Is there not clearly two individuals in the last photo posted by @StoppableSan ? Or Am I imagining something the second one?
There's two monkeys in the photo.
Is there not clearly two individuals in the last photo posted by @StoppableSan ? Or Am I imagining something the second one?
Is there not clearly two individuals in the last photo posted by @StoppableSan ? Or Am I imagining something the second one?
I saw two in one of the pictures.
I don't see any photographs in the gallery of red-tailed monkeys. I assumed that there was only one based on this post (below).There's two monkeys in the photo.
I saw an article that birds from the Cape May County Zoo will be coming to Philadelphia. Where are these photographs? The article didn't say which birds will be coming to Philadelphia.
New Jersey Aviary Closes Permanently, Relocation of 77 Birds to 13 Zoos Scheduled
Also, what information is there about the new red-tailed monkey? Is it a male or female? Where did it come from?
I don't see any photographs in the gallery of red-tailed monkeys. I assumed that there was only one based on this post (below).
Yep, there's two individuals! You can just see the tail of the second one hanging down from the log it's perched on.Is there not clearly two individuals in the last photo posted by @StoppableSan ? Or Am I imagining something the second one?
For some reason there are no pictures anywhere on the thread. My computer must be misbehaving (or I should say I don't understand it). Oh well. I apologize for derailing the thread.A couple of posts above that is one with three photos of the exhibit and animals.
For some reason there are no pictures anywhere on the thread. My computer must be misbehaving (or I should say I don't understand it). Oh well. I apologize for derailing the thread.
I do not.
...is this actually from the zoo itself or is this some rando? This seems way too far-fetched and illogical.I just saw a post on Facebook and want to hear what everyone says about it. I heard that the zoo plans to remove all the venomous snakes in its collection. I don't want to believe it.
I needed to confirm. Removing the venomous snakes is not a good idea. People love venomous snakes and the zoo would have access to antivenom that hospitals would need in case someone got bitten by a venomous snake....is this actually from the zoo itself or is this some rando? This seems way too far-fetched and illogical.
Edit: I know the person who posted this - this still seems pretty illogical.
Log into Facebook | Facebook
I needed to confirm. Removing the venomous snakes is not a good idea. People love venomous snakes and the zoo would have access to antivenom that hospitals would need in case someone got bitten by a venomous snake.
I just spoke to a friend of mine who works at the Philadelphia Zoo and she confirmed it, the zoo is removing all their venomous snakes. The reason why is that the zoo does not have anyone with the proper training to handle venomous snakes and they want to cut costs. My friend said that the zoo's ConEd manager will send out an email to zoo staff tomorrow explaining the situation
I don't know if this is my being in denial - anyone can say anything as far as corroboration. That said:I just spoke to a friend of mine who works at the Philadelphia Zoo and she confirmed it, the zoo is removing all their venomous snakes. The reason why is that the zoo does not have anyone with the proper training to handle venomous snakes and they want to cut costs. My friend said that the zoo's ConEd manager will send out an email to zoo staff tomorrow explaining the situation.
This is awful news. Venomous snakes are a big draw to zoos. They teach people that snakes are not mindless killing machines, they are complex, beautifully adapted carnivores that control rodent populations and help keep ecosystems stable. It is absolutely insane that the zoo is doing this.

As someone who has worked in a ER/Trauma center at a large hospital, I can verify that hospitals do NOT keep much anti-venom on hand, and if any, it is only for local native animals. We had to get anti-venom from the zoo on more than a few occasions for patients that would need anti-venom for exotics/pets/etc. Zoos are great partners in healthcare in these situations. Philadelphia ERs will indeed have to find another source, likely further away, delaying care. An unintended consequence no doubt.Hospitals keep anti-venom on hand. They probably keep more than the zoo does, they're more likely to use it and keep it up to date.
Exactly. I remember watching a documentary about animal attacks in which someone was bit by a cobra and the hospital did not have antivenom and they had to get it from somewhere far away and the person nearly died but was ultimately saved. Currently, the Philadelphia Zoo keeps a lot of vipers but likely has antivenom from many different species like the elapids they used to have.As someone who has worked in a ER/Trauma center at a large hospital, I can verify that hospitals do NOT keep much anti-venom on hand, and if any, it is only for local native animals. We had to get anti-venom from the zoo on more than a few occasions for patients that would need anti-venom for exotics/pets/etc. Zoos are great partners in healthcare in these situations. Philadelphia ERs will indeed have to find another source, likely further away, delaying care. An unintended consequence no doubt.