I have seen comments elsewhere(not this site) querying why our own British White Park cattle shouldn't fit the bill as well, or even better, for this task, given they are native to Britain. Is it just because they are too numerically low, or (in the case of the Chillingham breed at least, too wild and unmanageable? Or some other reasons?
The tauros, as they are called, are specifically bred to resemble the aurochs - not just in looks, but also ecologically and behaviourally - as much as possible. One big factor is that they are extremely self-reliant and human management can be limited to keeping their numbers in check. The project is supposed to be a Europe-wide endeavor, and the goal is to have something as close to actual wild cattle as possible present throughout the continent. Bred specifically to live in the wild, they are particularly useful in rewilding projects.
There is, of course, an argument to make that more diversity is better, so using breeds that are either native to a particular region or specifically well-suited for it, might be better than betting on a single type to live across the whole of Europe. I think this is the general ethos when it comes to rewilding with horses - Retuerta for the Mediterranean, Exmoor or Dartmoor ponies for the Atlantic region, Koniks for Central Europe and perhaps Takhi for the eastern steppes. I will not claim to have the wisdom to know which strategy is better.
In the Netherlands, both for cattle and horses several breeds are used, based on both ecological and societal factors. For example, tauros are temperamental, and small areas therefore often favour the more gentle highland cattle - a choice not without ecological consequences, by the way.