A new wildlife collection is due to open to the public in May in the Norfolk town of Diss.
New home for rare animals - Latest News - Diss Express
Home
New home for rare animals - Latest News - Diss Express
Home
So let's hope the collection will comprise more than just Shetland Ponies, Rheas, Meerkats and Wallabies.
That's very interesting, as Diss is not very far from where I live. No indication yet on what animals will be/are being kept there, except that there will be "nothing big or dangerous". So let's hope the collection will comprise more than just Shetland Ponies, Rheas, Meerkats and Wallabies. I see that Ben Potterton, the owner, has denied that it will be a zoo. Oh dear. I do wish people would understand that ANY place where non-domestic animals are on view to the public IS a zoo, no matter how the owner chooses to dress it up as a wildlife sanctuary or to give it some other label. (Monkey World is another that claims it is not, definately not, no way, a zoo. I don't understand. It has apes and monkeys and lemurs on show to the public, just like London, Paignton, or Colchester Zoos. How is it not a zoo?) Anyway, Mr Potterton, I like zoos, and I have no objection to the word.
Though i'm not particularly a bird lover this may make an interesting double visit with Banham in the future. I agree entirely with whats been said about it being a zoo though! There has been a trend to call places 'wild animal park'(though whipsnades thankfully not ashamed to call iyself a zoo again!),sanctury or wp, but they're all zoos! Africa Alive,Marwell Wildlife(my biggest gripe!), and monkeyworld(wherever the primates came from) are all zoos, whether its PC to be called one or not!Yes this sounds very interesting , Ben Potterton is a well respected name in the zoo world and I am sure he will do well with this new venture.
But I totally agree with zooman64 - a zoo is a zoo is a zoo- if it contains a collection of animals - it matters not one single jot what you call it, and it does not change what it is simply by calling it something else. The public`s initial perception of a place can be altered of course but that does not change the fact that it is a zoo at the end of the day.
That's very interesting, as Diss is not very far from where I live. No indication yet on what animals will be/are being kept there, except that there will be "nothing big or dangerous". So let's hope the collection will comprise more than just Shetland Ponies, Rheas, Meerkats and Wallabies. I see that Ben Potterton, the owner, has denied that it will be a zoo. Oh dear. I do wish people would understand that ANY place where non-domestic animals are on view to the public IS a zoo, no matter how the owner chooses to dress it up as a wildlife sanctuary or to give it some other label. (Monkey World is another that claims it is not, definately not, no way, a zoo. I don't understand. It has apes and monkeys and lemurs on show to the public, just like London, Paignton, or Colchester Zoos. How is it not a zoo?) Anyway, Mr Potterton, I like zoos, and I have no objection to the word.
If these are the genuine reasons then i can accept them,but its easy to see why some have jumped to the wrong conclusion possibly, when several collections do try to paint themselves as being in some way better than a zoo.(Puts body armour on).
To be fair, I can see why Ben Potterton might try to claim the place is not a (traditional) zoo:
1. It stops the place being compared with nearby Banham, which in most people's minds would be "better" as it has a more comprehensive collection of animals, and related to this;
2. It stops people turning up expecting the "usual" zoo animals and being disappointed.
I believe it's just strategic (marketing), to differentiate the collection a little. Ben Potterton is not "anti-zoo" and I dare say a number of members on this forum have described a zoo as "just a bird garden really" on occasion -it's a useful description.
isn't that name somewhat of a tautology?Javan Rhino said:If that miracle ever occurs and I open something up in the future, my preferred title is Fauna Gardens Wildlife Park, as opposed to Fauna Gardens Zoo, the latter just doesn't sound quite right and doesn't have any ring to it. Rest assured though, I would still be happy to say it's a zoo
the way I see it is if you need a zoo license to open to the public then you are running a zoo.
Given that the place has been going for,I believe well over 10 years with no public seeing it,I think it will stand a pretty good chance.It sounds a nice place.
My worry is that there are already rather a lot of collections open to the public in this corner of England. Will Shorelands be able to do much more than tread water?
I have visited the place, and I got to see some of the animals there. If you want me to list some species, then I can.