BenFoxster
Well-Known Member
The fennec exhibit looked larger in the photo I saw than the one you included. That was the most recent fennec photo in the LA Zoo Gallery, and I knew from AZA/USDA documents that LA still kept fennec, so didn't realize the exhibit changed. I will be retracting this choice later in the post.
As for the others you mentioned, Santa Barbara wasn't on my radar, and Living Desert wasn't included mainly because it's a rotational exhibit rather than a permanent exhibit for fennecs (for instance recent photos by @snowleopard showed a sand cat in the exhibit. I do like @Bactrian Deer's idea though of Mesker Park, it wasn't an exhibit on my radar but seems like one of the better indoor exhibits from the looks of it. That being said, fennecs are one of those kinds of animals (I forgot to mention this in the original post) that nocturnal exhibits are not ideal for. Natural light and the associated vitamins has been shown to be really important for fennecs and limiting skin issues, so much so that I know of at least one zoo who at times would remove their fennecs from exhibit so they could go to a behind-the-scenes off exhibit spot. Ideally, this wouldn't be necessary and the fennecs would have outdoor access (or an indoor exhibit with natural light) as much as possible, rather than only as an attempt to remedy skin issues.
As such, I think I will end up replacing Los Angeles with the Santa Barbara Zoo, at the recommendation of @Coelacanth18, who took this photo of the impressive space:
![]()
Yes! Another Santa Barbara win!