Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Garden Perceptions of Cincinnati Zoo

JVM

Well-Known Member
10+ year member
Moderator note - topic split from this thread: Cincinnati Zoo News 2025 [Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Garden]


After many years in the position, zoo director Thane Maynard is handing the reigns over become executive chair of the board.
Cincinnati Zoo’s director stepping into new role

Everything I have heard about this facility going back years has always been fairly negative. Hopefully whoever takes over from Maynard can help turn this facility around. :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Everything I have heard about this facility going back years has always been fairly negative. Hopefully whoever takes over from Maynard can help turn this facility around. :)

I know people love to hate Cincinnati, but I think most of their recent projects have been pretty good. I liked Roo Valley a lot more than I was expecting. The new elephant complex is solid, if not quite industry-leading. The old sea lion exhibit works better for penguins and the new wolf exhibit is shaping up to be a good home for the species. What I saw of the bear and otter habitats on my visit this month looked nice. The hippo exhibit’s really the only black mark for me.

People are upset about the collection, and I get that, but the actual physical spaces have mostly been well-executed.
 
I know people love to hate Cincinnati, but I think most of their recent projects have been pretty good. I liked Roo Valley a lot more than I was expecting. The new elephant complex is solid, if not quite industry-leading. The old sea lion exhibit works better for penguins and the new wolf exhibit is shaping up to be a good home for the species. What I saw of the bear and otter habitats on my visit this month looked nice. The hippo exhibit’s really the only black mark for me.

People are upset about the collection, and I get that, but the actual physical spaces have mostly been well-executed.

Even the hippo exhibit - albeit short of what it could have been... is by far nowhere close to the worst I've ever seen. It gets way too much unnecessary hate.
 
Everything I have heard about this facility going back years has always been fairly negative. Hopefully whoever takes over from Maynard can help turn this facility around. :)

Eh, "I wish the zoo had chosen a rare species over a more common one" is a very Zoochat-centric and minor complaint in the grand scheme of things. Most zoogoers don't care about this stuff, for better or worse. Cincinnati remains one of the most beloved and respected zoos in the country, and deservedly so.

If we're being honest, the Columbus Zoo has suffered worse scandals over the last decade that temporarily cost the zoo its AZA accreditation, and Prague Zoo is currently going through a serious row that has led to the resignation of its director since 2010. Just to give some perspective.
 
Even the hippo exhibit - albeit short of what it could have been... is by far nowhere close to the worst I've ever seen. It gets way too much unnecessary hate.
What is the worst hippo exhibit you have seen, I’m curious on this?

To me the hippo exhibit certainly is a little overcrowded with three adult hippos and a juvenile bull, as it was specifically built for two adults and a calf. It seems really embarrassing for the exhibit not to be one of the better Nile Hippo exhibits in North America since it only opened in 2016 and it is already one of the worst in the country, especially as several zoos with worse hippo exhibits than Cincinnati’s have since phased out Nile hippos.
 
I feel like any Cincinnati hate is exaggerated. Bear ridge should be for black bears, a species “rare” in larger American zoos. Its looks like a phenomenal exhibit complex, and is perfect for rescued black bears and rescued sea otters. The new play structures is also necessary imao. The zoo has no children’s area for play and education (children’s zoo is just a few domestics and ambassadors not enough imo) and is the leading demographic for zoos. Having a few small play and education structures for children seems like a great idea! Jungle Trails, Elephant Trek, Bear Ridge, and soon Roo Valley and Africa will all have their mini play areas which can be great for dead space. None of the recent projects have been bad, all great for the development of this zoo. I’d much rather see a zoo do the strategy of smaller play areas than a 7 acres playground *coughs* Detroit *coughs*. As for the hippos, the complex is overhated. Is it smaller? Yes, but it was meant for a breeding pair and a calf, which soon will likely be back to that. Fritz was an accident, and his name “Fritz” is called that since Phoebe’s birth control was on the “Fritz”. The zoo had no control over that, and I’ve heard they plan on transferring him soon. black bears are great animals for zoos also. They deserve to be in zoos as much as any other species. they were going to euthanize the two cubs (same for Columbus’s new girls) as not enough zoos or rescues have enough space for new animals. I do think the zoo is a little overrated, but it’s one of my personal favorites. It’s one of the best in America and, known to be one too. Cincinnati zoo is going in the right direction, and this the future of zoos.
 
What is the worst hippo exhibit you have seen, I’m curious on this?

To me the hippo exhibit certainly is a little overcrowded with three adult hippos and a juvenile bull, as it was specifically built for two adults and a calf. It seems really embarrassing for the exhibit not to be one of the better Nile Hippo exhibits in North America since it only opened in 2016 and it is already one of the worst in the country, especially as several zoos with worse hippo exhibits than Cincinnati’s have since phased out Nile hippos.

All the ones with no/little filtration, zero/terrible underwater viewing, puddles for pools, a tiny concrete pad for land area, or one solo hippo is a great start. It's getting better out there as standards improve, and you're not wrong that for an exhibit built in 2016 it could've aimed higher - but there is much, much worse the world over.

Calling it one of the worst in the US is... a stretch. In my oh so humble opinion, anyways.
 
Last edited:
I know people love to hate Cincinnati, but I think most of their recent projects have been pretty good. I liked Roo Valley a lot more than I was expecting. The new elephant complex is solid, if not quite industry-leading. The old sea lion exhibit works better for penguins and the new wolf exhibit is shaping up to be a good home for the species. What I saw of the bear and otter habitats on my visit this month looked nice. The hippo exhibit’s really the only black mark for me.

People are upset about the collection, and I get that, but the actual physical spaces have mostly been well-executed.
That's good to hear. I feel like most of the exhibits at Cincinnati I hear criticism about size so I didn't assume the execution of them was very successful.

Eh, "I wish the zoo had chosen a rare species over a more common one" is a very Zoochat-centric and minor complaint in the grand scheme of things. Most zoogoers don't care about this stuff, for better or worse. Cincinnati remains one of the most beloved and respected zoos in the country, and deservedly so.
I get that; I would definitely say my experience is most zoogooers wouldn't tell any bears of the same fur color apart. :p

If we're being honest, the Columbus Zoo has suffered worse scandals over the last decade that temporarily cost the zoo its AZA accreditation, and Prague Zoo is currently going through a serious row that has led to the resignation of its director since 2010. Just to give some perspective.
Definitely something to be said about Columbus. I'm totally ignorant the Prague situation though. Despite my European travel last year I'm still only dipping my toes into the Europe forum.

They could’ve just leveled the grottos completely, made the entire thing playground and then we wouldn’t have been having this discussion ;)
Very true!

Honestly, I've never understood the hate for Cincinnati whatsoever. It's a better zoo than Columbus and possibly even Toledo in my book.
What are your favorites parts of the Cincinnati Zoo? I'm not kidding about hearing mostly negativity so I'd welcome some positive here.
 
I like night hunters a lot and I adore the manatees. The insect house is great in the sense that it is an insect house that exists when those seem to be falling by the wayside. The sea eagle exhibit is very fun. Both the outdoor penguin exhibits are good. Jungle trails has nice landscaping and everything around the elephant exhibits is quite pretty.
 
When the grotto renovation project was first announced I too wished a tropical bear species was chosen instead and the area would've been treated as an extension of Jungle Trails. However, the limitations of using the old rockwork made black bears the obvious choice. There's really only room for one enclosure and holding areas are quite small, meaning that breeding would not have been possible. Overall, the zoo picks up two new charismatic species, takes a step towards creating a comprehensive North American exhibit, and replaces an outdated space while maintaining significant history. Seems like a win to me.

I haven't been to Cincinnati yet, but I agree it receives way too much unnecessary criticism on this forum just like several other major midwestern zoos. Yes the hippo exhibit is too small and the non-ABC collection has been greatly diminished to a saddening degree, but there's so much that is great: Elephant Trek looks fantastic, Jungle Trails is beautiful, the insect house is arguably the best of its kind in America, the little penguin aviary, the extensive nocturnal mammal collection, etc. The botanical gardens and sustainability initiatives should be envied by almost every zoo in the country, not to mention tons of amazing historical elements from the reptile house to the old elephant (future giraffe) house to the passenger pigeon memorial. Although I'm not sure why bringing back polar bears and pinnipeds is taking priority over building an improved space for their superstar pachyderms, Cincinnati is a terrific zoo that's heading a very positive direction.
 
I would not say that I have any "hate" for Cincinnati Zoo. I thoroughly enjoyed my time there and would go back. The exhibits are top notch and the food was decent. My main complaint is the feeling that the zoo is just kind of haphazardly laid out and isn't truly a full day zoo, certainly not a two day zoo. I just feel like the zoo is a little over rated, but I can see how other ZC members would entirely disagree with that statement.

Figuring out a route with little back tracking and generally navigating the zoo was a challenge. That said, I also have a similar issue with SDZ, there is just so much packed into the space that it is a puzzle for me to figure it out. Contrast that to Columbus where the layout is pretty easy to navigate, still packed with animals, and is easily a full day or day and a half zoo for me. I have not been to Toledo, so I can't compare them.

These impressions were from my visit in August, so obviously there is still a lot of construction going on, but Elephant Trek was open.

The lack of a decent play area is disappointing when you go with a kid that would like to play for 30 minutes but they don't really have anything to play on.

Broadly I really liked the zoo, it may squeeze into my top 10, but it would not make it into my personal top 5.
 
Everything I have heard about this facility going back years has always been fairly negative. Hopefully whoever takes over from Maynard can help turn this facility around. :)
When the grotto renovation project was first announced I too wished a tropical bear species was chosen instead and the area would've been treated as an extension of Jungle Trails. However, the limitations of using the old rockwork made black bears the obvious choice. There's really only room for one enclosure and holding areas are quite small, meaning that breeding would not have been possible. Overall, the zoo picks up two new charismatic species, takes a step towards creating a comprehensive North American exhibit, and replaces an outdated space while maintaining significant history. Seems like a win to me.

I haven't been to Cincinnati yet, but I agree it receives way too much unnecessary criticism on this forum just like several other major midwestern zoos. Yes the hippo exhibit is too small and the non-ABC collection has been greatly diminished to a saddening degree, but there's so much that is great: Elephant Trek looks fantastic, Jungle Trails is beautiful, the insect house is arguably the best of its kind in America, the little penguin aviary, the extensive nocturnal mammal collection, etc. The botanical gardens and sustainability initiatives should be envied by almost every zoo in the country, not to mention tons of amazing historical elements from the reptile house to the old elephant (future giraffe) house to the passenger pigeon memorial. Although I'm not sure why bringing back polar bears and pinnipeds is taking priority over building an improved space for their superstar pachyderms, Cincinnati is a terrific zoo that's heading a very positive direction.
The previous quote that hoped this new director would do better than Thane was genuinely upsetting. I was thinking for hours of what to say and you took most of the words out of my mouth. Thane will be irreplaceable in many aspects, especially since he's the only director I can name that isn't Jack Hanna that is so accessible to the public. You can catch him walking around the zoo and mingling with the crowd on any given day. He is very much loved throughout the city and he will be missed as the face of the zoo. Thane already HAS turned this place around from what it was when he took over.

As for your comment on the pachyderms, according to the plans that are out there, and from Thane himself, polar bears and sea lions are not taking priority over rhinos - they're just being moved.

The lack of a decent play area is disappointing when you go with a kid that would like to play for 30 minutes but they don't really have anything to play on.
I'm a little confused on that one. There are two minor play areas in Africa, one interactive elephant in Elephant Trek, one interactive element in Eagle Eyrie, a Children's room in Wings of the World, one large playground in Children's Zoo where kids spend a lot of their time, now one in Bear Ridge, and several in Jungle Trails.
 
Last edited:
The previous quote that hoped this new director would do better than Thane was genuinely upsetting. I was thinking for hours of what to say and you took most of the words out of my mouth. Thane will be irreplaceable in many aspects, especially since he's the only director I can name that isn't Jack Hanna that is so accessible to the public. You can catch him walking around the zoo and mingling with the crowd on any given day. He is very much loved throughout the city and he will be missed as the face of the zoo.

As for your comment on the pachyderms, according to the plans that are out there, and from Thane himself, polar bears and sea lions are not taking priority over rhinos - they're just being moved.
Anyone who calls Thane a bad director clearly is misinformed or little to no educated on the subject. He created Africa, one of the greatest versions in the nation, night hunters, helped work with Sumatran rhinos; and make the right decision in the end, create the new and astonishing elephant trek, roo valley, bear ridge and penguin point. All of his work looks beautiful in person, showing how much he cares for the zoo. All of his decisions seem perfect to me. He’s a real person. Similar to Jack Hanna, Jim Brehany, and Lee Simmons, he has made the zoo better than it was before; creating a top zoo in the country. Not to mention; his upcoming master plan seems to be perfect for the zoos future. Hot take- the removal of Wildlife Canyon was the right decision.
 
The previous quote that hoped this new director would do better than Thane was genuinely upsetting. I was thinking for hours of what to say and you took most of the words out of my mouth. Thane will be irreplaceable in many aspects, especially since he's the only director I can name that isn't Jack Hanna that is so accessible to the public. You can catch him walking around the zoo and mingling with the crowd on any given day. He is very much loved throughout the city and he will be missed as the face of the zoo.
Indeed, Thane Maynard is one of the most respected U.S. zoo directors in the industry. Few leaders are as public facing as him and his replacement has much to live up to in that regard. To say he's taken the zoo in a negative direction in any capacity is simply not accurate, although I understand it may seem that way if you only read overdramatic complaints from zoo nerds. ;)
As for your comment on the pachyderms, according to the plans that are out there, and from Thane himself, polar bears and sea lions are not taking priority over rhinos - they're just being moved.
I was referring to the hippos. :p Although that portion of the grounds is being geared towards North American fauna, if the zoo's willing to invest in a large exhibit complex with underwater viewing and expensive filtration systems, in my opinion it more makes sense to move the hippos to a space worthy of their stardom (ideally alongside other African river species like crocs, antelope, flamingos, etc). I'm sure what they'll put together for the marine mammals will be great and they certainly have plenty of space to do something special, just my two cents.
Hot take- the removal of Wildlife Canyon was the right decision.
Not as hot as you may think actually. Most who aren't blinded by nostalgia will concur that Wildlife Canyon was past it's prime and needed to be replaced. It was more so the fact that it's replacement was a kangaroo walkthrough and a ropes-course -- at least it came with the excellent little blue penguin (and others) exhibit.
 
As my current home zoo, Cincinnati is a great zoo that does not do any one thing incredibly well.

In general, the damn thing is on a hill. It's pretty easy to do in a circle... until you factor in Wolf Woods, African Penguins, Children's Zoo and the Red Pandas. Either direction you take that circle involves you having to repeat going uphill after exiting an exhibit (Gorilla World and Jungle Trails). It's landlocked. Some sightlines aren't the prettiest and the sounds of being near a hospital make it very apparent where you are. None of these are hard criticisms, but if you're coming from Columbus or Toledo, it's certainly a different experience.

However, I think the horticulture team makes up for all of those criticisms. It's a zoo I'm happy to be lost in or stuck double backing. Because for what the sirens and sightlines may do to take me out of it, it is absolutely bonkers to be walking through some parts of the zoo and remember where you are. For a lot of other zoos, this is easy. For Cincinnati, it takes a lot of effort and that should be applauded.

Is this place a charismatic megafauna lover's paradise? Absolutely. Are a lot of other zoos? Absolutely. As someone who isn't that critical of that to begin with, I do love what Night Hunters has to offer. I love World of the Insect. I like seeing puffins despite being in an aging exhibit. I've seen more manatees living in Ohio than I ever did in Florida. Little blue penguins are fun. Bonobos are fun. Sea otters will be fun. Heck, for someone that grew up in Chicago, cheetahs are still pretty heckin' cool.

Does Cincinnati do any of the above extremely well? No, with the exception of Elephant Trek and World of the Insect if you ask me. But they also all don't need to be world's best for Cincinnati to be a great zoo. They just need to be good and that's what the majority of the zoo is.

I challenge everyone to think of how many zoos on your list are 100% good. 90% good? 80%? 75?% I think Cincinnati is pretty high up there after you take out what are the consensus "best zoo's" among these forums. Sometimes Cincinnati is on those lists and rightfully so! But I wouldn't blame anyone for having it a little further down. It's better than most, even if you can't put your finger on why.
 
I bash Cincinnati routinely, but Thane Maynard is a legend. His profile in Cincinnati is as high as it gets for a zoo director. Been that way for decades. I've met my favorite rock start and I've met my favorite athletes. I'm never more of a fanboy than when I happen to be at the zoo and see Thane walking around. Embarrasses the heck out of my wife.
 
To say he's taken the zoo in a negative direction in any capacity is simply not accurate, although I understand it may seem that way if you only read overdramatic complaints from zoo nerds. ;)
I don't really see why there's any reason to call anyone on this forum overly dramatic, just because they have passionate and perfectly valid opinions. Don't get me wrong, I think Maynard had done a fantastic job, but it just seems wholely unnecessary.
 
Back
Top