South Lakes Wild Animal Park Safari Zoo 2016

Status
Not open for further replies.
The results of the most recent zoo inspection, in November 2015, have now been released. Possibly the most important point is that the recommendation that the zoo should not be granted a new licence to operate when the current one expires in June 2016.

An excerpt from the linked news article is below:

ANIMAL escapes, deaths, injuries to members of the public and 'dangerous mismanagement' have been uncovered at Dalton zoo following a visit from two government-appointed inspectors.

An inspection at South Lakes Safari Zoo took place on November 18/19 of last year. Inspectors said a number of health and safety breaches had left members of the public in danger and found there had been nine bite injuries that year to date.

The full report has now been published and while the inspectors said they "commended the overall evident hard work and dedication of the keeping staff and admin team", they were alarmed about a number of health and safety failings.

For more information, including a list of the key failings and observations, there is an article on the matter here:

Public 'in danger' at Dalton zoo - government inspectors

If I locate the actual report I will edit this post to add a link.
 
If I locate the actual report I will edit this post to add a link.

It is here https://data.barrowbc.gov.uk/dataset/south-lakes-safari-zoo-inspection-form
I couldn't download it directly, but I could do so from the Preview.

Kifaru Bwana said:
So ...., does this imply they will not renew their license now?
Or what is it otherwise?

I imagine that they are busy remedying the problems identified in this report, so that the zoo can be re-inspected before the current licence expires.

Alan
 
Last edited:
So ...., does this imply they will not renew their license now?
Or what is it otherwise?

In short - they seem to have from now until June to get there act together, sort out the problems and convince DEFRA they should have there licence renewed.. If they fail then they won't be allowed to open to the public once the current license expires
 
In short - they seem to have from now until June to get there act together, sort out the problems and convince DEFRA they should have there licence renewed.. If they fail then they won't be allowed to open to the public once the current license expires

The report gives a list of conditions which must be met, or be significantly worked towards, in order for a renewal in June to be likely. I will now paraphrase these, along with quoting the preceding comments about the decision:

Comment about the decision said:
The decision by the inspection team to recommend that a new licence for South Lakes Safari Zoo should not be granted at its due date, unless a Condition regarding the management structure has been complied with, is not taken lightly. It must be emphasised that the inspectors are keen to see the Zoo develop and thrive in line with modern zoo standards. The inspectors commend Mr David Gill for his initial decision to step back from the running of the Zoo and to concentrate on its conservation role, but do not believe that at the time of this inspection, or subsequently, sufficient progress has been made in this respect, and note that this decision was subsequently reversed during the compilation of this final report. This is no longer a small zoo and it now houses a large and diverse number of species. Suitable management processes must be in place before a new licence is issued to enable the zoo to meet all its legal obligations, particularly in respect of Sections 2,8,9 and 10 of the SSSMZP. These have been areas of concern and flagged as issues repeatedly over a number of years at previous zoo inspections. The inspection of November 2015 has highlighted 32 Conditions that the inspectors believe must be applied to the licence. This is a considerable number of Conditions for a zoo of this size, and many of these result from the repeated failure to implement fully previous Conditions, thus aggravating the situation and determining the inspectors position. Of particular concern to the Inspectors is the fact that as this zoo grows, it relies heavily on the owner's experience implementing out of date practices and refusing to implement modern zoo practices. In the inspectors' opinion this has resulting in animal welfare issues, a higher than expected mortality rate amongst the animals, higher than expected incidents (such as injuries to the public from animals) and places both staff and the public potentially in danger. The new management structure must include a competent, suitably qualified and experienced full-time Director (or Senior Manager). This individual will have day to day responsibility for the running of the Zoo, will be able to make decisions independent of the owner and will be fully responsible to the licencing authority for the conduct of the Zoo and all its on-site activities. This will be a full-time post and therefore cannot be someone who will spend large parts of the year absent from the site

It is worth noting that the section in bold would appear to be addressed by the arrival of David Armitage at the collection!

The Conditions listed are as follows, along with the timespan they must occur within. I have paraphrased where appropriate.

1) All vegetation and trees in proximity to the perimeter fence must be cut back and maintained to prevent animals from escaping (8 months)
2) All public wooden walkways and platforms to be designed and maintained in safe condition, and the effect of any walkway or platform stanchions being submerged in water for prolonged periods assessed (1 year)
3) A written and agreed-upon protocol for liason with Cumbria Constabulary in response to animal escapes, and appropriate firearms cover for the premises, to be reviewed on a yearly basis and provided to the Licencing Authority (1 year)
4) All staff involved in power washing surfaces used by animals must wear appropriate PPE to prevent zoonotic infection eg facemask, goggles etc. Clear written instructions to staff must be enforced (immediate)
5) Indoor facilities for the Andean Bears must be redesigned and rebuilt to meet standards, including facilities for the separation and direct visual assessment of bears, adequate ventilation, access for veterinary management etc (6 months)
6) All staff who work with newly arrived hazardous species not previously held in the collection or within other staff's past experience must undergo a period of recorded training at a collection already holding the species (immediate)
7) Indoor facilities for the group of baboons must be upgraded or replaced to meet standards (1 year)
8) Any organised sessions of public feeding of animals involving raw met or fish must be subject of written risk assessment with protective gloves provided as appropriate (immediate)
9) Removal of sign showing and implicitly encouraging public/lemur contact (immediate)
10) Lifebelt and a sign with emergency instructions to be provided at the top pond/walkthrough (3 months)
11) A functioning fly-killer must be provided in the fruit/veg kitchen store area (3 months)
12) Quarantine or housing of newly arrived birds within the same airspace as birds already within the collection must cease, with written protocols provided for the housing and quarantine of animals introduced to the collection and training for staff in these protocols (6 months)
13) A written report must be produced for the Licensing Authority by an indeptendent pest control company on the safe and effective control of rodent vermin within 3 months, and the zoo must implement the recommendations of the report (6 months)
14) All electrical apparatus must be installed and maintained in such a way that they do not present a hazard to animals (3 months)
15) Insulation in the roof of the bear dens must be protected to prevent the peafowl from eating insulation material (1 month)
16) Effective non-touch barriers e.g. a stand-off barrier for the public must be provided at the area of Andean bear fencing in proximity to their dens (3 months)
17) Top lemur house has no effective public barrier preventing access to the house and its doors - house and enclosures must be kept locked at all times when keeper is not present (immediate)
18) Temporary enclosure of hay bales, pallets and bale twine in Africa House is completely inadequate and must be made secure to modern zoo standards to prevent further escapes (1 month)
19) During the completion of the indoor accommodation of the Africa house the animals present must be provided additional shelter in the outside enclosure to accommodate all species (1 month)
20) Flooring of the new flamingo house must be subject of review by veterinary consultants and suitable flooring/substrate put in place to improve health of flamingos' feet (6 months)
21) A full review of diets and nutrition across all species must be carried out, with records of all diets and changes made documented and kept (6 months)
22) Corner of Andean Bear enclosure that tapers to a point must be rounded off with electric fencing to prevent one bear being cornered by another in the event of conflict (3 months)
23) Overall veterinary programme in the Zoo is inadequate and must be radically revised to bring it into line with modern zoo practice. A written outline of this revised programme must be produced and submitted to the licensing authority (3 months)
24) A full written review of incidents of members of the poublic being bitten must be carried out and an action plan adopted to reduce the number of bites, with a copy of each forwarded to the LA (3 months)
25) Dedicated staff hand-washing facilities must be provided where raw meat is handled (6 months)
26) If preparation of raw meat and raw fish is to continue in the same room it must take place in designated separate areas with separate utensils to avoid cross-contamination of food (1 month)
27) Details of the ethical review process must be recorded and made available to the zoo licencing process (3 years)
28) All walkways that are constructed of wood must have a surface that will prevent, as far as practical, visitors falling or tripping (6 months)
29) Regarding the prairie dogs free living in burrows in the top walkthrough area, a written risk assessment carried out by the veterinary consultant on the effectiveness of the perimeter fence must be undertaken and the steps taken by the zoo to prevent escapes documented. Copies of these reports to be forwards to the Local Authority (6 months)
30) Design of accommodation in the new Africa house must be such that keepers do not have to enter an enclosure with a Category 1 animal to work gates, supply food or move them, and a written document detailing the changes that will be made to the current animal management pracrtices - including risk assesments - must be forwarded to the local Authority (3 months)
31) The muck-heap in the rhino/giraffe paddock must be moved sufficiently far from the perimeter fence to eliminate its potential use as an escape aid (1 month)
32) A robust management and staffing structure musr be in place to the satisfaction of the licencing authority for a new licence to be issued, including a competent, suitably qualified and experienced full-time Director or Senior Manager. This individual will have day to day responsibility for the running of the Zoo, will be able to make decisions independent of the owner and will be fully responsible to the licencing authority for the conduct of the Zoo and all its on-site activities.
33) A suitable and sufficent risk assessment for the anaconda in the walk-through area (1 month)
 
33) A suitable and sufficent risk assessment for the anaconda in the walk-through area (1 month)

Am I reading this right? They have an anaconda in a walk-through?!
 
I am surprised by the hygiene standards! Those things should be obvious and sound very amateuristic atm....
 
According to the following news article, SLWAP has released a statement claiming that the inspection report is "false and misleading" and lacks evidence for its claims, and that they intend to contact their legal team to this effect:

South Lakes Safari Zoo inspection highlights concerns - BBC News

Maybe the zoo management should worry more about sorting out the 33 issues on the Zoo Licence inspection report than looking at legal action... Having personlly gone through a zoo inspection I have to say that the list of issues is pretty damning. Some of them are so blatently obvious and easy to sort out. The negative side (apart from the zoo potentially being closed, and I'm not entirely convinced that is a negative) is the bad PR it gives all zoos in the public eye. Most casual (non-zoo) readers would not realise that the owner's management style was at odds with other UK zoos.
 
Maybe the zoo management should worry more about sorting out the 33 issues on the Zoo Licence inspection report than looking at legal action... Having personlly gone through a zoo inspection I have to say that the list of issues is pretty damning. Some of them are so blatently obvious and easy to sort out. The negative side (apart from the zoo potentially being closed, and I'm not entirely convinced that is a negative) is the bad PR it gives all zoos in the public eye. Most casual (non-zoo) readers would not realise that the owner's management style was at odds with other UK zoos.

Agree fully and noting that while going through an inspection, the team points out where things are not good, ideal or incorrect and then will meet within the zoo to go through their onsite findings before going away to write up in full. The licence inspection team can allow for a 6 month, one year, 18 month, two year and full term zoo licence however, on this occasion the inspection team are saying that the licence should be refused and that says a lot. The most obvious and common sense approach is to fix, to amend and to get on with the job.
 
According to the following news article, SLWAP has released a statement claiming that the inspection report is "false and misleading" and lacks evidence for its claims, and that they intend to contact their legal team to this effect

Legally speaking, I doubt if they have a leg to stand on. The zoo's spokesperson has a real nerve to claim that the report does not contain factual evidence: the whole thing is evidence - in many instances it is the evidence that zoo should have provided that is missing (the collection plan, records of diets, veterinary protocols, records of staff training, risk assessments and procedures for liaising with police in the event of escapes etc).
I note that the spokesperson did not comment about the deaths of the two nyala or about the zoo's annual death rate.

Alan
 
Last edited:
Hello all, im VERY new here and in NO WAY up to your standard of knowledge but... i did notice bigcat speciali saying "The most obvious and common sense approach is to fix, to amend and to get on with the job." In layman's language if you make a rotten cup of tea for 20 years, change the milk, water, and sugar, and STILL get a rotten cup of tea... it seems a no brainer to me that it might just be the cheap nasty rotten T Bag that might be to blame... And with the fact that that T Bag will never be changed, the Tea will stay rotten.... just saying..
 
Hello all, im VERY new here and in NO WAY up to your standard of knowledge but... i did notice bigcat speciali saying "The most obvious and common sense approach is to fix, to amend and to get on with the job." In layman's language if you make a rotten cup of tea for 20 years, change the milk, water, and sugar, and STILL get a rotten cup of tea... it seems a no brainer to me that it might just be the cheap nasty rotten T Bag that might be to blame... And with the fact that that T Bag will never be changed, the Tea will stay rotten.... just saying..

A very good analogy. I feel that we can all agree that by having Dave Gill gone along with his wife is the most common sense approach going. When I say gone, I mean having no input both financial, physical and hidden. The longer Dave Gill, his wife and his local council councillor son Levi hang on, the greater the problem. The constant battle between him and the council and with others has gone on far too long and is bringing the zoo community into disrepute.
 
As an informed zoological group though, dont you all find it extremely odd as to how he has skirted round EVERY hurdle whatsoever from Mareeba to killing loads of animals????? How is it possible?? it seems so odd, no where else in the WORLD would he get away with the things he has done and claimed to have done but Barrow in Furness, SURELY someone somewhere can stop him?? Even the paying public seem to condone the things he has done. I tell you he IS unstoppable because NO ONE in Barrow will cross him.
 
I sincerely hope that with the expert guidance of David Armitage will put paid to any ado about fixing the ills of SLWAP / Safari Zoo. This latest communique makes me doubt whether he will get a free hand here.

It seems - diplomatically speaking - unwise and uncalled for - for current management to further antagonize the process of zoo inspections and expert advise on fixing the oversights found by the zoo inspection team.

I assume there will be provisions within the Zooinspection laws and bye-laws for installing a caretaker management, if that is what is needed (??)!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top