Shedd Aquarium Shedd Aquarium

I'll write this update post first, before I read and react to the recent news.

I just made my yearly visit to the aquarium, for the 3rd time since 2021, this past Saturday, July 29th, 2023, from 10am-12pm. Despite being very crowded, I managed to view the entire aquarium in about two hours. This short time was mainly due to traveling with some friends up from Champaign via Amtrak. Having been for a longer amount of time twice prior in the past two years, I became very used to the layout and I could quickly discern changes and new or interesting species I wanted to find, and I could remember which of the rest I'd seen already and could quickly glance, take a few photos for identification, and pass by.

The absence of a special exhibit also sped things up, and I didn't feel its loss too much. Without having read about the new developments, I speculate that a new permanent gallery will go in the special exhibit space, as I think the aquarium will need it.

Another thing that actually really helped speed up things was the Shedd Go app. I was somewhat skeptical of it first, but it actually works a lot better than the screens, although I still prefer the card signage around the historic galleries, even if the app is faster. The habitat ID system was annoying at first, until I got the hang of it and figured out the ID number system. It took a bit of time to make sure I had all the numbers right, but not nearly as much as taking photos of all of the slides, however. There is also the added bonus of being able to read about species more in-depth at home, without (Literally) 1000+ photos. I will try to write up an updated species list with all of the ID numbers at some point soon.

There has also been some changes and major reshuffling of species and exhibits around some of the galleries. This is typical of an Aquarium, and especially Shedd, but I noticed more since March of last year (2022) than I did between that visit and July 2021. Once I compile a full list, I can make note of most of these, like the Burbot that are now on exhibit, for example, but for now I'll just comment about some more major changes that I haven't seen noted on here.

This round, and very pleasant looking, Upside-down jelly exhibit is new since March of last year in the Philippine lagoon area of Wild Reef.

The four small cylindrical exhibits in the center of the At Home on the Great Lakes Gallery, that were new last March, have been redesigned. I like them better now, and they hold a few more species that are more visible. Previously they all held native amphibians, which were hard to see. Species list (including those lost) hopefully coming soon.

Also what is the plankton exhibit they say opened this year?
I was surprised by this too! I really liked the old small seahorse and pipefish tanks on one of the walls between the galleries, but this was an interesting, but less diverse, replacement. Many of the inhabitants of the old mini-gallery have been dispersed to various tanks around the aquarium, but I'll try to take a more in-depth look at that later. This may be a slightly worrying trend of the new developments, however. There were 25-35 species in the old mini-gallery, and there are only four now. If it was less crowded and I was less pressed for time, I would've tried to get a picture of the full display. I have to say it does look very nice, and has some more colorful tanks for algea, zooplankton, and phytoplankton they grow for feed, along with comprehensive signage.

 
I have a bunch of renderings of Shedd's new exhibits. Mixed feelings on the plan overall, I hope they keep their current stellar collection instead of phasing anything out. Have to split this into two messages to upload everything.
 

Attachments

  • Shedd External Aerial Rendering.jpg
    Shedd External Aerial Rendering.jpg
    194.4 KB · Views: 11
  • Whalefall.jpg
    Whalefall.jpg
    137 KB · Views: 14
  • Wonder of Water.jpg
    Wonder of Water.jpg
    234.5 KB · Views: 11
  • New Atrium and Shedd Store.jpg
    New Atrium and Shedd Store.jpg
    146.4 KB · Views: 10
  • River Wonders.jpg
    River Wonders.jpg
    172.7 KB · Views: 12
  • Kelp Forest Ramp Overlook.jpg
    Kelp Forest Ramp Overlook.jpg
    198.9 KB · Views: 11
  • Lakeside Learning Studio.jpg
    Lakeside Learning Studio.jpg
    206.1 KB · Views: 9
  • Living Lakes.jpg
    Living Lakes.jpg
    161.2 KB · Views: 9
  • Grand Hall.jpg
    Grand Hall.jpg
    198.1 KB · Views: 8
  • Kelp Forest Lower Look.jpg
    Kelp Forest Lower Look.jpg
    211 KB · Views: 10
Thanks for those! A couple interesting this from these renderings is that Living Lakes and River Wonders really do appear to keep the gallery feel more than I realized. In fact Living Lakes appears to have the exact same layout as the current At Home on the Great Lakes gallery. River Wonders appears to just be the Rivers gallery with some more species added in the center.

Honestly, this has gotten rid of my two primary fears for this renovation - a significant species reduction and loss of the historical feel of the facility. I'm still wary to a degree (I think Shedd in its current form is about as close to perfection as a zoological facility to get), but I'm definitely more on the positive side now.

One extremely minor issue is that the expanded Arapaima habitat appears to be taking out the Muddy Forest exhibit. That's a bit disappointing but it really is a minor issue.
 
Thanks for those! A couple interesting this from these renderings is that Living Lakes and River Wonders really do appear to keep the gallery feel more than I realized. In fact Living Lakes appears to have the exact same layout as the current At Home on the Great Lakes gallery. River Wonders appears to just be the Rivers gallery with some more species added in the center.

Honestly, this has gotten rid of my two primary fears for this renovation - a significant species reduction and loss of the historical feel of the facility. I'm still wary to a degree (I think Shedd in its current form is about as close to perfection as a zoological facility to get), but I'm definitely more on the positive side now.

One extremely minor issue is that the expanded Arapaima habitat appears to be taking out the Muddy Forest exhibit. That's a bit disappointing but it really is a minor issue.

I don't know if a reduction isn't still in the cards. They haven't revealed an official species list or anything.
 
I don't know if a reduction isn't still in the cards. They haven't revealed an official species list or anything.
As others have said it's difficult to speculate on that (and no doubt they are not entirely sure on the species list yet either). But this has made me more confident that a significant reduction in species count is less likely.
 
The absence of a special exhibit also sped things up, and I didn't feel its loss too much. Without having read about the new developments, I speculate that a new permanent gallery will go in the special exhibit space, as I think the aquarium will need it.
A shame, really. I was quite fond of Underwater Beauty. It had some very nice tanks and a couple of very interesting species. I'll have to go back to Shedd soon.
 
Underwater Beauty was one of the most innovative and unique zoo exhibits even and I wish it would have stuck around as a permanent fixture.
 
Although this looks better than what I could've expected, I still think a lot of what makes Shedd feel special could be lost. These renderings look more similar to a generic aquarium that could be anywhere in the country.
 
Thanks for those! A couple interesting this from these renderings is that Living Lakes and River Wonders really do appear to keep the gallery feel more than I realized. In fact Living Lakes appears to have the exact same layout as the current At Home on the Great Lakes gallery. River Wonders appears to just be the Rivers gallery with some more species added in the center.

Honestly, this has gotten rid of my two primary fears for this renovation - a significant species reduction and loss of the historical feel of the facility. I'm still wary to a degree (I think Shedd in its current form is about as close to perfection as a zoological facility to get), but I'm definitely more on the positive side now.

One extremely minor issue is that the expanded Arapaima habitat appears to be taking out the Muddy Forest exhibit. That's a bit disappointing but it really is a minor issue.
This takes a lot of words out of my mouth honestly. Rivers and Lakes feel like they're getting a refresh without losing what makes them special as far as we can tell, and that is really, really reassuring.

Which one is the Muddy Forest? Been a few years since I've made the trip, though hoping a revisit in the winter. I definitely could agree the arapaima needed space but I'm always conscious what is lost.

...

The addition of new species (spotted eagle ray and more blacktip reef sharks) to the Caribbean Reef tunnel definitely makes it more exciting. I've always wished the Shedd had such a tunnel, although I never wanted it to replace an existing exhibit.

I like the new entrance plaza. The Shedd is always kind of a nightmare to enter and exit. The pollinator garden is a nice move in making the whole thing more attractive. I like these ideas. I like the bus passes and the desire to get more children to the aquarium for education purposes. Those are good initiatives and everything related to guest experience seems cool. I do wish they'd have discussed the new educational space in more practical terms though. It feels like they lean too much on marketing speak for that.

I'm really confused by how the layout will change though. Will the Local Waters and Oceans galleries be enough for the new whalefall, kelp forest, tunnel and so forth exhibits? It looks like this is going to be a multi-level exhibit or did I misunderstand?

It's interesting they're aiming for a centennial celebration - Brookfield is taking a very similar route. The 2030s will be an exciting time for Chicago's zoological collections. Maybe after that they can tackle improved pinniped and penguin habitats.

Here's my big negative - Wonder of Water seems like an extremely underwhelming replacement for the iconic Caribbean Reef exhibit. I don't feel sold on this change at all. I feel like part of the current reef's strength is that it has a few iconic species in it already - sea turtle, small sharks, eel, rays - so it acts as both an exciting exhibit in it's own right but also a tease for what else the aquarium has. It makes a great first introduction and experience to the aquarium and a solid place to revisit on the way out. This just feels like you're getting a tiny version of a fourth reef and a small freshwater enclosure without, it seems, a fish worthy of mention in either space. It feels more like an art piece. I truly hate to sound this negative and I hope we get more details before the old reef is closed down, I'd sincerely like to be wrong, but so far it feels like the major step down.

In any case, the overwhelming majority of my fears and concerns are more than addressed here and I see most of this change as an overall positive for the aquarium, a very effective refresh of the existing space that is still respectful of the purposes of the existing galleries and layout without creating any serious loss. There is a major stylistic adjustment that it was inevitable the aquarium would eventually want to modernize the galleries so I'm just thankful the changes are respectful and not overly radical.
 
This takes a lot of words out of my mouth honestly. Rivers and Lakes feel like they're getting a refresh without losing what makes them special as far as we can tell, and that is really, really reassuring.

Which one is the Muddy Forest? Been a few years since I've made the trip, though hoping a revisit in the winter. I definitely could agree the arapaima needed space but I'm always conscious what is lost.

...

The addition of new species (spotted eagle ray and more blacktip reef sharks) to the Caribbean Reef tunnel definitely makes it more exciting. I've always wished the Shedd had such a tunnel, although I never wanted it to replace an existing exhibit.

I like the new entrance plaza. The Shedd is always kind of a nightmare to enter and exit. The pollinator garden is a nice move in making the whole thing more attractive. I like these ideas. I like the bus passes and the desire to get more children to the aquarium for education purposes. Those are good initiatives and everything related to guest experience seems cool. I do wish they'd have discussed the new educational space in more practical terms though. It feels like they lean too much on marketing speak for that.

I'm really confused by how the layout will change though. Will the Local Waters and Oceans galleries be enough for the new whalefall, kelp forest, tunnel and so forth exhibits? It looks like this is going to be a multi-level exhibit or did I misunderstand?

It's interesting they're aiming for a centennial celebration - Brookfield is taking a very similar route. The 2030s will be an exciting time for Chicago's zoological collections. Maybe after that they can tackle improved pinniped and penguin habitats.

Here's my big negative - Wonder of Water seems like an extremely underwhelming replacement for the iconic Caribbean Reef exhibit. I don't feel sold on this change at all. I feel like part of the current reef's strength is that it has a few iconic species in it already - sea turtle, small sharks, eel, rays - so it acts as both an exciting exhibit in it's own right but also a tease for what else the aquarium has. It makes a great first introduction and experience to the aquarium and a solid place to revisit on the way out. This just feels like you're getting a tiny version of a fourth reef and a small freshwater enclosure without, it seems, a fish worthy of mention in either space. It feels more like an art piece. I truly hate to sound this negative and I hope we get more details before the old reef is closed down, I'd sincerely like to be wrong, but so far it feels like the major step down.

In any case, the overwhelming majority of my fears and concerns are more than addressed here and I see most of this change as an overall positive for the aquarium, a very effective refresh of the existing space that is still respectful of the purposes of the existing galleries and layout without creating any serious loss. There is a major stylistic adjustment that it was inevitable the aquarium would eventually want to modernize the galleries so I'm just thankful the changes are respectful and not overly radical.
Pretty much agree with everything here.

Muddy Forest on the land exhibit that currently houses Red-fan Parrot (and formerly housed Goeldi's Monkey).
 
  • Like
Reactions: JVM
The absence of a special exhibit also sped things up, and I didn't feel its loss too much. Without having read about the new developments, I speculate that a new permanent gallery will go in the special exhibit space, as I think the aquarium will need it.

Shedd is opening a new water chemistry lab and animal hospital in this space. There's no mention of a special exhibits space, but I'm sure they'll include one somewhere at some point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CMP
Some thoughts...

The tunnel is going to be terribly loud and crowded, but the public demands tunnels and Nickel the beloved sea turtle will have more space and there will be new species. I will miss the old Caribbean Reef. I would argue it is of significant historical value. The replacements, though, look really nice. I love the idea of the freshwater next to the saltwater and to compare them. They look like beautiful tanks.

Now, concerning species loss, I remember when this news was released quite a while back they said they were keep the vast majority of the species. Perhaps we can look back at earlier reporting and press releases.

I am also an architecture enthusiast and am happy the Grand Hall and the Dome are not being ruined. The historic galleries are obviously evolving and damage is happening to there historic character.

I hope the Shedd Aquarium does a better job with the Great Lakes and Illinois waters with this renovation. I will offer some criticism of the present Shedd. If you are depicting the Great Lakes why is there no Lake Trout! It's native! Also what about the other Salmon and Trout species there are were stocked in the Great Lakes starting in the 1960's? Back in the 1980's Shedd had a tank with Chinook and Coho Salmon and the trout species that were stocked. That is what is in Lake Michigan! They haven't had those species in years. It is absurd. If your going to depict the Great Lakes show the native species (i.e. Lake Trout) and the stocked species (i.e. Chinook, Coho, Rainbow trout etc..). I am avid fisherman in Illinois and Shedd's current representation of our native fish is missing a very interesting fish in the bowfin. Hopefully this is corrected in the new Illinois streams.

My biggest hope for this new renovation does not lay in the work they did on Amazon Rising or Wild Reef because they were so long ago that many people who did those exhibits might not be with the aquarium any longer. My hope lies in the magnificent work they did on the Underwater Beauty exhibit. What an unforgettable exhibit. In fact, the freshwater tank under the dome looks similar to giant version of the relatively large tank toward the end of the Underwater Beauty exhibit. Did anyone notice that?

These are just some of my thoughts. Thanks!
 
Shedd is opening a new water chemistry lab and animal hospital in this space. There's no mention of a special exhibits space, but I'm sure they'll include one somewhere at some point.

For anyone wondering, this is where it's shown in the video.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2023-08-03 at 2.51.03 PM.png
    Screenshot 2023-08-03 at 2.51.03 PM.png
    349.1 KB · Views: 13
  • Like
Reactions: CMP
As someone who has been visiting the aquarium for as long as I can remember, I've taken a few days to process my thoughts on this announcement. Knowing these changes were on the horizon I've really taken time to appreciate the historic galleries while they're still here during recent visits.

First, the good. I for one am relieved that River Wonders and Living Lakes feel more like refocused versions of the existing galleries rather than brand new exhibits. That is a very good thing imo. As long as the historical aspects of the existing spaces are maintained I shouldn't have much to complain about. Very happy about the expanded arapaima tank as well, which is something I always felt was needed. The new learning wing, outdoor entry plaza and other quality of life improvements are all great of course. I have mixed feelings about Changing Oceans, which looks very good without being entirely distinct. It looks like an exhibit that could be at literally any aquarium. I am happy about the addition of a shorebird exhibit though, which is something that has always been lacking.

Before the announcement of the centennial campaign I never, not in a million years, would have expected them to remove the central coral reef tank. I know it's only existed in its present day iteration for about 50 years, but it's become an iconic part of the aquarium and it feels like a genuine mistake to replace it. It's cool that there will now be both a saltwater and freshwater aquarium at the center, but I worry these new displays won't have the same wow-factor as the existing rotunda. There's something special about walking from the grand hall and being greeted by a massive circular tank that you can completely circumnavigate. It's not just zoo-nerds who feel this way, just take a look at the top comments of the aquarium's instagram post of the announcement; clearly the removal of the Caribbean reef tank is not going over well with other locals, but it's far too late in the process to change course.

Overall, I'm optimistic about the aquarium's future. I fully trust that these will be worthwhile additions and Shedd will remain first-in-class worldwide for decades to come. With that said, I do wonder if all of this is really necessary. I'm looking forward to seeing how things turn out, but I feel as though attention would have been better directed elsewhere. So much of what makes the aquarium special is being altered for better or for worse, all while the weakest part of the whole facility (sea lions) will remain untouched. There is still room to expand on the North side and I wish instead of changing/replacing the existing galleries they used this opportunity to build something new from the ground up.

On a separate note, I'd just like to say that I appreciate how well communicated this announcement was. Renderings galore; even the smaller projects are being highlighted in great detail. It would be really nice if more facilities would be this transparent with future developments.
 
clearly the removal of the Caribbean reef tank is not going over well with other locals, but it's far too late in the process to change course.
I don't think that's true at all. If there's one change they could more easily make to this plan, it would be keeping Caribbean Reef. Not that I expect them to - but I think they could if they wanted to.
 
I don't think that's true at all. If there's one change they could more easily make to this plan, it would be keeping Caribbean Reef. Not that I expect them to - but I think they could if they wanted to.

If you don’t remove the Caribbean reef tank, why would you still do another Caribbean tank even if it’s a walk-through tunnel?

In general, I agree with @pachyderm pro ‘s sentiment of, “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” I love the main floor galleries the way they are. That whole level when you enter the building has such a historic feeling to it and I really think it’s gonna lose some charm once the renovations are complete.

It’s a world-class aquarium and my favorite that I’ve been to. I feel like expansion would’ve really pushed it to another, even higher, level, but some of this feels like change for the sake of change.
 
The Caribbean Reef tank is prominently featured in a recent commercial promoting Illinois tourism. I completely agree with the don't fix it if it isn't broken argument and the change for change sake argument, but realistically I am surprised the original galleries have lasted this long into the new century. As an architecture enthusiast, I am just relieved they are not putting a low ceiling above the Caribbean Reef to cover the dome because that assault has happened to historic buildings. I believe the Caribbean Reef tank is 80,000 gallons, but I cannot produce a source for that. The new Caribbean tunnel we be 190,000 according to Pepper Construction of Chicago who will build it. Shedd Aquarium Renovation
 
Slept on it. I think I’d be cool with them moving the larger reef fish / turtle to the tunnel as long as the old tank was still intact. I’m sure they could find something suitably impressive to stock an 80,000 gallon tank with. Maybe even a freshwater conversion with particularly pretty fish or something.
 
Back
Top