Would there be new or different management for the change?Hopefully things go better with this one than the last.
Actually on that note, its rant time, lol.
Pittsburgh used to have an excellent program, they were producing calves regularly and were on the top of their game, so to speak. However in the past 10+ years, they've really faltered. They sent out proven breeding cow Moja to a non-breeding facility (which has also broken a matriline) which is bad enough, yet they still retain three young cows at the zoo who are all desperately due for their first calves (especially 23 year old Victoria), plus proven wild caught cow Savannah who should still have a good 10+ years of reproductive life left in her too. Yet what do they do? Maintain all the girls at the zoo with no bull, and just let all that potential just go to waste. Then at the ICC, they have Jackson there with the Botswana cows plus the other old cow, and the only one that breeds rejects her calves. It makes absolutely no sense!! Like seriously, what the hell are they doing???
Now I don't know the finer details, of course, but why wouldn't they do the following that makes so much more sense:
With that, they could easily expand both matrilines, have good breeding at both facilities, and Seeni could at least have a chance to observe proper mothering behavior from Savannah.
- Send Savannah and her daughter Angelina to the ICC, while they retain Seeni and Sukiri
- Retain Moja with her daughters Victoria and Zuri at the zoo
- Send Jackson out to another facility that needs a bull, ideally in exchange for another proven male
- Bring in two new bulls. One for the ICC and one for the zoo.
Last edited: