As some observed earlier: in retrospect Taronga not having an okapi exhibit is equally irrelevant at this stage.
As far as I can see this would enrich both zoo regions with an iconic species and in the case of the platypus: the SDZ would contribute significantly to platypus conservation in Australia.
Second benefit would be that ZAA region would finally get another new ambassador rainforest species to fit with their theme at Taronga (for the more delicate species). Bongo to follow ..???
I just do hope the HS and Co. intervention do not **** up this - IMHO harmless (and quid pro quo) deal - between 2 world reknowned zoos. Out of interest there (and well be knowest to most ... I would assume in am no fan of self-proclaimed animal welfare organisations as such) what are the credentials of HS in native species conservation or even native species' animal welfare?
As far as I can see this would enrich both zoo regions with an iconic species and in the case of the platypus: the SDZ would contribute significantly to platypus conservation in Australia.
Second benefit would be that ZAA region would finally get another new ambassador rainforest species to fit with their theme at Taronga (for the more delicate species). Bongo to follow ..???
I just do hope the HS and Co. intervention do not **** up this - IMHO harmless (and quid pro quo) deal - between 2 world reknowned zoos. Out of interest there (and well be knowest to most ... I would assume in am no fan of self-proclaimed animal welfare organisations as such) what are the credentials of HS in native species conservation or even native species' animal welfare?