the exhibit looks great
the elephant exhibit is holding up really well. the grass in the top paddock is going quite as well as the lower paddock, because the elephants spend most their time up there, but over all it hasnt been ruined. im pretty sure the zoo would have formulated a substrate, like they zoo in football ovals, for minimum compaction, maximum drainage and moisture, etc.
the elephants were 100% active, in fact theyre real crowd pleasers. the cynics who said they are here for purely commercial purposes are right, the crowd loves them and they put on a great show, but the zoo friends were there with touch artefacts and every time i turned aorund people were dropping donations into the conservation foundation boxes.
in the lower paddock one big fig has died-NOT ONE OF THE BIG ONES IN THE DEER EXHIBIT DONT WORRY-but im sure the elephants will hae fun pulling it apart, and there is another fig in the rock wall dividing the exhibits that in the future should form a canopy covering much of the lower paddock.
enrichment included stacks of palm branches, swathes of grass, hay nets and there was obviously food hidden too because the elephants were clearly seeking it out.
i loved the sense of cohesion the elephants have, when some herd members moved to the lower paddock, everyone went together. i thought to myself that whilst the exhibit, to some people, seems a small place for 5 animals, that from the animals point of view its obviously more enriching to have a herd of 5 rather than just two or three herd mates.
getting back to a point pat had made earlier too, about what would happen if the elephants turned aggrssive, the zoo had to prepare contingency plans before the import was approved, so obviously they have covered all bases. it goes without saying of course that i would rather see all 5 animals live here forever.
on a happy note too, its wonderful to see how much the animals enjoy the 4 metre deep waterhole. its still brown as, but in the future, between the grass regrowing, the filtration system and the reed and papyrus beds becoming better established, the water may return to a shade clearer. perhaps in the winter, when the elephants wont be in the water quite so much.
as for the rest of the zoo everything looked great, as per usual. the garden at the gorillas has been replanted with some new plants, to enhance the 'lushness', though i would dearly love to see them get rid of those ugly terracotta pots. all the aviaries looked great, the signage fantastic. the waterhole is looking good, but for the name. sun bears, indian rhino and tapir arent from africa after all, but its still a nice area of the zoo with plenty to see and do. i cant wait, no matter what they decide to do, for them to start work on the tropical savannah. in my mind, the african waterhole and future highlands exhibit area just arent up to standard as the rest of the zoo. all the exhibits are full, peccary, dhole, fennec foxes, giraffes, meerkat, red panda etc, but they just dont match the standard of wild asia, in the same way as melbournes big cat enclosures dont come up to the same standard as trail of the elephants or gorillas.
backyard to bush has had a bit of a revamp. in my ind its a great area, and it was just packed to the rafters with kids and zoo friends the other days, patting reptiles, and sheep, and going on bushwalks, but it needs some more roos and emus in the bushwalk area. the barn would also be a great venue for a feral animals exhibit-maybe some red-eared terrapin, mosquito fish, cane toads and water hyacinth. some green tree ants or little sedge frogs in a crate of plastic banannas could also be a good way of demontrating how native animals can become 'unnative' when they reach new places.