Hmm... One wonders whether the money raised to bring in meerkats could have instead been used to retrofit the nocturnal house with more energy efficient technologies.
Well, at least they didn't start the entrance/meerkat/penguin thing knowing there was trouble brewing. It's a shame, though, that the money spent would (by your figures) have run the Nocturnal House for nearly 47 years (although doubtless it would cost more to maintain as time goes on!).
Ah, the classic disconnect between funds for shiny new things versus the ongoing costs of operating them. I doubt many of the donors who contributed to the (much-needed) new entry at WPZ would have had any interest in paying for keeper salaries and utility costs to keep the aging Night Exhibit in operation. Sad but true, pretty much anywhere.
WPZ is awesome when it's raining. There are just enough buildings around to duck in out of the rain, and the animals are usually pretty active in the drizzle. Usually it's not very busy and most of the people who are there are members who come often and are well behaved and polite.I think it helps that Seattle is in such a pretty part of the country. If you see it in one of the 2 months out of the year when it isn't raining, it's hard to beat.
Hmm... One wonders whether the money raised to bring in meerkats could have instead been used to retrofit the nocturnal house with more energy efficient technologies.
I really like nocturnal exhibits because of their potential to alert visitors to a largely ignored side of ecosystems.