Absolutely agree. I think this would also encourage more global cooperation with captive populations as well, and might even allow for more re-wilding efforts for species that don't typically have those programs in zoos.My last point might be the most controversial, but I wish that zoos could bring in animals from the wild with the specific goal being to help establish a species in captivity or to bring in new bloodlines to a species that would be at risk of becoming inbred.
There is space in hoofstock yards and behind the bird house where can be more exhibitBecause I’m basic, I wish that more of Franklin Park was the zoo so new, larger exhibits could be built. I know people say the zoo has wasted space, but there’s only so much you can do with those as is.
That’s really only it, though. There was also the patch of land in front of Serengeti Crossing, but they’re actually making use of that.There is space in hoofstock yards and behind the bird house where can be more exhibit
That Barcelona Zoo either...
1- Gets bought out by a private ownership that actually KNOWS what they're doing.
2- Benefits from a complete purge of anti-zoo nutjobs in places of power (never gonna happen)
3- Moves out of the city entirely; I have reached the conclusion that Barcelona doesn't deserve a zoo.
Long story short, things didn't go as badly as they could have thanks to the EAZA and WAZA intervening. But the BCN zoo's progress is stagnant, and still heading un weird directions, because they still have people in power at the zoo who are zoo-haters... And I often realise that the zoo could be amazing, but the city itself is unfit to have it due to how ingrained anti-zoo sentiments are in society.I thought that the developments in Barcelona ended up being much less drastic than they initially seemed? I would be very interested to hear more about it from someone who is well acquainted with the zoo. If this is too off-topic (and you have the time and feel like it of course), you can also send me a private message.
In general I'd love more standalone aquariums. Zoos in the US far outnumber aquariums, and the closest aquarium to me is... meh. It's fine, but it's no Shedd, you know? With how important the aquatic world is to humans, I'd love to see more facilities dedicated to displaying, educating, and preserving freshwater and saltwater landscapes.
Just over 70% of the world is water. I think that a 3:7 zoo:aquarium ratio is a little much, but I'd be happy with a little more representation! Right now in the US I think it's roughly 6:1.5. (4:1? if I'm doing my math right?)
somewhat shockingly, Los Angeles, which does have multiple small institutions in its suburbs or greater metro area but only the California Science Center in its city limits.
A lot of those species are hard to keep and/or obtain. Taronga Zoo did have a rescue leopard seal but it's unlikely zoos outside of Australia and New Zealand would be able to get those species. I feel like Japan would be the first thoughAntarctica species housed that are not simply just penguins in both zoos and aquaria. There are polar bears, caribou, arctic wolf and walrus and other whales (in valencia their local aquarium ive been too has beluga whales) in various zoo and aquaria. But antarctica has many species of birds and invertabrates and fishes that could be used in zoos (sheathbills, shorebirds, imperial shags, icefish and perhaps even antarctic midges) and seals that could be suprisingly charasmatic draws for the least biodiverse continent. Antarctican starfish would be interesting to perhaps see.
The Cabrillo Aquarium in San Pedro is actually within the city limits of Los Angeles as well and is operated directly by the city (San Pedro being a neighborhood rather than a municipality), although geographically it sits much closer to Long Beach than most of LA proper.
i understand that, sadly it will probably remain a wish. I know that antarctica is the least biodiverse continent, but i think it is way too unrepresented. Even penguin species displayed usually hail from Africa or south America. Thinking about exhibit, ive never seen a south american exhibit in a zoo thats not based off the andes or amazon. I would like some sort of south american desert, temperate rainforest or atlantic forest.A lot of those species are hard to keep and/or obtain. Taronga Zoo did have a rescue leopard seal but it's unlikely zoos outside of Australia and New Zealand would be able to get those species. I feel like Japan would be the first though
I feel like the Chaco, Serrano, pantanal, Patagonia, etc. would be good exhibits. Atlantic Forest would be hard as the only major mammal species is golden Lion tamarini understand that, sadly it will probably remain a wish. I know that antarctica is the least biodiverse continent, but i think it is way too unrepresented. Even penguin species displayed usually hail from Africa or south America. Thinking about exhibit, ive never seen a south american exhibit in a zoo thats not based off the andes or amazon. I would like some sort of south american desert, temperate rainforest or atlantic forest.