Tricoart
Well-Known Member
Not to bombard with polar bear related talk/updates, but I had the confidence to ask the keeper some questions after the talk today, and there’s some clarification, contradiction, and additional info I’d be remiss not to share.
First, clarification. Pre-COVID, they’d planned to transfer ‘Sura’ (seemingly a 5 y/o female from Ouwenhands Zoo in the Netherlands), and attempt to cohabitate her with Mishka, instead of immediately transferring Mishka. As COVID hit, though, those plans fell through, and the current situation began.
Contradiction: Supposedly their current hopes are still to do a similar thing to their pre-COVID plan, in which they attempt to cohabitate a female with Mishka, and are waiting for a suitable female to be available/agreed upon by the International Polar Bear Studbook. Nothing about any definite holds or pauses, or any plans for a male for Mishka once Hudson & Nelson pass (though, it was stated their plans do depend on bears’ genetic value, and it’s somewhat out of their control due to the Studbook). At the very least, there remains an avid disinterest to transfer Hudson, Nelson, or Mishka. If they couldn’t successfully cohabitate another female with Mishka, it was stated there’s enough backstage space for 4 individually kept bears, which I would assume means permanent cycling of their Maternity Den, but I don’t think it’d be ideal without an expansion/renovation of some kind. Speaking of…
Additional info: Supposedly, a current 10 year plan for Sea World exists, and includes preliminary plans to yet again expand Polar Bear Shores. This was initially somewhat confusing, as the current enclosure(/s) seems pretty snug in its location IMO, especially post-Preschool. But, when questioned about space, it was stated that there’s no concrete plans for an expansion’s exact location, but mentioned that certain staff facilities would be able to be demolished/relocated to create more space, if need be. I’ll be somewhat surprised if this does happen, but it being in the future plans (albeit only in very early stages), refills some previously lost hope for the future of the bears at Sea World.
First, clarification. Pre-COVID, they’d planned to transfer ‘Sura’ (seemingly a 5 y/o female from Ouwenhands Zoo in the Netherlands), and attempt to cohabitate her with Mishka, instead of immediately transferring Mishka. As COVID hit, though, those plans fell through, and the current situation began.
Contradiction: Supposedly their current hopes are still to do a similar thing to their pre-COVID plan, in which they attempt to cohabitate a female with Mishka, and are waiting for a suitable female to be available/agreed upon by the International Polar Bear Studbook. Nothing about any definite holds or pauses, or any plans for a male for Mishka once Hudson & Nelson pass (though, it was stated their plans do depend on bears’ genetic value, and it’s somewhat out of their control due to the Studbook). At the very least, there remains an avid disinterest to transfer Hudson, Nelson, or Mishka. If they couldn’t successfully cohabitate another female with Mishka, it was stated there’s enough backstage space for 4 individually kept bears, which I would assume means permanent cycling of their Maternity Den, but I don’t think it’d be ideal without an expansion/renovation of some kind. Speaking of…
Additional info: Supposedly, a current 10 year plan for Sea World exists, and includes preliminary plans to yet again expand Polar Bear Shores. This was initially somewhat confusing, as the current enclosure(/s) seems pretty snug in its location IMO, especially post-Preschool. But, when questioned about space, it was stated that there’s no concrete plans for an expansion’s exact location, but mentioned that certain staff facilities would be able to be demolished/relocated to create more space, if need be. I’ll be somewhat surprised if this does happen, but it being in the future plans (albeit only in very early stages), refills some previously lost hope for the future of the bears at Sea World.