Oklahoma City Zoo Oklahoma City Zoo News 2025

I think it would make no sense to be the only facility in North America to have maneless zebra. It is far more cost effective if the AZA would establish a pure-bred Grant's or other steppe zebra SSP .... (ATM, from what I know they do a mix/hit and miss with them).
I know that wild animals aren't generally done anymore, but what about breeding facilities in other countries? I would LOVE to see one of the near Quagga results coming out of Africa.
 
I know that wild animals aren't generally done anymore, but what about breeding facilities in other countries? I would LOVE to see one of the near Quagga results coming out of Africa.

Back in the mid-1970s when I was a kid, the OKC Zoo had a "Quagga" on exhibit for a short time in the Children's Zoo. It was correctly called a donkey X zebra hybrid, but they made a point of saying that it looked like the extinct South African Quagga (which I had never heard of before). I believe that it was some sort of traveling exhibit animal because I only saw it once. I don't know that I can find the photo that I took, but I'll look for it!
 
On October 30th, the zoo announced that starting in November, the 2 buildings in Cat Forest will be closed for improvements, lasting until mid-December. The zoo also announced that Cat Forest will still be open during this time, with the route being changed for the time being.

Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden

On January 27th, the zoo announced that most of Cat Forest (barring some exhibits due to construction) reopened to the public.

Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden
 
Back in the mid-1970s when I was a kid, the OKC Zoo had a "Quagga" on exhibit for a short time in the Children's Zoo. It was correctly called a donkey X zebra hybrid, but they made a point of saying that it looked like the extinct South African Quagga (which I had never heard of before). I believe that it was some sort of traveling exhibit animal because I only saw it once. I don't know that I can find the photo that I took, but I'll look for it!
I was actually talking about the Quagga Project:The Quagga Project : official website. I think the concept is great.
 
I was actually talking about the Quagga Project:The Quagga Project : official website. I think the concept is great.

Thanks for posting the link! I wasn't aware of the Quagga Project before now. I had read something years ago hypothesizing that the Quagga was a regional color pattern variant of the Plains Zebra, but I didn't realize that there was a group conducting selective breeding to bring that back! I would be interesting to see at the zoo - and so would Mountain Zebras, which I believe were one of the options that the OKC Zoo was considering (they used to have Mountain Zebras in the collection in the early 1970s before they imported Grevy's Zebras).
 
Thanks for posting the link! I wasn't aware of the Quagga Project before now. I had read something years ago hypothesizing that the Quagga was a regional color pattern variant of the Plains Zebra, but I didn't realize that there was a group conducting selective breeding to bring that back! I would be interesting to see at the zoo - and so would Mountain Zebras, which I believe were one of the options that the OKC Zoo was considering (they used to have Mountain Zebras in the collection in the early 1970s before they imported Grevy's Zebras).
Whereas the Quagga Project is certainly interesting .... till this day I have yet to see any long term benefit from the selective breeding of like Burchell's zebra selected in the project to breed back the dark non stripe and less stripey subspecies that was the quagga Equus quagga quagga ..., a subspecies of the plains zebra.

Sources:
A) IUCN Equids Specailist Group
B) https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/quagga-the-lost-zebra-44769800/
C) Quaggas and Diamonds: The Possible Relationship Between Diamond Mining and Species Extinction | African Studies Centre Leiden
The poignant fact is that the last surviving quagga, a filly, died in captivity on August 12, 1883 in my home town zoo Artis in Amsterdam. BTW: ATM there is actually a great exhibition in the Allard Pierson Museum where the specimen is on full show (normally it is in the Rarities' Cabinet in Naturalis in almost complete darkness..... So. go see while you can)!

NOTA BENE: It is very rare to have such an exact date for a (sub-)species historical extinction and to have it be backed up with documented historical sources as well as the preserved physical evidence of the quagga (remember very few skins and specimens were actually preserved for posterity....).

D) LibGuides: Plains Zebra (Equus quagga) Fact Sheet: Taxonomy & History
E) https://nuwejaars.com/the-quaggas-extinction-and-revival-fact-or-fiction/
 
Thank you for posting the links - especially the one to the IUCN Equid specialists group. All very interesting information! I wasn't aware that all of the putative subspecies had been called into question, but based on this work, they would seem to represent clinal variation in one species rather than distinct subspecies.
 
Not a big update, but the Zoo transferred ownership of three California sea lions on March 25th, 2025.

1.0 Cash is now owned by the Tulsa Zoo, where he's been housed since September 29th, 2022. 0.2 Phoenix (listed in the Cali. sea lion studbook as Oklahoma) and Isla are now owned by SeaWorld San Diego, where they have been housed since January 28th, 2023.

Phoenix and Cash were born at the zoo in 2016 and 2017 respectively, to father Xander and mother Pearl, both rescued founders to the California sea lion population. Isla was rescued in 2019.
 
482030988_961515702769141_4563395225960779933_n.jpg


Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden
 

Thank you for posting this map! I don't hate this, but I don't think it's much of an improvement and that the few benefits would be worth the money to implement this. But I'm not too worried because there are a half-dozen projects that the zoo considers higher priorities, so this plan is unlikely to ever happen. What I like about this, is the expanded Bison exhibit with the new trail and new small animal exhibits for species like the Swift Fox (their current exhibit is too small. And I hope that they add the Pronghorn to the Bison exhibit because that would make much more sense ecologically than putting them in a ravine with Elk. I also like that they're demolishing the current nocturnal barn and replacing it with something better that is intended to have a better bat exhibit. A lot of Oklahoma Trails will remain essentially the same - the two bear exhibits, the aviary, the big rivers building, and the coyotes. The Bald Eagles would move into the space where the Wild Turkeys are currently, and the White-tailed Deer exhibit would be cut in half to bringing back one of the wolf subspecies, which I think is a mundane exhibit animal for this particular zoo. The current Whooping Crane exhibit would be lost and the cranes would be given a smaller exhibit space near the Bison. The American Elk and what's left of the White-tailed Deer exhibit would be connected, but the deer might go away; I have mixed feelings about this because it might look better on one hand, but it seems like a convoluted exhibit. The big thing that I don't like about this design is the attempt to make what is currently a loop trail and try to retrofit it into a single-direction trail. It has the potential to destroy a lot of the Centennial Grove and it's going to reduce visibility for some of the exhibits like the Grizzly Bear exhibit (the latter of which might be on purpose since that section of the boardwalk seems to have an elevated human safety risk). I'm not sure what the substrate of the trail is, but it would almost have to be a new and larger boardwalk because it's moving back and forth across a pretty substantial ravine that contains the Centennial Grove. I love the Centennial Grove, it is a stand of approximately 100 Post Oaks and Bur Oaks that are well over a century old and were alive when Oklahoma was designated a state and they were preserved as landmark to honor the state's centennial in 2007, the year that Oklahoma Trails opened. The existing boardwalk preserved those trees, but this new trail will criss-cross the area and it looks like it will take out as much as a third of the trees. I'm also worried that other trees might be removed to improve visibility for some of the exhibits (for example, the Grizzly Bear exhibit cannot be viewed from the aviary without cutting down a section of trees). Call me a tree hugger, but I'm sensitive to the zoo's history and trees that have survived decades of development and redevelopment at the zoo. This design looks like a lot of money for very little benefit and no net-gain in animal exhibits.
 
Thank you for posting this map! I don't hate this, but I don't think it's much of an improvement and that the few benefits would be worth the money to implement this. But I'm not too worried because there are a half-dozen projects that the zoo considers higher priorities, so this plan is unlikely to ever happen. What I like about this, is the expanded Bison exhibit with the new trail and new small animal exhibits for species like the Swift Fox (their current exhibit is too small. And I hope that they add the Pronghorn to the Bison exhibit because that would make much more sense ecologically than putting them in a ravine with Elk. I also like that they're demolishing the current nocturnal barn and replacing it with something better that is intended to have a better bat exhibit. A lot of Oklahoma Trails will remain essentially the same - the two bear exhibits, the aviary, the big rivers building, and the coyotes. The Bald Eagles would move into the space where the Wild Turkeys are currently, and the White-tailed Deer exhibit would be cut in half to bringing back one of the wolf subspecies, which I think is a mundane exhibit animal for this particular zoo. The current Whooping Crane exhibit would be lost and the cranes would be given a smaller exhibit space near the Bison. The American Elk and what's left of the White-tailed Deer exhibit would be connected, but the deer might go away; I have mixed feelings about this because it might look better on one hand, but it seems like a convoluted exhibit. The big thing that I don't like about this design is the attempt to make what is currently a loop trail and try to retrofit it into a single-direction trail. It has the potential to destroy a lot of the Centennial Grove and it's going to reduce visibility for some of the exhibits like the Grizzly Bear exhibit (the latter of which might be on purpose since that section of the boardwalk seems to have an elevated human safety risk). I'm not sure what the substrate of the trail is, but it would almost have to be a new and larger boardwalk because it's moving back and forth across a pretty substantial ravine that contains the Centennial Grove. I love the Centennial Grove, it is a stand of approximately 100 Post Oaks and Bur Oaks that are well over a century old and were alive when Oklahoma was designated a state and they were preserved as landmark to honor the state's centennial in 2007, the year that Oklahoma Trails opened. The existing boardwalk preserved those trees, but this new trail will criss-cross the area and it looks like it will take out as much as a third of the trees. I'm also worried that other trees might be removed to improve visibility for some of the exhibits (for example, the Grizzly Bear exhibit cannot be viewed from the aviary without cutting down a section of trees). Call me a tree hugger, but I'm sensitive to the zoo's history and trees that have survived decades of development and redevelopment at the zoo. This design looks like a lot of money for very little benefit and no net-gain in animal exhibits.

I understand and agree with the concerns about the trees, but there are some advantages to this. The pronghorns will be new, but the two biggest improvements are on the periphery of Oklahoma Trails. There will be a much better alligator exhibit, although it’s technically part of the “Heart of the Zoo” exhibit. The biggest plus is the path out of the Oklahoma Trails that runs alongside the rhino exhibit. I am in favor of just about any plan that gets rid of the dead end and massive backtrack that currently exists at the rhino exhibit at the end of Sanctuary Asia.
 
I agree with @Okie that it will be great to have Pronghorns at the Zoo and to finally resolve the dead end that's been created between the Veterinary Hospital and the Indian Rhinoceros exhibit and all of the back-tracking that it's created. I hate to admit that I was wrong, but I visited the Zoo this afternoon and looked more closely at the Centennial Grove. Assuming that the proposed new trail is a wide boardwalk (it almost has to be a boardwalk because of the steep-sided ravine), I think it's more feasible to work between the trees than I thought because there is some spacing between the biggest trees. And, there is a gap in the stand of original trees between the Aviary and the Grizzly Bear exhibit. The oak trees that I was thinking about (11 of them) are farther to the west (closer to the Bison yard) and would become part of the new crane exhibit. The only trees between the two exhibits are some ruderal mulberries and four sugar maples that were planted when Oklahoma Trails was opened (these could be limbed up or removed). I'm indifferent about having a better American Alligator exhibit (I'd rather have Tomistomas or Gharials) but the current alligator exhibit is pretty mediocre and not particularly safe for the alligators because people can easily throw things in the pond. There are definitely more merits to the plans for the revamped Oklahoma Trails than I acknowledged this morning, and time will tell which of these changes get implemented. I hope they put the Pronghorns in the yard with the Bison, and I hope that they leave the Whooping Cranes in the expanded exhibit for White-tailed Deer and Elk.
 
Back
Top