@Zooplantman Sorry for a delayed response (3 months delayed) to your question about the cover of America's Top 100 Zoos & Aquariums. I just came across this now. Although I had nothing to do with the writing or production or layout of the book, I did supply the cover photo (a bateleur eagle at San Antonio Zoo). I was involved via email with the decision, though it was ultimately Tim's decision, he may (or may not) have taken my opinion into account.
When he approached me via email to supply photos for the cover, one of the things he asked for was unusual species that only a few zoos have (this being one of the species I sent along with Tasmanian devil, etc). He was toying with two different cover options. One is a dramatic single image like the one they ended up using. The other was a collage that would show a variety of zoos, which I think is what you are saying would be more appropriate. Here is the opinion I gave Tim which he said he agreed with, though I have no idea to what extent (if any) I influenced his decision. My point was that a collage would be interesting once someone actually bought the book because they could take time perusing the cover. However to those who were still considering buying the book a single image would pop out more on a bookshelf or in online ads. A collage would just get lost and people would be less inclined to pick up the book. In my opinion a single strong image sells better and definitely comes across better online, where the cover may be reproduced as a thumbnail image. You may or may not agree with my assessment, but there it is.
When he approached me via email to supply photos for the cover, one of the things he asked for was unusual species that only a few zoos have (this being one of the species I sent along with Tasmanian devil, etc). He was toying with two different cover options. One is a dramatic single image like the one they ended up using. The other was a collage that would show a variety of zoos, which I think is what you are saying would be more appropriate. Here is the opinion I gave Tim which he said he agreed with, though I have no idea to what extent (if any) I influenced his decision. My point was that a collage would be interesting once someone actually bought the book because they could take time perusing the cover. However to those who were still considering buying the book a single image would pop out more on a bookshelf or in online ads. A collage would just get lost and people would be less inclined to pick up the book. In my opinion a single strong image sells better and definitely comes across better online, where the cover may be reproduced as a thumbnail image. You may or may not agree with my assessment, but there it is.