Popular Zoo Mammals and Their Best Exhibits

While I know that the purpose of this exercise is to rank zoos based on quality and not quantity, I do wonder if might be some "apples-to-oranges" comparisons happening here, in the sense that some of these zoos have very different collection sizes. I'm curious to know whether any weight or consideration was given to how differences in the number of exhibits affects comparing the "average" or "range" in a ranking like this?

For example, you have Jackson at #7 for ungulates, yet their most recent USDA inspection only has 6 species of ungulate (at least one of which I believe is gone now) and your post only mentions 2 exhibits. Meanwhile, Saint Louis has about 3 times that many species and most of them are in exhibits that are (IMO) aesthetically pleasing and well-suited to their species - yet you considered them outside the top 10 for having "less impressive" exhibits. I feel like being judged on only your 2 best enclosures is a low bar to clear compared to an overall average of potentially 20+ enclosures.

I had this same thought when you ranked Nashville #4 for primates, despite it only having 6 species of primate on display (and the exhibits for 2 of those - the lemurs - weren't mentioned in the post). Nashville may have a fairly high average, but how meaningful is that average compared to San Diego (ranked #7) when the latter has 4 or 5 times as many primate enclosures?
A very fair point. I was aiming for a wide variety of collections, including some with very large and diverse collections, but also ones that are smaller with only one or two excellent exhibits. In many of these instances, facilities punched well above their weight due to having one or two exhibits amongst the best possible- this category includes facilities like Nashville and DAK for primates, Jackson for ungulates, etc.

I will say another thing that hurt Saint Louis in regards to ungulates, which I probably should've clarified earlier, is that I was primarily focusing on the species which were included in this list. If the list included, say, multiple additional antelope posts, Saint Louis might have had more of a case to be made. Instead, however, it was primarily based on the "popular" species on the list: elephants, giraffes, rhinos, hippos/pygmy hippos, tapirs, camels, warthogs/river hogs, takin, bighorn sheep, zebras, bongo, bison, and native deer. Others were mentioned when relevant, but by and large STL didn't stand out above the rest if one looks beyond the fact they have a diverse collection featuring various rare species.

Ranking of large zoos is tough because it is easy for some exhibits to drag down otherwise excellent facilities. In the case of San Diego and primates, for instance, despite their various excellent monkey exhibits, their ape exhibits are not amongst the best in the country which dragged them down. Likewise with carnivorans, I *almost* left Bronx off entirely as despite their tiger and snow leopard exhibits being phenomenal, the amur leopard exhibit leaves a lot to be desired. I will also add that this was a *very* subjective ranking, and not based on any sort of mathematical formula. Of course, the other difficulty is I am ranking zoos that in many cases I haven't visited, which certainly might skew my perspective.
 
will say another thing that hurt Saint Louis in regards to ungulates, which I probably should've clarified earlier, is that I was primarily focusing on the species which were included in this list. If the list included, say, multiple additional antelope posts, Saint Louis might have had more of a case to be made. Instead, however, it was primarily based on the "popular" species on the list: elephants, giraffes, rhinos, hippos/pygmy hippos, tapirs, camels, warthogs/river hogs, takin, bighorn sheep, zebras, bongo, bison, and native deer. Others were mentioned when relevant, but by and large STL didn't stand out above the rest if one looks beyond the fact they have a diverse collection featuring various rare species.
This was part of the answer I was originally expecting and not fully certain about. Thank you for clarifying this as I did wonder if it was part of the question/conversation, leaning towards the species covered.
 
Today's post will be the final planned post of this thread, and will be dedicated to the best zoos for other mammal exhibits! Yes, this group is a hodgepodge of various taxa, including rodents, Australian mammals, xenarthrans, bats, and more, and because of that it was a little more difficult to make than some of these other final review posts. The zoos I selected for other mammals are:
  • When it comes to Australian mammals, San Diego Zoo has amongst the best collections in the country, including what it by far the best exhibit for koalas. These series of exhibits is home to the largest number of koalas outside of Australia, and San Diego has long been a leader in exhibiting and breeding this unique species. The koala exhibits here also contain mixed-species elements, as wallabies and bettongs utilize the ground-level of these exhibits:
full
Photo By: @pachyderm pro
full
Photo By: @pachyderm pro
  • Elsewhere in Southern California, the San Diego Zoo Safari Park also has a large collection of Australian species that nicely compliments that of its sister facility. Kangaroos have access to a nice, large walk-through exhibit here, while a lush, forested exhibit for Matschie's tree kangaroos is similarly excellent. Of course, rarity hunters would be most interested in their platypus exhibit, which provides an excellent, nocturnal habitat for these unique monotremes:
full
Photo By: @pachyderm pro
full
Photo By: @pachyderm pro
full
Photo By: @pachyderm pro
  • While the general perception on ZooChat is that AZA zoos tend to be better than unaccredited ones (and this does tend to be true), this thread managed to highlight some exhibits that are exceptions to the rule. One of the best exhibits is the capybara exhibit at Wildwood Wildlife Park Zoo. This species was amongst the earliest featured in this thread, and the capybara exhibit here contains plenty of space including natural swampland for these incredible, large rodents:
full
Photo By: @birdsandbats

  • The single mixed-species exhibit to be featured more than any other in this thread is Houston Zoo's Pantanal. Along with a mention for an ungulate, both giant anteaters and capybaras were featured including this, incredible and dynamic mixed-species exhibit which contains plenty of land and water areas, and is perfectly designed to evoke a naturalistic, non-Rainforest take on a South America complex:
full
Photo By: @Zooplantman
full
Photo By: @TheImmigrant1
  • While many of these "other mammals" are small, Columbus Zoo has excellent exhibits for some of the largest, namely one of the country's best kangaroo walk-throughs and the country's best exhibit for manatees, the large Manatee Coast. The Manatee Coast is an excellent, naturalistic habitat for these incredible animals, and is also a mixed-species exhibit with pelicans, sea turtles, and more. Along with the kangaroo walk-through, Columbus' Australia and the Islands of Southeast Asia also contains some respectable exhibits for smaller mammals, including koalas and wombats, though these aren't quite as notable as the manatees or kangaroos are:
full
Photo By: @TinoPup
full
Photo By: @Moebelle
full
Photo By: @Moebelle
  • When it comes to North American native rodents, two of the best places to visit is the Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum and Minnesota Zoo, which both feature large, naturalistic exhibits for both beavers and prairie dogs. These exhibits all show plenty of thought was put into the natural behavior of their residents, with both land and water areas for the beaver and plenty of digging opportunities for the prairie dogs, and are also both very large for these small mammal residents:
full
Photo By: @Coelacanth18
full
Photo By: @snowleopard
full
Photo By: @pachyderm pro
full
Photo By: @snowleopard
  • Flying foxes, while awesome animals, are seldom given the opportunity to shine by zoos. Disney's Animal Kingdom has an excellent, outdoor flying fox exhibit, however, that allows for plenty of opportunities for these fascinating animals to display natural behaviors, including climbing and flying, and allows these incredible animals to shine in their own right:
full
Photo By: @Mr.Weasel
full
Photo By: @AndyJ08
  • One of the best ways for zoos to exhibit two-toed sloths is as part of large, walk-through exhibits. Amongst the best examples of this is the Roger Williams Park Zoo, which uses two-toed sloths and golden lion tamarins as the flagship animals for the large walk-through Faces of the Rainforest building. This allows plenty of space for the sloths to move, although they mostly hang about in their few favorite hiding spots, while also maximizing space use by featuring a variety of unique species (most of them non-mammals) in this exhibit. Also in this building is a very respectable tamandua/toucan mixed-species exhibit, while outside is an excellent giant anteater habitat, which pre-dates the opening of Faces of the Rainforest and was also featured in this thread:
full
Photo By: @TinoPup
full
Photo By: @Pleistohorse
  • Few zoos give capybaras access to an entire lake, which is what makes the capybara exhibit at the small Rolling Hills Zoo in Kansas so unique, and worthy of being highlighted in this post. Not all good exhibits need million-dollar budgets, and a perfect example is this excellent exhibit which utilizes the zoo's natural terrain to their maximum advantage in creating a great capybara exhibit:
full
Photo By: @MGolka

My (highly subjective) ranking of zoos for other mammal exhibits are:
10. Rolling Hills Zoo
9. Roger Williams Park Zoo
8. San Diego Zoo
7. Disney's Animal Kingdom
6. Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum
5. Minnesota Zoo
4. Wildwood Wildlife Park Zoo
3. Houston Zoo
2. Columbus Zoo
1. San Diego Zoo Safari Park

And with that, this thread is finished! I have started research on a sequel featuring non-mammals, however I don't yet know if I will go through with that idea as I'm not sure the same format for posts would be successful. In the mean time, thank you all for taking the time to read and comment in this thread, which I'm thankful to finally finish!
 
Today's post will be the final planned post of this thread, and will be dedicated to the best zoos for other mammal exhibits! Yes, this group is a hodgepodge of various taxa, including rodents, Australian mammals, xenarthrans, bats, and more, and because of that it was a little more difficult to make than some of these other final review posts. The zoos I selected for other mammals are:
  • When it comes to Australian mammals, San Diego Zoo has amongst the best collections in the country, including what it by far the best exhibit for koalas. These series of exhibits is home to the largest number of koalas outside of Australia, and San Diego has long been a leader in exhibiting and breeding this unique species. The koala exhibits here also contain mixed-species elements, as wallabies and bettongs utilize the ground-level of these exhibits:
full
Photo By: @pachyderm pro
full
Photo By: @pachyderm pro
  • Elsewhere in Southern California, the San Diego Zoo Safari Park also has a large collection of Australian species that nicely compliments that of its sister facility. Kangaroos have access to a nice, large walk-through exhibit here, while a lush, forested exhibit for Matschie's tree kangaroos is similarly excellent. Of course, rarity hunters would be most interested in their platypus exhibit, which provides an excellent, nocturnal habitat for these unique monotremes:
full
Photo By: @pachyderm pro
full
Photo By: @pachyderm pro
full
Photo By: @pachyderm pro
  • While the general perception on ZooChat is that AZA zoos tend to be better than unaccredited ones (and this does tend to be true), this thread managed to highlight some exhibits that are exceptions to the rule. One of the best exhibits is the capybara exhibit at Wildwood Wildlife Park Zoo. This species was amongst the earliest featured in this thread, and the capybara exhibit here contains plenty of space including natural swampland for these incredible, large rodents:
full
Photo By: @birdsandbats

  • The single mixed-species exhibit to be featured more than any other in this thread is Houston Zoo's Pantanal. Along with a mention for an ungulate, both giant anteaters and capybaras were featured including this, incredible and dynamic mixed-species exhibit which contains plenty of land and water areas, and is perfectly designed to evoke a naturalistic, non-Rainforest take on a South America complex:
full
Photo By: @Zooplantman
full
Photo By: @TheImmigrant1
  • While many of these "other mammals" are small, Columbus Zoo has excellent exhibits for some of the largest, namely one of the country's best kangaroo walk-throughs and the country's best exhibit for manatees, the large Manatee Coast. The Manatee Coast is an excellent, naturalistic habitat for these incredible animals, and is also a mixed-species exhibit with pelicans, sea turtles, and more. Along with the kangaroo walk-through, Columbus' Australia and the Islands of Southeast Asia also contains some respectable exhibits for smaller mammals, including koalas and wombats, though these aren't quite as notable as the manatees or kangaroos are:
full
Photo By: @TinoPup
full
Photo By: @Moebelle
full
Photo By: @Moebelle
  • When it comes to North American native rodents, two of the best places to visit is the Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum and Minnesota Zoo, which both feature large, naturalistic exhibits for both beavers and prairie dogs. These exhibits all show plenty of thought was put into the natural behavior of their residents, with both land and water areas for the beaver and plenty of digging opportunities for the prairie dogs, and are also both very large for these small mammal residents:
full
Photo By: @Coelacanth18
full
Photo By: @snowleopard
full
Photo By: @pachyderm pro
full
Photo By: @snowleopard
  • Flying foxes, while awesome animals, are seldom given the opportunity to shine by zoos. Disney's Animal Kingdom has an excellent, outdoor flying fox exhibit, however, that allows for plenty of opportunities for these fascinating animals to display natural behaviors, including climbing and flying, and allows these incredible animals to shine in their own right:
full
Photo By: @Mr.Weasel
full
Photo By: @AndyJ08
  • One of the best ways for zoos to exhibit two-toed sloths is as part of large, walk-through exhibits. Amongst the best examples of this is the Roger Williams Park Zoo, which uses two-toed sloths and golden lion tamarins as the flagship animals for the large walk-through Faces of the Rainforest building. This allows plenty of space for the sloths to move, although they mostly hang about in their few favorite hiding spots, while also maximizing space use by featuring a variety of unique species (most of them non-mammals) in this exhibit. Also in this building is a very respectable tamandua/toucan mixed-species exhibit, while outside is an excellent giant anteater habitat, which pre-dates the opening of Faces of the Rainforest and was also featured in this thread:
full
Photo By: @TinoPup
full
Photo By: @Pleistohorse
  • Few zoos give capybaras access to an entire lake, which is what makes the capybara exhibit at the small Rolling Hills Zoo in Kansas so unique, and worthy of being highlighted in this post. Not all good exhibits need million-dollar budgets, and a perfect example is this excellent exhibit which utilizes the zoo's natural terrain to their maximum advantage in creating a great capybara exhibit:
full
Photo By: @MGolka

My (highly subjective) ranking of zoos for other mammal exhibits are:
10. Rolling Hills Zoo
9. Roger Williams Park Zoo
8. San Diego Zoo
7. Disney's Animal Kingdom
6. Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum
5. Minnesota Zoo
4. Wildwood Wildlife Park Zoo
3. Houston Zoo
2. Columbus Zoo
1. San Diego Zoo Safari Park

And with that, this thread is finished! I have started research on a sequel featuring non-mammals, however I don't yet know if I will go through with that idea as I'm not sure the same format for posts would be successful. In the mean time, thank you all for taking the time to read and comment in this thread, which I'm thankful to finally finish!
Congrats on officially 100% completing this thread!
 
Congrats on finishing this awesome thread, it's been very fun
And with that, this thread is finished! I have started research on a sequel featuring non-mammals, however I don't yet know if I will go through with that idea as I'm not sure the same format for posts would be successful. In the mean time, thank you all for taking the time to read and comment in this thread, which I'm thankful to finally finish!
I don't know if it would work per se, but still interested in seeing the best for non-mammals. I think the best way you can do it is to split up between larger exhibits, such as giant aviaries, aquariums, etc., and the smaller exhibits that zoos sometimes do with these animals.
 
I don't know if it would work per se, but still interested in seeing the best for non-mammals. I think the best way you can do it is to split up between larger exhibits, such as giant aviaries, aquariums, etc., and the smaller exhibits that zoos sometimes do with these animals.
I'm definitely interested in doing a non-mammals thread, there are just some challenges with the format that I don't think would translate well to a lot of non-mammals, namely:
  • Given that some of the largest walk-through aviaries contain a wide variety of bird species, any attempt at including many common walk-through species would likely become the same handful of exhibits repeated again and again. I'm not sure how interesting the thread would be if basically every other post was a line-up including the same three or four massive aviaries (e.g., Disney's Animal Kingdom, San Diego Zoo, Zoo Miami, etc.). This is similar to in the mammals thread how antelope were underrepresented- I strongly considered putting in posts for wildebeest and a few other popular species, however each one would've had a similar line-up of mixed-species exhibits (many of which were already mentioned for white rhinos, giraffes, etc.)
  • Similar to the above point, it's a lot harder to find source photos and information about the exhibits when they aren't labelled in a way that mentions the species. Most photos on Zoo Chat of, say, a lion exhibit, would have a label that includes the word "lion" somewhere in it. However, most photos of San Diego's Scripps Aviary won't include "blue-bellied roller" in the label, despite that being one of many species featured there.
  • When it comes to reptiles and amphibians, there's a lot less diversity in exhibits than with many mammals. Yes, there are exceptions, and standout exhibits do exist, however even for mammals there are some species I wasn't able to include because there wasn't enough variation in exhibit design for me to make a solid post (e.g., rock hyraxes, naked mole rats).
I will say, if I go through with a non-mammal project it is highly unlikely it will be quite to the massive scope this mammal one was. So far there are fifteen taxa I know I will feature, but beyond that I'm not sure how many more I can add that I have interesting, valuable information to post on.
 
You could avert some of these problems by just going for broader taxonomic groups over individual species. Or just split it into types of aviaries. Best Asian mixed species, African mixed species, etc. “Cold water penguins” instead of trying to do king and gentoo and rockhopper and having tons of overlap.

Reptiles… you could probably only do a few of the bigger ones. I agree that for smaller ones there isn’t a great deal of difference. You could absolutely do top five Komodo dragon, American alligator, Aldabra tortoise, or green iguana exhibits. Bearded dragon… I mean I can think of a few non-terrariums I’ve seen.
 
Congratulations on the spectacular undertaking and this is definitely a strong addition to ZooChat's canon of must-read topics. I can imagine the amount of work and research that went into this, and it is fascinating to see how certain zoos perform. My favorite posts were those that highlighted exhibits or zoos I hadn't seen before, although it still provided a fresh perspective on some habitats I was familiar with all the same. I still appreciate the level of detail you put into the criterion for species evaluation as well.

If you aren't able to gather enough material for a proper follow-up thread on non-mammals, I certainly think you could discuss the plausible animals here as a series of "bonus posts". I think the best exhibits for reptiles and birds could certainly use some exploration as unlike popular megafauna there are fewer obvious, 'shoe-in' candidates as there are. I admit some bias in that I just think there isn't discourse on the topic which inherently makes it interesting to me.

I know you've mentioned some animals that were considered but ultimately not included in the thread, who came closest? Were there any last minute switcheroos on the species level?
 
I know you've mentioned some animals that were considered but ultimately not included in the thread, who came closest? Were there any last minute switcheroos on the species level?
There weren't really any species that came the closest or were swapped out at the last minute. I was never really set on a particular number of species to be included, so there was never a need to remove a species in order to add another. Species that were considered but not included always had a reason for it, whether that reason be that there weren't enough good exhibits (e.g., cetaceans), that the exhibits weren't distinct enough from each other to warrant inclusion (e.g., naked mole rats, rock hyrax), or in some cases too often kept in large, mixed-species exhibits that are difficult to judge properly (e.g., wildebeest). It was never a matter of "I want to feature X species, so that means I can't feature Y".
 
Today's post is dedicated to the largest of the canid species, the Grey Wolf! While many of the individuals kept in US zoos are generic, there is also a sizeable population of Mexican Grey Wolves managed through the AZA and USFWS, which has also served as a reintroduction program. Grey wolves are by and large the most commonly seen large canid in US Zoos, and are often found in everything from large AZA zoos, to roadside attractions, to facilities specializing in native wildlife. There are even a handful of US zoos almost exclusively dedicated to grey wolves! For this post, the main criteria being used are:
  • Size: Wolves are fairly large animals that in the wild will live across large territories. This can best be replicated in captivity through giving extremely large enclosures, even more so than what should be given to other, similarly sized species. In fact, I'm pretty certain every exhibit on this list is at least an acre large!
  • Social Structure: Wolves are pack species. While many zoos have traditionally (and even to this day) kept wolves in pairs, many of the better exhibits for wolves are those that display larger packs of wolves.
  • Plants: Wolves typically live in dense, forested areas. Due to this, exhibits that are more densely planted were prioritized for this thread.
  • Hiding Opportunities: While size and plants partially accounts for this, it warrants additional mention that wolves are shy, timid creatures. The best exhibits for them account for this by giving the wolves plenty of spaces to hide. One way this is achieved is by ensuring exhibits are properly deep (allowing areas far from the visitor path) rather than building long, yet narrow, exhibits.
Before listing my five choices for wolf exhibits, I feel it deserves mentioning that there is no shortage of impressive wolf exhibits in US Zoos. While I chose five that I feel stand out from the rest, I could've easily made a list of five entirely different exhibits that would be equally defendable. While I don't expect any of these choices to be controversial, someone could easily make an equally valid list that includes five completely separate exhibits:
  • Like with many native wildlife species, some of the best exhibits in the country are at facilities that specialize in native species. One of the best examples of this is at Washington's Northwest Trek Wildlife Park, whose wolf exhibit is essentially just a spacious area of forest dedicated to the wolves. When a zoo's location is similar or identical to the animal's wild habitat, oftentimes it doesn't require much to build a stand-out exhibit, and what essentially amounts to a fenced off section of forest can be the best option for a species such as wolves. Features for visitors include viewing tunnels and other options for unobstructed views of the exhibit. The only problem with this exhibit is that unfortunately the Northwest Trek only has three wolves in its collection, and per their website the two females rotate time on exhibit:
full
Photo by: @Ituri.
full
Photo by: @snowleopard.
  • A very large exhibit for grey wolves is located on Oakland Zoo's California Trail. This exhibit may not be as densely forested as the rest on this list, but still dedicates a large area to its wolves and is still nicely planted, providing a strong aesthetic to an already strong exhibit. Oakland Zoo keeps a pack of six grey wolves, which is commendable in its own right, a breeding pair and their four adult pups.
full
Photo by: @Coelacanth18.
full
Photo by; @TheEthiopianWolf03.
  • Another zoo with a pack of six wolves, in this case six Mexican grey wolf brothers, is Massachusetts' Stone Zoo, the only exhibit on this list I've personally seen. This exhibit is particularly commendable because it shows how a small or medium zoo can dedicate substantial space and resources to a high profile species: in this case by having a two-acre area dedicated to the pack of wolves, located in what is essentially undisturbed forest. For a zoo that is only approximately 20 acres, it's impressive when two of them are dedicated to a single species! While not the most aesthetically pleasing exhibit on this list, it is very naturalistic in its own right, and certainly warrants a mention in this post:
full
Photo by: @Newzooboy.
full
Photo by: @TinoPup.
  • For another facility to focus on native species, Wisconsin's Bay Beach Wildlife Sanctuary dedicates an acre to its pack of grey wolves, which as of 2022 consisted of five individuals. Impressive viewing windows overlook an exhibit that is similarly very forested and large:
full
Photo by: @snowleopard.
full
Photo by: @snowleopard.
  • While not as well known as their sister facility in Omaha, Lee G. Simmons Conservation Park, which also specializes in native species, has its fair share of impressive exhibits as well. Their grey wolf pack consists of five individuals, and similarly to some of the other exhibits mentioned in this post this amounts to essentially a large fenced off section of forest:
full
Photo by: @snowleopard.
full
Photo by: @Dhole dude.

There are plenty of terrific wolf exhibits in American zoos and you did a great job in highlighting five of them. However, I think that a notable omission would be Brookfield Zoo's Regenstein Wolf Woods. It's arguably the single best exhibit at that zoo. With its innovative one-way windows and two acres of space, @pachyderm pro was so impressed that he included it in his thread America's 100 Must See Exhibits. Here are some photos:

full

@geomorph

full

@pachyderm pro

full

@Moebelle

I have officially decided that I will not be making a sequel to this thread, and let me explain why for a second. This last weekend, I visited all three facilities in Chicago. At Brookfield Zoo, I realized that seeing exhibits in person can sometimes lead to incredibly different impressions than simply seeing photos can. Based on photos, Regenstein Wolf Woods seemed to me like a good wolf exhibit, but I didn't include it in this thread as it didn't seem to break through above the others as a really excellent wolf exhibit.

I couldn't have been more wrong.

This exhibit was easily the best exhibit at Brookfield Zoo, and easily the best wolf exhibit I've ever seen. The use of one-way glass is purely genius, as some of the wolves were super close to the glass and seemed very comfortable being so close (one of them was napping right against the window- something I've seen before in lions but never wolves), while I'm so used to wolves being used to hiding in the back of exhibits and being hard to see. I easily saw five or six wolves at Brookfield, an excellent group size, some of which were very active, making it the most enjoyable and engaging experience I've ever had watching wolves. The exhibit's horticulture is a more well-manicured designed than I tend to like for native species, as I usually like exhibits that incorporate more fenced-in sections of existing forest, however in the concept of this exhibit my personal aesthetic preferences don't matter. The exhibit is unarguably incredible, and was a sorely inaccurate exclusion from the thread. I'd also like to concede to @pachyderm pro that I was wrong to criticize this exhibit's inclusion in "America's 100 Must-See Exhibits", and I now completely understand its inclusion in a way I didn't understand prior.

I'm still glad I made this thread, as I got to experience making long-form content that isn't something I've ever done before. Plus, some of the discussions it sparked were really interesting and enjoyable to read. I'd love to see other, more well-traveled members make similar threads in the future, and maybe once I've visited ten times the number of zoos I've visited now I'll consider re-making this thread and/or making one for non-mammals. However, until then it seems unfair to design a resource that is by default incomplete or inaccurate due to my lack of personal experience seeing the exhibits. I question how many other entries to this thread would've been different if I had been to all of the zoos in question- or what other incredible exhibits simply weren't on my radar at all.
 
It's nice to read a post where someone is so honest and forthright about what they have seen in a zoo. I'm happy to see that you made it to Brookfield Zoo and realized just how darn impressive that wolf habitat is. For sure, I agree that it's the best exhibit at the zoo and so many wolf exhibits aren't half as eye-opening as the one in Chicago.

If you are interested in typing up some reviews of the three facilities you visited in Chicago, then I'm sure that many of us would be excited to read them. ;)
 
It's nice to read a post where someone is so honest and forthright about what they have seen in a zoo. I'm happy to see that you made it to Brookfield Zoo and realized just how darn impressive that wolf habitat is. For sure, I agree that it's the best exhibit at the zoo and so many wolf exhibits aren't half as eye-opening as the one in Chicago.

If you are interested in typing up some reviews of the three facilities you visited in Chicago, then I'm sure that many of us would be excited to read them. ;)
I'm not normally one to write reviews of zoos, and especially not well-visited facilities where others have said most things that I'd say. There are very few US facilities more documented on ZooChat than the ones in Chicago!

That said, all three facilities were incredible and are each excellent in their own right. Shedd was probably my least favorite, but that was mainly because the currently on-going construction is causing a lot of layout and crowd control issues- I'm sure I'd enjoy the aquarium a lot more once construction is finished! All of the exhibits are great, however, and I loved the way they did the "Animal Spotlight", as they expertly use projected images to enhance the educational aspects of the dolphin presentation. The California sea lion exhibit is easily the one bad exhibit in an otherwise excellent institution.

Lincoln Park has a lot of exhibits that are impressive, and has done an admirable job balancing modern exhibitry with highlighting the zoo's long history. The Pepper Family Wildlife Center is my favorite lion exhibit I've ever seen- and was very engaging despite the fact lions are one of my least favorite of the common zoo animals. This probably ranks as my second favorite zoo exhibit I've seen, after only Bronx's Congo Gorilla Forest. I also really loved the Japanese macaque exhibit, and it was a really nostalgic exhibit for me as Japanese macaques were the species that first got my interested in primates, and this exhibit re-captured the wonder I experienced seeing them at my childhood zoo. If I was a local, I could easily visit this free zoo all the time simply to sit and watch the macaques. For a medium-sized zoo, Lincoln Park also does an excellent job creating a diverse collection. In addition to having most of the classic charismatic megafauna, they have an excellent primate collection, an impressive bird collection, plenty of reptiles, a number of smaller mammals, and even a few fish. The "Camel-Zebra Loop" is the weakest part of the zoo, and is definitely showing its age, but other than that the zoo is excellent.

Brookfield Zoo stands out more for its collection than its exhibitry, and I saw a lot of really great species I'd never seen before: white-bellied tree pangolins (!!), short-beaked echidnas, crested capuchins, greater prairie chickens, Gambel's quails, two species of duiker, Chicago garter snakes, the list goes on! Much of the attention Brookfield Zoo gets on ZooChat is due to Tropic World, which is certainly a very historically significant exhibit. In some ways the exhibit has outlived its welcome, but in other ways it still remains excellent- the South America area is absolutely massive, creating one of the best New World monkey exhibits I've ever seen. Many of the species in here are also kept in larger social groups than typically seen, which is always really great. The mixed-species components of this building are also excellent- as it allows animals to display natural social behaviors not only between conspecifics, but also between other species they'd interact with in the wild. It'll be interesting to see if any modifications to the interior happen after the outdoor expansion opens (which looks like it'll be excellent!), as if so that could turn this already impressive exhibit back into a state-of-the-art one.

Outside of Tropic World, there are many other excellent exhibits around Brookfield: the aforementioned Wolf Woods, Habitat Africa: The Forest, and Desert's Edge were all standouts. I loved how many smaller species were interspersed throughout the zoo as well- almost every building had some smaller herps in addition to the larger mammals, which really enhances the theming around the zoo. I've also gained even more appreciation for the zoo's masterplan now, as it really seems as though the zoo understands what some of its weaker sections are: Phase 1 includes new exhibits for penguins and pinnipeds- which will move animals out of their current exhibits which I was unimpressed by. Phase 1 also will rework the existing Habitat Africa: The Savanna, Hoofed Animals, and Pachyderms areas, all of which mainly contain outdoor yards which are functional, but largely unextraordinary. The only other areas that stood out to me as rather poor were two of the zoo's oldest buildings: "Reptiles and Birds" and "Feathers and Scales". Even though these both felt older, and of weaker quality than, the rest of the zoo, nothing in either of these buildings seemed overly egregious either.
 
The only other areas that stood out to me as rather poor were two of the zoo's oldest buildings: "Reptiles and Birds" and "Feathers and Scales". Even though these both felt older, and of weaker quality than, the rest of the zoo, nothing in either of these buildings seemed overly egregious either.
This is an interesting take, as I feel reptiles and birds and especially feathers and scales are among the best animal buildings at the zoo. The terrariums and aviaries for the most part seem adequate for the inhabitants and make for pleasant viewing. While I thoroughly enjoy them, the more biogeographical buildings, like the swamp, Desert's edge, clouded leopard rainforest, and Habitat Africa: The Forest have small enclosures and outdated interiors, full of nice species, yes, but some without outdoor space for medium to large mammals. The two aviary/terrarium buildings have much nicer interiors and appropriate animal enclosures.
 
This is an interesting take, as I feel reptiles and birds and especially feathers and scales are among the best animal buildings at the zoo. The terrariums and aviaries for the most part seem adequate for the inhabitants and make for pleasant viewing. While I thoroughly enjoy them, the more biogeographical buildings, like the swamp, Desert's edge, clouded leopard rainforest, and Habitat Africa: The Forest have small enclosures and outdated interiors, full of nice species, yes, but some without outdoor space for medium to large mammals. The two aviary/terrarium buildings have much nicer interiors and appropriate animal enclosures.
I'm not sold on the argument "without outdoor space", especially not for tropical species in areas with severe winters. The animals wouldn't be able to use the outdoor areas half the year anyways- so I'd much rather the zoo invest primarily in good indoor spaces for those animals. The only thing close to a "large mammal" that I didn't see outdoor access for (barring the great apes, of course) was a clouded leopard (and I've also seen all-indoor clouded leopard exhibits at multiple other zoos), other than that it was definitely all smaller species. Most of the indoor exhibits I also would not classify as "small enclosures" either. The ocelot and Pallas' cat enclosures have some of the best verticality I've ever seen, giving the animals more choice and control over their environments than just about any other exhibit I've ever seen. The meerkat exhibit is also spacious and a really complex space for the animals. In Clouded Leopard Rainforest, the clouded leopard exhibit is also very spacious, and is packed full of climbing opportunities. Thematically, I'm not a fan of the fact there are lemurs in there, but the exhibit itself didn't seem bad at all.

The Victorian crowned pigeon exhibit in Feathers and Scales, on the other hand, was tiny for housing such a large bird, and barely allowed it space to move around. I don't see how you get "pleasant viewing" out of that building, either, given the number of terrariums stacked on top of each other and aviaries with difficult to see through barriers. A lot of the terrariums in there also seemed very small. Reptiles and Birds was probably the better of the two in terms of exhibit quality, but the roof in the aviary was actively leaking during the rain- which is certainly a big problem for a space actively being used as an animal exhibit. The signage in Reptiles and Birds could also use some work, although that could just be my strong dislike of rotating signage.
 
For today's post, we will be looking at the best exhibits for sea otters! While not a particularly common species, a decent number of facilities continue to house non-releasable rehab animals, including both zoos and aquariums.

The criteria for this post will be fairly similar to that of sea lions:
  • Pool Size: Many traditional sea otter pools are unfortunately on the small side. While smaller than pinnipeds, sea otters are still sizeable creatures that are quite active in the water, making a large pool one of the main keys to a successful exhibit.
  • Land Access: While primarily aquatic, sea otters do ocassionally go onto dry land, and a good exhibit for them should have a large enough land area for all individuals to be comfortably on the land at the same time. The layout of this land area is less important, and there are many excellent examples of either island-style set-ups and/or land areas on one side of the exhibit.
  • Social Structure: Sea otters are social animals, and as such it is important for zoos with sea otters to keep multiple individuals.
The exhibits selected for sea otters are:
  • One large, impressive sea otter exhibit can be found at a facility that has yet to be featured in this thread, the Oregon Coast Aquarium. This exhibit is quite large, and provides an excellent outdoor home with plenty of space for the sea otters to dive, swim, or go onto land. This large exhibit is also excellent for visitors, as it has a number of different viewing opportunities available:
I almost replied to mention the best sea otter exhibits without looking back a few pages, but I'm glad I checked because I mostly agree with your list, especially the nod given to the underrated Oregon Coast Aquarium. The other institutions on your list - the Monterey Bay Aquarium (obvious choice), the Minnesota Zoo, and the Oregon Zoo would've been on mine as well. I've heard that the Oregon Zoo plans on using some of its recent $380 million bond to renovate and expand its sea otter facilities.

The Detroit Zoo's exhibit was originally designed for sea lions, I believe, but it suitable for the otters as well. If we were to include Europe, I might have swapped out Detroit for the National Aquarium Denmark/Den Blå Planet, which has the best sea otter exhibit on the continent according to the stated criteria. I also have soft spots for the Vancouver Aquarium and the Lisbon Oceanarium...it's hard to be impartial sometimes when discussing my favorite animal!
 
The Detroit Zoo's exhibit was originally designed for sea lions, I believe, but it suitable for the otters as well. If we were to include Europe, I might have swapped out Detroit for the National Aquarium Denmark/Den Blå Planet, which has the best sea otter exhibit on the continent according to the stated criteria. I also have soft spots for the Vancouver Aquarium and the Lisbon Oceanarium...it's hard to be impartial sometimes when discussing my favorite animal!
It was meant for harp and grey seals.
 
Glad you saw the light. ;) Fully agree that seeing an exhibit in person can really change your perspective, although that doesn't mean you need to be a globetrotter to create threads like this. In truth, I've only seen half of the 100 "must-see" exhibits I included on that thread in person, but even though there's a handful I'd probably drop if I did it today, a vast majority of the choices were largely agreed upon. You just have to do enough thorough research and revising to compensate for exhibits you haven't seen for yourself.

And since you dropped some thoughts on my local zoological stopping grounds, I feel obligated to respond:
That said, all three facilities were incredible and are each excellent in their own right. Shedd was probably my least favorite, but that was mainly because the currently on-going construction is causing a lot of layout and crowd control issues- I'm sure I'd enjoy the aquarium a lot more once construction is finished! All of the exhibits are great, however, and I loved the way they did the "Animal Spotlight", as they expertly use projected images to enhance the educational aspects of the dolphin presentation. The California sea lion exhibit is easily the one bad exhibit in an otherwise excellent institution.
You visited Shedd at a slightly unfortunate time due to the ongoing construction around two major exhibit areas, but at least you were able to see the original galleries before they're replaced/renovated next year. They will be missed, even if what's coming in their place will likely be pretty great. Regarding the sea lions, I agree the on-show exhibit is way too small, but there is a fairly extensive off-exhibit area that's larger. At one point they sometimes left the enclosure to participate in dolphin presentations, although I haven't attended one in years so I'm not sure if that happens regularly still.
Lincoln Park has a lot of exhibits that are impressive, and has done an admirable job balancing modern exhibitry with highlighting the zoo's long history. The Pepper Family Wildlife Center is my favorite lion exhibit I've ever seen- and was very engaging despite the fact lions are one of my least favorite of the common zoo animals. This probably ranks as my second favorite zoo exhibit I've seen, after only Bronx's Congo Gorilla Forest. I also really loved the Japanese macaque exhibit, and it was a really nostalgic exhibit for me as Japanese macaques were the species that first got my interested in primates, and this exhibit re-captured the wonder I experienced seeing them at my childhood zoo. If I was a local, I could easily visit this free zoo all the time simply to sit and watch the macaques. For a medium-sized zoo, Lincoln Park also does an excellent job creating a diverse collection. In addition to having most of the classic charismatic megafauna, they have an excellent primate collection, an impressive bird collection, plenty of reptiles, a number of smaller mammals, and even a few fish. The "Camel-Zebra Loop" is the weakest part of the zoo, and is definitely showing its age, but other than that the zoo is excellent.
Lincoln Park is one of the most cohesive zoos I've ever visited, in the sense that century old buildings don't feel out of place among newer exhibit complexes. The ambiance of the zoo has always been really special with the park atmosphere, attractive gardens and the towering city skyline in the distance. I get what you mean when you're talking about the macaques; being able to stroll through the zoo for a bit, walk out to grab some lunch nearby, and casually walk back in is such a simple pleasure. Even though Brookfield will always be closer to my heart, Lincoln Park has improved so dramatically over the last decade it's easy to understand why many prefer it. The hoofstock loop is due to replaced eventually, but all things considered it's a perfectly fine for time being, albeit a bit dull. Did you see take a walk through the nature boardwalk just outside of the grounds? Really nice local wetland that was restored by the zoo some years back.
Brookfield Zoo stands out more for its collection than its exhibitry, and I saw a lot of really great species I'd never seen before: white-bellied tree pangolins (!!), short-beaked echidnas, crested capuchins, greater prairie chickens, Gambel's quails, two species of duiker, Chicago garter snakes, the list goes on! Much of the attention Brookfield Zoo gets on ZooChat is due to Tropic World, which is certainly a very historically significant exhibit. In some ways the exhibit has outlived its welcome, but in other ways it still remains excellent- the South America area is absolutely massive, creating one of the best New World monkey exhibits I've ever seen. Many of the species in here are also kept in larger social groups than typically seen, which is always really great. The mixed-species components of this building are also excellent- as it allows animals to display natural social behaviors not only between conspecifics, but also between other species they'd interact with in the wild. It'll be interesting to see if any modifications to the interior happen after the outdoor expansion opens (which looks like it'll be excellent!), as if so that could turn this already impressive exhibit back into a state-of-the-art one.

Outside of Tropic World, there are many other excellent exhibits around Brookfield: the aforementioned Wolf Woods, Habitat Africa: The Forest, and Desert's Edge were all standouts. I loved how many smaller species were interspersed throughout the zoo as well- almost every building had some smaller herps in addition to the larger mammals, which really enhances the theming around the zoo. I've also gained even more appreciation for the zoo's masterplan now, as it really seems as though the zoo understands what some of its weaker sections are: Phase 1 includes new exhibits for penguins and pinnipeds- which will move animals out of their current exhibits which I was unimpressed by. Phase 1 also will rework the existing Habitat Africa: The Savanna, Hoofed Animals, and Pachyderms areas, all of which mainly contain outdoor yards which are functional, but largely unextraordinary. The only other areas that stood out to me as rather poor were two of the zoo's oldest buildings: "Reptiles and Birds" and "Feathers and Scales". Even though these both felt older, and of weaker quality than, the rest of the zoo, nothing in either of these buildings seemed overly egregious either.
The exhibits you mentioned as your favorites at Brookfield are my favorites as well, alongside the Australia House and the new native species exhibits in the Nature Plaza (Speaking of, how many prairie-chickens were on-show when you visited? Looking forward to seeing those numbers increase). Tropic World has been criticized for feeling rather empty and void of life compared to its heyday, but the South American room in particular has seen a resurgence with the arrival of three additional monkey species over the last year or so. Once the gorillas move out of Tropic World proper in the coming months, additional African monkeys will likely be brought in as well. I'm glad you enjoyed the building for what it is currently, because depending on the day it still manages to wow me after all these years and it will be a genuinely great exhibit once the outdoor extension is completed.

Echoing @CMP, I'm surprised you weren't a fan of the reptile/bird houses. Feathers and Scales in particular is one I always really enjoy mainly for the aviaries, namely the free-flight tropical birds who seem to prefer the visitor hall to their actual exhibit, as well as the Sonoran desert aviary. I do agree about the crowned pigeon aviary which is awkwardly tucked away in a corner and difficult to view, but otherwise the building is quite good. Reptiles and Birds is primarily a reptile house these days, as it should be, and for a nearly 90 year old building the terrariums are pretty generous with space (except for the olive python). The electronic signage is annoying, but they've started gradually replacing them with physical signs. They aren't perfect, but as historic animal houses packed with birds and herps, they still provide a valuable experience and have held up pretty well.

This is a very interesting moment in time to visit Brookfield. Even with most of the first phase of the master plan completed, it's mostly consisted of smaller additions and renovations so not much of the existing footprint has been significantly altered. Even Tropical Forests is being built on a previously empty lawn and isn't replacing an existing exhibit area. However, soon large portions of the grounds will be up for redevelopment and in a few years time it'll be a completely differently zoo. With so many ambitious projects being undertaken at Brookfield and Shedd Aquarium, I envision Chicago being just as much of a of a premier destination for zoos as San Diego or Berlin one day.
 
Speaking of, how many prairie-chickens were on-show when you visited? Looking forward to seeing those numbers increase
I saw one prairie chicken and one sandhill crane. This was my first stop in the morning (the animals were leaving the smaller holding cages when I arrived), so I'd imagine I saw all the individuals on display currently.

Did you see take a walk through the nature boardwalk just outside of the grounds? Really nice local wetland that was restored by the zoo some years back.
I did not- as insane as it sounds, I saw all three institutions in the matter of just a weekend. On Saturday, I flew to Chicago and visited both Lincoln Park and Shedd. As a result, in order to have enough time at Shedd in the afternoon I skipped the nature boardwalk, farm, and Children's zoo (I'm aware there are some native species exhibits in there, but nothing that seemed worth prioritizing).

namely the free-flight tropical birds who seem to prefer the visitor hall to their actual exhibit, as well as the Sonoran desert aviary
I was definitely amused by the curassows spending time in the visitor hallways.

Reptiles and Birds is primarily a reptile house these days, as it should be, and for a nearly 90 year old building the terrariums are pretty generous with space (except for the olive python)
Yes, herp-wise the Reptiles and Birds is definitely the stronger building (purely from an exhibitry perspective). I think with Feathers and Scales more of the issues are in regards to visibility than animal welfare- the exhibits stacked on top of each other were particularly difficult to see into due to the heights, and the aviary mesh was much more obstructive than what is found in more modern buildings these days.

They aren't perfect, but as historic animal houses packed with birds and herps, they still provide a valuable experience and have held up pretty well.
Definitely a valuable experience, I agree, and the zoo maintains a very respectable collection of herps and birds. When looking at the species I've seen at only one zoo, Brookfield ranks third (behind Bronx and Toledo)- almost entirely due to smaller birds and herps not often seen in other collections.
 
Back
Top