Prospect Park Zoo Prospect Park Zoo review 2025

snowleopard

Well-Known Member
15+ year member
Premium Member
In terms of amenities, Prospect Park Zoo is very similar to Queens Zoo. There's a tiny cafe selling pre-made sandwiches and snacks, with a small gift shop as part of the package. There's only one set of restrooms, attached to the Discovery Center which is only open for summer camps and tour groups. That's annoying, as there's a second viewing window into the Pallas's Cat exhibit from within that building, but my wife and I were denied when we asked a staff member if we could enter for less than a minute.

Other than the California Sea Lion exhibit (with only two animals!), and a farmyard zone (which I spent two minutes in), Prospect Park Zoo can be divided up into three distinct areas.

The Discovery Trail outdoor loop is a pleasant walk in the woods, but with no geographical focus such as Queens Zoo (animals from the Americas). At Prospect Park, there's Southern Pudu, maybe a hundred Red-eared Turtles, some waterfowl, a couple of Black Swans, a couple of Dingoes and Emus, then 4 other species (Red Panda, North American Porcupine, River Otter, Tufted Deer) and a walk-through aviary. It's enjoyable enough but seems like a hodgepodge collection of animals. Why not make it a loop focusing on a specific geographical region?

The Animal Lifestyles building has as its star attraction a mock-rock Hamadryas Baboon exhibit which has 3 large viewing windows and held our attention for quite some time as there's currently several youngsters and they are entertaining to watch. It's not a great enclosure, but it's adequate and the family group makes it popular. The rest of the building is a random collection of Green Iguanas, a small space for Sand Cats, a big Amazon fish tank, 3 species of small monkey, Wreathed Hornbills and some herps. It's all a bit random, with the baboons by far the best thing there.

The other building at the zoo is called Hall of Animals, a vague term and again there's no coherent theme to the display of animals. A couple of Kookaburras are in a glass tank, there's some turtle exhibits and mice, poison dart frogs and Dwarf Mongooses, Black-footed Cats in a tiny nocturnal space, a number of reptiles and amphibians, fruit bats and Lesser Galagos but why not make one of the zoo's buildings dedicated to South American fauna and perhaps the other a legitimate Reptile House? As things stand, it's all over the place.

Prospect Park Zoo was my 612th zoo all-time and of course it was a thrill to be visiting a new facility I'd never been to before. It was odd to come across exhibits for 3 small, rare feline species (Sand Cat, Black-footed Cat, Pallas's Cat - didn't see this last one) and the Hamadryas Baboons were very active, but the zoo is clearly the weakest of the 5 Wildlife Conservation Society establishments. Other than the baboons, there was only one or two specimens of each mammal species and the whole zoo can easily be seen in an hour as long as one has no kids with them and only takes a quick glance at the barnyard zone.
 
Last edited:
In terms of amenities, Prospect Park Zoo is very similar to Queens Zoo. There's a tiny cafe selling pre-made sandwiches and snacks, with a small gift shop as part of the package. There's only one set of restrooms, attached to the Discovery Center which is only open for summer camps and tour groups. That's annoying, as there's a second viewing window into the Pallas's Cat exhibit from within that building, but my wife and I were denied when we asked a staff member if we could enter for less than a minute.

Other than the California Sea Lion exhibit (with only two animals!), and a farmyard zone (which I spent two minutes in), Prospect Park Zoo can be divided up into three distinct areas.

The Discovery Trail outdoor loop is a pleasant walk in the woods, but with no geographical focus such as Queens Zoo (animals from the Americas). At Prospect Park, there's Southern Pudu, maybe a hundred Red-eared Turtles, some waterfowl, a couple of Black Swans, a couple of Dingoes and Emus, then 4 other species (Red Panda, North American Porcupine, River Otter, Tufted Deer) and a walk-through aviary. It's enjoyable enough but seems like a hodgepodge collection of animals. Why not make it a loop focusing on a specific geographical region?

The Animal Lifestyles building has as its star attraction a mock-rock Hamadryas Baboon exhibit which has 3 large viewing windows and held our attention for quite some time as there's currently several youngsters and they are entertaining to watch. It's not a great enclosure, but it's adequate and the family group makes it popular. The rest of the building is a random collection of Green Iguanas, a small space for Sand Cats, a big Amazon fish tank, 3 species of small monkey, Wreathed Hornbills and some herps. It's all a bit random, with the baboons by far the best thing there.

The other building at the zoo is called Hall of Animals, a vague term and again there's no coherent theme to the display of animals. A couple of Kookaburras are in a glass tank, there's some turtle exhibits and mice, poison dart frogs and Dwarf Mongooses, Black-footed Cats in a tiny nocturnal space, a number of reptiles and amphibians, fruit bats and Lesser Galagos but why not make one of the zoo's buildings dedicated to South American fauna and perhaps the other a legitimate Reptile House? As things stand, it's all over the place.

Prospect Park Zoo was my 612th zoo all-time and of course it was a thrill to be visiting a new facility I'd never been to before. It was odd to come across exhibits for 3 small, rare feline species (Sand Cat, Black-footed Cat, Pallas's Cat - didn't see this last one) and the Hamadryas Baboons were very active, but the zoo is clearly the weakest of the 5 Wildlife Conservation Society establishments. Other than the baboons, there was only one or two specimens of each mammal species and the whole zoo can easily be seen in an hour as long as one has no kids with them and only takes a quick glance at the barnyard zone.
I concur. At one point the Prospect Zoo was, arguably, the best of the , then, “municipal zoos” with larger areas- paddocks for hoof stock and multiple rocky dens for bears - than Central Park.
It exhibited elephants, black rhino , Nike hippo, zebra, eland, lions, leopard ,Polar bear , Asiatic black bear with an entirely autonomous “farm” exhibit - then some ***** decided to change that and turn it into a glorified roadside zoo that no one would care about
“ A mega children’s zoo”- inspired by the Brookly children’s museum
A disaster.
Queens zoo -with all its shortcomings - no indoor exhibits, no neotropical rain forest for year round exhibition of reptiles, amphibia or equatorial birds or mammals - has a thematic basis ( Nearctic and ( transitioning ) Neo Tropical “Americas” birds and mammals and it manages to exhibit large artiodactyls - bison, elk and- till recently - pronghorn antelope.
It displays four carnivore species as well as a large aviary and some poorly exhibited , reptiles and amphibians in its barn.
Prospect Park zoo, conversely , has no theme , no verisimilitude- just random exhibits
I had envisioned a zoogeographic them in miniature with a few representative species of each realm . So one could take a world tour of sorts within two hours - thirty is adequate to view the current collection.
Beginning with the current Discovery Zone which could become an Australian Walk about with kangaroos, wallabies , emu, and( separately ) dingo then an indoor facility to house wombat, Tasmanian devils , birds of paradise , echidna
The building there now - but, of course unused.
Expand the former elephant exhibit - the crown of the zoo- for black rhino and Nile hippos - you would have three to four acres for that .
Ditch the farm in the zoo for an orangutan exhibit .
Expand and maintain the sea lion exhibit and ad an aviary for South American condor .
You would then have Nearctic (Sea Lions), Neo Tropical (Condor), Ethiopian (Rhino and Hippos) , Australasian (A dozen species of various classes : mammals —primarily marsupials - , birds, reptiles.
Oriental: Orangutan
Palearctic: Pallas cats
Just 12-16 species of large mammals - UNIQUE to the zoo , thus encouraging visitors to go there for an experience they could only get at THAT facility.
Or specialize , They seem to have success with small felids so specialize in that order : Lions, Sumatran tigers, cheetah , jaguar and, an entire array of small felids : ocelot, margay, jungle cats, caracal, servals - augmenting the current Pallas , Sand and Black footed cats they now exhibit.
Prospect Park Zoo - with a very, very few notable exceptions - is a dumping ground for excess inventory with no scientific or zoological value
It had a great collection whose reach exceeded its grasp and never gave the animals the space and habitats they were entitled to.
Let us do it CHEAP
You can not increase revenue via attendance if there is nothing there to see. As a New Yorker it is an abomination
 
I concur. At one point the Prospect Zoo was, arguably, the best of the , then, “municipal zoos” with larger areas- paddocks for hoof stock and multiple rocky dens for bears - than Central Park.
It exhibited elephants, black rhino , Nike hippo, zebra, eland, lions, leopard ,Polar bear , Asiatic black bear with an entirely autonomous “farm” exhibit - then some ***** decided to change that and turn it into a glorified roadside zoo that no one would care about
“ A mega children’s zoo”- inspired by the Brookly children’s museum
A disaster.
Queens zoo -with all its shortcomings - no indoor exhibits, no neotropical rain forest for year round exhibition of reptiles, amphibia or equatorial birds or mammals - has a thematic basis ( Nearctic and ( transitioning ) Neo Tropical “Americas” birds and mammals and it manages to exhibit large artiodactyls - bison, elk and- till recently - pronghorn antelope.
It displays four carnivore species as well as a large aviary and some poorly exhibited , reptiles and amphibians in its barn.
Prospect Park zoo, conversely , has no theme , no verisimilitude- just random exhibits
I had envisioned a zoogeographic them in miniature with a few representative species of each realm . So one could take a world tour of sorts within two hours - thirty is adequate to view the current collection.
Beginning with the current Discovery Zone which could become an Australian Walk about with kangaroos, wallabies , emu, and( separately ) dingo then an indoor facility to house wombat, Tasmanian devils , birds of paradise , echidna
The building there now - but, of course unused.
Expand the former elephant exhibit - the crown of the zoo- for black rhino and Nile hippos - you would have three to four acres for that .
Ditch the farm in the zoo for an orangutan exhibit .
Expand and maintain the sea lion exhibit and ad an aviary for South American condor .
You would then have Nearctic (Sea Lions), Neo Tropical (Condor), Ethiopian (Rhino and Hippos) , Australasian (A dozen species of various classes : mammals —primarily marsupials - , birds, reptiles.
Oriental: Orangutan
Palearctic: Pallas cats
Just 12-16 species of large mammals - UNIQUE to the zoo , thus encouraging visitors to go there for an experience they could only get at THAT facility.
Or specialize , They seem to have success with small felids so specialize in that order : Lions, Sumatran tigers, cheetah , jaguar and, an entire array of small felids : ocelot, margay, jungle cats, caracal, servals - augmenting the current Pallas , Sand and Black footed cats they now exhibit.
Prospect Park Zoo - with a very, very few notable exceptions - is a dumping ground for excess inventory with no scientific or zoological value
It had a great collection whose reach exceeded its grasp and never gave the animals the space and habitats they were entitled to.
Let us do it CHEAP
You can not increase revenue via attendance if there is nothing there to see. As a New Yorker it is an abomination
Copy and paste.

Prospect Park became what it is after a litany of controversies surrounding its large mammal enclosures at the time. For what it is, Prospect Park is incredibly charming and does its job well. For $9, getting to see Pallas' cat, Hamadryas baboon and Chinese red panda alongside a litany of smaller critters is a steal. Could it be improved? Absolutely, I'm debating making a dedicated thread of the changes I'd personally make. But fundamentally, Prospect Park doesn't have the room to do larger mammals than (debatedly) a bear species, especially when the standard for apes (as far as the WCS is concerned) is as high as Congo Gorilla Forest.
 
Copy and paste.

Prospect Park became what it is after a litany of controversies surrounding its large mammal enclosures at the time. For what it is, Prospect Park is incredibly charming and does its job well. For $9, getting to see Pallas' cat, Hamadryas baboon and Chinese red panda alongside a litany of smaller critters is a steal. Could it be improved? Absolutely, I'm debating making a dedicated thread of the changes I'd personally make. But fundamentally, Prospect Park doesn't have the room to do larger mammals than (debatedly) a bear species, especially when the standard for apes (as far as the WCS is concerned) is as high as Congo Gorilla Forest.
Brooklyn is the largest borough in terms of population (2,000,000 plus) and second to Manhattan in affluence , based on residential real estate values.
It doesn’t have the kind of zoological park it deserves .
Once again: apathy .
Prospect Park Zoo should have been administered by the Staten Island Zoological Society - which could have used it to exhibit its mega fauna . THEY once displayed Orangutan , Chimpanzee, Lions , Tiger and Sun Bear in equally cramped quarters.
They even, ambitiously , exhibited Oryx in their Sahara exhibit for a while.
Properly funded , SIZS would have had a greater vested interest in maintaining a first class zoo as an adjunct to
Their primary campus.
Most Staten Islanders emigrated from Brooklyn so there is a far greater empathetic connection between those boroughs than the Bronx and Manhattan
WCS has too much on its plate
Due to NYC’s negligence the zoos deteriorated and a quick fix was to have them managed - if not financed - by WCS
It was, “ This is all we will spend “- “take it or leave it “ Something IS better than nothing , I suppose
Brooklyn once boasted a Major League Baseball team ( The Dodgers) , now it has a minor league one ( Cyclones)
Brooklyn does not deserve a minor league zoo.With its population, affluence is deserves one that is Major league
 
Brooklyn is the largest borough in terms of population (2,000,000 plus) and second to Manhattan in affluence , based on residential real estate values.
It doesn’t have the kind of zoological park it deserves .
Once again: apathy .
Prospect Park Zoo should have been administered by the Staten Island Zoological Society - which could have used it to exhibit its mega fauna . THEY once displayed Orangutan , Chimpanzee, Lions , Tiger and Sun Bear in equally cramped quarters.
They even, ambitiously , exhibited Oryx in their Sahara exhibit for a while.
Properly funded , SIZS would have had a greater vested interest in maintaining a first class zoo as an adjunct to
Their primary campus.
Most Staten Islanders emigrated from Brooklyn so there is a far greater empathetic connection between those boroughs than the Bronx and Manhattan
WCS has too much on its plate
Due to NYC’s negligence the zoos deteriorated and a quick fix was to have them managed - if not financed - by WCS
It was, “ This is all we will spend “- “take it or leave it “ Something IS better than nothing , I suppose
Brooklyn once boasted a Major League Baseball team ( The Dodgers) , now it has a minor league one ( Cyclones)
Brooklyn does not deserve a minor league zoo.With its population, affluence is deserves one that is Major league
The other WCS parks are accessible by metro though? Like, if someone wanted to see great apes, elephants, giraffes, bears, big cats, etc. they'd go to Bronx, if someone wanted to see Antarctic penguins and snow monkeys they'd go to Central Park, if someone wanted to see pronghorn, Andean bear, cougar, etc. they'd go to Queens, New York Aquarium is very accessible by metro, etc.

Back to Prospect Park for a minute, the fact that it was kept afloat at all (no pun intended) is an absolute miracle. All of these zoos have significant amounts of maintenance as is and are working towards mitigating the very real effects of climate change. Prospect Park is working on flood mitigation strategies as is Central Park, Ocean Wonders: Sharks was fundamentally changed in the design phase to be hurricane-proof. Again, would I like to see more at Prospect Park? Absolutely - moving Nature Play over to the barn area, bringing back macropods and bringing in sloth bears would be INCREDIBLE. Discovery Trail already is oriented towards animal habitats/animal adaptations, so streamlining that theme as well as the themes of the other buildings (Animal Lifestyles and Hall of Animals) with more cohesive signage would be amazing. But that's neither here nor there, point is it's good at being what it says on the tin.
 
The other WCS parks are accessible by metro though? Like, if someone wanted to see great apes, elephants, giraffes, bears, big cats, etc. they'd go to Bronx, if someone wanted to see Antarctic penguins and snow monkeys they'd go to Central Park, if someone wanted to see pronghorn, Andean bear, cougar, etc. they'd go to Queens, New York Aquarium is very accessible by metro, etc.

Back to Prospect Park for a minute, the fact that it was kept afloat at all (no pun intended) is an absolute miracle. All of these zoos have significant amounts of maintenance as is and are working towards mitigating the very real effects of climate change. Prospect Park is working on flood mitigation strategies as is Central Park, Ocean Wonders: Sharks was fundamentally changed in the design phase to be hurricane-proof. Again, would I like to see more at Prospect Park? Absolutely - moving Nature Play over to the barn area, bringing back macropods and bringing in sloth bears would be INCREDIBLE. Discovery Trail already is oriented towards animal habitats/animal adaptations, so streamlining that theme as well as the themes of the other buildings (Animal Lifestyles and Hall of Animals) with more cohesive signage would be amazing. But that's neither here nor there, point is it's good at being what it says on the tin.
I agree.
Somethings better than nothing but we must continue to strive for for something better than anything.
 
I agree.
Somethings better than nothing but we must continue to strive for for something better than anything.
And I give great credit to the repair and renovation following the unforeseen deluge that swept over the zoo.
It is the original refurbishment of the 1936 facility that I disagree with.
I think that plan was flawed
I hope that the zoo can get an influx of money and attendees - if not to return it to its former state but, at least, improve tbe current one
 
It is a bit surprising that with the huge local population, the zoo that's provided for this borough is one that has no theme whatsoever and isn't particularly memorable. After touring Queens Zoo (North and South American animals) and Central Park Zoo (Tropic Zone, Temperate Territory, Polar Zone), Prospect Park Zoo by comparison has no rhyme or reason. Even the three sections have vague names: Discovery Trail, Animal Lifestyles and Hall of Animals. Clearly, beyond a shadow of a doubt, Prospect Park is the weakest of the WCS zoos.

However, having a trio of small feline species, such as Sand Cats, is fantastic.

full


The mock-rock Hamadryas Baboon exhibit is crying out for some more natural substrate, but the large group in there is great to watch.

full


And there's no way that this Southern Pudu exhibit was originally designed for this particular species. There must have been Prairie Dogs or Meerkats in here at one point, with those pop-up visitor bubbles.

full
 
It is a bit surprising that with the huge local population, the zoo that's provided for this borough is one that has no theme whatsoever and isn't particularly memorable. After touring Queens Zoo (North and South American animals) and Central Park Zoo (Tropic Zone, Temperate Territory, Polar Zone), Prospect Park Zoo by comparison has no rhyme or reason. Even the three sections have vague names: Discovery Trail, Animal Lifestyles and Hall of Animals. Clearly, beyond a shadow of a doubt, Prospect Park is the weakest of the WCS zoos.

However, having a trio of small feline species, such as Sand Cats, is fantastic.

full


The mock-rock Hamadryas Baboon exhibit is crying out for some more natural substrate, but the large group in there is great to watch.

full


And there's no way that this Southern Pudu exhibit was originally designed for this particular species. There must have been Prairie Dogs or Meerkats in here at one point, with those pop-up visitor bubbles.

full
The pudu exhibit previously held prairie dogs.
The driving force behind the remodeled Prospect Park Zoo was, “Think Small” - in terms of exhibition and audience ( young children) . Maybe expand on this theme and specialize in, “Cats and Dogs” with more felids - ocelot, fishing cats, jungle cats as well as cheetah, Sumatran tiger, leopard and “ Dogs”- red wolves, bush dog, timber wolves, bat eared foxes, fennec, maned wolves thus allowing children to compare canids and felids to their domestic dogs and cats and bringing some continuity to this eclectic, hodge podge
 
@Don Majeski, if Prospect Park ever wanted to do something with the space currently occupied by the Discovery Trail, that could be a nice way to go; even if several charismatic species (red panda, emu, etc.) would be lost in the process.
And convert the current, “Conservation Classroom” back into the indoor exhibit space that it was originally built and intended for but was left unrealized forvthe purpose
 
As someone who visited Prospect Park last year and Central Park this year and actually liked them about equally for quite different reasons, I think the former works better when you take it for what it is--a children's zoo which eschews the larger animals it once held in favor of utilizing its space for diverse (and sometimes rare) smaller species, even with the extremely tenous theming. From a visitor standpoint I'd also say Prospect Park Zoo has more shade and more outdoor greenery (excluding the Intelligence Garden) and, notably, is half the admission cost.

I think objectively I'd have to consider Central Park "better" but, I dunno, Prospect Park struck a chord with me.
 
Back
Top