Just thought I'd mention Martha Nussbaum's new book,
Justice for Animals: Our Collective Responsibility. Among other things, it argues that recognizing the need for animal justice is a key requirement for a fuller humanity; indeed, the book argues that humanity does not exclude animality, which are otherwise regarded as polar opposites. In doing so, she questions our conceptions of rationality, identity, and of course the rationale that reinforces the convenient division between humans and animals (non-humans). She expands the term "humanity" to mean a political community in which non-human animals are also participants. Perhaps the only reason then to continue to use the term "humanity" is to call attention to the many ways in which we are affecting other species by thinking of the planet as our
fundamental niche; other species, per this view, exist for our curiosity or amusement, and this is one of many problematic rationales we have to deal with. Very good book that demands readers to reconsider and grapple once more with several ethical questions.