Polar Bears are not going to potentially vector a disease that could disrupt an entire industry, like hippos could for cattle.
AAAH - point taken.
Polar Bears are not going to potentially vector a disease that could disrupt an entire industry, like hippos could for cattle.
I would assume that they would give them a fairly decent and large exhibit (you would hope), and make it an 'interesting' experience.
If it turns out to be good... I may have to visit the Gold Coast. Yikes.
As for reasons why - They ran a focus group AFTER they began construction \reclamation works, and the focus group were shown two proposals - the first being Sea World's land reclamation deal, with an elevated walkway going through the middle for guests to look down on the animals (which were intended to be real, not animatronic).
The second option, and one which - from what i've heard was overwhelmingly more popular was to use the land at the back of AOS to create a 'Disney's Animal Kingdom' type open-plains park, with attached guest lodge \ hotel, night-time tribal stage performances etc - which would also give the animals far more 'natural' habitat, than the cramped and enclosed edge of Sea World's already cluttered parkland.
And I think - although they didn't end up following through - the response to option 1 killed Wild (as it was at Sea World) in favour of the much more extravagant option two. Perhaps further down the track when VR has a little more support (and opportunities for those animals) they might begin work on that project again...
Looks like Wild has been scrapped for the time being according to this source: Sea World update news?? - Theme Park Discussion - Parkz Forums - Theme Parks
Seems it's on hold indefinitely, with their New Atlantis Precinct and allSo is option 2 still going ahead? Or has the whole idea been scrapped altogether? I haven't heard of any of these developments at all.