Snowleopard's Epic Road Trip

Even I'm amazed!

OK, this is Allen, who met up with Mr. & Mrs. Leopard yesterday at the Indianapolis Zoo. Yes, I did rave about Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo, but I'm still amazed that our heroes completely changed their schedule like they did. Now I'm very anxious to see what they think of this wonderful zoo.

I will report to all of you that the "Leopards" are really nice, down-to-earth, and humble. While SnowLeopard may seem very opinionated in some of his reviews, I can bear witness that he's very open to others' points of view. That's a good human quality. I wish them the best as they continue this great adventure.

We did have one very funny moment together, as we toured the Indy Zoo and discussed my book. I was telling them how some of the "first ever underwater viewing" exhibits are over-rated because the animals there rarely go in the water. (I was thinking of Woodland Park's Jaguar Cove and Bronx's Tiger Mountain). To illustrate, as we walked up to Indy's tiger exhibit, I said, "I've been here to this tiger exhibit over 100 times, and I've only seen these tigers in the water once!" Wouldn't you know it -- almost immediately, a big Amur tiger came around the corner, treading water, and then he almost completely submerged in water over his head. We had to laugh!
 
Indianapolis Zoo Review

Indianapolis Zoo Review - 5 hours (Zoo/Aquarium #16 on road trip)

The Indianapolis Zoo surpised me, as it is small and not very well known and yet well designed and has only been in existence for 20 years. After seeing so many zoos and aquariums in such a short span of time, it was definitely cool to come across 2 innovative and brilliant pieces of exhibit design. Some zoos are triple the size of Indy, and yet lack even a single item that stands out from other zoos. Seeing something new and fresh is one of my requirements in a major zoo, and nothing bores me like mediocrity.

As has been noted on here, my wife and I for the first time met up with Allen W. Nyhuis and he is an extremely gracious man. He took time off work to come visit the zoo with us, have lunch and sign my copy of his zoo book, and then we hung out for more than 2 hours and walked around sections of the zoo. Allen is definitely an optimist when it comes to zoos, and perhaps isn't as critical as I have been in regards to certain enclosures at various collections. But I actually envy him, as he genuinely loves all kinds of zoos and he can value the conservation messages, education and sheer entertainment that they provide. The mini-tour of the zoo with him was a delight, as Debbie and I were able to learn much more than if we had simply been by ourselves. He has a wealth of knowledge, has visited over 200 zoos worldwide, and so everyone who hasn't already purchased his book should go out and do so right now! Anyway, on with my usual review...

The Best:

Oceans - this massive building contains a variety of surprises. The dolphin dome is the first piece of innovative exhibit design that stunned me. To be able to watch a 15 minute dolphin show that was better than the standard one (complete with a conservation message) was a thrill, but to then walk INTO the dolphin pool and watch such sleek animals swim overhead was startling and unique. The glass was sparkling clean, the area was spacious for visitors, and the experience was unforgettable. I'm a huge fan of all sorts of tunnels (shark tanks, polar bear exhibits, dolphins, etc) and it gives the visitor a fantastic viewing opportunity.

Also in the Oceans complex, as this zoo is the only one of its kind divided into biomes, is a good walrus exhibit, a cool touch tank where there were at least 30 dog sharks waiting in a large pool, and the second innovative exhibit design that truly impressed me. The penguin exhibit was standard, except for the fact that it was duplicated on the other side of the hallway. Then there was a large part of the flooring that was all glass and allowed visitors to see penguins swimming under their feet! I could see small penguins jump into their pool on one side of the hall, speed by beneath my sandals, and then pop back onto the second exhibit on the far side. Brilliant idea, and why don't more zoos build similar enclosures? The cost factor could perhaps be overwhelmed by the reaction of zoo fans. The oceans section also included seals, sea lions, a large shark tank, a standard polar bear exhibit that is the only weakness, and a diverse collection of other marine animals.

Plains - a large savannah yard has kudu, zebra, ostriches, etc in a spacious setting, closely situated to another large paddock with giraffe and gazelles within close reach of zoo visitors. The african wild dogs and lions have standard exhibits, while the guinea baboons are a joy to watch in their rocky habitat. I thought that the public could have benefited from seeing the baboons on an island (without all of the mesh) but the troop appeared to be settled where they are. The large elephant paddock winds around a huge settlement of rocks, and the pool there is perhaps the most scenic that I've ever seen. Lots of green grass and room to roam for the 8 pachyderms (including 2 youngsters) and my only complaint was the electric wire that was a bit of an eyesore.

Deserts - nice little desert building, with meerkats, birds, reptiles and many varieties of cacti. It was quite well done (but blown away by Omaha's Desert Dome the following day) and the only drawback was the snake exhibit in a back room. Not a single snake in the dimly lit hallway had a naturalistic exhibit, as they all laid on black or grey pebbles in a display that resembled an art exhibition.

The Average:

Australian Plains - lorikeet aviary and a few kangaroos, emus and swans in a spacious paddock. Typical zoo fare and I liked the size and lushness of the enclosure.

Commons Plaza - two lemur islands, with 4 different species and a small flock of flamingoes. Great spot for lunch!

Forests - as Allen mentioned in his post, the three of us saw an amur tiger swimming just as we were commenting on the lack of poolside action. A great moment that was perhaps fated to happen, and the tiger exhibit was decent but nothing spectacular. Muntjacs and red pandas in a mixed-species exhibit, turkey vultures and bald eagle in a basic cage, and at least 7 asian small-clawed otters and 1 gibbon in another exhibit complemented this tiny section of the zoo.

The Worst:

Nothing much in the way of negative publicity can be said about this zoo, other than the fact that the completely encased koalas behind glass walls was perhaps a bit of a letdown. The koalas probably appreciated the quieter surroundings, but for a temporary summer exhibit it lacked zest. Maybe I'm cynical because I've been to Australia and viewed countless koalas, but I feel that they deserved more than a basic glass box.

Overall:

The Indianapolis Zoo is small and without a great collection, but it has a number of above average exhibits and 2 fantastic ones. To walk inside a dolphin pool and to see penguins swimming beneath ones feet was a wonderful experience, and the elephant paddock is one of the best around. It's tough to complain about a zoo that does most things right, and they have a bright future with a possible great apes complex to be opened in another few years. The zoo is worth visiting simply for the Oceans complex, which brilliantly showcases aquatic wildlife.
 
Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo - 7.5 hours (Zoo/Aquarium #17 for the road trip)

Having veered off course and driven 9 hours from Indianapolis to just outside of Omaha I was hoping that the zoo would be excellent. I simply felt that it was worth going out of the way on the road trip to see a zoo that has some highly regarded exhibits, and to be honest my wife and I were absolutely blown away by the true greatness of the BIG THREE displays of captive wildlife. I put those words in capitals because Omaha has gone out of their way to create stupendously overwhelming buildings. There are parts of the zoo that are terrible (the seemingly obligatory bear grottoes and the antiquated cat complex) but overall Omaha is a lock to make my top 5 zoos in North America list. The sheer quality of the big three are unsurpassed by almost any other zoo in the continent, and perhaps the world. I personally have gone on record here saying that the San Diego Zoo is my choice for #1 zoo in North America, and while I still believe that to be true my honest response is that San Diego doesn't have anything that can come close to Omaha's big three standouts. The Bronx's "Congo Gorilla Forest" and Detroit's "Arctic Ring of Life" are 2 other truly awesome adventures.

The Big Three: Omaha's "Lied Jungle", "Kingdoms of the Night", and "Desert Dome".

The Best:

Lied Jungle - probably the best rainforest building on the planet. I've been to buildings in Montreal, Central Park, the Bronx, Brookfield, Minnesota, Denver, Zurich and many others...and none are really close contenders to the Lied Jungle. Some people point out the flaws (of which naturally I can understand) but even with those minor flaws this exhibit goes above and beyond "Tropic World" in Chicago or "Jungleworld" in the Bronx. The clouded leopard, malayan tapirs and baird's tapir all have too little land, and there might be a couple of other tiny quibbles such as the space for the lemurs. But the fact that the jungle trails pathway is made out of dirt and contains the odd rock for authenticity, that I had to keep ducking to miss being hit by hanging vines and branches, that there was a tiny bridge that was soaking wet from a waterfall, that the entire building actually reeked of an actual rainforest...the attention to detail is amazing. As I said earlier, Zurich Zoo's Masoala rainforest is #2 on my list, but nothing equals Omaha's massive creation. Top-notch, immersive experience that cannot be touched by anything else. If anyone bashes it, then what is better?

Kingdoms of the Night - best nocturnal house on the planet. I've never even been into a nocturnal house in any zoo in Europe, but I can tell all you readers that no one can produce anything even remotely close to this multi-roomed, underground lair that feels as if it never ends. Every time my wife and I left one bat cave, swamp or mixed-species exhibit there was a door into another, darker cavern. Sheer brilliance on every level, and arguably gives the Lied Jungle a run for its money in terms of Omaha greatness.

Desert Dome - another incredibly overwhelming building. Are there some flaws here? You bet: the bobcat, serval and mountain lion exhibits are painfully small (all types of cats get shafted at both Omaha and Cincinnati)...but all in all this is another unequalled building that has no parallels. Not many zoos actually have desert biomes in the first place, but to see rock hyrax apparently free a few feet from my head, or to see hundreds of tons of red sand off the pathway, or any number of other experiences elevates this exhibit to the top of its class.

If I stopped this review right here then Omaha would be one of the most innovative zoos in North America. Someone could show up, spend hours at the big three exhibits, and then leave satisfied for their $11 entry fee. The best jungle rainforest, the best nocturnal house, the best desert building...all with a handful of flaws but all more than likely the best of their kind in the entire world. With those 3 the zoo already had leapt into the upper echelon of quality zoos.

Other excellent exhibits:

Orangutan Forest - not really much of a forest at all, and I feel that normally this type of habitat wouldn't appeal to me due to mountains of mesh...but it totally works for the apes. There were at least 6 orangs and one gibbon split up between two separate but side-by-side exhibits that allowed for loads of brachiation. I'm sick and tired of seeing orangs sitting on the ground in zoos (a big problem everywhere from San Diego to Seattle) and so to spend lots of time seeing the magnificent apes climbing up the mesh walls was exciting. The enormous, 65-foot trees (complete with multiple branches) allowed for lots of climbing and appealed to me. The actual land space isn't much, but in terms of height this might just be one of the tallest orang exhibits in the entire world.

Scott Aquarium - brilliant penguin exhibit (could the tide be turning for decent penguin habitats after Omaha and Indianapolis?) where it was actually snowing! Snow was pouring out of a large hole in the roof, and probably 40% of the land mass was covered in the white stuff. The pool was deep and fairly wide, and this was another great exhibit at the zoo. Also in the aquarium were lots of colourful tanks and displays featuring eels, sea horses, sharks octopus...and a huge amazon habitat with squirrel monkeys and massive freshwater fish.

Gorilla complex - I'm not completely sold on this maze-like exhibit, with lots of older male gorillas playfully wrestling with each other in the many outdoor and indoor habitats. The bubbles that popped up into the enclosure allowed my wife and I to feel as if we were inside with our relatives, and there was a glass tunnel both overhead and below our bodies that featured close-up shots of gorillas. Innovative designs elevated this series of interlinking enclosures, and while there are better gorilla habitats out there this one was still cleverly done.

Free Flight Aviary - is this another one of the biggest and best in the world? An enormous, 4-acre aviary with 120 species of birds. One problem was that the signs were mouldy, dilapidated and barely hanging on...but the sheer size of the netting was staggering. What's with Omaha and size?

Butterfly & Insect Pavilion - top-notch pair of joined buildings that were enjoyable to stroll through. Not quite at Cincinnati's level, but much better than the silly tents that numerous zoos have for their butterflies.

Wild Kingdom Pavilion - many smaller species of mammal, reptile, amphibian and fish in a kid-friendly setting that was loaded with informative signage.

Koi Pool & Monkey Island - squirrel and spider monkeys packed onto an island, and surrounded by a couple of thousand koi fish. That's right, a couple of thousand! An entertaining sight, with the monkeys creating lots of havoc amongst themselves and people purchasing handfuls of fish food for the chaos below.

The Average:

Paddocks - haphazard arrangement, with sable antelope, cassowaries, red river hogs and emus in side-by-side, basic grass fields. The 4 white rhinos had a decent couple of enclosures that allowed them some privacy from the public.

The Worst:

Bear Canyon - typically awful bear exhibits for 4 different species. Sad that as the zoo continues to spend millions on expansion plans the bears continue to pace their concrete pits and go slowly insane. It's such a joy to find the elusive high-quality, substrate-packed bear exhibit...but there's none of that here.

Cat Complex - loads of signs advertising the fact that this is the biggest cat house in North America, but it's far from the best and arguably one of the all-time worst. Every kind of conceivable large feline crammed into concrete boxes. Interesting that not a single cat was found to be pacing, as EVERY DAMN ONE OF THEM was laying on its side with its belly going up and down as they panted for air. It was scorching hot in the hallway, and so who knows how boiling hot it was in the sterile, bare, brutally warm exhibits. It's hard to know what was more disturbing: these big cats gasping for air as their bellies heaved, or all of the pacing smaller species in Cincinnati?

Elephants - two exhibits for two african elephants (from what I could see) that will eventually be much bigger and better if the zoo follows through with their proposal to construct a massive set of new elephant habitats.

The Future:

There is a long pathway that is now shut down in preparation for 2009's "Madagascar" exhibit, which judging from photos online will be a long building that also has many outdoor islands/exhibits for a variety of lemur species. Will Omaha go all out and now build the largest Madagascar habitat of its kind? We'll have to wait and see...

Overall:

How does one go about ranking Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo? It has 3 absolute knockout exhibits that are the very best of their kind, and I honestly believe that those 3 simply have no equal in the zoo world for their specific categories. There are also impressive orangutan and gorilla habitats, a terrific insect display and a decent african veldt (giraffes, crowned cranes and ostrich). However, the cat and bear sections are atrocious, and the many other paddocks that surround the upper portion of the zoo are all average at best.

I find it difficult to believe that anyone I've ever met can provide me with a better rainforest building, desert dome or nocturnal house than the ones that are showcased at the Omaha zoo. This zoo has its faults in terms of space issues for big cats and bears, along with some of the larger animals in its knockout exhibits...but surely this is a top 5 zoo in North America? I know that some of you will agree wholeheartedly, and that others will rank the zoo a little lower, but the important thing is that reviewing zoos is a subjective experience and thus we all have a slightly different opinion. At least Omaha doesn't settle for mediocrity, and goes all out in a quest for greatness.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the reviews so far.

About Omaha: I have stated my criticism reg: several of the "outstanding" exhibits mentioned and don't think I have to repeat myself here. Zooplantman's description of the "Lied Jungle" as a "jungle mall" is spot-on, and several serious other flaws in terms of husbandry and exhibit design, both behind and before the scenes, are all too obvious to neglect them, no matter how optimistic and zoo-friendly one is (f.e. the overcrowding effect and limited space of various examples, may it be Ratufa sp., Desert Monitors, Yellow-Footed Rock Wallabys, Ratels or poor moloch gibbons in tiny concrete cells behind the scenes, or the lack of outdoor enclosures for tapirs, klipspringers. cougars, etc etc...).

Better rainforest exhibits? Randers, Arnheim, the already mentioned Zurich, and especially Singapore (Zoo/Night Safari)...

Better desert exhibits? Arnheim, Vienna, Arizona Desert Museum, The Living Desert...

"best nocturnal house on the planet. I've never even been into a nocturnal house in any zoo in Europe(...)" bit of a paradoxon, isn't it?;)

"Free Flight Aviary - is this another one of the biggest and best in the world?" No.;)

Please note: superlatives in size and amount of money spent do not equalize quality of husbandry. Omaha is just another example for that...

"(...)others will rank the zoo a little lower" that would be a little too euphemistic from my point of view. On a quest to greatness, one shouldn't forget that sometimes greatness lies in the details. And if I see more than just a few important "details" (which are for the animal that has to live its whole life there, far from "minor"...) gone wrong, I start to wonder whether spending millions of dollars on deficient zoo exhibits is really a "quest for greatness"- and the right way to the future of zoos, may they be American, European, Australian, Asian or whatever...
 
snowleopard another excellent review, are you or your wife flagging yet?
What species were in the nocturnal house at Omaha?
 
I think the "anti-Omaha bias" is simply the opinion--of many zoo professionals and zoo designers--that Henry Doorly Zoo consistently exhibits too many animals in spaces that are too small. Period. One can have a valid difference of opinion about the aesthetics of the visitor experiences (I tend to agree with Zooplantman that while the overall Desert, Rain Forest and Nocturnal environments may be large, they are rendered crudely--i.e. "mall-like"). But no one would stand for the tiny spaces afforded to many of the species on exhibit if they were in old-style cages or pens--the fact that the barriers are "disguised" and the enclosures are made of artificial rock instead of bars can't hide the fact that many are ridiculously small, sterile and un-stimulating for their inhabitants.

There are some great "moment" in the exhibits: the giant Namibian sand dune, the fantastic cave, the sense of walking on a soft forest floor in the jungle, but all of these are VISITOR experiences. The adjacent animal environments almost always pale in comparison--it's all about guaranteeing animal views, never about animal well being.

Snow Leopard marvelled at the experience of seeing a hyrax perched just above his head in the Desert Dome, as did I at first glance when I visited. Only upon careful viewing did I realize that that hyrax lives with a few others of its kind on a foot-wide ledge of rock, about twenty feet in length, confined at all sides by hotwire. It is literally trapped on a ledge. The cougars, wallabies, hummingbirds, lynx.....on and on....live in similarly impoverished spaces surrounded by millions of dollars worth of artificial rocks and trees, which I might add are for the most part not very realistic.

Sorry, Omaha is spectacular, but seriously flawed.
 
I certainly meant no criticism of our hero Snowleopard, who is clearly a thoughtful, knowledgeable and perceptive zoo critic himself. I am just a little surprised that the aspect he frequently criticizes at other zoos he has reviewed on this trip--the small sizes and lack of complexity of animal habitats--is not noted as a concern when evaluating Omaha zoo's "big three" exhibits (except of course the Cat House, which is blatantly "old-school"). I believe this may in part be because Omaha has done a good job of masking the true sizes of the small enclosures with naturalistic veneers, together with their settings within the powerful, even overwhelming scale of the massive exhibit buildings themselves. Many of the animal spaces in Lied Jungle and the Desert Dome are as small (or smaller) than those that Snowleopard has rightly taken to task at Lincoln Park, Pittsburgh, Minnesota, Toledo, the Bronx, National Zoo and elsewhere.

I am sure Henry Doorly's animal staff are deeply caring and very good at their jobs, and that Lee Simmons cares as well. I certainly would never imply there is intentional mistreatment of any animal in the collection. But I will strongly maintain that a modern zoo with the resources of Omaha could and should do much more to create complex, enriching environments for many of their animals. Perhaps this would mean exhibiting fewer species, but that is a concession progressive zoos around the world have been making for decades.
 
When I last visited the Omahas Zoo the Jungle was very crowded and it was not appealing to me (I think they were in the middle of finishing construction), after seeing some pictures it looked really good. Everone has their opinion, it's not all criticisum. Some people's opinion's may not seem true to other people, but it is thier opinion.

BTW, ANyhuis I really do enjoy reading your book. It has lots of interesting points, and is very cool.
 
Thanks, Quartz92. Yes, Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo can get crowded. That's because it's one of the highest attended (per capita) zoos in the nation. That's just another sign of its excellence.

Hey, guys, I didn't mean to get into a war of words with anyone. I appreciate it, RedUakari, that you've attempted to tone down the disagreement. I will point out that SnowLeopard DID point out the land areas for the tapirs and pygmy hippo were slightly too small (though they have large pools to swim in). As I said before, the Big 3 exhibits are not perfect, no exhibit is. But they're as good as or better than any other exhibit of their kind.

Sun, in your post in which you (rightly) chastised me for my overly emotional words, you said of me that I should "not behave like a stubborn child defending his favourite toy". I have a simple question: WHY was it so important to you to log on here to bash a zoo? SnowLeopard has reviewed 16 zoos now, and after those reviews, often someone would log on to DEFEND their favorite or local zoo. That's understandable. People get emotionally attached to their favorites. (Even I have exhibited that trait). But what you are doing is interesting -- getting emotional about making sure your very negative view of a zoo is posted. Why is it so important that your negative views are posted? Why not just let SnowLeopard post his personal experience review and let it stand?

If I've learned one thing on this board, it's this: The fastest way to get people upset with you is to contradict David Hancocks. If you do, you will soon feel the wrath of someone who STRONGLY agrees with him. Thus, I'm bowing out -- not gonna argue this stuff anymore.
 
Bias ?

To impute me and others of a biased viewpoint in regard to Omaha Zoo just because we do not sing from the same hymn sheet as You do is kind of contraproductive and well, pretty rude.

Quote from Sun Wukong .

Would someone please tell me how I can visit a zoo and write a review totally without any bias either for or against it ? We are all different people , and we all have our little biases , and we all see zoos through our own eyes .

I find it interesting to compare the reviews in the book of Americas Best Zoos , with the reviews that Snow leopard is writing on his trip . It is to be expected that there will be differences of view and opinion , especially when comparing the zoos .

Sun , if you dont like what other people think , well too bad . And they are NOT being rude . Alot of your responses border on the inflamatory !
May the zoo reviews keep coming from Snow leopard !
 
Wow! I see that I have kickstarted a second firestorm here on ZooBeat. The first was in regards to the Toronto Zoo, which I stated was a huge zoo that lacked a knockout exhibit. The Columbus Zoo I loved for its above average enclosures, but it nevertheless lacks a killer exhibit as well. Some zoos I ripped into in terms of habitat design, such as Lincoln Park, Toledo, Cincinnati and Pittsburgh. But each and every zoo has its amazing wonders, such as Lincoln Park's great apes complex, Toledo's underwater hippo pool, Cincinnati's sumatran rhinos, and Pittsburgh's superb aquarium. I don't sugarcoat my reviews, and people have praised me for that. I stated that Cincinnati was a top 5 North American zoo in terms of its animal collection, but I wouldn't even consider it to be anywhere near that level in terms of its ancient exhibits. But then again the "Jungle Trails" pathway was an absolute delight to explore, and I thought that it was the premier set of habitats in the zoo.

I don't mince words when talking about poor exhibits, and Omaha was no exception. The cat complex may be large but it really should be bulldozed, and the same goes for the awful bear grottoes. In terms of the big three exhibits, I even said in the first or second line in the description of the "Desert Dome" that the bobcat, serval and mountain lion habitats are "painfully small". I also criticized the amount of land space given to lemurs, tapirs, clouded leopards and others in the "Lied Jungle" description. The Kingdoms of the Night exhibit I didn't include anything negative, because other than minor quibbles there is nothing negative to announce. That nocturnal house is surely the biggest and best on the planet. If anyone thinks that I'm overpraising the Omaha zoo they might have missed the negative comments that I put into the review. I was still blown away by the majesty, sheer size, and wonder of the big three exhibits.

It's not like I'm reviewing Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo from years ago, as I was just there yesterday and my reviews are usually only hours old. Loads of people have privately messaged me since I began this odyssey more than a month ago, and I'm sure that lots more will do the same before my wife and I arrive back in southwestern Canada. I don't mind the critiques of my reviews, and if anyone wants to add something to my thoughts on any particular zoo then feel free to let it fly! Censorship in all forms is terrible, and so as long as I'm not being personally attacked then I am open to anything.

Omaha annoys me in one regard, and that is its future plans. I'm overjoyed to hear about the new Madagascar set of habitats, which open in 2009 and will surely be world-class. The possibility of future arctic enclosures (polar bears and seals) and maybe a massive, multi-acre elephant set of habitats is fantastic. But my beef is this: instead of constantly expanding and adding on to the zoo, why not bulldoze the bear and big cat buildings first? Improve what is already there before expanding outward. If there are several more wonderful exhibits that are going to be added in the near future, then the big cats and bears will still be languishing in tiny grottoes or barren indoor tanks. Why not get rid of such unsightly cages before anything else? The animals can be transferred into other AZA zoos, or they can be slowly phased out of the collection in a period of ten years. But to have such stunning exhibits near outdated ones is perplexing, but I suppose that in reality all zoos are similar in that regard.

As for my assessments of the big 3 exhibits, I've pointed out the flaws and concerns in both my initial review and then again here. I know that many people here at ZooBeat have never even been to Omaha, as it is in an awkward position geographically. There are folks who take either west-coast or east-coast road trips, or fly into major hubs along both coastlines. But not many people drive through the heart of America intending to see a zoo...and my wife and I hadn't even planned to visit Omaha until 48 hours ago.

"The Lied Jungle" in my opinion is the best indoor rainforest building I've ever seen, and even if someone were against it in any way I find it difficult to believe that they wouldn't rank it in the top 3 in the world. The nocturnal house is almost surely unequalled, and I question whether any zoo in the next 20 years will build a nocturnal house that is even half as good as "Kingdoms of the Night". I'll be an old man before I see anything better than the caves and caverns underground in Omaha! As for the "Desert Dome", which is magnificent but still the weakest exhibit of the three, it has its flaws in terms of space for the animals and I immediately addressed that in my review. I'm not ducking the negatives in any of my reviews, and I'm certainly not afraid to rip into established institutions. I called the lion house in Chicago's Lincoln Park Zoo an "abomination to animals", and love to use the term "bulldoze" in reference to the crappy bear grottoes that I see at almost every single zoo. Having said all of that, the "Desert Dome" is the biggest and best that I've ever seen even with its flaws. I cannot comment on the indoor quarters as I've never been behind the scenes, and so any mention of spatial issues will have to be debated by others. I can only comment on what I see, and that is for the most part above and beyond any other zoo in North America.

Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo has 3 exhibits that will stand the test of time, as proven by the fact that in the 16 years since the "Lied Jungle" was created not a single zoo has built anything that provides the visitor with such an immersive experience. Every habitat in the world has its flaws, but that rainforest has yet to find an equal. The same goes for the other 2 major buildings, and I'm sure that just about all of us wished that our local zoo had enclosures that were even half as good as the ones that Omaha showcases. Most zoos that I visit don't have nearly the ambition and desire that Omaha has, and whether that is down to public support or financial support is irrelevant. The two co-authors of "America's Best Zoos" BOTH had all three of the huge Omaha exhibits in their top 25 zoo exhibits in the United States. It was the only zoo out of 220 that had 3 exhibits to appear on those exclusive lists. I would agree with both authors, and so that makes three of us who adore those amazing habitats. Does that make Omaha the best zoo in North America? No. I'd definitely put San Diego and the Bronx at #1 and #2, but after that it's a tough call.
 
@Kiang: The nocturnal house "Kingdoms of the Night" has to be seen to be believed. Absolutely outstanding, and this is from a guy who isn't afraid to bash poorly constructed habitats. There are at least 5 different species of bats in a realistic and huge underground cave, and I think one species of fruit bat had thousands of members in a large wire cage.

The nocturnal house is actually 4-5 different rooms (all really underground)...and there were fossas and fossa pups, a mixed-species enclosure with 5 different species (aardvark, bushbaby, porcupine and springhaas) and another mixed-species enclosure with at least 7 different species (agouti, a few different armadillos, tamandua, sloth?), an Australian section with parma wallabies, sugar glider, bats, tawny frogmouth, etc, a 16 foot deep pool of water that is truly amazing and full of blind cave fish, 2,400 stalactities hanging from the ceiling, a naked mole-rat colony, a swamp section with alligators, a white alligator, nutria, caiman, beavers, bullfrogs, opossums, and at least 15 alligators mixed with about 4 raccoons in the same exhibit!
 
This will more than likely be my third and final message for the night:

After visiting the astonishing Omaha Zoo my wife and I basically drove all day today. We woke up to pouring rain, drove for hours across the State of Missouri in bucketing rain, hit St. Louis with intentions of possibly seeing the free zoo and Gateway Arch tomorrow...but the rain was insane and the weather forecast was bleak. So what to do? We headed south!! So long St. Louis, bring on Memphis!! The rain cleared within two hours, and since the Memphis Zoo was already on our zoo itinerary we have simply decided to see it earlier than predicted.

I type this 16 minutes from the Memphis Zoo (according to our GPS system that someone loaned to us for the summer) and so tomorrow it's time to view giant pandas, bonobos for the 3rd time in a week, the 2006 Northwest Passage set of habitats (polar bears, sea lions, black bears, and bald eagles), and many other hopefully exciting enclosures. I'll be giving a full review in the near future.

After the Memphis Zoo it will be onwards towards the city of Atlanta. I don't think that we will be seeing any zoos between Memphis and Atlanta, as 6 zoos in 7 days is exhausting. I'm not really complaining, but it's time to rest rather than drive, zoo, drive, zoo, drive zoo, etc. We probably walk on average 8 km a day while looking at animals, and there needs to be some relaxing time for my wife around scrapbook stores and other delights. But Zoo Atlanta sounds promising, with loads of gorillas, orangutans and more giant pandas. We'll have visited all 4 American zoos with giant pandas by the end of this epic road trip.

While in Atlanta we'll visit the massive Georgia Aquarium and the World of Coca-Cola Museum...and possibly one other attraction. Don't worry loyal fans, the reviews will still be forthcoming.
 
Enjoy Memphis!
And on your way to Atlanta, take time to enjoy the Great Smoky Mountains! One of America's most beautiful areas.
I assume you'll skip "Dollywood" :D
 
@ANyhuis: My original motive when responding to Your paeans of praise reg. Omaha Zoo was certainly not to "bash" Omaha Zoo "emotionally"; not even the slightest. The first time I went to Omaha was way before reading Hancock's book. Actually, I visited the zoo full of expectations, fuelled by its internet displays, its list of species at ISIS etc. The zoo did not live up to the hopes, which I wasn't the only to notice among the numbers of concomitant "zoo people" back then, and which has been confirmed independently by Hancocks' book as well as by various others (including some in this forum, European zoo staff etc.). I do not defend Hancocks in general (and if he has the well-being of elephants in mind, then that's his well-intentioned cup of tea); I just want to point out that there are many other criterions You have to keep in mind to evaluate a zoo exhibit, than just judging from the visitor's point of view. And as reduakari correctly reminded us, quite a bunch of Omaha Zoo's exhibits mislead some to neglect that, which makes me especially sad in regard to the animals that have to live under these conditions...The well-being of the latter is in fact my original motive here. And just as You constantly praise this zoo again and again, I will again and again remind You of its shortcomings.;)
The numbers of visitors of an institution is not always a sign that everything there is optimal; and in the case of Omaha, I had the impression that the number of visitors is a result of no other serious attractions around...
Where and when exactly did I animadvert the staff of the zoo? The people there were all very friendly and seemed to be dedicated to their jobs, just like other good zoo staff elsewhere. But this doesn't help a lot if the husbandry design is seriously flawed...

@Snowleopard: I respect Your opinion and enjoyed Your reviews so far. Yet assessing a zoo exhibit is not always as easy as it seems, even if You try to avoid unconscious favouritism and concentrate to be as objective as possible (which I think You did mostly so far). In particular,
this becomes clear if You want to give consideration to important criterions which one from a visitor's point of view can't evaluate properly. In general, sometimes certain criterions can be easily neglected due to various reasons -may it be lack of a deeper knowledge of the biology and husbandry demands of the particular species(for example, that it is not really recommendable to keep the highly social drills in pairs...), the (dis)advantages of the exhibit for the zoo staff during daily routine, the situation behind the scenes (bad night quarters, bad feeding routine...) etc. I also saw that You rightfully animadverted the cat house, bear grottos etc. of Omaha, but I would be rather careful in regard to hyping other parts of Omaha Zoo-as I would be careful to judge an exhibit just from a visitor's viewpoint in general.

A last word to the moderators: Your wish to guide such discussions into the right direction is nice and fine, but in this particular case I thought that both @ANyhuis and I were pretty civil and polite torwards each other. If this did not appear so to You, then I hereby apologize, even though I'm pretty sure that was neither ANyhuis' nor my intention. Thanks for Your understanding-and please do not delete this post, as I spent the few spare minutes of my working day on this answer...;)

For those interested, especially @ANyhuis: if You want to talk about it, send me a PM.

So, @snowleopard, back to Your interesting reviews.
 
Last edited:
The nocturnal house at Omaha sounds amazing quite a list there, unusual for fossa to be found in a nocturnal house, thank snowleopard
 
Back
Top