nanoboy: I believe your comment includes me. I would not personally say I have a "link" to Shambala, but my "link" is I visited the park for the entire day and had personal conversations with Elaine and two (out of five) other staff that were there on the day.
How then do I have the information I do? I have a VERY weak link to some of the residents that now reside there so naturally I was more than curious about the zoo (present and future plans), also those people I talked to were more than willing to discuss many aspects of the zoo even without my provocation.
I do not have an axe to grind, personally I have always and will always wish them success (mainly because I know some of the residents). Secondly, Elaine is a lawyer, everything I have said is true to my best recollection and started by trying to answer a Question, I am aware of possible ramifications of publicly sharing untruths (specifically if it can be classed as defamation) when a lawyer owns the facility you are talking about and even more so when some extra cash wouldn't go a stray.
If I did have an axe to grind I would have shared other things that I know, the reason I didn't is because from my opinion they are truely trying to make the zoo a good place for animals and people. AGAIN I wish them nothing but the best!
PS I didn't mean for my initial posts to be so negative or confronting, I hope to contribute to this forum for many years more positively
How then do I have the information I do? I have a VERY weak link to some of the residents that now reside there so naturally I was more than curious about the zoo (present and future plans), also those people I talked to were more than willing to discuss many aspects of the zoo even without my provocation.
I do not have an axe to grind, personally I have always and will always wish them success (mainly because I know some of the residents). Secondly, Elaine is a lawyer, everything I have said is true to my best recollection and started by trying to answer a Question, I am aware of possible ramifications of publicly sharing untruths (specifically if it can be classed as defamation) when a lawyer owns the facility you are talking about and even more so when some extra cash wouldn't go a stray.
If I did have an axe to grind I would have shared other things that I know, the reason I didn't is because from my opinion they are truely trying to make the zoo a good place for animals and people. AGAIN I wish them nothing but the best!
PS I didn't mean for my initial posts to be so negative or confronting, I hope to contribute to this forum for many years more positively