They don't note specifics on the website, but it doesn't sound like it will be a "tour" but the week prior to the official opening they are going to allow members to tour the new exhibits. If I hear anything specific I will post about it here.How can one get to the member tours? I tried calling the aquarium multiple times but got jack-all in terms of information.
When Ocean Wonders Sharks was under construction there was a wall cordoning off the area that showed renderings of the 4 new exhibits that would eventually open; Ocean Wonders, Playquarium, Spineless (was going to be called Spineless Wonders) and the Sea Cliffs exhibits which had an official name regarding cold water marine environments (South African, California coasts and I guess Alaska/Russian coasts). The renderings for the first three exhibits appear accurate for what has/will open. For Sea Cliffs I remember them showing underwater viewing of the walrus and fish swimming with the penguins (which are already in the exhibit). Due to the situation with the captive walrus population I would not be surprised if the sea lions take their place permanently in the largest exhibit. I'm not sure if the large flock of brown pelicans will remain (they can only be exhibited seasonally and not the best species for underwater views) so I'd like fur seals to return of possible. I guess we will see in a few years what the aquarium decides to do.Could you tell what year those plans for renovation were made? Lol. Now you have me thinking not just of the exhibit, but walrus. If it's a recent date, maybe the walrus are coming back after all! I don't know where they could possibly come from, though, as they're certainly not many around; current animals in AZA facilities have been joined in hopes of increasing reproduction. Someone should consider arranging a breeding with Marineland's Smooshie before she ages out.
They don't note specifics on the website, but it doesn't sound like it will be a "tour" but the week prior to the official opening they are going to allow members to tour the new exhibits. If I hear anything specific I will post about it here.
The aquarium was set to reopen on July 20, just two days away, but following Gov. Cuomo's newest mandate that indoor cultural institutions are to remain closed, the aquarium is no longer reopening.
~Thylo
Seems like a waste of "public" divestment: Tells you something about Government or not?The aquarium was set to reopen on July 20, just two days away, but following Gov. Cuomo's newest mandate that indoor cultural institutions are to remain closed, the aquarium is no longer reopening.
~Thylo
Seems like a waste of "public" divestment: Tells you something about Government or not?
It is also the duty of the City and State Govt. to safeguard integral cultural and heritage establishments within our societies from demise where public funding has been in place (or simply should have been) with CoVid19 measures part and parcel of no income being generated. Rather convenient for some perhaps, but not a very good sign of upholding a societal standard in general.I do agree and I am frustrated, especially since I've already gotten tickets for Bronx's reopening, but at the end of the day NY has been doing a pretty great job at lowing their infection rates despite NYC being such a large and compact city. This decision is to keep people safe, and I understand that, even if I do hate it.
~Thylo
It is also the duty of the City and State Govt. to safeguard integral cultural and heritage establishments within our societies from demise where public funding has been in place (or simply should have been) with CoVid19 measures part and parcel of no income being generated. Rather convenient for some perhaps, but not a very good sign of upholding a societal standard in general.
Further, when and if supporting business massively in CoVid19 times, why has it simply not happened for museums, zoos and conservation and cultural organisations (that surely is a very valid point of argument)?!
This is exactly the reason why a restricted policy is failing society at large (which I have been saying from the outset)! I would even go as far as to conclude lack of oversight and considering the perspectives and impacts of policy on institutions larger than 500 employees and that it still is talking about (small) business and not about cultural or heritage establishments as if the latter are completely unaffected and have no other value but being a commercial venture (which they are clearly not just not).Well the core issue for NY’s big cultural institutions is size. Non-profits under 500 employees could apply for the federal government loan program to continue paying payroll, and those loans will be forgiven if the institution follows the rules for where to spend the money. Many zoos applied and used this program (Kansas City, Atlanta, Brookfield, Denver). Sadly for WCS, the American Museum of Natural History, and several other NY institutions this program was not an option at all. Due to their size and the 500 employee rule they were not qualified as a small-business/non-profit. This is not to say this program should be the only thing done to help cultural institutions, but at least for many zoos and aquariums it allowed them 4 months of no payroll.
I did love how passive aggressive the zoos and aquariums Facebook posts came off. Which makes sense given that the key issue is not reopening, instead its the lack of communication. Cuomo has done it several times that he reverses decisions right before they are supposed to be implemented.