Prague Zoo Praha Prague Zoo Walkthrough / Review

Kalaw

Well-Known Member
Prague Zoo Review 07/08/24:

Inarguably one of the best zoos in the world, Zoo Praha, which I will henceforth be referring to by its English name of Prague Zoo, spans 58 hectares of hilly landscape in Troja, one of the Czech capital’s northernmost districts. Divided in two by a tremendous cliff face, used as an iron mine in the 19th Century, the zoo has a very challenging setting, and yet has used it to full effect. With close to 700 species it has one of the largest zoological collections in Europe and with it being a pioneer in the captive breeding of many scarcely kept taxa, there is a reason why any zoo enthusiast who visits Prague will leave regarding it as one of the best that they have seen.

On the 7th of August, I had the pleasure of visiting this zoo for the first time, and it truly was an unforgettable experience, which I intend to describe here in great detail, with the hope that this review will be a valuable resource for anyone who is considering a Prague Zoo visit, or indeed anyone who fears they may not get to visit, and wants to learn more about the place.

All that said, as this is a first-time visit, I am not all that knowledgeable about the zoo, so will appreciate any corrections or additional facts that Prague Zoo regulars can provide me with here.

I believe that this review is comprehensive, with the only exclusion being the Farmhouse that focuses entirely on domestics, and the Gocars' House, a temporary exhibition featuring poison dart frogs that I did not get round to. That said, there is a chance I missed some of the many aviaries scattered throughout the zoo’s grounds. If this is the case, then yet again, additional information from more experienced readers would be welcome.

Enjoy the review!

Part 1 - Indonesian Jungle, Parrot Trail and Australia

The following morning, I rose at about 6:30, half-an-hour before I intended to do so, but I concluded that going back to sleep was pointless. Instead, I made my way downstairs for breakfast at the hotel buffet, while planning how to get to the zoo. Although public transport was an option, it would require three changes of line and could easily backfire. If I missed a train or, as was the case in Zurich, failed to get my head around the ticket machine in time, then I would no doubt fail in my goal to arrive at the zoo by opening time which, unlike at Zurich, could here be quite an issue. My main goal here was to spend the first hour (from 9:00 to 10:00) in the Indonéská Džungle, known to English-speaking visitors as the Indonesian Jungle Pavilion, as during this time the light in the nocturnal section was on, allowing for better views of its inhabitants which, if all went according to plan, would include my first ever pangolin! As such, I decided to travel by bicycle, which wasn’t too fast (around 35 minutes), but at least would make the duration of my journey more ‘fixed.’ Unfortunately, things didn’t go all too well in this regard either, as a huge portion of the city between our hotel and the zoo was subject to roadworks to allow for the construction of a new tram line. As such, we were delayed by ten minutes or so, but even still, by the time we had arrived at the zoo, locked up our bikes at the Southern Entrance, walked up to the Main Entrance (nearer to the pangolins, but sadly not featuring a bike lock) and scanned our online tickets (which, at a price of CZK 300, which is £10.24 or €11.88, makes Prague one of the best value for money zoos in the world), it was only 9:10 - 50 minutes to try for a pangolin!

The first enclosure encountered after the main entrance was for Nepalese Red Panda. Admittedly, I rushed through this somewhat, so as to get to the Indonesian Jungle on time, but I wish I hadn’t, as it may well be the best red panda enclosure that I have ever seen, in all honesty. It fades brilliantly into the cliff face (which at this point is fairly subtle, but becomes more extreme further west in the zoo), and offers a wonderful selection of climbing, including both artificial structures and some gorgeous live trees. The inhabitants are clearly grateful, as I had never seen them so active, although it wasn’t enough to tempt me away from my pangolin. You then took an uphill path that loops around this enclosure towards the entrance to the pavilion, passing another enclosure, mirroring the red pandas, although with far less leaves remaining on the trees, this time for North American Porcupine. A wonderful species that isn’t seen often enough in zoos, and were again far more active at Prague than normal from my experience, on both instances in which I passed their enclosure.

IMG20240807091439.jpg

Upon entering the Indonesian Jungle, the first thing you are greeted with is a dimly lit room featuring a series of paludariums (aquariums with a landscaped area above). While not as big as the ones at Zurich, they were just as charming, benefitting a fair amount from the very visible frogs inhabiting the portion above, the turtles in the pools, and the high numbers of fish. They were very well-constructed indeed, and truthfully, I wish that I wasn’t rushing to the pangolin, as I could have spent some time admiring these masterfully crafted habitats. The three or four tanks were signed as housing the following (and, surprisingly for an aquarium exhibit, the signage appeared to be very accurate):

Common Tree Frog
Roti Island Snake-necked Turtle
Southeast Asian Box Turtle
Red-bellied Short-necked Turtle
Pig-nosed Turtle
Southern Batagur
Mekong Snail-eating Turtle
Black Marsh Turtle
Siamese Flying Fox
Flying Fox
Moonlight Gourami
Kissing Gourami
Redtail Sharkminnow
Tinfoil Barb
Hoven’s Carp
Ghost Catfish
Clown Loach
Tricolour Sharkminnow
Bleher’s Rainbowfish
Boseman’s Rainbowfish
Dwarf Rainbowfish
Red Rainbowfish


Between the tanks, they had no less than seven freshwater turtle species, which I thought was rather impressive. The batagur is only held at a few public collections in Europe, and the Pig-nosed Turtle, while fairly commonplace, has always been a favourite of mine due to it having once been held in London’s Mappin Aquarium, always one of the livelier and more entertaining species in the building, so it was great to be ‘reunified’ with. This, along with the presence of four rainbowfish species, was my first introduction to Prague’s almost unbelievably vast collection, which often entails several taxa of the same genus being kept. The most entertaining feature here, however, was the Common Tree Frog, a lifetick, and one that was surprisingly easy to locate amidst the many branches and trees that form the terrestrial and arboreal portion of these paludariums.

Turning the corner, I came to one of Prague’s Komodo Dragon enclosures. The species was one that I had always associated with the zoo, due to having read in Sheridan’s 2015 guide that they had been the most prolific breeder of the species in Europe over the past decade (a record which I believe has continued to go strong in the time since). A large enclosure, although a little unimaginative, being fairly open in a way that resembled a desert habitat rather than a rainforest one that most visitors would associate with them, held, if memory serves, no less than four dragons, far larger than the members of this species that I have seen at London Zoo over the years, and quite possibly the biggest members of this species that I personally have ever seen.

You then enter the main portion of the Indonesian Jungle, the rainforest hall. Glass-roofed, brilliantly planted and landscaped with bizarre vines and a selection of pools, and crowned with free-flying birds, it feels as though it is trying to be Prague’s answer to Burgers’ Bush. Unfortunately, the two exhibits really cannot be compared, and I must admit that, upon first entering the hall, I was hugely disappointed by its small size. I would later come to realise that the portion of the hall that I was viewing here was far from its entirety, but even still, for a 21st Century rainforest hall at one of Europe’s greatest zoos, it is a little unremarkable. The real issue is how understocked it seems to be in terms of free-flying birds, as I only saw two (although luckily could hear many more, and their calls certainly did enhance the place), an aspect in which it not only looks poor next to just about any other tropical house that I had seen. This initial portion places visitors on a pathway down the centre, with pools on both sides, each featuring an island. On the right was a very significant lifeticks for myself, the Sunda Pig-tailed Macaque, whose enclosure is a little unattractive (entirely lacking in greenery), and seems to have no outdoor access, but there is a very impressive amount of climbing and some decent privacy. At first, only a large male revealed himself, but later on, a few other members of the troop began chasing each other up and down the branches before vanishing. The moat surrounding their enclosure was signed as being home to New Guinea Snapping Turtle, Giant Asian Pond Turtle, Clown Knifefish and Giant Pangasus, although I saw none of those, a particular shame for the two turtles who brought Prague’s turtle collection up to 9! The other island was home to Palawan Binturong and Indochinese Smooth-coated Otters, with only a pair of sleeping otters visible. While not quite as impressive as the Dresden enclosure that I saw earlier in the trip, this binturong enclosure was still excellent and could have easily passed for primates. However, neither of these were my personal favourite enclosure in this section of the pavilion, with that title instead going to the small pool sandwiched between the binturongs and the boardwalk for Spotted Green Pufferfish. A mangrove-themed tank, presumably with brackish water, for a small, but colourful and bizarre fish, that could easily be seen floating about its pool. Hardly world-class, but very charming.

IMG20240807092643.jpg

The path then led into the nocturnal portion, which was at this time diurnally lit, allowing for bright views of the animals. Naturally, at this point, my impatience to see a Chinese Pangolin was too much, and I didn’t give a second thought to any of the other animals on my way to their enclosure, which is located at the very far end of this corridor. A large crowd was gathered around, which gave me a suspicion that something was active in there, and I was not mistaken. Behind one of the logs at the far end of the enclosure, a mass of pinecone-like scales was moving along. Pangolins check all of the boxes that make animals interesting to me - endangered, rarely seen in zoos, very cute, and best of all, about as bizarre as it comes. A mammal with genuine keratin scales. As such, I had wanted to see one throughout my entire childhood, and amongst all the many rarities kept at Prague Zoo, none came close to this for me. I had made an agreement with myself that if a pangolin did not show when I first came to its enclosure, then I would sacrifice my chance to see most of the zoo’s other exhibits so as to ensure that I saw at least one, by committing time that would have been spent elsewhere moving back and forth to the Indonesian Jungle until I saw one. The pangolin began by patrolling its enclosure, inspecting the hollow logs and bark that lay throughout it, before digging itself a hole in the floor, foraging some more, and then vanishing. The moment was short-lived, but unforgettable, and may well be the best lifetick that I have ever claimed. I even managed to spot a second pangolin, this time curled up in one of the glass-fronted burrows between the main enclosures, although barring one stretch of its tail, it did not move. A special encounter indeed, although it wasn’t until after my visit that I realised that this individual curled up was most likely the female, Run Hou Tang, who recently gave birth to a ‘pangopup’ named Connie (by some coincidence, her name was announced on the same day as my visit), who was at the age where she would still be expected to remain in the burrow and clinging to the mother, thus implying that I had only narrowly missed the pangopup!

Of course, having never seen pangolins of any species before, I can’t really compare the enclosure to anything. However, I was very much impressed by Prague Zoo’s complex for the species, which features three main rooms, six glass-fronted burrows, a sizable offshow portion, and, in all of the main enclosures, deep natural substrate allowing for the animals to dig. A brilliant enclosure indeed. However, what was strangest to me, is that one of the three (the closest to the corridor’s entrance) had a large tree frog, presumably another Common, resting on the glass! They were unsigned, but if intentional and not an escapee, then this means a mixed-species exhibit with pangolins.

IMG20240807092152.jpg
(Apologies for the woeful quality of this image, which was taken from a phone through reflective glass in the dark)

The other nocturnal mammals housed here are:

Sugar Glider
Northern Luzon Giant Cloud Rat
Southern Luzon Giant Cloud Rat
New Guinea Ground Cuscus
Sunda Slow Loris


Both cloud rat species share the enclosure and were the highlights for me aside from the pangolins. It was lovely to have a side-by-side comparison between the Northerns, a species that I had seen on many occasions before, and the Southerns, a lifetick which is kept at four Czech zoos, but in no other European countries. Both were perched on a wooden platform in the top corner of their enclosure, which was lovely to see, and were very easy to tell apart with the jet black colourations of the Southerns. Sadly, none of the other three inhabitants were visible, a particular shame in the case of the loris, who is allegedly the only member of the Sunda species in Europe. It isn’t just nocturnal mammals in this hall, however, as at the far end, just beyond the pangolins, are two enclosures for reptiles, based primarily around the water, but also featuring a series of leaf-covered branches for them to rest among. The smaller of the two houses Borneo Earless Monitor (unseen), while the second is a mix of two snake species, the Long-nosed Whip Snake (also unseen) and the Pacific Tree Boa, with the latter visible making good use of the pool.

The pathway then leads upstairs as you return to the rainforest hall that forms the bulk of the house, and are greeted with yet another primate enclosure, for an even higher profile species, the Sumatran Orangutan. They have a pair of indoor islands, neither of which are too impressive, but they have enough climbing and substrate on offer that I didn’t really mind. Later in the day, I also discovered an outdoor area, just behind the pavilion, which was actually of a solid size and had many ropes for swinging. On paper, this orangutan enclosure is by no means subpar, and may actually be rather good, however there were two issues that I noticed upon closer analysis: the lack of separation options, which presumably means the orangs must be confined to one of the two indoor islands if separation is an issue (I know this is possible, as while a keeper was cleaning the larger island two orangs could still be seen in the smaller one); and the fact that the orangutans don’t seem motivated to use the climbing areas, as all four that I saw throughout the day were on the ground. Overall, not a bad enclosure, but nothing to brag about either.

Moving along, one follows a boardwalk over a stream that houses Enigmatic Leaf Turtles, bringing the total number of turtles in this pavilion alone up to 10, and was also signed as housing more tree frogs who can presumably roam freely throughout the entire hall. I was very fond of how this stream lead into a deeper pool for fish that is mostly underground, albeit with a large opening in a cave (that leads visitors to a close-up viewing of the smaller orangutan island), a small touch that did well to give a feeling of a natural and random setting as opposed to an artificial and ‘clean’ one. Sadly, the fish in these pools are unsigned, and to make matters worse, the free-flying birds around the house are as well. Strange, as the quality of signage at Prague is by a country mile the best that I have ever seen at a zoo, with highly detailed information and fascinating facts that can educate even the most devout of zoo enthusiasts. After some nice views of the pavilion as a whole, you then depart via one more enclosure, a lovely mix of Philippine Porcupine and Belanger’s Treeshrew. I had seen the treeshrew before, at both Chester and Shaldon, but the former was a fleeting glimpse and the latter, although prolonged, was through some strangely thick mesh in the sunlight. The very clean glass at Prague allowed for a much better view of a lively group of them, although the porcupines (the second species of the day!) were the highlight here, a lifetick, and a rather bizarre porcupine species, with short, and at times curled, quills.

As I left the Indonesian Jungle, I felt a mixture of emotions. On one hand, if you are to perceive it as a rainforest hall, then it is hugely underwhelming, with functional but unattractive enclosures, very few free-flying birds and a lack of signage for what little they do have. But on the other hand, looking at it as an overall package, it is quite excellent. Some delightful aquaria, Komodo Dragons, orangutans, a rainforest hall, a nocturnal house and a decent reptile collection; what more could one ask for with a zoo exhibit? Overall, I thought it was an excellent start to the day, but not an excellent exhibit, and to consider that when it opened (2004) it was the most expensive project in the history of Czech zoos just feels strange. It says a lot that my favourite enclosure here was for pufferfish, and my second favourite was for turtles, frogs and rainbowfish, despite being someone who typically enjoys mammals and birds the most by far, as both of those enclosures were, in my eyes, much more interesting (and of a higher quality when considering what they hold, than the orangutan, macaque or binturong enclosures, as well as the main walkthrough. That said, the excitement of seeing a pangolin, at the time, overshadowed any scepticism. I do feel as though had I not seen it, I wouldn’t have enjoyed Prague Zoo half as much, as I would constantly have to backtrack across a huge zoo on a steep hillside to get to the Indonesian Jungle and try my luck again, no doubt resulting in me missing many of the zoo’s other exhibits. Thankfully, it all worked out well, and I left the Indonesian Jungle by about 9:50, feeling as though I was making good time.

Opposite the Indonesian Jungle is the zoo’s Polar Bear enclosure. The signage here implies that this is among Prague Zoo’s oldest enclosures, having existed since its opening in 1931. Inevitably, in the time since it has aged poorly and is by no means adequate to house polar bears today. I feel as though I should provide some personal context here - before visiting Prague, I had only seen polar bears on three occasions prior (at La Flèche, Highland and Hagenbeck), and as such, even though the number of UK holders of the species has doubled in the past year or so, they still feel like a major rarity to me. At Hagenbeck, however, my most recent encounter with the species, I was somewhat disturbed by the poor quality of their enclosure, with a male bear locked outdoors and pacing all day, and as such didn’t get near as much enjoyment out of watching this delightful species as I would have liked. Although it had affected me before, it had never been quite so extreme, in that a bad enclosure completely eliminated my enjoyment of an amazing animal. Hence, upon hearing from zoo enthusiasts that Prague’s enclosure is also of a poor quality, I allowed myself to make an exception to my ‘no images’ rule, spoiling it for myself to eliminate any risk of disappointment. Here, I also had the comfort that, unlike Hagenbeck, whose enclosure opened in 2014, age is a factor in its poor quality, and that, most significantly, construction on a new and improved enclosure elsewhere in the zoo will start soon.

I think my decision paid off, as although I wasn’t fond of their enclosure (it is astronomically superior to Hagenbeck’s, however), I did find great joy in watching one of the two brothers, who recently arrived from Warsaw, swimming about their pool. Seeing them up close, and with underwater viewing, for the first time since La Flèche 5 years ago, was a real treat, and I had forgotten just how enormous these animals are. And this old enclosure far exceeded my expectations, with a decently deep pool, good separation options in the shape of a secondary enclosure (unlike at Hagenbeck where they had to be locked indoors for separation), and good enrichment, such as a pile of ice for them to roll in. That said, moving the bears to a better enclosure is still, indisputably, the right choice, and I have to wonder what the plans are for this space once they move out (presumably demolition).

IMG20240807094913.jpg

Later in the day, while returning to the bears, who by this point had moved on to the secondary enclosure, resting just outside the doors to their indoors, I found a plan for their future exhibit, and it looks excellent. It claims that it will be named 'Arkitda' and will cover 8,000 square metres (not mentioned whether this refers solely to the bear enclosure, or to the whole complex), with two enclosures for the bears featuring four pools between them. It also alludes to underwater viewing and depicts in one of the images a pinniped of sorts (not mentioned whether this will be a new species, or the fur seals already at the zoo moved into a new home). There will also be a restaurant specialising in seafood. One thing that I am fairly curious about is what else will be integrated, asides from the bears and pinnipeds, as Prague has a good habit of including such extras in their exhibits. A seabird aviary, or even a cold-climate aquarium?

IMG20240807192254.jpg

Taking the stairs down from the bears leads to a long pathway along the cliff face, and as you progress along it, it begins to develop into the towering monstrosity that it is so well-known for. This pathway offers wonderful views of Prague’s hilly city centre, with St Vilnius Cathedral within Prague Castle the highlight, although as a football fan, I was also delighted to be able to see, throughout the day, the stadium of newly promoted Dukla Praha, one of four first division Prague clubs and historically the smaller of the four, as reflected by the size of their stadium, but still nice to see. This exhibit forms the start of the Papousci Stezka, known in English as the ‘Parrot Trail,’ with aviaries for smaller parrot species, such as fig-parrots and lorikeets on the right and views of the city on the left for a very charming exhibit indeed.

In order, starting from the bears and ending at ‘Gobi’ on the map, the exhibit holds:

Purple-naped Lory
Orange-breasted Fig-parrot
Vernal Hanging Parrot
Brown Lory
Large Fig-parrot
Edwards’ Fig-parrot
Stella’s Lorikeet
Mitchell’s Lorikeet
Mindanao Lorikeet


I was delighted to see all 9 species in this exhibit, which cannot often be said for such enclosures in zoos. This was particularly welcome for all three fig-parrot species, a group of birds which I had never encountered before, and got very good views of here. I was really fond of all the aviaries, which had onshow indoor areas and surprisingly spacious, densely vegetated outdoors, however, what struck me most about this area was actually the outstanding quality of the signage, something that would go on to become a recurring theme throughout the day. Every sign had a picture of the birds, in colour and usually perched on a branch, with a map showing their range to the right and a brief profile to the left (showing their family, native biome, diet and size among others), with the far right column being a written paragraph. Most species in the zoo (including all the birds here except the Stella’s) also had a second sign underneath offering even more detailed fun facts, often obscure and interesting enough to be worthwhile even for enthusiasts. At times they are specific to the species in question, and at other times they are more general. My favourite here was for the Brown Lory, which shows illustrations and descriptions of the different types of feathers found on birds - namely contour feathers, down feathers, filoplumes and bristles.

IMG20240807095654.jpg

The whole Parrot Trail is very long, and with only nine aviaries there is naturally a lot of empty space, which Prague has done well to fill with plants. However, where there is none, the views of the volcanic rock that forms the cliff are also nice, something contributed to by the signed explaining how it is ‘volcanic tuff strongly saturated with hematite,’ before encouraging you to ‘take a piece of the rock in your hand,’ promising that ‘you will be surprised by how heavy it is.’ It also explains how iron ores from cliffs around here, including the cliff that today forms Prague Zoo, were essential for the ‘growth of the Bohemian metallurgy in the 19th Century.’ So not only are you paying £10 to visit one of the best zoos on the planet, but you are getting an included history and chemistry lesson all in one!

The Parrot Trail does, however, consist of a little more than these eight aviaries, as it concludes with what is (the free flight hall in the Indonesian Jungle, in which I saw free-flying birds just two times, although heard them much more, notwithstanding) the first walkthrough of the day. A small detail, but I love the placement of this walkthrough, right between the Parrot Trail and Australia, and with it featuring entirely Australian birds and predominantly parrots. In terms of the desert-like vegetation and reddish colour of the rocks, this is a fairly standard Australian walkthrough, only hugely scaled up, and instead of budgies, this stars the rarely kept Scaly-breasted Lorikeet, with a very attractive and very large ‘flock’ of these perched on branches, demonstrating the namesake feathers on their chest (with pronounced enough lower edges that they resemble scales) and their attractive tail feathers. It also held the more common, but all the same lovely, Superb Parrot, Rainbow Lorikeet, Crested Pigeon and Bush Thick-knee (although the thick-knee would have actually been a lifetick had I not encountered them just over a week ago at Dessau in the same trip.

Upon leaving the aviary, you find yourself at a junction of sorts, where four pathways converge. Carrying on along the path above the cliff, from the Parrot Trail, leads you to the zoo’s newest exhibit, ‘Gobi,’ as well as the chairlift that help scale the cliff with ease, for an additional charge of CZK 40 (€1.58 or £1.36). To the right of the Parrot Trail, two pathways lead along different sides of ‘Across the Continents,’ which the zoo map treats as one exhibit, but in reality feels a lot more like a confused cluster of multiple exhibits, and that is how I chose to treat it, not visiting it all as one entity, and rather admiring its enclosures in passing, focused on other exhibits. Hence, I now cut back on myself, taking a pathway through the aforementioned ‘Australia’ zone (which ironically is the smaller of the two Australia-themed zones at the zoo), viewing a part of ATC (as I will henceforth be abbreviating it to for convenience) in doing so.

The first ATC enclosure I saw was one for Maned Wolf, which I regrettably had no luck locating from the raised platform overlooking their enclosure. It was about as standard an exhibit as it comes - spacious, grassy, undulating and shaded, with what appears to be a large, but offshow, indoor area at the far end. Good, but nothing memorable. What was just to the left of their enclosure, however, certainly was memorable - the zoo’s Eastern Wallaroo enclosure, not for the enclosure (much like the Maned Wolf enclosure in that, although very good, it was hardly special), but instead for the inhabitants. ‘Wallaroo’ is a name given to species of the osphranter genus, the same genus as Red Kangaroos, that are smaller than said animal, or indeed any other kangaroo, but far smaller than wallabies. I must confess to having been a little disappointed when I realised that they are not their own genus, with their unique name referring solely to size - it always gave the illusion of them being something special, and as such they were an animal that I longed to see throughout childhood. However, even after this, while admiring the animals at Prague, one fairly unique feature did stick out to me, that being their sexual dimorphism, which not only includes size, but also colour (the males being a very attractive blend of hazel and black, while the females are a more standard grey), something rarely seen among macropods. The nearby Addax enclosure is similarly average, although I was quite taken by how they managed to preserve such gorgeously green grass for a grazer without (unless I was missing something) rotating their pasture.

IMG20240807101327.jpg

Around here was a map of Prague Zoo, something that (having made the regrettable decision of not picking up a paper copy of the map upon entry, too blinded by pangolin excitement!) I had to photograph, favouriting the photo for easy access to aid with navigation. Thankfully, I did manage to find a paper map that somebody had left lying around, that I would scavenge for my collection, however this wasn’t until the final minutes of the day, and as such this photograph proved vital for navigating one of the largest and most labyrinthine zoos on the continent. Now feels like a good time to address Prague Zoo’s map, while may will be one of my favourites ever. I love the colour-coded exhibits, the detailed silhouettes, the use of both exhibit and animal names, and, most uniquely, the contour lines. The only thing it doesn’t do that I like to see in zoo maps is use detailed illustrations of the buildings so that you know where you are standing, but as most of the Prague Zoo buildings are fairly nondescript anyways, this hardly would have helped. An excellent map, but strangely, it seems to have switched the positions of the wallaroos and Maned Wolves in ATC.

On the other side of the pathway, the Australia zone commences with Southern Cassowary. This is an animal that I hadn’t seen in quite some time, but was always one of my favourites, and thankfully, one of the cassowaries was doing us a great favour by standing right in front of the glass viewing panel, seemingly quite curious about our presence. Their indoor area is in the centre, with a second enclosure on the other side of it, and while as an overall complex I did approve of having multiple enclosures, I could not help but feel as though individually they are both far too small for such a large bird, especially when compared to the cassowary enclosures in the UK. The following pair of enclosures (for Common Emu and Swamp Wallaby) were of a much better standard in my opinion, being well-landscaped and well decorated with a selection of trees, although of course the species in question are more commonplace. The final enclosure in Australia was for Red Kangaroo, and was rather out-of-the-way, requiring the visitor to travel up a rather lengthy boardwalk to reach it, and then forcing you to backtrack. A fairly standard enclosure, but I did appreciate the placement of the rear fencing behind a slight drop to render it completely invisible, allowing visitors to admire the kangaroos with an unobstructed view of the city in the background.

IMG20240807102621.jpg

Next along in ATC is the zoo’s Turkmenian Kulan enclosure. Completely absent from the UK and a lifetick, the Kulan is a subspecies of Onager that returned to Prague earlier this year after over a decade of absence. Sadly, I could only locate one in their enclosure. The final enclosure in this initial stretch of ATC is labelled on the map as ‘South American Carnivores,’ and indeed features three species that match said description, as well as a Central American rodent. I was very much impressed by the first of these, the Bush Dog enclosure, which was huge, with a large pool, many trees, fallen logs for shelter and play, as well as a large, onshow indoor area with deep substrate for them to dig among. This is easily the biggest and best Bush Dog enclosure that I have seen aside from the temporary one at Chester, in which they were briefly given access to one of the former Jaguar enclosures (now housing bears, I believe), which feels somewhat like cheating. Now feels like an appropriate time to discuss one of the more unusual facets of Prague zoo, albeit one that I gather a fair few other continental zoos have adopted, and that is the fact that dogs are allowed to enter for CZK 150 (€5.94 or £5.08). At the bush dogs, a fellow visitor’s own dog clearly recognised its distant cousins as being related and, after a brief bark, took to attempting to play with them, placing its paws on the glass viewing window and desperately trying to get the inhabitant’s attention. One of the Bush Dogs delivered, and its roommates followed suit, and you ended up with both sides of the fence being equally curious and excited by the other. A delightful moment which resumed until the owner had to forcefully drag their dog away. It was also a moment that left me very much in favour of the practice of allowing dogs into zoos, as although I am in favour of zoos, the idea that captive animals almost never get to interact with animals who aren’t of the same species, barring mixed-species exhibits, of course, has always been a bit of a grey area for me, being a crucial part of nature. But here, both domestic dog and bush dog seemed to benefit. I also found throughout the day that most owners had enough common sense not to bring their dog into the zoo if they aren’t well-trained, as only once did I hear a sustained period of barking (although there were few other one-off barks such as the one here). All in all, I was hugely fond of this.

Adjacent to the indoor area for Bush Dogs is the Cuban Hutia enclosure, which struck me as an odd way to display a large rodent, with a cage-like outdoor area, but it seemed to get the job done. I spotted two outdoors, which served as a welcome lifetick, and a very pleasantly surprising one at that, as truth be told I did not know Prague so much as held this species prior to discovering them here. Next up is a typical small cat cage, well-planted and with decent climbing but hardly all that spacious or aesthetically appealing, that houses Jaguarundi, a taxa that I regrettably could not locate on both my visits to Exmoor Zoo during the brief period in which they were onshow, and sadly this extended their streak, as despite some thorough attempts to locate them, I had no luck. On the other side of the same house as the cats is a Tayra enclosure, in which, as is typical of mustelids (who seem to always be fast asleep or hyperactive with no real ‘in between’), was enthusiastically bounding around its enclosure. I was delighted to see how evidently curious it was with regards to the presence of a keeper, who was cleaning out its enclosure.The final enclosure around here is the zoo’s North American River Otter enclosure, which I was quite charmed by, due to the delightful water feature, many mature trees (something which seems to be a strength of this area of Prague Zoo in general), and a good choice of species, being among the rarer otter species in European zoos, although one that I had seen in the past at the New Forest Wildlife Park, so wasn’t all too phased by missing out on. Coupled with the Smooth-coateds in the Indonesian Jungle, it made a welcome change from the Asiatic Short-claweds.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I hope that all readers enjoyed Part 1 of this review. I aim to release one-per-day, and they will all be around the same length (this one was just under 6,000 words). In the next one, which I will start working on this afternoon if I get the time, I aim to cover Africa Up Close, the Hippo Pavilion, Elephant Valley and African Savannah, as well as potentially the Dja Reserve depending on word count and time. Hopefully, it will be released at the same time tomorrow!
 

Attachments

  • IMG20240807091439.jpg
    IMG20240807091439.jpg
    202.8 KB · Views: 314
  • IMG20240807092643.jpg
    IMG20240807092643.jpg
    174 KB · Views: 341
  • IMG20240807092152.jpg
    IMG20240807092152.jpg
    37.6 KB · Views: 329
  • IMG20240807094913.jpg
    IMG20240807094913.jpg
    166.7 KB · Views: 328
  • IMG20240807095654.jpg
    IMG20240807095654.jpg
    142.3 KB · Views: 343
  • IMG20240807101327.jpg
    IMG20240807101327.jpg
    185 KB · Views: 341
  • IMG20240807102621.jpg
    IMG20240807102621.jpg
    201.8 KB · Views: 332
  • IMG20240807192254.jpg
    IMG20240807192254.jpg
    176.2 KB · Views: 330
Last edited:
It´s always enjoyable to read an in-depth review written by a first-time visitor.

Let me add a few snippets of info to some topics you touch.

The zoo indeed faces several challenges due to its terrain. On top of instabillity of the high cliff, the low part of the zoo lies within active river floodplain. Based on 2002 flood experience, its evacuation plan enables the staff to move a larger half of the collection into bts safe locations within hours. Buildings in that zoo part are either meant to survive 10 meters underwater unscatched, get repaired within reasonable budget, or get destroyed in a manner that wouldn´t cause water/soil contamination or dangerous debree down the stream. With further adaptations like floodtower at gorilla house or many details in utilities networks etc.

The red panda enclosure is old, already at place when the zoo opened in 1931. It was built following construction plans the zoo bought from Hagenbeck architect company (when Hagenbeck first built famous panorama-exhibits at his zoo in Hamburg, it became such big hit that other zoos worldwide wanted to copy his designs, Hagenback promply reacted, opened a large architect company and took orders to produce customised blueprints for various zoo buildings or even whole new zoos, which granted him nice income for decades). The panda enclosure was originaly meant for wolves, but hosted also other species - a Kodiak bear pair during my childhood. It seems well suited for red pandas.

The north American porcupine exhibit is another relict of old times (pre-WWII). My earliest zoo map places there beavers but I´m yet to find out what it was originaly built for. Porcupines look there rather underwhelming, but the zoo seems to wrestle with this place unsuccessfully.

The Indonesian jungle house haven´t aged gracefuly indeed, with too many outdated exhibits. It was built when no Czech zoo had any experience with tropical halls. And zoo´s attendance was just over half a million, thus funds were limited. i´m sure the zoo would build it differently today. But I still loved it a lot when it first opened because it was such a leap forward compared to old derelict monkey house from 1950s that was taking this space previously.

Komodo dragons you saw is a group of parthenogenetic brothers. The exhibit kept originaly a single breeding pair. But the zoo placed there 7 brothers in 2015 - to test if they could live peacefuly together. I think 2 of them were sent away meanwhile and 5? should still be there. The zoo gets eggs from dragons kept bts annualy but the last time any hatched was 2017, since then all are thrown away because the EEP program doesnt need more babies from over-represented lines.

Pig-tailed macaques were an ad hoc acquissiton. The zoo planned to get a pair of some super rare macaques from Indonesia, but then Safaripark Gänserdorf in Austria went bancrupt. Other zoos picked up their more interesting animals while nobody wanted a large macaque group of a species that had phase-out status and they were slated for lab or euthanasia. Lack of a proper outdoor cage for them is troubling (but they have a mini outdoor walk on roof near pavilion´s entrance).

Lack of free-flying birds in the hall (with exception of bulbuls) is due to sweet tongue of the macaques. They proved to be such good bird hunters that the zoo no longer exhibits there more bird species.

Various bird voices you can hear when you walk through the hall belong to lory parrots the zoo keeps in many simple cages placed along staff walk-ways above the exhibits (technically bts). On one hand, it allows the zoo to keep several pairs of each species bts and thus increaces breeding success odds in fig parrots and other rare birds. On the other hand, these birds create a nice backround sound for the hall.

Orangutan EEP is not happy with current setup at Prague and the zoo has a list of infridgements is has to work on. Among them is lack of second outside exhibit (at least what I heard). But separation possibilities inside the house seems enough, there is also a row of "sleeping" cages bts.

I´m personally not happy with the planned polar bear complex. I think intended sizes of bear exhibits are simply too small. Published plans mention only polar bears and harbour seals. No birds or aquaria.

Regarding kulan - are you sure you saw one? You would be the first to announce arrival of this species at the zoo.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the feedback, @Jana ! Some really interesting facts about the zoo, and precisely what I intended when creating a thread like this - a place to generate discussion about Prague Zoo.

Fascinating to hear that Hagenbeck started an architecture company, as I had never heard of it. I knew of the influence he had on zoo design but had always assumed it was more indirect with other zoos taking inspiration from him, rather than from Hagenbeck himself designing the exhibits.

Shame about the birds not doing so well. I saw the lory cages from one angle, just before entering the nocturnal zone, but dismissed it as being an illusion (I thought the birds must have been perched on the outside of the mesh). However, if the other birds are gone, then having lories there to add some lively bird song is quite a smart plan indeed. I did at one point hear a bird call coming from directly above my head (near the orangutans) and saw one bravely flying over the macaques, so assume that must have been the bulbuls.

It's a shame if the new Polar Bear enclosure disappoints - I would assume from your comments that the 8,000 sqm statistic provided is in reference to the entire complex and not just the bear enclosure, then? Shame about the lack of any aviaries - based on their other aviaries and the manner in which they have been integrated, I feel as though an Arctic aviary with wave machines and gulls, akin to what I saw at Dessau earlier in the same trip, could be pulled off magnificently.

Certain I saw the Kulan (or at least an equid within their enclosure, unless it was one of the Kiangs being used as a placeholder, although it didn't look like one). Below is the only picture that I have of it, showing the overall enclosure with a Kulan just visible in the centre, underneath a tree. Not a great image, apologies.

IMG20240807101921.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG20240807101921.jpg
    IMG20240807101921.jpg
    178.6 KB · Views: 329
Certain I saw the Kulan (or at least an equid within their enclosure, unless it was one of the Kiangs being used as a placeholder, although it didn't look like one). Below is the only picture that I have of it, showing the overall enclosure with a Kulan just visible in the centre, underneath a tree. Not a great image, apologies.

View attachment 722011

It really looks like a kulan! And the person just behind the fence looks like a keeper observing it closely (khaki shorts plus pinkish-red t-shirt zoo uniform).
 
Part 2 - Africa, Elephant Valley and Dja Reserve

Opposite the otters, an inviting stairway, enclosed by bushes and marked with images of fennecs, porcupines and badgers, leads into a series of outdoor enclosures, all walled by yellowish mock rock. This, I came to realise, was the outdoor portion of ‘Africa Up Close,’ which conceptually may well be one of my favourite enclosures at Prague Zoo. At the commencement of the Africa zone, not long before you see hippos, giraffes, zebras and gorillas, this exhibit serves as a reminder that ecosystems in Africa consist of far more than these big animals, by introducing you to the smaller delights of the continent. I will admit that I wasn’t all that impressed by the outdoor portion, which houses a fairly standard selection of species (two exceptions), and design-wise is indistinguishable from what most zoos have in this regard, reminding me quite a bit of the average mongoose and porcupine area at a British zoo. However, the indoor area is where this exhibit developed into something truly special.

Outdoors, it holds:

Cape Ground Squirrel
Cape Porcupine
Fennec Fox
Leopard Tortoise
Honey Badger
Bat-eared Fox
White-fronted Lemur
Ring-tailed Lemur
Yellow Mongoose


With the two lemur species sharing an exhibit, and the rest all being individual. The badger and the ground squirrel were the two aforementioned rarities, and while I had no luck with the former, or at least not outdoors, several of the latter were very visible curiously exploring their enclosure. Personally, this is a species that I often find myself wishing for more zoos to adopt as an alternative to meerkats or other mongooses when it comes to filling the small mammal spaces in African exhibits, being more lively than their carnivorous counterparts and, in my opinion, much cuter, so I suspect there would certainly be a positive reception amongst the general public if they were to become a more regular sight. Enclosure-wise, all the habitats here were acceptable, but the Bat-eared Fox one was particularly pleasant, with many bushes, dens and secretive areas, although even still, a pair of foxes made themselves very visible at the front of the enclosure.

IMG20240807103639.jpg

I then made my way indoors with fairly high expectations, having heard a lot of praise for this exhibit among other zoo enthusiasts, but I truly had no clue what I was getting myself in for, quite. This house is huge, and packed with rarities, going on for far longer than one would have anticipated after every turn. That said, it didn’t exactly get itself off to a great start with a series of enclosures for small rodents and terrestrial invertebrates, with one reptile and two amphibians, namely:

Golden Spiny Mouse
Wagner’s Gerbil
Southern African Spiny Mouse
African Pygmy Mouse
Iredale’s Giant African Land Snail
White-spotted Reed Frog
African Bullfrog
Egyptian Cockroach
African Bell Cricket
Kenya Sand Boa


Of the four rodents, I sadly missed out on the gerbil and pygmy mouse, but saw both species of spiny mice. The former were the highlight, with how commonplace Turkish Spiny Mice are in British zoos these days, as it was great to be able to see new species of this very unusual subfamily (their name comes from stiff ‘guard hairs’ that, reportedly, are comparable in texture to the spines of a hedgehog). The issue here is not the very nice species selection, but the enclosures, which are frankly ridiculous. With how much space there is within the walls of the house, the zoo has deemed it appropriate to carve out enclosures about half a cubic metre, if I were to guess, for the animals. It would be bad if they were equivalent in size to the average enclosure at home for a domestic mouse, as zoos should be role models for captive animals and have standards higher than what is seen in the pet trade, but they are probably even smaller (yes, spiny mice are smaller than domestic mice, but the difference is marginal and for either species this size is not acceptable. And these minute enclosures somehow manage to offend visitors as well as animals, by reducing viewing to nothing more than a crack in the wall, which within what may have been the most crowded house in the entire zoo, meant you often had to wait in a queue of sorts to see the mice.

IMG20240807104008.jpg

Thankfully, what came next would certainly cure the distaste for the house which I had until that point. Past a fairly standard Gundi enclosure, you come to the zoo’s Mechow’s Mole-rat habitat. The Mechow’s are a close relative of the more commonly seen Naked Mole-rats, and I am always rather fond of when zoos use a rarely seen relative of a more commonly seen species in an enclosure that could have quite easily suited either. It is entirely needless, and is a great example of zoos choosing not to take the easy path for the benefit of visitors. However, that isn’t the only common criticism of mine that was addressed here. I mentioned in my reviews of Zurich and Dresden, and quite possibly many other instances of mine in the past, that the standard for a mole-rat enclosure in a zoo is very poor. It almost always consists of glass tunnels, which seem interesting at first, until one realises that mole-rats naturally want to dig themselves, and you often see them attempting to make a burrow out of the glass, only for their efforts to be futile. I find it a little disturbing, and as someone who firmly supports zoos, I fear that such a restriction of natural behaviours is doing a very good job at proving animal rights activists’ arguments against zoos. Then there is Prague’s enclosure, which gives them deep soil, straw, and other forms of natural substrate in which they can make their own burrows. It's a simple enclosure, and one that can easily be replicated, but I absolutely loved it, and hope that more zoos can learn from this stroke of excellence.

Next is an enclosure that was signed as ‘Hissing Africa,’ and was a very large, glass-topped Ball Python enclosure that I was pleased by, with many different viewing angles on offer and plenty of space, as well as privacy, for the animal. Opposite this is the second nocturnal area at Prague Zoo, labelled as ‘Night in the Bush,’ quite fittingly home to bushbabies. The first enclosure here held Moholi Bushbaby with Lesser Hedgehog Tenrec, while the second held Senegal Bushbaby with Malagasy Giant Jumping Rat. With all four species being held at my home zoo, I didn’t expect to be bothered by this (these weren’t the bushbaby species that I was most looking forward to at Prague), but I truly was. I counted eight Senegals in one bustling and exciting enclosure, compared to two Senegals and three Moholis in London - proof, if any was needed, that the excitement factor of any enclosure can be improved upon tremendously simply by increasing the number of animals on display. Although I will say that eight is about the upper limit of how many you can fit in that space (assuming that the eight I saw is all of them, which it may not be) without it feeling overstocked, so in the event of future breeding success I think Prague should be looking for other holders. I would like to add that, although these enclosures are average for bushbabies and perhaps a little small for the giant rats, for the tenrecs it is outstanding; a huge space with branches, hollow trees and leaf litter.

Upon leaving this room and returning to the main corridor, I was saddened to see an extension of the previous wall of enclosures, featuring yet more small mammals, invertebrates and herptiles which although consisting of a nice species selection at times, was subpar in terms of exhibitry. That said, the mammal enclosures here were at least a little larger and, while still not great, I thought they were at least acceptable this time around. The species signed were:

Barbary Striped Grass Mouse
Ghost Mantis
Helmethead Gecko
African Banded Velvet Gecko
Cryptic Mantis
Turkish Spiny Mouse
Fire Skink
Round-eared Sengi
Madagascar Giant Cockroach
Pink-winged Stick Insect
Tropical Girdled Lizard
Percivall’s Lance Skink
Vaillant’s Mabuya
East African Cave Cricket
South African Rock Scorpion
Two-spotted Assassin Bug
Featherleg Baboon Spider
Giant Land Snail
Socotra Island Blue Baboon Spider
Sun Beetle
Somali Fruit Beetle


With the unfortunate passing of the sengi at London Zoo, and with my failure to spot the species at Dresden earlier that week, I was delighted to have better luck with locating the species at Prague. The other notable species in this row of exhibits was the Vaillant’s Mabuya, who proved to be very showy and is quite the rarity in Europe, with only one other public holder on the continent. Opposite these enclosures were the indoors for the Honey Badgers and Bat-eared Foxes, with the former, a species that I have always been fond of but only seen once before, at Exmoor, being very visible, at first sleeping inside a hollow log but later bounding about energetically, exploring both the outdoor and indoor area with a great degree of excitement.

Compared to the rodents, the Black-and-rufous Sengi can be very grateful for the amount of space it has at Prague. A huge and beautifully designed terrarium, with leaf litter, hanging branches and raised mounds almost seeming overkill for such a small mammal. With many zoos having abrupt breeding success with this species, it has seen itself go from an almost unheard-of rarity in Europe, to a well-established staple of small mammal houses on the continent, although sadly, they remain entirely absent from the UK, and I have only had the pleasure of seeing the species once, at Antwerp. I hoped to double that tally at Prague, but had no luck. You now turn a corner and enter the final stretch of Africa Up Close, which begins with one of the lifeticks I looked forward to the most, the Garnett’s Greater Bushbaby, in a mix with Dwarf Mongoose, but sadly I made it two missed target species in a row by not seeing the bushbabies. This is my first time ever seeing a bushbaby not displayed within a nocturnal setup, and the inactive animals here did well to demonstrate why such an enclosure isn’t exactly the most appropriate. That said, the mongooses were very active, and there was another appealing feature of this exhibit for me - the fact that it can be viewed from two angles, with one of them being the outdoor cafe adjacent to Africa Up Close. After leaving the house, I took a brief break from zoo visiting to enjoy a coffee here while watching the enclosure, desperately awaiting some bushbaby activity, but seeing nothing.

Opposite the bushbabies, however, was a delightful species that made up for the inactivity of their neighbours - the Bush Hyrax, who share their enclosure with yet more Belanger’s Treeshrew, who are geographically out of place here, but according to signage, are very effective at controlling native insect populations in this enclosure. Belonging to the heterohyrax genus, they are, despite what their misleading alternative name of ‘Yellow-spotted Rock Hyrax’ may lead one to believe, a separate group of hyraxes, just as distinct as tree hyraxes are. Prague had loads, perhaps more within a single space than I have ever observed with any hyrax species, and they were all extremely active and visible amongst the trees. Although I knew Prague kept tree hyraxes, as they are labelled on the map, I didn’t expect these, and it was a pleasant surprise when I turned the corner to see what I first thought was an off-colour rock hyrax until it took to running throughout the branches!

IMG20240807105023.jpg
(apologies for reflection in the photo)

At this point, the only enclosures left in Africa Up Close were three habitats for a solid selection of reptiles, with the first being a large, desert-themed enclosure housing:

Tunisian Spur-thighed Tortoise
Pancake Tortoise
Five-lined Skink
Fischer’s Two-toed Gecko
Peter’s Rock Agama


And the second being home to yet more of the agamas in the previous enclosure, this time co-existing with Red-banded Spiny-tailed Lizard. The final enclosure in the house was a much smaller vivarium for Standing’s Day Gecko.

Much like with the Indonesian Jungle, I left Africa Up Close with mixed feelings. On one hand, for any zoo enthusiast who loves small mammals, which I suspect is the bulk of us, then this is heaven on Earth. So many mammalian rarities. On the other hand, while the bushbaby, hyrax, sengi, Honey Badger, fox and lizard enclosures are great, the rodent enclosures really are rather poor. My enjoyment of the house as a whole was also certainly hindered by crowds. I never seem to have too much of an issue with crowded zoo exhibits, but this exhibit was an entirely different level of crowded, and off the top of my head, the only time I ever remember being so frustrated by crowds at a zoo before was at Chester’s ‘Realm of the Red Ape.’ That said, it was great to see the hyraxes and mole-rats, and as mentioned I think that conceptually this exhibit is great, with its placement in the zoo, shortly before the major African species, definitely helping with that.

After a coffee, I made my way into the Hippo Pavilion, one of the very few buildings at Prague Zoo to feature one large mammal, with no other smaller species surrounding it. It houses Common Hippopotamus, who, both indoors and outdoors, have access to a massive, deep pool, with underwater viewing in both instances. This is only the second time, after Beauval, that I had personally encountered underwater viewing for the species, although it was nowhere near as impressive as the French zoo’s attempt at it, and while the indoor pool looked very clean, the outdoors, where both hippos were, was a little too murky for good views of them swimming, sadly. My main criticism of this hippo enclosure, however, was the lack of grass, but my concerns there were quickly resolved upon the realisation that the Eastern Bongo enclosure behind them, which was very pleasant and grassy, could be connected with the hippo enclosure through the simple opening of a gate. Prague Zoo regulars may be able to correct me if I am wrong here, but I am fairly certain that this means a mixed-species hippo and antelope enclosure, with ample grass for them both to graze on, during certain days?

The pathway then leads past Nile Lechwe (decent but average hoofstock enclosure, but this species is always nice to see) and back to Across the Continents, this time with an alternative viewing area for the Kulans and, an unexpected highlight of this corner of the zoo, White-nosed Coati. I had only seen this species once before, that being at Hagenbeck when it was nothing more than the namesake snout and part of its tail emerging from a nesting box, whereas here, I saw two fully active coatis, climbing, sniffing and foraging around their outstanding enclosure. Prague’s carnivore enclosures are often criticised and while I can agree with some of them, I simply cannot here, as it is outstanding. Mature trees, a seemingly endless expanse of bushes, with further climbing apparatus hidden among it as it fades into the surrounding forest, sloping, varying ground and what appears to be a very large house. From all but one angle, the enclosure’s rear fencing was invisible, adding an excellent visitor perspective for what is the second best coati enclosure that I have seen after the one at Burgers’. Beyond the coatis is a very spacious Guanaco enclosure, which I thought was excellent, and quite nice on a personal note, given that this species has been held continually since 1944 when two guanacos were evacuated from Dresden during bombings (according to ZTL), and having visited Dresden and seen their guanacos earlier in the trip, it was a nice thought. I was also pleasantly surprised to see this species out of nowhere, given that the map has them labelled as ‘llamas.’

IMG20240807112111.jpg
(only showing a small portion of the enormous coati enclosure)

The pathway then leads to Elephant Valley, which houses Asian Elephants (somewhat out-of-place with the Africa zone on all sides). If I were to rank all the elephant enclosures that I have personally seen, I strongly suspect it would end up right in the middle, or at least not far off, because by every metric (size, structural complexity, quality of indoor area, viewing options) it is almost perfectly average, and while that may sound like a criticism, it really isn’t, as there are just as many elephant enclosures worse than it than there are better. There was one feature of this enclosure that stood out to me, however, and that is the bull yard. It’s huge; in fact, a map of Elephant Valley that I found later in the day indicated that the bull has more space than the cows, and with the cow enclosure being by no means small, that is certainly a good thing. So often at zoos, even at my beloved Whipsnade, a great cow yard is let down by a small, sandy, and ugly bull yard, but that could not be further from the case at Prague. Their mightily impressive bull has a huge, grassy field with a pool, and very attractive rockwork and surrounding foliage to appeal to visitors. It's quite incredible. I will say, however, that I find it odd that Prague, a zoo that excels in filling the gaps between exhibits for large mammals with charming vivariums, aquariums or aviaries, makes visitors walk five minutes to and from the elephant house with nothing but some statues on the way. An aviary for Indian birds would hugely enhance this area, but as it stands, it feels like a lot of space is being wasted, which isn’t a criticism one can normally direct at Prague. As a whole, Elephant Valley hugely impressed me, but when I look back on it, it isn’t the enclosure quality that springs to mind, nor the animals themselves, but rather a very interesting feature of the house - a display panel educating visitors on the use of ankuses, or elephant hooks, and why Prague Zoo defends the use of them. I was initially shocked by this - I had never taken the time to read up on hooks or how moral they were, and always assumed that they were wrong, however this display made a very convincing argument and made me feel a little ignorant, to be honest. It explains how elephants have pressure points which can be triggered to train them to do certain things, but because of their size, the simple use of hands as a stimulus here do nothing, so the sharp edges of the hook (which the zoo claims do not hurt the elephants) must be used instead. Although I still haven’t decided my opinion on the use of the hook (and ultimately my opinion on it is meaningless anyways), Prague has made me, to some extent, reconsider, achieving this through some thought-provoking education, which they must be very brave to use, given how much it must disgust animal rights activists who plucked up the courage to give zoos another try (unless the culture around that sort of thing is different in Czechia, of course). Agree with it or not, this is good education.

IMG20240807112313.jpg
IMG20240807113321.jpg

Nearby, Mhorr Gazelles can be found in a basic grassy enclosure beside a cafe. A nice enough enclosure for a delightful species that, although technically not a lifetick, as I had seen them at Paris before, very much felt like one, as I was somewhat ignorant with regards to their rarity at the French zoo. Like all gazelles, they are absent from the UK, and this encounter had me longing to change that. Nearby was the first of many delightful examples of artistic pieces at the zoo, a statue of Krishna. After this, I crossed the bridge over the Pod Hrachovkou (Prague is, as all the best zoos are, divided in two by a road, although here the two sides are much less equally proportioned than usual). After crossing over, you pass another enclosure for bongo, which upon an initial glance, appeared to be mixed with more Cape Ground Squirrels - or at least that is what I thought until realising that they lacked the African species’ signature stripes on the back, and the fencing that surrounded the bongo enclosure wouldn’t do anything to prevent escapees. After a brief moment of fearing that it was an escaped ground squirrel, I suddenly remembered that ground squirrels are actually native to Eastern Europe and, since entering Czechia and perhaps in the final days of my time in Germany, I had, for the first time in my life, been in their native range. The name ‘European Souslik’ occurred to me, and after a quick google search, I had all but confirmed that they were what I was looking at. During my time in and around the African Savannah, I saw four or five of them and was very excited by their presence, but a glance at ZTL had me come to the unfortunate realisation that the sousliks at Prague are actually captive. However, as disappointing as this was, I still struggled to see how this works, as they were quite comfortably running through the fences, and surely could easily escape into the surroundings. I am still not quite sure what keeps them in the savannah, and would appreciate any further information that can be provided in this regard.

IMG20240807112837.jpg

Speaking of the African Savannah, it is, after the bongos, the next enclosure that one passes. The Savannah at Prague is an enclosure that I had heard a lot of praised about, with many enthusiasts claiming that it is comparable to Zurich and Burgers’ as one of Europe’s best savannah exhibits, but I was slightly underwhelmed. While Zurich brings something interesting to the table with the myriad of labyrinthine pathways and watering holes, the aim of which being to force greater animal activity, and Burgers’ adds an element of awe with the genuine crash of rhinos and an element of natural beauty with the surrounding trees, Prague does none of that. It is just a scaled up version of the classic grassy field, which while very spacious and impressive, is actually smaller than both the other exhibits I mentioned - according to google maps, it is just a little over 1.5 hectares (3.7 acres), which is massive, but dwarfed by Zurich’s 2 hectares (5 acres) or the absurd 3.7 hectares (9.1 acres) of Burgers’, with all the above measurements coming from an area calculator. I am not sure quite what I expected, given that there is only so creative you can get with a savannah (essentially a big field with big mammals), but I just felt a little underwhelmed, with the huge amount of praise it often receives from enthusiasts no doubt being a factor in said disappointment. I feel as though it could quite easily be improved with the addition of White or Black Rhinoceros, with rhinos in general being a strange absence at Prague (one of the most complete zoological collections in the world, and yet it doesn’t have any), and for me, they are always the highlights of savannahs. Without the majesty and might of the Burgers’ crash, or the liveliness of the young rhinos at Zurich, both those savannahs would lose a bit of their character, and Prague’s is certainly big enough for the species. Once the Polar Bear renovations are done, the introduction of rhinos to this savannah is the single change that I would most like to see at Prague.

All that aside, the other species in this exhibit are:

Black Sable
Blesbok
Kafue Lechwe
Rothschild’s Giraffe
Scimitar-horned Oryx
Grevy’s Zebra
Ostrich

IMG20240807113730.jpg


Spiralling down a slope towards the entrance for the indoor portion of this exhibit, the African Pavilion, takes you past some very standard exhibits for Aardvark, Kirk’s Dik-dik and Meerkat. Little to say about these outdoor areas, which are almost identical to each other, the standard enclosure for these species in Europe, and what had been seen earlier in the day for similar species in ‘Africa Up Close.’ The indoors, however, were much more impressive, perhaps the biggest I had seen for both aardvarks and dik-diks. The former is a species I appreciate much more in zoos since the London animals were tragically killed in a fire a few years ago, and are now one of my favourites - however, I was especially curious to see the Prague animals, as one of them, a female named Pieta, is the oldest aardvark ever recorded, at 32 years and 325 days at the time that I saw her. Sadly, in an adorable pile of three aardvarks, lying upsidedown under a heat lamp (how any animal could be actively seeking more heat on the day of my visit is beyond me, as it was scorching), I couldn’t tell which was her, but I still enjoyed admiring the Prague animals. I was also delighted to see Migratory Locusts in a nearby vivarium, an infamous species that, at least so far as I can recall, I have never personally seen before.

Climbing back up the boardwalk which leads along the edge of the Savannah, I was delighted to see a zebra rolling in sand, creating vast clouds of dust, a giraffe attempting, but ultimately failing, to eat an ostrich feather, and a sable chasing off some of the sousliks, before arriving at one of Prague’s newest exhibits, having opened in September 2022, the Dja Reserve.

The Dja Reserve was intended to allow Prague to house a family group of gorillas, with the former Gorilla Pavilion, which has now been renamed to ‘Mefou Centre’ so as to help differentiate the two, remains as a gorilla enclosure, featuring a bachelor group of two young males, both born at Prague, and the zoo’s former silverback. I am not sure what the long-term plan is, as I have heard suggestions that it will remain as a bachelor group for gorillas, but also that the two males will be leaving the zoo so that it can be turned into a space for South American species. However, regardless of what happens with Mefou, Dja is now the main gorilla exhibit at Prague Zoo.

At the end of the path along the lower end of the African Savannah, you enter Dja and are greeted by a viewing of the outdoors for Western Lowland Gorilla and Mantled Colobus. Although it is a very large exhibit, perhaps one of the largest outdoor gorilla enclosures that I have seen, in fact, it looked very bare, with little to no vegetation, and gave visitors the misleading impression, as so many gorilla exhibits do, that these apes are savannah, not rainforest species. That said, there was a very impressive amount of climbing, so even though the open grassy portion is irritating, the gorillas in theory have no reason to ever touch it. Even still, I was left a touch dissatisfied by this outdoor enclosure, especially seeing as it is one of the zoo’s newest exhibits.

You then enter the indoor portion of the Dja Reserve, which feels very out-of-character in Prague Zoo, but in a way that appealed to me quite a bit. Decorated with plants, with subtle thematic elephants and indoor rooms playing documentaries that linked somewhat to in situ conservation, not to mention the use of mock rock and the overall modern feel of the place, with its skylights - I was reminded here heavily of Zurich, and in fact, in my mind, I couldn’t help but wonder if it was a preview of sorts into what ‘Kongo,’ Zurich’s new gorilla exhibit due to open in five years, may be like (although I would of course like to see the Swiss zoo demonstrate just a little more ambition when it comes to naturalism outdoors). In a fashion that reminded me somewhat of Africa Up Close, a small corner of this hall is walled off by a wooden shelter to reduce light, so that a small nocturnal exhibit can feature. This one also had a delightful species selection, with Straw-coloured Fruit Bat and Gambian Pouched Rat, with the latter being a lifetick, and a long-overdue one of sorts, considering that, although they are tremendously rare on the continent, they are common in the UK, being held at nine collections of which I have visited two (Longleat and Exmoor, as well as Hertfordshire although they arrived after my visit). In another room adjacent to the main hall, I found the indoor room for gorillas and colobus, and I found myself in awe. It is huge, easily the biggest indoor area for gorillas that I have seen, and quite possibly the biggest individual room that I have seen for any great ape, as well as one of the best overall indoor complex for a great ape that I have seen, with only the orangutan enclosures of Chester and Dresden and the chimpanzee enclosure at Edinburgh really rivalling it. It offers good climbing and plenty of straw for foraging as well. Simply outstanding, and it put any doubts that I had about the exhibit from the bareness of the outdoor area at once to rest.

There are two further enclosures in another room on the other side of the main hall, one of which being a mix of Gabon Talapoin and African Brush-tailed Porcupine, which brought the total number of porcupines seen thus far at Prague up to four - and to think that I thought three at Magdeburg last year was too many! Speaking of which, for both the talapoin and the porcupine, this was only my second encounter with the species in question after Magdeburg, in which they were also sharing an exhibit. Opposite them, De Brazza’s Monkeys share with Red River Hogs, this time with both an indoor and outdoor enclosure. In some ways, this feels like a scaled down version of the gorilla and colobus enclosure, with the same issue of an overly barren outdoor portion for two rainforest species, but I appreciated the size and foraging opportunities indoors.

IMG20240807120906.jpg

Coming to the realisation that I toured the house in the wrong order, I had to backtrack to the gorillas hall, in the middle of a talk that did well to concentrate the large crowds in this house to the amphitheatre-like seating area, making passage through the rest of it a much easier ordeal, to get to the exit. Interestingly (and presumably due to the fact that the Dja Reserve is located right besides the Sklenarka Entrance, one of three different entrances / exits to the zoo), a gift shop can also be found here, and although I didn’t purchase anything here, I did look around at the zoo’s merchandise, considering buying gifts for family members, but also curious, after how cheap the admission fee was, what prices elsewhere in the zoo would be like, and as expected they were all very good prices for what is being sold. Due to the heat, a pile of ice cubes was present, both for children to play in and for visitors to pick up so as to cool down, something interesting that I had never observed before (it could also be seen in a few animal enclosures). Here was also one of only two water refill stations I could find at the zoo, sadly (the other one being near the Rakos’ Pavilion), although given how hot it was, I at some point found myself having to use the taps intended for refilling dog bowls to refill my own drink (and throughout the day many other visitors seemed to have to make the same choice). Grateful to have replenished my water bottle, I crossed back over the Pod Hrakovkou and returned to the main portion of the zoo, having seen the entire Africa zone.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Finished this earlier than intended, and decided to release it tonight to get it out the way, as will not be getting as much time tomorrow. Apologies in advance for any typos in this segment - I am too tired to proofread it!

Tomorrow's segment will be shorter than the previous two, partly due to the time constraints mentioned above, and partly as I think it makes sense structurally. If I cover Northern Forest, Plains, Gobi and the remainder of Across the Continents, then I would have completed the entire 'upper' portion of the zoo (as in, on top of the cliff).
 

Attachments

  • IMG20240807103639.jpg
    IMG20240807103639.jpg
    153.8 KB · Views: 325
  • IMG20240807104008.jpg
    IMG20240807104008.jpg
    89.6 KB · Views: 325
  • IMG20240807105023.jpg
    IMG20240807105023.jpg
    109.4 KB · Views: 320
  • IMG20240807112111.jpg
    IMG20240807112111.jpg
    153 KB · Views: 316
  • IMG20240807112313.jpg
    IMG20240807112313.jpg
    284 KB · Views: 314
  • IMG20240807113321.jpg
    IMG20240807113321.jpg
    87 KB · Views: 325
  • IMG20240807112837.jpg
    IMG20240807112837.jpg
    169.9 KB · Views: 321
  • IMG20240807113730.jpg
    IMG20240807113730.jpg
    92.9 KB · Views: 321
  • IMG20240807120906.jpg
    IMG20240807120906.jpg
    153.8 KB · Views: 325
Prague Zoo regulars may be able to correct me if I am wrong here, but I am fairly certain that this means a mixed-species hippo and antelope enclosure, with ample grass for them both to graze on, during certain days?
No, the enclosures were never connected. If I remember, there were plans like that in the beginning, but it never happened. Hippos only have the small concrete enclosure.
 
About the elephants, the bull only can use the big grassy yard in summer and only for half a day. In winter, they never let any elephants in the biggest paddock on the right, so the bull has to use the smallest (rather ugly) paddock on the far left and the females are in the middle paddock. In summer season, the female herd spends the morning/midday in the grass yard on the right and the bull in the middle paddock, and in the afternoon, the bull is moved in the small paddock and the females into the middle paddock.

Regarding free contact, the keepers only use it for the 2 old females. The 3 young females are already in protected contact after one of them attacked a keeper a few years ago. Once the old females die (one is over 60, the other in her 50th), it will be protected contact only. Which I do consider a great thing because I have seen a lot of ‚rough‘ use of bullhooks in a lot of zoos in the past, with keepers prodding elephants in very sensitive areas (mouth, near the eyes, belly) in a way that absolutely must have hurt the elephant.
 
No, the enclosures were never connected. If I remember, there were plans like that in the beginning, but it never happened. Hippos only have the small concrete enclosure.
Quite a missed opportunity, if you ask me, as hippos are grazers and benefit massively from grass. If a mix doesn't work, then would moving these bongos to the second enclosure by the giraffes and then giving both paddocks exclusively to the hippos work? Is there any reason as to why they are separated?
 
Small size of some rodent tanks in the small mammal house has been critized ever since the house re-opened after remodeling in 2004. Nothing has changed.

You coudn´t see aardvark Pieta during your visit - she is kept off-show permanently due to her age.

Souslik use to be a common pest species living in hundreds millions. But an inventory done in 2007 found just last 2500 individuals scattered in few isolated colonies in whole Czechia. Prague City had the last colony inhabiting general aviation airport in Letnany, with 600 heads, the largest surviving one in the country. Our Ministry together with zoos started a rescue program for the species - taking care of remaining colonies but also starting captive breeding program for reintroductions. Prague zoo got permit to catch few souslik from Letnany and start its own reassurance captive colony. Sousliks were kept in a large cage behind giraffe paddok for a few years before they were released to live free within zoo grounds. Their source colony in Letnany died out in 2018, unfortunately. Nowadays, the zoo colony thrives and sometimes goes beyond zoo grounds - you can find bold rodents scouring giraffe feeding platform for food rests, others playing catch-me-if-you-can with young gorillas inside their house. The zoo catches young animals from this colony and they get released elsewhere in the country to start new colonies.

To experience magic of the giraffe savana - you are at least 10 years too late. Once it was new, it indeed was pretty captivating sight. But it deteriorated - construction of the gorilla exhibit being the last nail in the coffin.

You dont mention two small exhibit tanks on top of the seating portion inside Dja house. One contains forest hingeback tortoise and the second one a mix of beetles. And I wont comment more on the new gorilla house, lets say I´m not a fan.

The bland visitors area inside the new elephant house is because it was added very late in the project planning process. The whole house was projected to be solely off-show but public pressure made the zoo to reconsider after construction already started. Thus it feels inconsistent and barebones.

The zoo has a few more fontanes with drinking water but they are not signed on the map and most visitors seem oblivious about them.
 
Thank you @Kalaw for your report!
I always enjoy someone else´s view on zoo I know.
That said, moving the bears to a better enclosure is still, indisputably, the right choice, and I have to wonder what the plans are for this space once they move out (presumably demolition).

One thing that I am fairly curious about is what else will be integrated, asides from the bears and pinnipeds, as Prague has a good habit of including such extras in their exhibits. A seabird aviary, or even a cold-climate aquarium?
Originally, there were plans for great pandas (or a"another asiatic bear species", likely sloth?, as back up option), now, I think, some sort of enlargement of space for orangutans should be there.
While I would really like to see even more species in Prague, to improve conditions for already kept ones, seems to me right (and maybe necessary)

One thing that I am fairly curious about is what else will be integrated, asides from the bears and pinnipeds, as Prague has a good habit of including such extras in their exhibits. A seabird aviary, or even a cold-climate aquarium?
As Jana mentioned, current plans involve only bears and seals, while original included also sea bird aviary, it was changed later (because of space or money, probably? planned exhibit is controversial, some criticize its price, even czech mainstream media attend to this topic a little bit, few months back)
While I, being more mammal-oriented person, prefer seals over birds, I kind of hope, some smaller, additional exposition may be added later (even if I don´t think thats likely)

The north American porcupine exhibit is another relict of old times (pre-WWII). My earliest zoo map places there beavers but I´m yet to find out what it was originaly built for. Porcupines look there rather underwhelming, but the zoo seems to wrestle with this place unsuccessfully.
I believed there were originally sealions, but now, looking on one of oldest maps, there were already beavers - Map of Zoo Praha - 1933
But some newer maps depicts indeed sea-lions there, though it may not be exactly same spot
(Map of Zoo Praha - 1971)
 
I believed there were originally sealions, but now, looking on one of oldest maps, there were already beavers - Map of Zoo Praha - 1933
But some newer maps depicts indeed sea-lions there, though it may not be exactly same spot
(Map of Zoo Praha - 1971)

My theory so far is that the enclosure was planned/built probably for pinnipeds but the zoo couldnt source any thus it decided to place beavers there as a stop-gap. It was only in 1934 when movie star Vlasta Burian bought the first two Californian sea lions called Batul and Hýta and donated them to the zoo. They were placed in this exhibit still labeled "12" beavers in 1933.

It´s impossible the exhibit was originaly intended for beavers - it´s too large for them (just compare it to the tiny cage labeled "10" sloth+Himalaya bears the same year). And most importantly it gave its animals access to a house. Beavers woudnt need a house for either heated space in winter or secure separation room during pen cleaning.

The map of 1971 depicts sea lions at the same spot. I remmember the place from 1980s - the profil was still the same - a rounded pool that took almost the whole exhibit area with 2-3 huge boulders in the middle for the animals to climb on and bask. Funilly, for many years I believed I saw a Baikal seal there once (middle or late 1980s), but search in old literature found zero evidence for this childhood memory.
 
Small size of some rodent tanks in the small mammal house has been critized ever since the house re-opened after remodeling in 2004. Nothing has changed.

You coudn´t see aardvark Pieta during your visit - she is kept off-show permanently due to her age.

Souslik use to be a common pest species living in hundreds millions. But an inventory done in 2007 found just last 2500 individuals scattered in few isolated colonies in whole Czechia. Prague City had the last colony inhabiting general aviation airport in Letnany, with 600 heads, the largest surviving one in the country. Our Ministry together with zoos started a rescue program for the species - taking care of remaining colonies but also starting captive breeding program for reintroductions. Prague zoo got permit to catch few souslik from Letnany and start its own reassurance captive colony. Sousliks were kept in a large cage behind giraffe paddok for a few years before they were released to live free within zoo grounds. Their source colony in Letnany died out in 2018, unfortunately. Nowadays, the zoo colony thrives and sometimes goes beyond zoo grounds - you can find bold rodents scouring giraffe feeding platform for food rests, others playing catch-me-if-you-can with young gorillas inside their house. The zoo catches young animals from this colony and they get released elsewhere in the country to start new colonies.

To experience magic of the giraffe savana - you are at least 10 years too late. Once it was new, it indeed was pretty captivating sight. But it deteriorated - construction of the gorilla exhibit being the last nail in the coffin.

You dont mention two small exhibit tanks on top of the seating portion inside Dja house. One contains forest hingeback tortoise and the second one a mix of beetles. And I wont comment more on the new gorilla house, lets say I´m not a fan.

The bland visitors area inside the new elephant house is because it was added very late in the project planning process. The whole house was projected to be solely off-show but public pressure made the zoo to reconsider after construction already started. Thus it feels inconsistent and barebones.

The zoo has a few more fontanes with drinking water but they are not signed on the map and most visitors seem oblivious about them.
Interesting, I didn't see the tortoise or beetle vivariums in Dja Reserve, presumably as the crowds in the amphitheatre were blocking them (a talk was occurring while I was in the house). I quite liked Dja, but don't think it fits Prague's character well. It would be perfect if attached to Lewa Savanne at Zurich, but right now something is just off. Thanks for providing the information about the sousliks, as I was quite confused about what was going on there...
Thank you @Kalaw for your report!
I always enjoy someone else´s view on zoo I know.

Originally, there were plans for great pandas (or a"another asiatic bear species", likely sloth?, as back up option), now, I think, some sort of enlargement of space for orangutans should be there.
While I would really like to see even more species in Prague, to improve conditions for already kept ones, seems to me right (and maybe necessary)


As Jana mentioned, current plans involve only bears and seals, while original included also sea bird aviary, it was changed later (because of space or money, probably? planned exhibit is controversial, some criticize its price, even czech mainstream media attend to this topic a little bit, few months back)
While I, being more mammal-oriented person, prefer seals over birds, I kind of hope, some smaller, additional exposition may be added later (even if I don´t think thats likely)


I believed there were originally sealions, but now, looking on one of oldest maps, there were already beavers - Map of Zoo Praha - 1933
But some newer maps depicts indeed sea-lions there, though it may not be exactly same spot
(Map of Zoo Praha - 1971)
Am I right in thinking that the panda plans disintegrated for political reasons (the arrival of the pangolins from Taipei marked the zoo supporting Taiwan)? I definitely agree that improving current living conditions should be a priority, and using it for orangutan expansion, perhaps connected to the current space via overhead tunnels, would be excellent, although it would require some extensive renovations.

Shame that the seabird aviary was scrapped, I think Prague could have done a magnificent job there, but you never know what the future may hold. The recent outdoor aviary attached to Sichuan shows that Prague are not opposed to making subtle additions to existing exhibits, so maybe seabirds will arrive later down the line.
 
Am I right in thinking that the panda plans disintegrated for political reasons (the arrival of the pangolins from Taipei marked the zoo supporting Taiwan)?
If I remember correctly, panda plans were scrapped BEFORE arrival of pangolins was announced (but it was connected with Prague municipality policy toward Peking/China and Taiwan/Taipei.
I think, that economical factors may also played some role, even if not that big
 
one of the very few buildings at Prague Zoo to feature one large mammal, with no other smaller species surrounding it.
One thing I don´t like that much about both "pachyderm" exhibit is this lacking of another species... I believe there could be crammed some aquarium or terrarium with some smaller species in hippo house... and as you said, some small aviary in elephant valley (but yeah, fact that hippos don´t have an acces to grass is greater shame)

I feel as though it could quite easily be improved with the addition of White or Black Rhinoceros, with rhinos in general being a strange absence at Prague (one of the most complete zoological collections in the world, and yet it doesn’t have any
I think rhinos (not sure if white or black) may be originally also part of plans for African house, but i don´t know much on this topic (aside of murky memory of model of house, before it was finished, containing also rhinos - maybe aardvarks/dikdik was originally meant as a rhino stable? which would explained its generous space... on the other hand, for many years aardvark home was only half of this paddock, another one served to hogs)
However, rhinos shall return to Prague in future. There were some plans, probably scrapped at the moment, for white rhinos next to African house, more recent (and probaly closer to realisation) is return of indian rhinos.
Opposite them, De Brazza’s Monkeys share with Red River Hogs, this time with both an indoor and outdoor enclosure. In some ways, this feels like a scaled down version of the gorilla and colobus enclosure, with the same issue of an overly barren outdoor portion for two rainforest species, but I appreciated the size and foraging opportunities indoors.
In earlier plan, that space was meant to house bachelor gorilla group.

Sousliks were kept in a large cage behind giraffe paddok for a few years before they were released to live free within zoo grounds.
I believe there is also some souslik colony at Dívčí Hrady, or at least plans for it (large paddock for Przewalski horses in another part of Prague)

To experience magic of the giraffe savana - you are at least 10 years too late. Once it was new, it indeed was pretty captivating sight. But it deteriorated - construction of the gorilla exhibit being the last nail in the coffin.
I wonder what do you mean by that, aside of Dja, what else had changed there?[/QUOTE]
 
Part 3 - Northern Forest, Plains and Gobi

After crossing the bridge, you get another view of the bull elephant paddock, before entering Northern Forest, Prague’s zone devoted to cold-climate species who, in my opinion, fit the vegetation that surrounds them very appropriately indeed, making for one of Prague’s more charming zones. Low expectations helped here, as I was very pleasantly surprised by this zone of the zoo. Unfortunately, the height of the cliff, which I did not want to have to climb up twice, did result in me planning out a rather random route, which involved me first seeing all the exhibits at the upper end of Northern Forest, then backtracking to the elephant paddock, and doing a loop around the Plains and Gobi exhibits, finishing the rest of Northern Forest and Across the Continents in doing so. Between the large size of the species exhibited, the impression given by the map that they are spaced out, and the fact that one of these exhibits is named ‘Plains,’ always gave me the impression that this area of the zoo would be quite open, but in reality it quite a bit more forested than I anticipated and, somewhat embarrassingly, it is the only part of Prague Zoo where I got lost on several occasions!

Taking a right turn into Northern Forest first brings you to the zoo’s Siberian Tiger enclosure, which I was actually hugely impressed by. While by no means massive, it is quite large and may well be one of the most densely planted tiger enclosures that I have ever seen, using Czech lookalikes to give a very good impression of a Siberian woodland. There is excellent rockwork and landscaping, with a raised portion at the rear end and a more valley-like portion, equipped with a water feature at the front, and my only criticism is the fact that the glass viewing area was not all too clean and made observing the one tiger we did see, roaming along the rocks at the back, quite the challenge. Prague’s big cat enclosures were some of the things that I heard most regular criticism of from zoo enthusiasts, but after seeing this tiger enclosure, the first big cats of the day, I didn’t quite get it, as I loved this enclosure. Sadly, the Amur Leopards nearby made the reason for said criticism more obvious. It isn’t a bad space, being similarly gorgeously planted to the tiger one, only it is far too small.

Moving along the pathway, I came to a rather curiously placed Alpaca enclosure on the opposite side to the rest of the exhibits. It seemed a bit random, but a glance at a map from the start of the year reveals that, until recently, Kiangs were kept here, and presumably, the alpacas were moved in afterwards to prevent grass from overgrowing, as this is the site of the future Polar Bear enclosure, similar to how Zurich used dwarf cattle on the site of what will become Kongo. On the other side of the path are Bharal and White-lipped Deer in very spacious and attractive enclosures on a subtle slope. As good as these were, I couldn’t help but feel a little bad for the bharal, who were missing out on Prague’s legendary cliffside mountain goat enclosures (which, despite my attempts to avoid photographic spoilers before visiting, I saw as I was coming through Troja to get to Prague).

I then backtracked towards the elephants, and this time took a left turn in relation to the bridge, with Northern Forest continuing around the other side. Here, I was delighted by a series of birds of prey aviaries, which began with Oriental Bay-owl (kept at just nine public European collections), Ural Owl and Common Barn Owl, followed by a second aviary for the Urals. Given how low the standard for owleries is in Europe, I was hugely impressed by these, which offer plenty of height and flight space, and stretch far further back than one might anticipate, again with some very attractive vegetation in the foreground. I was particularly delighted to see a bay-owl, surely one of the most bizarre-looking birds of prey out there, although it wasn’t until after my visit that I realised if only it had opened its eyes it would have been even more peculiar. The raptor offerings continued with another lifetick, the European Honey-buzzard, although I was much less impressed by their aviary, which after the previous four felt like a reversion to the standard for such aviaries, which isn’t that high.

The path then led me to one of the most highly anticipated lifeticks of the day, the Brown Hyena, and even though a potential upcoming visit to Hamerton did make this one less urgent (when compared to pangolins and others), I was hardly opposed to the idea of getting to see this species twice, being quite fond of hyenas. Granted that I have only seen five other hyena enclosures to compare it to (Colchester, Longleat, Beauval, Hemsley and Zurich), I thought this was easily the best of the five that I have seen. Two huge enclosures, each with rolling hills, dense vegetation, many hidden dens and good use of rocks to offer more hiding areas, as well as what appeared to be a very large indoor area embedded into a nearby hillside, and many trees for shade. Sadly, such was the amount of hiding spaces on offer that I had no hope of seeing the hyena, so after a brief initial look, concluded to come back later if I had the time, and if not, hope that my plans for a Hamerton visit came to fruition and hold on until then! However, while completing the loop around ‘Plains,’ I decided that a detour to return to the hyenas was warranted, and scanned both enclosures thoroughly in the hope of seeing one, with no luck. I returned to my company, who was by the stairs that led down to the hyena viewing, and confessed that I could not spot any, and that we would have to wait for Hamerton, to which they laughed in my face and told me to look to my left. And there it was, prowling along the very edge of its enclosure, against the back wall, masked by the hills from both the main viewing areas, but visible from the stairway that led down to them! For me, this is by far the most attractive of the four hyena species (of which I have now seen all but the Striped in person), with its wolf-like face, and the contrast between the gold of its neck and the chestnut brown of its body. After jogging along the dip at the far end, at one moment coming right up to us, it then ran back along and, after a brief rest in front of the door that leads to its indoors, it slipped through said door and vanished. Much like the pangolins, this encounter was short-lived but unforgettable. It was also while returning to see the hyenas that I spotted an enclosure nearby that I had missed earlier - a very pleasantly shaded, grassy yard for Lowland Anoa, that I had initially mistook for a third hyena enclosure given the similarities in fencing and viewing area. On that note, I had seen all of Across the Continents.

IMG20240807124247.jpg IMG20240807134420.jpg

Returning to Northern Forest, I was very pleased by the zoo’s Eurasian Grey Wolf enclosure, which was expansive and thoroughly planted throughout, although I only managed to spot one wolf, lying down underneath one of the raised platforms near the takins. I then began to loop around the Plains zone of the zoo, which begins with Javan Rusas in a standard grassy field, and then follows up with Chacoan Peccary in a standard muddy yard, which offered a good amount of spaces and places to dig, but that I ultimately found to be quite forgettable. Mishmi Takins and European Bison in basic, dusty yards extended this streak, as did European Forest Reindeer opposite them (although it is always lovely to see this wild species as opposed to the more commonplace domestic one, even if I am starting to take them for granted somewhat since their arrival at Whipsnade) and asides from having a huge bison and a calf roll in sand, creating clouds in the air similar to what the zebra could be observed doing in the savannah earlier in the visit, nothing really stuck out to me around here. Apologies for going so fast, but I did find that this particular stretch of Plains and Northern Forest was the weakest area of Prague Zoo, or at the very least the one that I got the least enjoyment out of. Nothing offensively poor (bison enclosure could have been bigger, I felt, but it is hardly urgent), but nothing remotely interesting either.

IMG20240807125152.jpg

Thankfully, that would all change with the European Moose enclosure. A little bit of personal context here - moose were one of my favourite animals as a child, and my excitement of finally seeing one at Whipsnade is what made me enjoy said zoo so much, and thus indirectly (by prompting me to return to Whipsnade many times throughout childhood) made me love zoos as much as I do. As such, you can imagine my heartbreak when I visited Whipsnade in 2018 to find that the bull had passed away, and the female had left the collection a year ago. Since then, I had seen moose on more occasions (at Longleat and Highland), but hadn’t seen a bull to recapture the childhood awe that I felt upon seeing them at Whipsnade. Prague changed that - a huge bull moose was seen wading in a deep pool, its branch-like antlers, long face, huge size, and all the other features that make it so bizarre on full display. Seemingly unbothered by crowds, I was able to get very close to it, and it was genuinely one of the highlights of my visit. It was made even better by the very good enclosure. Quite narrow, but seemingly endlessly long, well-shaded, with deep pools, long grass and a sloping terrain - far better than the Whipsnade enclosure that I once loved.

IMG20240807130120.jpg

It was now about 12:50, and I decided it was time for lunch. I ordered a ‘chicken steak’ from a barbeque-type stand nearby, expecting typical, low-quality zoo food, but completely exceeded all my expectations. Nearby, Chinese Goral occupied an impressively landscaped enclosure with a steep slope, although even this was not in the same league as the main mountain goat enclosures. After dinner, I found the zoo’s Black-tailed Prairie Dog enclosure, which is fairly standard for the species, and the American Bison field. This field is much bigger than the one for the European bison, and features a much bigger herd of animals, who were quite impressive to admire in the setting, although at the end of the day it is just a scaled up version of the sandy, barren yard template that is repeated throughout the Plains zone of the Prague. Here, the enclosures become more open, with the outstanding views of the city behind you, and the obvious lack of trees on the cliff, being factors in this. Interestingly, the bison shared with Canada Goose, which I don't recall ever seeing captive before, being native to the UK. The fact that they don't occur in Czechia, and that the geese I have been seeing all trip, were Greylags, caught me off guard after seeing this.

IMG20240807132448.jpg

Next, Bactrian Camels have the first enclosure within Plains that I was truly fond of, with a good mix of grass and sand for substrate, a sizable stable at the rear end, good shade from many trees and an attractive backdrop for the same reason. At the time of my visit, a small group of people were participating in what was advertised as a camel experience, in which a few camels approached the front to be stroked and fed, resulting in some good up-close views of the inhabitants. Nearby, Burmese Brow-antlered Deer occupy a pleasant grassy yard. Next along the path was what has become the Eastern Kiang enclosure since they moved out of their former home near the tigers (replaced with the aforementioned alpacas, presumably an indication that construction of Arktida is imminent). This species is always a lifetick that I was rather adamant to claim, being one of the more attractive equids with their contrasting reddish upper half and white lower half, and along with the Kulan they would make it two equid lifeticks in one day. Thankfully, unlike the Kulan, a whole herd of Kiang seemed to be present, as opposed to just the one individual (of course it is possible that a few others were indoors).

Having now concluded Plains, Across the Continents and Northern Forest, I now had just one exhibit left to see in the upper half of the zoo - Gobi. Having opened in March 2024, Gobi is, at the time of writing, the newest exhibit at Prague Zoo, and I think that it could be a good sign for the zoo’s future developments. At this point in my visit, I had thoroughly enjoyed Prague (I had seen a pangolin, so of course I had), but I couldn’t help but feel slightly disappointed in certain areas. One of the zoo’s attributes that I hear praised most often is its ability to compliment bigger exhibits with smaller ones, such as aviaries, vivariums or aquaria. This has always been my personal preferred way to display birds, reptiles or fish. As much as I love all three of those classes (especially birds), I can easily find myself tiring after seeing rows and rows of them, often rushing the final few exhibits in a reptile house due to the need for some variety. And the same applies for large mammals, as my lack of enthusiasm for Plains demonstrates - rows and rows of hoofstock paddocks result in incredibly forgettable displays. Having a large mammal with something else on the side is perfect, and something that I looked forward to massively at Prague, but up until this point nothing had delivered. I criticised Elephant Valley and the Hippo Pavilion for this, but the criticism could be extended to almost every area of the zoo up until now, with the only exceptions being the brief birds of prey zone in Northern Forest (although if you count the entire Africa section as one coherent unit, then Africa Up Close could be seen as its equivalent of this).

Gobi changed that. The stars of the show here are Przewalski’s Wild Horse, a species that Prague is historically tied to, having held them continuously since 1932, a year after its opening, and bred countless foals within that time, not to mention being involved in several releases to the wild to the Golden Steppe in Mongolia, as well as a few other places throughout their range of Central Asia. Their sandy yard is attractive, with a much thicker layer of sand than is usual (something I suspect is good for their hooves) and good use of rockwork to give the illusion of a desert (I love when zoos use different coloured rocks to indicate whereabouts in the world you are, and the orange-tinted ones here do a good job at that), but it isn’t what makes this whole area so special. The indoor area attached to Gobi is devoted to Mongolian reptiles and small mammals, namely:

Long-eared Hedgehog
Roborovski Dwarf Hamster
Mongolian Gerbil
Steppe Lemming
Tartar Sand Boa
Mongolian Sunwatcher
Przewalski’s Toadhead Agama
Gobi Racerunner
Chinese Golden Scorpion
Chinese Medicinal Cockroach


I managed to spot the hedgehog, a lifetick and a rarity, curled up in the hay, as well as a gerbil, but was quite saddened to miss out on the lemming, having never seen one, or indeed any lemming, in the past, but was ultimately disappointed here. The sand boa had always been a species I was fairly interested to see, knowing that they were a big factor in inspiring legends of ‘the Mongolian death worm,’ and is kept at just five European zoos. The Przewalski’s Toadhead Agama was also of note, as I had no clue that Nikolaj Przewalski had any other animals, aside from the horses, named after him. For both this and the sunwatcher (another species of toadhead agama), Prague is the only public collection in Europe where they can be observed, as well as the racerunner, who derives its Latin name for Przewalskii. Outdoors, there is a themed Mongolian yurt, a good example of the subtle use of cultural theming that I like to see in zoos (yet again, one of Prague’s newest exhibits reminding me of Zurich). Another fact that I liked about Gobi was the overall flashy and morning feeling, as though Prague is trying to show off. The dimly lit room with maps of Mongolia, screens showing in situ conservation work in action, and a variety of tools and other such artefacts on the wall - the vibe in here is something special indeed. And to top it all off, the outdoor portion also features Pallas’ Cats, who have a simple small cat cage, with mesh walls and good climbing, only that there are two of them and both are massively scaled up, and in a sense give me hope that Prague can improve their existing small cat enclosures considerably. My only criticism of these lovely enclosures is that they look a bit sparse, but hopefully time will fix that.

IMG20240807135031.jpg
IMG20240807133056.jpg

Overall I loved Gobi. A large, charismatic mammal, with a charming, modern building attached, packed with rarities seen at next to no other collections in Europe, and extending well beyond mammals. It may seem like I am overhyping what is, at the end of the day, a very simple exhibit, but it perfectly encapsulated what I had expected to see from Prague, but, at this stage of my visit, hadn’t really seen. At this stage of my visit to Prague, I had counted 3 amphibians, 16 fishes, 22 birds, 28 reptiles and *94 mammals*. For reference, that is more mammal species than any UK zoo has in their entire grounds (Chester comes closest with 91). That didn’t bother me too much, because I love mammals, but I also love birds, and although I must admit that the lack of them only really phased me because of Prague’s reputation, my love for balanced exhibits also made it hurt. I loved elements of this upper half of Prague - as mentioned Gobi was great, as was Northern Forest, the African Savannah, and the Indonesian Jungle, not to mention my excitement seeing rarities such as the pangolin or the hyena. But I wasn’t yet as amazed as I thought I would be.

All that would change, however, as I made my way down the cliff.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Again, hope all readers enjoyed this post.

Part 4 will be out tomorrow and will cover the Zakazanka Path, the Aviaries under the Cliff and Bird Wetlands, as well as potentially the Feline and Reptile Pavilion depending on time and word count. And the review is only going to get a lot more positive from this point on!
 

Attachments

  • IMG20240807124247.jpg
    IMG20240807124247.jpg
    189.6 KB · Views: 294
  • IMG20240807134420.jpg
    IMG20240807134420.jpg
    127.9 KB · Views: 316
  • IMG20240807125152.jpg
    IMG20240807125152.jpg
    341.7 KB · Views: 301
  • IMG20240807130120.jpg
    IMG20240807130120.jpg
    166.7 KB · Views: 299
  • IMG20240807133056.jpg
    IMG20240807133056.jpg
    130.5 KB · Views: 311
  • IMG20240807135031.jpg
    IMG20240807135031.jpg
    269.8 KB · Views: 308
  • IMG20240807132448.jpg
    IMG20240807132448.jpg
    255.3 KB · Views: 310
An excellent map, but strangely, it seems to have switched the positions of the wallaroos and Maned Wolves in ATC.
In the past, wallaroos and maned wolves quite irregularly swapped their enclosures time to time, so it is a relict of old (recent :D) times.
 
Thank you so much, @Kalaw, for taking the time to write up and share this very entertaining and informative walkthrough and review of the Prague Zoo. I have thoroughly enjoyed following along with your posts, and I look forward to the future updates :) This thread has made me even more excited for my own trip to Prague next month, and it has helped me think more about my intended route, so I very much appreciate it for that, as well!
 
Thank you so much, @Kalaw, for taking the time to write up and share this very entertaining and informative walkthrough and review of the Prague Zoo. I have thoroughly enjoyed following along with your posts, and I look forward to the future updates :) This thread has made me even more excited for my own trip to Prague next month, and it has helped me think more about my intended route, so I very much appreciate it for that, as well!
Thanks for the kind words, and I hope that you enjoy your visit, it is an outstanding zoo. Planning a route can be quite difficult, and in the bottom half of the zoo, where it is very compact, I ended up making up a rather random route as I went along, beginning with the bird wetlands through to the cat house, then making my way to the Rakos' Pavilion to give myself more time to see the birds-of-paradise, then to Chambal to give myself more time to see the gharials, and then mopping up what I missed from earlier.

From this one visit, the best advice I could give is to start with the bottom half of the zoo and then do the upper half. The one argument against this would be seeing pangolins in bright light, but it is easily possible to start with the Indonesian Jungle so as to achieve this and then go to the lower half. The bottom half is much better, in my opinion, with some delightful walkthroughs that you need time to appreciate, and plenty of rarities that may need multiple stops at their enclosure to enjoy properly. I regret that I was rushing around here a little too much, and would have much preferred to have been able to take my time, with a planned route, down here, and then be more hectic with the upper portion which, while still good, is less interesting, with only the pangolins and Brown Hyenas as interesting species and very few outstanding enclosures.

That said, it is ultimately up to you and you should always prioritise the areas that you think are most important, so that you rush round them the least
Sousliks were kept in a large cage behind giraffe paddok for a few years before they were released to live free within zoo grounds
Is the cage in the background of this picture, posted in the gallery by @Maguari in 2010, the one that you mention?

full


And when you mention that Dja Reserve hurt the savannah, do you mean that it ruined the view, or that it actually took up space that was once part of the paddock?
 
I think rhinos (not sure if white or black) may be originally also part of plans for African house, but i don´t know much on this topic (aside of murky memory of model of house, before it was finished, containing also rhinos - maybe aardvarks/dikdik was originally meant as a rhino stable? which would explained its generous space...

I wonder what do you mean by that, aside of Dja, what else had changed there?

You are right. The two low stalls in giraffe house were ear-marked to house white rhinos. The zoo at that time kept an old non-breeding pair of Pidlis and Pongola (where today lowland tapirs live). But sometime during the construction of the giraffe house, the zoo realised the stalls and their connection to the main savana pen is unsuitable for rhinos and gave up on moving them there.

I find it hard to explain what actually changed in savana that destroyed its former esthetic value. It was probably not one thing, more like more details coming together. Dissappearance of grass in part of it, new giraffe feeding platform, new fence, change in vegetation in surroundings, reconstruction of Skenarka and its vinicity, new houses built nearby and so on.

The old-looking cage of honey-buzzards is simply just old. I think from 1940s. The birds inside are flightless wild birds the zoo took over from a rescue station.

Amur leopard cage is small and uninspiring. But it´s actually a leopard breeding complex of 4 inter-connected cages of similar size, only the one you saw is visible.

The barren hoofstock pens in Plains could be visually more appealing if the zoo tried to restore grass in them and maybe added more trees. Maybe not with wisents, but the rest might fare better. Those pens exist since late 1940 or so and generations of animals and keepers stripped all topsoil of it and just barren stony flat terrain is left.

Canada geese you saw mixed with bison are pure maxima subspecies. They have several holes in the wooden fence they can freely use to leave the bison paddock and go search for food and entretainment in the rest of plains (they spend time outside usually during night and morning and retire back with bisons when visitor crowd gets too much for them.)

Is the cage in the background of this picture, posted in the gallery by @Maguari in 2010, the one that you mention?

full


And when you mention that Dja Reserve hurt the savannah, do you mean that it ruined the view, or that it actually took up space that was once part of the paddock?

Yes, that is the cage.

And yes, Dja ruined both the view and it also took a good chunk out of the savannah paddock.
 
Back
Top