Sacramento Zoo Sacramento Zoo News

And finally a California zoo has Cloudies on display!

San Diego had them in the jungle area that replaced the monkey quadrangle when that complex first opened, and then there was one in one of the crappy cages on ex-Elephant Mesa. It is curious that no other California zoo has them. The Sacramento Zoo actually did have one in the 1980s, but this is the first time that they have had them in 30 years.
 
San Diego had them in the jungle area that replaced the monkey quadrangle when that complex first opened, and then there was one in one of the crappy cages on ex-Elephant Mesa. It is curious that no other California zoo has them. The Sacramento Zoo actually did have one in the 1980s, but this is the first time that they have had them in 30 years.

The San Diego parks still have Cloudies too, but they use them as ambassador animals rather than being on exhibit. Not really sure why they got taken out of Lost Forest to begin with; that whole area of the zoo seems to me like it has multiple exhibits that are perfect size and design for them!
 
0.1 North American River Otter Kai has died aged 9 years.
SacramentoZoo on Instagram: "It is with heavy hearts that we share the passing of Kai, our beloved 9-year-old female North American river otter. She was found unresponsive early Monday morning in her habitat. An initial examination has not revealed a cause of death, but a full necropsy (animal autopsy) is currently underway and will hopefully shed some light on why she passed. Kai has been a resident of the Sacramento Zoo since 2017 where she has shared a habitat with fellow North American river otter, Jackson. Kai brought so much joy to guests and staff alike with her playful spirit and curious nature. Lead Carnivore keeper Anela shared “Unexpected loss is one of the most difficult experiences in the life of an animal keeper, and it is especially hard when the loss involves an animal that brought so much joy to her care team. Kai was known for being a sassy, opinionated otter who knew exactly what she did and didn’t want in every situation. She has specific preferences for bedding, the type of fish she ate, and the time she shifted onto habitat. She’ll be remembered for her ‘worm time’ where she rolled around on her favorite hammock bed every afternoon and for her grumpy vocalizations during morning checks when she felt keepers woke her up too early. She was an incredible otter, and that word truly doesn’t cover it.” Keeper Evanne said “I don’t think there is a single thing Kai would do that wouldn’t make you smile. She was equally frustrating and rewarding to work with because she was so smart and so stubborn, but no matter what, whatever she was doing, somehow it always made you smile.” And from Keeper Parker, “We love Kai because of how she would yell at us early every morning to make her presence known. We love her because of her passion for throwing things into the pool, her skill for nest building, and how she’d try to swim in even just an inch of water as the pool was filling." Kai was a treasured member of our zoo family, and she will be deeply missed by all who knew her. Thank you for keeping her caretakers and companion Jackson in your thoughts during this difficult time."
 
It was announced in October that the Executive Director and CEO (Jason Jacobs) was leaving and he is now at Lion Country Safari. The whole Elk Grove project had gone suspiciously quiet before today's statement. It's very disappointing news.

There was no desire to open a much smaller zoo than anticipated, with only 30 species.
 
Last edited:
Shocked and saddened to hear this news, especially for Jason Jacobs. He's a real zoo guy who has worked tirelessly for years to make this project a reality before leaving for Florida. It seemed like things were progressing smoothly, but according to the zoo's interim director, staying within budget in spite of rising construction costs would've led to the new zoo being significantly smaller than envisioned with even less species than the current site. Add that on top of the state needing to recover from January's fires in time for the 2028 Olympics, I suppose investing hundreds of millions of dollars into a new zoo was no longer an appealing option. What a shame...

Hopefully a comparatively smaller investment can be made to rebuild the current site similar to what Paris Zoological Park did many years ago. There were several unique ideas proposed for the new location and perhaps some of them can still be done at the current zoo at a smaller scale: the okapi/colobus aviary, gelada mountain, mutlti-acre hippo complex, stand-alone restaurant with savanna views, etc.
 
Very unfortunate news and sad as someone who isn't too far from the area. However I cannot say I am surprised by the stated nail of it being too expensive... construction costs in California are extremely high, and building a complex new facility from the ground up was no doubt starting to exponentially grow above initial estimates.

I think another major reasoning behind this was the lack of public transportation routes in the area of the planned Elk Grove Zoo.

I do not think this factored in too much, the routes could be adjusted once the facility was in place. Normal procedure for cities.

It was announced in October that the Executive Director and CEO (Jason Jacobs) was leaving and he is now at Lion Country Safari

This I think did bite the project, he left at a critical time and it probably took a good deal of wind out of the sails. However even had he stayed I'm not sure they could have managed to deal with the cost hurdle.

Add that on top of the state needing to recover from January's fires in time for the 2028 Olympics, I suppose investing hundreds of millions of dollars into a new zoo was no longer an appealing option. What a shame...

I don't recall the state ever being involved with the project, despite being in the area of the capital.

perhaps some of them can still be done at the current zoo at a smaller scale: the okapi/colobus aviary, gelada mountain, mutlti-acre hippo complex, stand-alone restaurant with savanna views, etc.

Not sure honestly. I do not expect to see hippo return to the zoo, however they do have the flamingo lagoon that could maybe house Pygmy. The zoo already has very little space to work with, and the large majority of it is currently occupied. I would expect to see more exhibit upgrades than new things all together.
 
Not sure honestly. I do not expect to see hippo return to the zoo, however they do have the flamingo lagoon that could maybe house Pygmy. The zoo already has very little space to work with, and the large majority of it is currently occupied. I would expect to see more exhibit upgrades than new things all together.
Well they've already raised a substantial amount that would've gone towards the new location. Seems like a good way to make the best of disappointing circumstances is to use that capital to invest in redoing a majority of the current property -- minus the newer stuff like the okapi and alligator exhibits which are already quite good. Most of the zoo is rather dated otherwise and could do with being replaced entirely. Only time will tell I suppose.

Agreed that hippos probably won't come back now; I was just listing off the proposals from the new site that sounded the most interesting and that I most wish could be revived.
 
Hopefully a comparatively smaller investment can be made to rebuild the current site similar to what Paris Zoological Park did many years ago. There were several unique ideas proposed for the new location and perhaps some of them can still be done at the current zoo at a smaller scale: the okapi/colobus aviary, gelada mountain, mutlti-acre hippo complex, stand-alone restaurant with savanna views, etc.

One of the major reasons for moving the zoo was to give them the space to house large animals that the current relatively tiny site (14 acres of animal space) cannot house any longer. Once there were elephants, hippos, bears (polar, grizzly, sloth), multiple big cat species, multiple antelope species, gorillas, chimps, orangutans, sea lions, giraffes, multiple bird species, kangaroos, and other species all housed on zoo grounds. With modern exhibit standards only a handful of those species can be exhibited at the zoo now. There is definitely not room for a big hippo complex (or probably any). The chimps are gone and the 40 year old orangutan exhibit is really outdated. The lion exhibit is small, and the giraffe space is just okay (albeit with a terrific modern barn).

If the zoo stays on the current site, there are multiple existing master plans that they could go through and put together an interesting facility, but it would be nowhere as dynamic as what was planned for moving the zoo, and the fundamental problems of parking and increasing guest services that were also reasons for building a new zoo will not be solved.
 
Last edited:
Terrible to hear the new zoo project has been cancelled, and I think it's unfortunate it happened at this particular stage of development - after lots of initial public planning and funding acquired but before the plans could start to be realized. It's particularly saddening as this was the first chance in almost thirty years for a new, modern zoo to be opened in the United States. When will the next shot arrive?

I hope the funding can be used to improve the existing zoo but fourteen acres is a small lot and there are many problems to solve.
 
I noted this statistic in an article from the local Sacramento newspaper -

"The city was on the hook for 57% of the first phase of construction while the zoo had to raise $50 million. Community partnerships and developer fees were to pay the balance. As of January 2025, the zoo appeared to have raised $17.5 million of their desired goal. But it turns out only $1.9 million was in cash, the rest was just pledges, not real. They had a deadline of Thursday to raise/provide to Elk Grove $10 million that the zoo simply didn’t have."

I'm not 100% sure if this is true as I couldn't find confirmation at the present moment, but I will see what I can find tomorrow. If true though, the zoo was inherently far short of the needed fundraising - and also has very little actual cash in regards to the situation. In the zoo's statement it says "donors will be contacted shortly in regards to what they would like done with their donations", leading me to believe it's possible some of it could end up being returned to the donors. Depending on what plays out, the zoo could end up with basically no extra money at all, promptly ruling out any major new developments on the existing site. Unfortunate, but the zoo does not appear to have the pulling power locally like some others do.

Link to the quoted article - not really any other pertinent information as it's an opinion piece from in-house staff.
https://www.sacbee.com/opinion/article305406241.html
 
I noted this statistic in an article from the local Sacramento newspaper -

"The city was on the hook for 57% of the first phase of construction while the zoo had to raise $50 million. Community partnerships and developer fees were to pay the balance. As of January 2025, the zoo appeared to have raised $17.5 million of their desired goal. But it turns out only $1.9 million was in cash, the rest was just pledges, not real. They had a deadline of Thursday to raise/provide to Elk Grove $10 million that the zoo simply didn’t have."

I'm not 100% sure if this is true as I couldn't find confirmation at the present moment, but I will see what I can find tomorrow. If true though, the zoo was inherently far short of the needed fundraising - and also has very little actual cash in regards to the situation. In the zoo's statement it says "donors will be contacted shortly in regards to what they would like done with their donations", leading me to believe it's possible some of it could end up being returned to the donors. Depending on what plays out, the zoo could end up with basically no extra money at all, promptly ruling out any major new developments on the existing site. Unfortunate, but the zoo does not appear to have the pulling power locally like some others do.

Link to the quoted article - not really any other pertinent information as it's an opinion piece from in-house staff.
https://www.sacbee.com/opinion/article305406241.html
According to the city of Elk Grove,

"The City of Elk Grove is returning all donated funds to the Society, which amounts to approximately $1.9 million. The Society has committed to contacting all donors in the near future to determine whether the donors would like to affirm their donation to the Society or have the funds returned."

More info is available on their website.
https://elkgrove.gov/capital-improvements/elk-grove-sacramento-zoo
 
This is awful news, talk about being as anticlimatic as possible in the way that the news was released. I was so hyped, this and the Los Angeles Zoo master plan (which is most likely not happening anymore either) were my most anticpated zoo projects to come within the next decade. Now hopefully Nashville is still successful in its African expansion, that masterplan seems very expensive and ambitious as well.

I've sever visited Sacramento, so maybe a regular or someone who's visited in person could offer some input, but based on my analysis of the zoo map it still seems like the zoo could still be salvaged even at it's mere 14 acres of land.

2025_sac_zoo_map_compressed.jpg


Based solely after scenning through the map, at the top of my head:
- I want to know how larger the white rhino exhibit is; to my understanding it was meant to be very temporary until they could transfer them to the new zoo
- As the kangaroos and emus were meant to be phased out according to the later draft of the new zoo master plan anyways I propose phasing them out and moving the Galapagos tortoises to another part of the zoo, then combining the rhino exhibit with the tortoise, roo, kookaburra, and emu exhibits to make one medium sized mixed species savanna, where the rhinos could cohabitate with zebras and ostriches
- Combine the giraffe exhibit with the nearby zebra habitat now that the zebras were moved into the expanded rhino exhibit, make a second now larger mixed species savannah with giraffes and various birds/hoofstock
- Remove the giraffe viewing deck, make the entire habitat visible from the guest path, add a smaller viewing/feeding deck between the giraffe and rhino habitats just like Fresno Chaffee Zoo has, then puts gaps beneath the viewing deck so the smaller birds and hoofstock can travel between the two large exhibits
- Move the flamingos back into their ild exhibit, move the orangs and gibbons to another part of the zoo (will elaborate shortly) and use the land to combine all three ape exhibits to make room for a single large lion enclosure in the same vein as Fresno Chaffee's large lion exhibit, plus squeeze in a neighboring meerkat enclosure
- With the rhino and giraffe savannahs, plus the lion and meerkat exhibits, this would be the zoo's star African Savannah zone
- The nearby park space and pavillion shown on the map could be land contributed to the proposed African savannah zone to add more guest space, amenmities, or expand the savannah further
- Combine the land from the black-and-white ruffed lemur, mongoose lemur, and old meerkat enclosures into one large mixed species lemur aviary similar to the lemur exhibit from San Diego's African rocks, and move the ring-tailed lemurs in with them
- Most likely phase out the guenon monkey
- If there is enough space use the land where the current guenon, ring-tailed lemur, and thick-billed parrot exhibits are to make three modernized enclosures for saki monkeys, sloth, and thick-billed parrots - bonus points if they are rotational between one another so the three species each get further enrichment
- combine the current sloth and saki monkey exhibits to make a humble capybara-squirrel monkey exhibit as was in the original master plan
- Now combine the olde squirrel monkey, lion, and capybara exhibits to make one large orangutan-gibbon mixed species netted aviary, preferably with glass viewing to optimize visitor engagement and maximize space for the animals, taking inspiration from San Diego's moxed orang-siamang enclosure
- Upgrade the now clouded leopard exhibit, perhaps borrow a few feet from the capy exhibit to give the leopards more space
- Downsize from NARO to ASC otters, renovate the otter exhibit with underwate viewing, and retheme this entire area to an Asian forest themed zone
- Keep the jaguar and American Alligator exhibits mainly as is; they allong the neraby proposed flamingo, squirrel monkey, capybara, thick-billed parrot, sloth, and saki monkey exhibits could create a South American river themed area
- Alternatively there seems to be a bit of land between the lion exhibit, red panda exhibit, and Kampala Cafe, perhaps combine that land with the jaguar exhibit, and extend all the way to the cafe (offering glass viewing into the exhibit from the cafe) and replacing the jaguar with tigers as was the plan in the new zoo's master plan
- This could add to the Asian theming with the now nearby orangs, gibbons, ASCO's, and current red panda
- Maybe put an aviary over the otter exhibit and a bridge connecting it to the aforementioned Asian primates habitat so the Asian apes can travel back and forth to the otter habitat for more enrichment
- Retheme cafe to an Asian themed cafe
- Upgrade the current cheetah, okapi, and hornbill exhibits, not too many changes as necessary being that these are fairly recent exhibits
- Make a new Galapagos tortoise exhibit on the empty lawn across from the reptile house
- Modernize the reptile house

https://photos.google.com/photo/AF1QipO0bQcFI9ST4XNsA75HmMgHESogjaulLkpybjNm
AP1GczOAzZyJhmJpwYh6QNe5JfjoqQr6AeDRYtE7W78AFx9XZ3de8lhb4e1-tg=w1414-h896-s-no-gm

AF1QipO0bQcFI9ST4XNsA75HmMgHESogjaulLkpybjNm

- Very sloppy outline I made right now while at work lol

https://photos.google.com/photo/AF1QipOsIVjlnfja6Ijqi6IueStAlEr-xctl9xIKF8Yu
AP1GczNew2xHNvyUvo9LpUCETMD9DGczX3mjFM7dqEqz7f2uM9E9QMapGLFaIg=w1134-h607-s-no-gm

AF1QipOsIVjlnfja6Ijqi6IueStAlEr-xctl9xIKF8Yu

- Some minor descriptions + outline for clearer vision


This is the bare minimum I could come up with, and again, having not seen the zoo in person many of my ideas may not be feasible. There are still many other drastic changes that could be made, but would be more timely and cost-extensive. For example, moving the cafe near my proposed savannah exhibits (prehaps where the lemurs and meerkats currently are) so they could revitalize their much desired African themed restaraunt overlooking the savannah concept, or phasing out the rhinos and combining the land from the rhinos down to the roos and emus to make one modern hippo complex, even if not as spectacular as the one from the master plan.

At the end of the day though any of these changes would most likely require a Measure Z level of funding just like Fresno Chaffee Zoo was able to obtain.
 
- I want to know how larger the white rhino exhibit is; to my understanding it was meant to be very temporary until they could transfer them to the new zoo

Not tremendously large - it works for the one Rhino but it's not the biggest exhibit.

- As the kangaroos and emus were meant to be phased out according to the later draft of the new zoo master plan anyways I propose phasing them out and moving the Galapagos tortoises to another part of the zoo, then combining the rhino exhibit with the tortoise, roo, kookaburra, and emu exhibits to make one medium sized mixed species savanna, where the rhinos could cohabitate with zebras and ostriches

Not really as much space there as it seems, and i dare say it's probably better off as is.

- Remove the giraffe viewing deck, make the entire habitat visible from the guest path

The viewing deck was and remains a big deal, they wouldn't take it out without very good reason.

- Move the flamingos back into their ild exhibit

Not happening unless they cover the pond, the Flamingos changed exhibits because of avian flu.

move the orangs and gibbons to another part of the zoo (will elaborate shortly) and use the land to combine all three ape exhibits to make room for a single large lion enclosure in the same vein as Fresno Chaffee's large lion exhibit

The map is a bit deceiving there i think, I do not particularly believe it would give the lions any more space than what they already have.

- If there is enough space use the land where the current guenon, ring-tailed lemur, and thick-billed parrot exhibits are to make three modernized enclosures for saki monkeys, sloth, and thick-billed parrots - bonus points if they are rotational between one another so the three species each get further enrichment

Thick-billed Parrot exhibit is fine - also three is unnecessary as the sloth and saki have been sharing for decades. Would also disrupt the best breeding colony of the parrots in the US.

- Downsize from NARO to ASC otters, renovate the otter exhibit with underwate viewing, and retheme this entire area to an Asian forest themed zone

The exhibit is already small, and I doubt it could take on ASCO properly.

Alternatively there seems to be a bit of land between the lion exhibit, red panda exhibit, and Kampala Cafe,

True, but the map is misleading. That area is actually where the off-show areas for big cat row are, along with storage and access points. There is no space for anything new there.
 
This is awful news, talk about being as anticlimatic as possible in the way that the news was released. I was so hyped, this and the Los Angeles Zoo master plan (which is most likely not happening anymore either) were my most anticpated zoo projects to come within the next decade. Now hopefully Nashville is still successful in its African expansion, that masterplan seems very expensive and ambitious as well.

You are doing some creative thinking, but a lot of what you are proposing is probably not feasible because the infrastructure of much of the zoo is old and in need of complete replacement. The reptile house was built in 1970 and is very outdated for modern husbandry needs. The zoo was planning to replace it before the Elk Grove project. The whole complex with lions, clouded leopards, etc. is 60 years old. It has undergone multiple renovations, but the exhibits are quite small. The otter exhibit is over 50 years old and was extensively renovated in the 2010s. There is no way to put underwater viewing in it because the pond is a concrete swimming pool. The rhino space is okay for a single rhino.

My guess is that they will put together yet another master plan for the current zoo site. Jason Jacobs and his predecessor Mary Healy did a lot of good for the zoo, modernizing what they could. The okapi exhibit is really good. The cheetah exhibit is actually 50 years old, but still functional. There are still major problems with the core zoo that need total replacement - the primate complex including the orang exhibit, the reptile house, eventually probably the central carnivore zone.

There was talk of building a hippo exhibit at the current zoo site before the Elk Grove project. An earlier master plan had pygmy hippos. There was perpetual talk of building a penguin exhibit. A new master plan, if it were funded, could probably make creative use of the site and create a really good small modern zoo. They will still have perpetual parking problems though. But it is the reality that they have to work with.
 
The map design looks almost completely identical to the one from November 2023, but one small change I noticed was that Rhinos are now in the Phase 1A-1B rather than 1C. This does look like a really nice plan and I can't wait until the day this magnificent place opens in a few years!
(map comparison: November 2023 vs now)
site_plan_buildout_231112_204146-jpg.667687

zoo-plan-all-phases-outlines.jpg
Plan throw out the windows now ..., sadly!
 
Not tremendously large - it works for the one Rhino but it's not the biggest exhibit.



Not really as much space there as it seems, and i dare say it's probably better off as is.



The viewing deck was and remains a big deal, they wouldn't take it out without very good reason.



Not happening unless they cover the pond, the Flamingos changed exhibits because of avian flu.



The map is a bit deceiving there i think, I do not particularly believe it would give the lions any more space than what they already have.



Thick-billed Parrot exhibit is fine - also three is unnecessary as the sloth and saki have been sharing for decades. Would also disrupt the best breeding colony of the parrots in the US.



The exhibit is already small, and I doubt it could take on ASCO properly.



True, but the map is misleading. That area is actually where the off-show areas for big cat row are, along with storage and access points. There is no space for anything new there.


Thanks for the feedback Argus, looks like I overestimated the zoo's layout and footprint. Guess I'll just wait to see what new masterplans the zoo is able to come up with, though it looks like it will be a struggle to keep both the lions and the orangutans; seems like the giraffes, zebras, red pandas, cheetahs, okapis, roos, emus, tortoises, and gators will be the easiest and most likely to stay. I'd rather they not lose either the orangs or the lions but it seems like they may have to choose between one or the other.

Also, maybe the white rhino paddock could be used to hold black rhino instead (being slightly smaller and more solitary), or even converted into a future pygmy hippo exhibit? Or just move the zebras there and possibly connect the old zebra exhibit to the giraffe exhibit and make a mini savannah with giraffes, ostriches, and dama gazelle or nyala.
 
You are doing some creative thinking, but a lot of what you are proposing is probably not feasible because the infrastructure of much of the zoo is old and in need of complete replacement. The reptile house was built in 1970 and is very outdated for modern husbandry needs. The zoo was planning to replace it before the Elk Grove project. The whole complex with lions, clouded leopards, etc. is 60 years old. It has undergone multiple renovations, but the exhibits are quite small. The otter exhibit is over 50 years old and was extensively renovated in the 2010s. There is no way to put underwater viewing in it because the pond is a concrete swimming pool. The rhino space is okay for a single rhino.

My guess is that they will put together yet another master plan for the current zoo site. Jason Jacobs and his predecessor Mary Healy did a lot of good for the zoo, modernizing what they could. The okapi exhibit is really good. The cheetah exhibit is actually 50 years old, but still functional. There are still major problems with the core zoo that need total replacement - the primate complex including the orang exhibit, the reptile house, eventually probably the central carnivore zone.

There was talk of building a hippo exhibit at the current zoo site before the Elk Grove project. An earlier master plan had pygmy hippos. There was perpetual talk of building a penguin exhibit. A new master plan, if it were funded, could probably make creative use of the site and create a really good small modern zoo. They will still have perpetual parking problems though. But it is the reality that they have to work with.

Thanks Mr. Brown, looks like it will just be better to wait and see what the zoo is able to come up with for its latest master plan. Too bad about the reptile house, carnovore paddocks, and otter habitats being so outdated, I was hoping there'd be more to work with there.

Its cool that hippos and penguins were considered at one point.

Taking from pachydermpro's comment from earlier in the thread but adding my own proposition, maybe at this point the zoo should just phase out most of its non-African species and just rework itself into an African theme zoo. They could reuse many of their scrapped concepts from the new zoo - the okapi/colobus aviary, gelada mountain, large lion habitat, hippo complex, restaraunt overlooking savannah, flamingo aviary, etc. - plus a few additions like phasing out the otters in place for African penguins, replacing the American alligators with Nile crocodiles or slende-snouted crocodiles, etc. They could pretty much take the new zoo's planned phase one plus the hippos and penguins, and make an African safari/forest themed zoo, in a similar vein to Bioparc Valencia in spain; even Disney Animal Kingdom and Busch Gardens are primarily African themed. Plus, I feel the capital of Ca deserves to house iconuc species that every kid would like to see like giraffes, lions, hippos, penguins - plus some they may not be familiar with like okapi and geladas. Maybe dedicate an acre of the zoo's land towars making a new entrance and parking lot?

Of course to basically rebuild the zoo from scratch to hold these species would be near impossible unless they could receive measure Z level funding like Fresno Chaffee was able to.
 
Thanks Mr. Brown, looks like it will just be better to wait and see what the zoo is able to come up with for its latest master plan. Too bad about the reptile house, carnovore paddocks, and otter habitats being so outdated, I was hoping there'd be more to work with there.

I don't know where one would find them, but there have been at least three master plans for the current zoo site since the 1980s. The 1988 plan had African elephants, hippos, grizzly bears, multiple big cat species, etc. in it. The 1990s plan had an African forest complex with okapi, pygmy hippos, and the chimps in it, along with penguins and an Asian animal complex with tigers, tapirs, and orangs. The 2010s plan apparently has a multi species savanna for giraffes and other species in it. If somebody could find those plans it would give you a sense of what people think could adequately be built at the zoo by the standards of different eras (no elephants by 2020s standards!).
 
Back
Top