Only took 7 years.....
£225 for 75 minutes works out at £3 per minute! I suppose that's less than Mr Farage gets in the jungle or Mr Lineker gets in the MoD studio, but they can talk and they don't need to be given worms to eat (although Mr F might, I supposeDon't get me wrong, it's an exciting experience, given it's the only one in the UK, but £225 for a single animal experience is a lot of money in a cost of living crisis.
Why do they have only one? Have they ever attempted to try and find a mate?
£225 for 75 minutes works out at £3 per minute! I suppose that's less than Mr Farage gets in the jungle or Mr Lineker gets in the MoD studio, but they can talk and they don't need to be given worms to eat (although Mr F might, I suppose).
I could give myself a tour of the zoo ('This is the maned wolf paddock, but I can't see it. Those little sheep are where the Darwin's rheas used to be. This used to be the elephant paddock, perhaps I'll see a giraffe there one day . . . . ' and so on. And I could survive without the delicious bap. So if I claim a Member's discount, please could I do a deal to have 10 minutes with our kiwi for £20?
There is little demand for kiwi. Frankfurt and Berlin, who are Europe's main kiwi breeders basically only breed on demand when they know there is interest in the chick.
Thanks Lintworm. It's a shame.There is little demand for kiwi and they are generally solitary. Frankfurt and Berlin, who are Europe's main kiwi breeders basically only breed on demand when they know there is interest in the chick.
I agree, I find it odd. Even though birds (beyond penguins..) are less popular, Kiwi's are an iconic animal and I would have thought they would have attracted more interest than most.Are they difficult to keep? Or is there something else driving the low demand? I’d have said they’d be popular with visitors not just zoo fans though birds do seem to attract less general viewing.
Are they difficult to keep? Or is there something else driving the low demand? I’d have said they’d be popular with visitors not just zoo fans though birds do seem to attract less general viewing.
they are basically invisible, bar the odd individual (Zlin...)
whilst educational, it was not enjoyable and there was no real experience at all to it ... apart from 3 scatter feeds for Diana Monkeys, River Hogs and Tapir, the day consisted of cleaning, food prep and making enrichment, but not actually really seeing any animals
Honestly, if you're able to travel, that £225 would get you most of the way to Zlin and, on my experience, you'd probably see more kiwi for your money..!![]()
This actually sounds like a pretty accurate description of a keeper experience. Cleaning/food prep/ other non-animal contact activities are what a keeper's day mostly comprises!Sounds like you got a very accurate-to-the-job keeper experience at Paignton then![]()
I suspect the fact it wasn't a flashy "play with the animals" experience speaks more to your personal tastes than the quality and value-for-money of the experience!
Sounds like you got a very accurate-to-the-job keeper experience at Paignton then![]()
I suspect the fact it wasn't a flashy "play with the animals" experience speaks more to your personal tastes than the quality and value-for-money of the experience!
£225 for 75 minutes works out at £3 per minute! I suppose that's less than Mr Farage gets in the jungle or Mr Lineker gets in the MoD studio, but they can talk and they don't need to be given worms to eat (although Mr F might, I suppose).
They aren't very good display animals. In a diurnat setting they are basically invisible, bar the odd individual (Zlin...) and even in nocturnal houses they are quite often invisible. They do best in larger enclosures and are sensitive to light and noise disturbance, so overall not the best candidates for exhibits unfortunately.