Snowleopard's 2012 Road Trip

I'm almost finished my review (mainly positive) of tiny Blank Park Zoo in Iowa, and I'll more than likely post it in the morning. However, I did want to comment that for the first time in all of my hundreds of zoo visits over the years there was an emergency at a facility. On Friday afternoon during my tour of Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo at least 50-60 zoo employees all congregated in one section of the zoo and many had walkie-talkies out and zoo visitors were herded like sheep away from the crisis zone. There was much speculation about what could possibly be transpiring, and in the end it turned out that a young giraffe had escaped and needed to be coaxed back into its exhibit. That is the very first time that there has been an animal on the loose when I've been at a zoo, although I know that in most instances the general public is not aware when an animal is outside of its cage.
 
I look forward to reading your review of the Blank Park Zoo because I might want to stop there if the zoo is worth visiting because I would like to go to the Henry Doorly Zoo and the Blank Park Zoo is on the way (I might not go to the Henry Doorly for a while) Also I look forward to read your review of the Peoria Zoo because I want to know if the rest of the zoo is any good or just the African section is good. (I also plan on visiting this soon in the near future)
 
I have to assume that bad timing was an issue regarding the walk-through lemur exhibit.

This is something I often have an issue with regarding reviews I read. By this, I mean people accessing an exhibit based partially on not seeing the animal(s), or barely seeing them, or seeing fewer than the normal amount, and then writing a review with that issue heavily factoring into it.

For anyone who strongly considers the inhabitants of an exhibit when judging it, the only fair way to do it is to have seen the exhibit quite a few times and/or see video/pics and/or hear from others about the animals.

For instance, I've been to the SD Safari Park at least 15 times over the past 8 years, therefore I can come close to properly accessing how much watching the elephants or tigers for example should factor into rating the exhibit. Thus, I can sometimes be annoyed when someone who sees the exhibits once makes some definitive statement about the exhibit because they didn't see the tigers, or didn't see the elephants doing much in the 10 minutes they watched or they watched some great, but rare activity that makes them think more positively of the exhibit.
 
I have to assume that bad timing was an issue regarding the walk-through lemur exhibit.

This is something I often have an issue with regarding reviews I read. By this, I mean people accessing an exhibit based partially on not seeing the animal(s), or barely seeing them, or seeing fewer than the normal amount, and then writing a review with that issue heavily factoring into it.

For anyone who strongly considers the inhabitants of an exhibit when judging it, the only fair way to do it is to have seen the exhibit quite a few times and/or see video/pics and/or hear from others about the animals.

For instance, I've been to the SD Safari Park at least 15 times over the past 8 years, therefore I can come close to properly accessing how much watching the elephants or tigers for example should factor into rating the exhibit. Thus, I can sometimes be annoyed when someone who sees the exhibits once makes some definitive statement about the exhibit because they didn't see the tigers, or didn't see the elephants doing much in the 10 minutes they watched or they watched some great, but rare activity that makes them think more positively of the exhibit.

@mweb08: I scrolled through my old road trip threads this morning and in 2010 you were quite negative and critical of several of my reviews and I sent you a private message in regards to your comments. On the 2011 thread you were also very critical as you stuck up for a lot of the California reviews and took exception to what I wrote on a few occasions. Now it is 2012 and you are yet again making comments that are far from positive.

I think that you have a lot of good points and in the case of the lemur walk-through at Omaha I sincerely hope that you are correct and that I was simply the victim of bad timing. However, in the peak of summer during the zoo's busiest season of the entire year, on a gorgeous summer day with huge crowds streaming into the establishment...to have heavily advertised North America's only walk-through lemur habitat and then for there to be two lemurs sleeping on a branch is a major disappointment and nothing can disguise that fact. If you decide to take 3 family members along for a 35-40 zoo/aquarium road trip I promise to be positive, even though the majority of your comments in 2010, 2011 and now 2012 are all negative. Lighten up my fellow ZooChatter and just enjoy the reviews!:) You can be critical of a zoo but not necessarily the person writing about a zoo as everything is for the most part subjective in that category.
 
DAY 6: Saturday, July 7th, 2012

Road Trip Review # 3: Blank Park Zoo

Blank Park Zoo’s website:

Blank Park Zoo

Zoo Map:

http://blankparkzoo.us/Downloads/BPZooMap10.pdf

Blank Park Zoo opened in 1966 as a children’s zoo and thus the facility will celebrate its 50th anniversary in 2016. The zoo is located in Des Moines, Iowa, and has just over 100 species of close to 1,500 animals. The zoo is fairly small at 22 acres, and there is another 27 acres that is owned by the zoo but has not been developed. There has been record-breaking attendance in recent years and now the zoo regularly attracts around 400,000 annual visitors. An interesting fact is that the zoo actually closed down from late 1982 to early 1986 (similar to what occurred with the small zoo in Central Park, NY) and when it reopened it became an AZA-accredited establishment.

THE BEST:

Japanese Macaques – This fairly new exhibit is quite large and set on a hillside with lots of grass, strewn branches and enrichment opportunities for the snowy monkeys. The best fact of all is that there are apparently close to 20 of the primates, and it was a joy to watch them cavort with one another, groom their neighbours, or laze around in the hot sun. A large troop of primates at any zoo is always a showstopper and this was no exception.

Australia Adventure – This excellent zone opened in 2011 and it was a real treat as the theming is impeccable for a small zoo. Usually these areas contain the obligatory wallaby paddock with a couple of emus behind fences, but Blank Park went all out with their thematic design. Large wooden gates greet visitors at the entrance, and the walk-through area is well-shaded and contains a large pool. Bennett’s wallabies, black swans and emus are surprisingly all in the same area as their human counterparts, and at the entrance is a small aviary with these 3 species: rainbow lorikeet, red lory and eastern rosella. Along the short pathway are Aboriginal artwork, didgeridoos and various Aussie signs before Bundarra Station greets visitors with its authentic outback appearance. This train station has an indoor/outdoor kookaburra exhibit, a walk-through budgie/parakeet encounter and numerous Australian facts listed on the walls.

An emu yard and a cassowary exhibit are next, and guests exit via a small walk-through aviary with these 9 species: palm cockatoo, chestnut teal, crested pigeon, plumed whistling duck, eclectus parrot, nicobar pigeon, Rothschild’s peacock pheasant, cattle egret and blue-faced honeyeater. The zoo train departs from this area and around another wallaby habitat and there are not many major American zoos with such a well-designed Australian section.

THE AVERAGE:

Discovery Center – This building opened in 2001 and it is the first thing that many visitors see as they enter the zoo as it is located directly next to the main entrance. An Alpine Cabin area invokes images of camping high up in a mountain, and a small red panda exhibit is found amongst the conifers. The Cave is up next and it is dark with some innovative twists and turns with these species: Madagascar hissing cockroach, emperor scorpion, Egyptian fruit bat and boa constrictor (which at one point can be looked down on from above via a glass viewing window in the floor of the cave). The aviary section has many colourful Gouldian finches, some waterfowl, a crashing waterfall as well as a giant day gecko exhibit and a two-toed sloth/golden-headed lion tamarin enclosure.

The Aquatics zone has a Water Lab that is rather dull with its small tanks; a dwarf caiman exhibit that is not very large; an impressive looking Amazon tank with pacu and arowana; a pretty African cichlid pool; and a spectacular, floor-to-ceiling Coral Reef tank. Scarlet macaws are seen in an all-indoor area on the way out but their enclosure is disappointing. Overall the Discovery Center gives a nice overview of several ecosystems and for a small zoo it is fairly well done. In comparison to the mega structures that other zoos have (i.e.: Omaha) it is small fry but nevertheless still enjoyable.

Great Cats – A trio of exhibits that feature lions, snow leopards and Amur tigers that opened in 1999. The lion and tiger enclosures have a nice stand of tall trees in the background that almost obscure the circling train and black metal fence, while the snow leopard exhibit is also nicely planted. The lions and tigers can also be seen in their indoor dens and there are quite a few cool graphics discussing big cats in general, but all three enclosures (while more than adequate) are a tad on the small side.

Seal/Sea Lion Pool – This area was renovated and reopened this year and it contains 3 harbour seals and 2 California sea lions. There are a couple of huge sun shades, underwater viewing, a raised observation deck, and the pool is definitely large enough for its inhabitants. The downside to the habitat is that it is not as naturalistic as I’d like to see it, and while the pinnipeds probably don’t care I would much rather see a rocky coastline image rather than the flat, somewhat sterile lines of a boring tank.

African Boardwalk – This area features a winding boardwalk that curves around a trio of exhibits. A serval is looked down upon in its large but sparse enclosure; ostriches are in a big field, and they rotate with Watusi cattle; and giraffes, helmeted guineafowl, African crowned cranes and lesser kudu inhabit the largest paddock. The downside to this area is that it is completely shut down in the winter and therefore is only seasonal. In the background behind the giraffe habitat there is a lot of construction going on and it is possible that black rhinos will be joining the zoo in 2013 but I’m not sure where they will be placed.

Kids’ Kingdom – This area opened in 2007 and features the ubiquitous farmyard zone, a large playground and the usual assortment of domesticated animals. Due to the blazing hot day we skipped this area so that our two children would not want to stay and explore, but I did take 5 minutes to poke my head around and briefly check it out.

Odds n’ Sods – There is a scenic Chilean flamingo pool just outside the Discovery Center; a very small outdoor red panda exhibit; ring-tailed lemurs in a well-furnished exhibit; Aldabra tortoises in a typical yard; white-handed gibbons in a huge cage that is not aesthetically pleasing but quite large in size; black-tailed prairie dogs inhabit a dirt enclosure with pop-up bubbles; a bald eagle has an aviary to itself; and a small aviary near the Safari Grill contains superb starlings and Rothschild’s peacock pheasants.

THE WORST:

Squirrel monkeys – These small South American clowns curiously share space with a king vulture in a black metal cage directly from the era of outdated primate enclosures. The cage is directly in the middle of the zoo and an eyesore.

River Otters – There are so many terrific otter exhibits in American zoos that it is almost a shock to come across one with such a tiny pool and so much rockwork.

Penguins – Magellanic penguins inhabit a shallow, tiny pool that is near the squirrel monkeys and those two exhibits should be bulldozed in favour of a central habitat that will stun zoogoers. What about some great apes?

OVERALL:

Blank Park Zoo can be seen in 2 hours and yet it is the only AZA-accredited zoo in the state of Iowa. Many of the states that I’ve driven through at this point in the road trip (Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, South Dakota and Iowa) barely have a half-decent zoo between the lot of them. Having said that Blank Park has very few poor exhibits and the Japanese macaques, Australia Adventure and even the Discovery Center all have interesting aspects of exhibitry. It is an establishment well worth seeing for the zoo enthusiast and sometimes it is nice to be done and dusted in a couple of hours when one is in the midst of a record-breaking heat wave.
 
@mweb08: I scrolled through my old road trip threads this morning and in 2010 you were quite negative and critical of several of my reviews and I sent you a private message in regards to your comments. On the 2011 thread you were also very critical as you stuck up for a lot of the California reviews and took exception to what I wrote on a few occasions. Now it is 2012 and you are yet again making comments that are far from positive.

I think that you have a lot of good points and in the case of the lemur walk-through at Omaha I sincerely hope that you are correct and that I was simply the victim of bad timing. However, in the peak of summer during the zoo's busiest season of the entire year, on a gorgeous summer day with huge crowds streaming into the establishment...to have heavily advertised North America's only walk-through lemur habitat and then for there to be two lemurs sleeping on a branch is a major disappointment and nothing can disguise that fact. If you decide to take 3 family members along for a 35-40 zoo/aquarium road trip I promise to be positive, even though the majority of your comments in 2010, 2011 and now 2012 are all negative. Lighten up my fellow ZooChatter and just enjoy the reviews!:) You can be critical of a zoo but not necessarily the person writing about a zoo as everything is for the most part subjective in that category.

Wasn't it super hot and humid? Couldn't that have been part of the issue?

As far as lightening up, you clearly take this at least as seriously as I do, so I find your comment curious. I also don't see how my comments are so negative or unique on this site. You and/or Arizona Docent said it was a joke for someone to pick CA in the best state poll, which was more critical and uncalled for than anything I've said imo. I'm just pointing out what I feel are inconsistencies and unfair comments to make you and others think further about what they're writing. The point about timing is legitimate imo as well as comparing the Madagascar exhibits at Omaha to Bronx regarding the lack of outdoor exhibits.

I've always appreciated your opinions, reviews, and pictures and I'll continue to do so; I'm sorry you don't care for some of my responses to your posts.
 
Thank you for all your reviews so far, this is my first comment in this thread but I wanted to let you know I'm onboard for the ride! I have had very little oppurtunity to see any zoos or aquariums in the past year and a half, so armchair adventuring with you is a delight. (I was able to visit the Pittsburgh Zoo and PPG Aquarium as well as the National Aviary in May but have not finished editing my pictures or writing reviews yet.)

I'm glad Blank Park's Australian exhibit turned out well, and I always like to hear about small zoos opening well-designed features that seemingly rise above their expected potential. I wish that more of my favorite zoos had excellent Australian sections even if they do not have koalas as the key feature. Besides, for me a cassowary is more of a key feature than a koala, those birds are fantastic!
 
The problem with most Australian exhibits is a lack of anything other than the same ol,same ol species..in the case of Blank Park this has been addressed by the inclusion of a few non-aussie species.And geomorph by nominating a cassowary as a more key feature than a Koala you have fallen for my worry that folks get erroneous inormation...the taxonomic jury is rather out on cassowaries at the moment but there are probably no Southern Cassowaries of the Australian taxon in the U.S.[if indeed it is a seperate subspecies or even species].Whatever the semantics at least there is no argument over Koalas!Blank Park was another place on my 2009 visit that had big plans to expand.Seems,not surprisingly,that these are on hold.
 
ANyhuis, what criteria do you use to pick your "#1 Zoo" (or your top zoos in general)?

A lot of things -- exhibit quality, animal collection, feature animals, extras (rides, shows, great viewing), attendance, reputation, visitor convenience, and size. I put the emphasis on the first 2 factors, exhibit quality and animal collection. Of course I write books for tourists, so the zoo visitors are my first priority. But I would never highly rate a zoo if I felt the animals were suffering.
 
(I was able to visit the Pittsburgh Zoo and PPG Aquarium as well as the National Aviary in May but have not finished editing my pictures or writing reviews yet.)

Looking forward to hear what you think of my hometown zoo and aviary.
 
The problem with most Australian exhibits is a lack of anything other than the same ol,same ol species..in the case of Blank Park this has been addressed by the inclusion of a few non-aussie species.And geomorph by nominating a cassowary as a more key feature than a Koala you have fallen for my worry that folks get erroneous inormation...the taxonomic jury is rather out on cassowaries at the moment but there are probably no Southern Cassowaries of the Australian taxon in the U.S.[if indeed it is a seperate subspecies or even species].Whatever the semantics at least there is no argument over Koalas!Blank Park was another place on my 2009 visit that had big plans to expand.Seems,not surprisingly,that these are on hold.

Wow this is a level of pedantry above anything I've seen before. Even if the New Guinea birds turn out to be a unique species, they would certainly be closely related to the Cape York birds. Miniscule and rapidly changing taxonomic assessments are not exactly the important information that zoos are trying to get out.
 
Tim Brown said:
the taxonomic jury is rather out on cassowaries at the moment but there are probably no Southern Cassowaries of the Australian taxon in the U.S.[if indeed it is a seperate subspecies or even species].
Ituri said:
Wow this is a level of pedantry above anything I've seen before. Even if the New Guinea birds turn out to be a unique species, they would certainly be closely related to the Cape York birds. Miniscule and rapidly changing taxonomic assessments are not exactly the important information that zoos are trying to get out.
I have never heard of any suggestions that Australian C. casuarius are specifically distinct from New Guinea ones, quite the opposite in fact (many authors now consider them monotypic).
 
I had a thought that I wanted to bounce around with fellow Zoochatters regarding great zoos and exhibits within them. It occurred to me that Elephant Odyssey at San Diego Zoo and the Desert Dome and Lied Jungle at Omaha Zoo are in some ways inverses of each other in the way that they are regarded on Zoochat. Many people have derided Elephant Odyssey for failed theme and design elements, but mostly I think people accept it as at least a decent exhibit for the species living in it. The Desert Dome and Lied Jungle have wonderful design elements but some really awful animal exhibits within them. Are these exhibits equal failures and do they detract from the "greatness" quotient of their respective zoos?
When visiting EO at the SD Zoo, I pay little attention to the displays and such. I think it's a nice concept, but the gajillion people climbing all over the statues makes it difficult to really appreciate any of it, although I do find it fascinating and interesting. Mostly, though, I like the nice ehixibits, especially the elephant yards. I don't consider EO to be a failure.
 
I'm almost finished my review (mainly positive) of tiny Blank Park Zoo in Iowa, and I'll more than likely post it in the morning. However, I did want to comment that for the first time in all of my hundreds of zoo visits over the years there was an emergency at a facility. On Friday afternoon during my tour of Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo at least 50-60 zoo employees all congregated in one section of the zoo and many had walkie-talkies out and zoo visitors were herded like sheep away from the crisis zone. There was much speculation about what could possibly be transpiring, and in the end it turned out that a young giraffe had escaped and needed to be coaxed back into its exhibit. That is the very first time that there has been an animal on the loose when I've been at a zoo, although I know that in most instances the general public is not aware when an animal is outside of its cage.
I was at the Phoenix Zoo one time and was photographing at the Tiger exhibit. There was one of the zoo security guards also taking pictures next to me and I could hear his radio. I heard them call a 'code blue' for a Squirrel Monkey. Having a medical background I became concerned for the monkey, thinking he was in cardiac arrest and commented to the guard that I hoped he was going to be okay. He said he'd be fine it just meant the monkey had escaped. He said "code blue" was for most animals and "code red" was for the larger, dangerous animals. I think you're right in that most people don't know of escapes unless they're actually there to witness it or it's such a big thing (like the Andean Bears that kept escaping their new exhibit in Phoenix that it makes the press. It's probably a big reason why many zoos use radios that can't be picked up/monitored by the media/scanner enthusiasts because escapes probably happen more than the public realizes.
 
DAY 7: Sunday, July 8th

We decided to have a non-zoo day to let my son rest and not be pushed around in a stroller in sweltering heat and so Peoria Zoo was skipped. To be honest I was fine missing what would have been just about the smallest zoo on the entire trip, and the bonus addition of Omaha on Friday more than made up for the loss of tiny Peoria.

We drove 3 hours to Indianapolis and met up with my great friend Allen Nyhuis for the 3rd time in the past 4 years. As many of you know he co-wrote the wonderful book "America's Best Zoo" (his second zoo book) and he and I have been terrific friends for 4 years now. About once a week one of us will send the other a long email that is perhaps 10 paragraphs in length, and then the other will respond with a message that is just as long! We've been doing this for 4 years and he bounces a lot of ideas off of me while he researches for any possible future books. We've had many emails that are about our family members and so I think that I really surprised his wife when I showed up and could rattle off information about their family.

He and his wife have graciously allowed us to spend two nights at their home, and we met 3 out of his 4 children and we had a yummy taco dinner on our first night. Naturally we chatted about lots of zoo facts and statistics, and then Jon Wassner (Allen's co-author for "America's Best Zoos") popped by and my wife and Allen's wife rolled their eyes as we had a long, in-depth discussion about zoos until close to 11:30 p.m. We did touch on a few other topics (family, sports, etc) but when you put a trio of guys in one room who are obsessed with zoos then there is no chance of many other topics creeping into the conversation. At one point Allen's wife went through a list of American zoos and as she called our their names Allen, Jon and I each shouted out a letter grade and then began our analysis. Ahhh, the life of a crazy ZooChatter!
 
@ snowleopard - I saw the baby elephant made its public debut for a little bit yesterday. Were you able to see it?
 
DAY 7: Sunday, July 8th

We decided to have a non-zoo day to let my son rest and not be pushed around in a stroller in sweltering heat and so Peoria Zoo was skipped. To be honest I was fine missing what would have been just about the smallest zoo on the entire trip, and the bonus addition of Omaha on Friday more than made up for the loss of tiny Peoria.

We drove 3 hours to Indianapolis and met up with my great friend Allen Nyhuis for the 3rd time in the past 4 years. As many of you know he co-wrote the wonderful book "America's Best Zoo" (his second zoo book) and he and I have been terrific friends for 4 years now. About once a week one of us will send the other a long email that is perhaps 10 paragraphs in length, and then the other will respond with a message that is just as long! We've been doing this for 4 years and he bounces a lot of ideas off of me while he researches for any possible future books. We've had many emails that are about our family members and so I think that I really surprised his wife when I showed up and could rattle off information about their family.

He and his wife have graciously allowed us to spend two nights at their home, and we met 3 out of his 4 children and we had a yummy taco dinner on our first night. Naturally we chatted about lots of zoo facts and statistics, and then Jon Wassner (Allen's co-author for "America's Best Zoos") popped by and my wife and Allen's wife rolled their eyes as we had a long, in-depth discussion about zoos until close to 11:30 p.m. We did touch on a few other topics (family, sports, etc) but when you put a trio of guys in one room who are obsessed with zoos then there is no chance of many other topics creeping into the conversation. At one point Allen's wife went through a list of American zoos and as she called our their names Allen, Jon and I each shouted out a letter grade and then began our analysis. Ahhh, the life of a crazy ZooChatter!

Sounds like the perfect way to spend an evening! I hope your son is able to shake whatever bug he has.
 
Back
Top