embarks on ambitious $75 million renovation
 
A very ambitious plan and hopefully some of the projects will see the light of day. Spending $4.5 million on a Reptile House is barely anything in comparison to the $20 million Reptile House projects at Fort Worth Zoo and Zoo Atlanta but I'm sure that Sacramento has seen what has occurred at Fresno Chaffee Zoo in the past few years and now there needs to be public support in California's capital city in order for a modern zoo to be built.
 
I finally made a long overdue trip to Sacramento -- man, is their zoo tiny -- and I'm glad that they're recognizing the need to update their facilities. It's not a bad zoo, but definitely in need of being brought into the modern age. Just by eyeballing the cat exhibits it looks like they barely meet the AZA's minimum threshold. I don't know how they managed to hold five adult lions in that one tiny space either.

Personally, I would phase out lions and tigers (send Jillian to San Diego or somewhere), and spend their time and resources on the mesopredators -- the leopard, jaguar, and snow leopard. They could probably put together a world beating exhibit for those three with a smaller budget than the expansive tiger habitat they want. Maybe get a couple of servals.

There's also a lot of wasted and unused space near the reptile house. Depending on the size of this Biodiversity Center you could fit a substantial chimp forest adjacent to it. This would free up the old space for an expansion of one of the large hoofstock yards or even the orangutan exhibit.
 
I finally made a long overdue trip to Sacramento -- man, is their zoo tiny -- and I'm glad that they're recognizing the need to update their facilities. It's not a bad zoo, but definitely in need of being brought into the modern age. Just by eyeballing the cat exhibits it looks like they barely meet the AZA's minimum threshold. I don't know how they managed to hold five adult lions in that one tiny space either.

Personally, I would phase out lions and tigers (send Jillian to San Diego or somewhere), and spend their time and resources on the mesopredators -- the leopard, jaguar, and snow leopard. They could probably put together a world beating exhibit for those three with a smaller budget than the expansive tiger habitat they want. Maybe get a couple of servals.

There's also a lot of wasted and unused space near the reptile house. Depending on the size of this Biodiversity Center you could fit a substantial chimp forest adjacent to it. This would free up the old space for an expansion of one of the large hoofstock yards or even the orangutan exhibit.


There is a new master plan kicking around that does some of what you suggest (I've only read news reports and not seen the actual plan). Lions are going to be phased out and a new tiger area is planned. Orangutans may be phased out. There was a mention somewhere that bonobos could be their future ape choice to replace the current chimps and orangs, but who knows at this point. The "wasted space" is a huge area where they have their outdoor events, education programs, etc. The new biodiversity center is going over where the bongo are now. Other than the biodiversity center a lot could change in their future plans as they just got a new director, Jason Jacobs, shortly after they completed their master plan.
 
There is a new master plan kicking around that does some of what you suggest (I've only read news reports and not seen the actual plan). Lions are going to be phased out and a new tiger area is planned. Orangutans may be phased out. There was a mention somewhere that bonobos could be their future ape choice to replace the current chimps and orangs, but who knows at this point. The "wasted space" is a huge area where they have their outdoor events, education programs, etc. The new biodiversity center is going over where the bongo are now. Other than the biodiversity center a lot could change in their future plans as they just got a new director, Jason Jacobs, shortly after they completed their master plan.

The newest master plan I've found is here, and it seems to comport to what you were saying. If there's a newer one, I haven't been able to find it. It looks pretty good overall, but a zoo of Sacramento's size really shouldn't be keeping megafauna with that much unused "event" space, not when they have the park outside and the amphitheater.

I'm also disappointed that they'll phase out their jaguars. It's not a species kept up here (at least until Oakland's goes on exhibit).

I'll be interested to see what they do, and when they intend on breaking ground. The current Kampala Lodge is currently undergoing a fairly significant refurbishment.
 
Judging by the current map, …. an almost complete overhaul!
LINK: https://www.saczoo.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/SZS-Map_WEBSITE.pdf
I can understand why they wanted J.J. here!!!

Can you phantom whether the Kampala Lodge refurb resembles anything like the central lodge and hub they are looking for in their Masterplan?

From the magazine: they plan on the new Biodiversity Center as their project.

The central lodge and hub would be separate from the current restaurant that they are renovating.
 
The newest master plan I've found is here, and it seems to comport to what you were saying. If there's a newer one, I haven't been able to find it. It looks pretty good overall, but a zoo of Sacramento's size really shouldn't be keeping megafauna with that much unused "event" space, not when they have the park outside and the amphitheater.
I'm also disappointed that they'll phase out their jaguars. It's not a species kept up here (at least until Oakland's goes on exhibit).

Thanks for the link to the story and plan. Sacramento Zoo has gone through a few master plans since the 1980s. The 1988 master plan planned for African elephants, an underwater viewing exhibit for hippos and crocodiles, a big cat complex with multiple species, a large grizzly bear exhibit, and a large primate exhibit.

Had that been built they would have been wildly out of date by now, so while it's frustrating that the zoo stagnated, it avoided becoming even worse arguably had it built an outdated plan. The zoo has struggled with its neighbors for decades, a virulently nasty group of NIMBYs. It will never be able to expand beyond its current footprint and the new plan recognizes that.

In the new plan they have downsized the megafauna collection to what the zoo can sustain in modern exhibits, which is one great ape species (probably chimps or bonobos), giraffes and zebras (and maybe an antelope species or two in the big mixed species savanna proposed which is an extension of the current giraffe complex), tigers, snow leopards, and some African and Asian mesocarnivores. As you state the jaguars are not on the map shown in the story about the new plan, but it also says that the plan is a work in progress. There may be room in there for the jaguars somewhere. Beyond the new biodiversity center (funded and designed) and the current giraffe exhibit (slated to be expanded into a larger multi-species savanna), the entire zoo will likely be rebuilt in the decades to come.
 
Last edited:
Judging by the current map, …. an almost complete overhaul!

Can you phantom whether the Kampala Lodge refurb resembles anything like the central lodge and hub they are looking for in their Masterplan?

I don't see the current Kampala Lodge on that Masterplan, but David would know better. The current reno that I saw was focused on redoing the interior; the physical shell remains untouched. When I was there they were working on the floor.

Overall, yeah, it is a complete overhaul!

Had that been built they would have been wildly out of date by now, so while it's frustrating that the zoo stagnated, it avoided becoming even worse arguably had it built an outdated plan. The zoo has struggled with its neighbors for decades, a virulently nasty group of NIMBYs. It will never be able to expand beyond its current footprint and the new plan recognizes that.

Why am I not surprised that the area is chock-a-block with NIMBYs? It seems like a rather nice neighborhood and I don't imagine they're fond of the place.

In the new plan they have downsized the megafauna collection to what the zoo can sustain in modern exhibits, which is one great ape species (probably chimps or bonobos), giraffes and zebras (and maybe an antelope species or two in the big mixed species savanna proposed which is an extension of the current giraffe complex), tigers, snow leopards, and some African and Asian mesocarnivores. As you state the jaguars are not on the map shown in the story about the new plan, but it also says that the plan is a work in progress. There may be room in there for the jaguars somewhere. Beyond the new biodiversity center (funded and designed) and the current giraffe exhibit (slated to be expanded into a larger multi-species savanna), the entire zoo will likely be rebuilt in the decades to come.

I am glad that they're planning on downsizing. I know everybody wants the big, charismatic species, but they really could do a lot of good for smaller species on the same footprint. I look forward to seeing how it develops and changes.

re: Jaguars. I do hope the zoo keeps theirs. The locals all seemed to know them, and, as stated, there could be a good breeding opportunity with Oakland (provided Oakland doesn't acquire yet another surplus animal). Just going off the Masterplan, I would consider lopping off part of the Kid's World-thing and installing a jaguar habitat near the proposed South American aviary.

Merging the zebra and giraffe yards is a good idea. In fact, I'm surprised that it hasn't happened already. It seems like such a natural step with all those separate yards adjoining each other.

I have no idea who Jason Jacobs is, but I do look forward to seeing how the zoo evolves under his leadership.
 
I have no idea who Jason Jacobs is, but I do look forward to seeing how the zoo evolves under his leadership.

Jason Jacobs was formerly the director of the Reid Park Zoo, a similar sized zoo to Sacramento (although big enough to have elephants and rhinos and other megafauna). He saw that zoo through a renewal phase that culminated in the passage of a large tax measure to renovate the zoo. He has the expertise needed to hopefully make major fixes in Sacramento.
 
Back
Top