Prop 202 Zoo Tax Charter Authorization: 52% yes, 48% no
Prop 203 Zoo Tax: 50% yes, 50% no
However, the physical count shows the 50/50 split is not exact with slightly more no votes (36,216 no versus 35,866 yes).
Since both propositions must be passed for it to take effect, I am fearful it was very narrowly defeated. Since the two propositions went hand-in-hand, I want to know why a small percentage of voters said yes on one and no on the other. (For that matter I wonder why it was split into two propositions, but I am sure there is a technical legal reason why).
Interestingly enough, the Point Defiance Zoo & Aquarium in Tacoma, Washington, has had several "bond issues" over the years that have passed with approximately 65% of the public vote on each occasion. What is the difference between Tacoma residents supporting their local zoological park and the Tucson, Arizona, residents not supporting their local zoo? Do folks in Tucson not see the excellent Reid Park Zoo as deserving of new exhibits?