I agree with @Okie that it will be great to have Pronghorns at the Zoo and to finally resolve the dead end that's been created between the Veterinary Hospital and the Indian Rhinoceros exhibit and all of the back-tracking that it's created. I hate to admit that I was wrong, but I visited the Zoo this afternoon and looked more closely at the Centennial Grove. Assuming that the proposed new trail is a wide boardwalk (it almost has to be a boardwalk because of the steep-sided ravine), I think it's more feasible to work between the trees than I thought because there is some spacing between the biggest trees. And, there is a gap in the stand of original trees between the Aviary and the Grizzly Bear exhibit. The oak trees that I was thinking about (11 of them) are farther to the west (closer to the Bison yard) and would become part of the new crane exhibit. The only trees between the two exhibits are some ruderal mulberries and four sugar maples that were planted when Oklahoma Trails was opened (these could be limbed up or removed). I'm indifferent about having a better American Alligator exhibit (I'd rather have Tomistomas or Gharials) but the current alligator exhibit is pretty mediocre and not particularly safe for the alligators because people can easily throw things in the pond. There are definitely more merits to the plans for the revamped Oklahoma Trails than I acknowledged this morning, and time will tell which of these changes get implemented. I hope they put the Pronghorns in the yard with the Bison, and I hope that they leave the Whooping Cranes in the expanded exhibit for White-tailed Deer and Elk.
Yeah, the part about seeing what’s actually implemented is definitely an issue. With the cuts to Shore to Sea and ever-increasing costs, part of me wonders if they finish replacing the wood on the boardwalk and just end up leaving Oklahoma Trails as is.