Philadelphia Zoo Philadelphia Zoo News 2019

ZPA said:
They updated their website, and honestly it needed to be changed.
Home – Philadelphia Zoo
Click to expand...

This is significantly worse I feel. There are much less species listed and none of them have their own pages. The zoo's old site had extremely detailed pages that even gave the zoo's individual animals' backgrounds. This site doesn't even have scientific names.

~Thylo
 
ThylacineAlive said:
This is significantly worse I feel. There are much less species listed and none of them have their own pages. The zoo's old site had extremely detailed pages that even gave the zoo's individual animals' backgrounds. This site doesn't even have scientific names.

~Thylo
Click to expand...
Looking more into the entire website, I have to agree. I just assumed it wasn't finished yet.
 
Apparently, the newest Water is Life section for the Giant Otters is not winter proof yet. I remember hearing about this in the past, but I thought they rectified the issue. Anyway, the water is drained from the exhibit and currently the red pandas are able to also access this area. It will definitely be interesting if any photos surface of the red pandas on the slide! :D The giant otters still have access to their original exhibit and the smaller exhibit next door that once housed the Canada lynx.
 
nczoofan said:
From what I know, Philadelphia Zoo has significant plans for the future (something I could not say for London), specifically the south end of the zoo. It upsets me to see the decline of the small mammal collection, but I’m optimistic for this zoo. They still have a great carnivore, primate and reptile collection right now.
Click to expand...
I am afraid the Small Mammal House is one of the endangered sites in the Zoo. I hope long-time visitors and members will complain about the changes that have already occurred, and that could occur in the future once the Zoo gets passed all the disruption in plans caused by the coronavirus. The problem is that visitors have not been allowed in the Small Mammal House since March 2020 when the shutdown occurred. Even during the Zoo's reopening time, the Small Mammal House was not reopened for visitor access. The Zoo is now closed again for the month of January, and it seems probable that the Small Mammal House will not be open when the Zoo reopens again in mid-February. So visitors can't see what is happening. In addition to housing so many fascinating species for so many years, the Nocturnal Room, which used to feature so many nocturnal creatures, was the first of its kind to be created in a zoo. Visitors could see vampire bats, striped weasels, striped skunks, kangaroo rats, pygmy lorises, echidna, and various small rodents from all over the world. That wonderful part of the Zoo's history was erased when the Nocturnal Room was converted into an exhibit featuring only vampire bats. Unfortunately, even that opportunity may be gone if the Zoo does not commit to renovating the Small Mammal House instead of closing it.
 
Gondwana said:
I've got to agree with @ThylacineAlive. Philadelphia still has a decent collection, but a decade ago it probably had one of the best collections in the US outside the Bronx/Omaha/San Diego group, at least for mammals. Plenty of interesting rarities too -- not just the douc langur but also things like bamboo lemur, striped weasel, bearded pig, striped possum, etc. Some of the drawdown was inevitable, of course, and was precipitated by needed renovations, like the Pachyderm House/KidZooU renovation or through combining adjacent enclosures to provide more space. What is concerning is the underutilization of space when areas are closed down or when seemingly viable mixes are ended (as is the case with the Aardvark). Looking at the entirety of the zoo, the entry sequence (Rare Animal/Reptile/KidZooU/Primate/Big Cat) has vibrancy that the rest of the zoo lacks. Hopefully some of that big empty space in the south end of the zoo gets updated to something special.
Click to expand...
If you travel even further back in time, the Philadelphia Zoo had an even more wonderful collection of wild animals that represented the fascinating variety of life on earth. Elephants (both African and Asian), rhinos (black rhinos, white rhinos, and Asian rhinos), bears (polar and kodiak), two subspecies of giraffe, three subspecies of zebra, warthogs, and too many species of carnivores to list here, including a wonderful variety of big and small cats. The Small Mammal House was filled with both nocturnal and crepuscular species. Whenever I go off on a tangent like this it makes me sad. Changes in the past decade have slowly erased all trace of what made the Zoo so wonderful throughout the first 150 years of its history. I still love and support the Zoo, but the things that make it a good zoo now can not compare to all that made it a great zoo in the past. So I disagree that it was necessary to convert the Pachyderm House into KidZooU, or to relocate so many species then spread the remaining ones out over space they never use just to appease visitors who don't understand that most wild creatures move over large spaces because they have to, not because they want to. Instead, they would stay in a smaller area if everything they needed could be found in that smaller area. I do definitely agree that too much space is underutilized in the Zoo, though. Some really great multi-species areas could be created throughout the Zoo in those areas. That would be enrichment for the animals in those exhibits, and would allow the Zoo to increase the number of species it showcases for visitors.
 
Zoo Visitor said:
If you travel even further back in time, the Philadelphia Zoo had an even more wonderful collection of wild animals that represented the fascinating variety of life on earth. Elephants (both African and Asian), rhinos (black rhinos, white rhinos, and Asian rhinos), bears (polar and kodiak), two subspecies of giraffe, three subspecies of zebra, warthogs, and too many species of carnivores to list here, including a wonderful variety of big and small cats. The Small Mammal House was filled with both nocturnal and crepuscular species. Whenever I go off on a tangent like this it makes me sad. Changes in the past decade have slowly erased all trace of what made the Zoo so wonderful throughout the first 150 years of its history. I still love and support the Zoo, but the things that make it a good zoo now can not compare to all that made it a great zoo in the past. So I disagree that it was necessary to convert the Pachyderm House into KidZooU, or to relocate so many species then spread the remaining ones out over space they never use just to appease visitors who don't understand that most wild creatures move over large spaces because they have to, not because they want to. Instead, they would stay in a smaller area if everything they needed could be found in that smaller area. I do definitely agree that too much space is underutilized in the Zoo, though. Some really great multi-species areas could be created throughout the Zoo in those areas. That would be enrichment for the animals in those exhibits, and would allow the Zoo to increase the number of species it showcases for visitors.
Click to expand...
I agree to an extent, as while I do agree that a drawdown in species as drastic as this covers the zoo's image with a sheen of mediocrity, the exhibit for the elephants for instance was absolutely atrocious. The zoo admitted this themselves through the transfer of Dulary to The Elephant Sanctuary and Bette/Kallie to the ICC in Pittsburgh. That said, the zoo has the historical significance as well as hopefully enough community support to warrant a renaissance in zoological design (they started this with Zoo360 and then sort of stagnated after a while), as well as the return of several species to the zoo. If Seneca Park can successfully have elephants (AND polar bears) on only 16 acres of land, then why can't Philadelphia with 42? Of course the former polar bear-turned penguin habitat can be utilized for polar bears once more (with the proper renovations, like galvanizing the pool, adding a saltwater system and a Zoo360 trail in general for Bear Country), and with enough creativity in site utilization, elephants can be brought back to the zoo. Even a bachelor herd of 2 or 3 would do just fine, and even be conducive to a mixed-species environment, which is what zoos that are limited in space do to maximize their collection as feasibly as possible. Overall I'm not saying that the zoo should return to the days of being a postage stamp collection, but some kind of an indication of a renaissance would be nice, not... *animatronic dinosaurs and a glorified food court*.
 
Wyman said:
I agree to an extent, as while I do agree that a drawdown in species as drastic as this covers the zoo's image with a sheen of mediocrity, the exhibit for the elephants for instance was absolutely atrocious. The zoo admitted this themselves through the transfer of Dulary to The Elephant Sanctuary and Bette/Kallie to the ICC in Pittsburgh. That said, the zoo has the historical significance as well as hopefully enough community support to warrant a renaissance in zoological design (they started this with Zoo360 and then sort of stagnated after a while), as well as the return of several species to the zoo. If Seneca Park can successfully have elephants (AND polar bears) on only 16 acres of land, then why can't Philadelphia with 42? Of course the former polar bear-turned penguin habitat can be utilized for polar bears once more (with the proper renovations, like galvanizing the pool, adding a saltwater system and a Zoo360 trail in general for Bear Country), and with enough creativity in site utilization, elephants can be brought back to the zoo. Even a bachelor herd of 2 or 3 would do just fine, and even be conducive to a mixed-species environment, which is what zoos that are limited in space do to maximize their collection as feasibly as possible. Overall I'm not saying that the zoo should return to the days of being a postage stamp collection, but some kind of an indication of a renaissance would be nice, not... *animatronic dinosaurs and a glorified food court*.
Click to expand...
I agree with everything you said in this reply! Your realistic vision of how the Zoo should be is definitely one I can be supportive of.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top