The inaugural issue of the online newsletter Small Wild Cat Conservation News is now out. Read it here: http://www.smallcats.org/files/SWCCN_2015_01_01.pdf
Issue two has just been released. The introduction includes a hint that a new cat taxonomy will be unveiled next month at the IUCN Congress. Small cat splits will take the number of cat species from the current 36/37/38 (depending on source) up to 41.
http://www.wild-cat.org/SWCCN/SWCCN_2016_02.pdf
My guess for some of the potential areas for new species:
Colocolo/Pampas/Pantanal split
Tigrina/Oncilla split
Amur Cat/Leopard Cat
Mainland Tiger/Sumatran Tiger
Going on the most conservative 36-species count that adds 5.
I thought Tigrina was already recognised?
the IUCN already uses 14 genera:The thing that interests me is the statement that there will be 14 recognised genera; this may mean that the Profelis/Caracal and Catopuma/Pardofelis synonymizations have been reversed, that new genera have been split, or a combination of the above.
the IUCN already uses 14 genera:
Acinonyx
Caracal
Catopuma
Felis
Herpailurus
Leopardus
Leptailurus
Lynx
Neofelis
Otocolobus
Panthera
Pardofelis
Prionailurus
Puma
Precisely my point; over the last few years the list has dropped to twelve:
....
Therefore, in order to go up again to 14 the Catopuma/Pardofelis and Herpailurus/Puma merges will have been reversed, assuming the current IUCN list is identical to the forthcoming one.
I thought I'd already replied saying much that same thing, but it seems I had forgotten to so.But it hasn't dropped to 12 in the IUCN's official opinion, which is the matter at hand - so there's nothing to reverse in those two cases.
Do remember that what is changing is an organisation's official opinion of which versions of the names most accurately represent our understanding of felid taxonomy - there're no absolutes.
Also the Chinese mountain cat is a full species which I find odd - I thought it had been definitively placed as a subspecies of wildcat.