Memphis Zoo Review - 4 hours (Zoo/Aquarium #18 on the epic road trip)
The Memphis Zoo was a little disapointing, as only 4 hours is a much shorter time than many of the larger zoos that I've seen on this road trip. Seeing the new Northwest Passage set of habitats, as well as a pair of giant pandas, was worthwhile, but the zoo's potential for the future outweighs the present.
There were a handful of large billboards advertising upcoming exhibits, and the next couple of years appear to be potent for the zoo. In the spring of 2009 "Teton Trek" opens, with a massive Yellowstone Lodge (I have a photo of the finished frame), grizzly bears, timber wolves, trumpeter swans and a herd of elk. Then in the spring of 2010 "Zambezi River Hippo Camp" opens, with underwater viewing of hippos and nile crocodiles, as well as flamingo and okapi. I'd like to revisit this zoo in a few years to see just how good the new habitats are, as they are certainly promoting them in at least 4 different sections of the zoo.
The Best:
Northwest Passage - opened in 2006, and it shows because everything is still so shiny. The totem poles are gorgeously painted, the gift shop has that fresh smell, the glass windows in the underwater viewing pavilion are crystal clear of algae, and this section of the zoo seems to have only opened to the public yesterday. The highlight of the entire zoo visit was seeing the 3 massive polar bears interacting with each other in their large pool. Two of the bears literally swam around and around a bunch of rocks, biting and playfully squabbling and seeming to be having a blast. The third bear would sometimes dive into the water and pretend to attack the other two, but they were only fake attacks and no actual biting occured. The sea lions across the hall in the beautiful building were also a delight to watch, and these two enclosures were very well done. Of course after Detroit everything else is downhill in terms of polar bear exhibits, but Memphis has staked a claim to the #2 slot. There were the usual rocky cliffs and deep pool, but also a set of substrate in the form of dirt and some type of gravel around one section of the enclosures. Black bears and bald eagles complete this area of the zoo. The "Teton Trek" set of habitats is being built practically right next to the "Northwest Passage", and so clearly this eastern edge of the zoo has been revitalized.
CHINA - the walk-through temple is amazing, the short film is informative, the beautiful Chinese symbols and designs are immersive and quite wonderful to see, and the gibbons, asian small-clawed otters, pere davids deer, pheasants, francois' langur and other bird aviaries are all pleasant and impressive. However, no matter how great it was to see the pair of giant pandas, their particular exhibit was the weakest section of the CHINA experience. The National Zoo in Washington D.C. has an amazing Asian section, with 3 massive panda enclosures with rocks, hills, valleys, a stream, a pool, misters, long grass, etc....and Memphis has a basic habitat that is tiny and offers nothing that anyone's not seen before. The lead-up to the pandas is outstanding from a visitor perspective, the surrounding animal exhibits are all excellent, and the pandas have been shafted. It was so blazing hot that they were each in their separate indoor room, which allowed for some terrific photos and close-up views but doesn't offer the giant pandas much in the way of space. Mixed review of this set of habitats.
Cat Country - after seeing Cincinnati's terrible small cat house and cat canyons, Toledo's awful snow leopard cages, Pittsburgh's tiny leopard mesh pits, and Omaha's brutally barren big cat complex....Memphis had a surprise in store for me. Nothing spectacular by any means, but every one of their extensive collection of cats had an outdoor exhibit with grass, shade, poles for climbing and cool pools for relaxing from the heat. After never once seeing a tiger use its pool, for the second time in a week I viewed a swimming tiger! Great collection of cats in a decent set of naturalistic habitats.
The Average:
Basically the rest of the zoo!
Elephant and rhino - average, sterile, dusty, small paddocks. However, the two african elephants on display did have a massive pool.
Primate Canyon - orangutans, bonobos (nearby), gorillas and a number of monkeys and gibbons in a large section of the zoo. All of the exhibits are average to good, but nothing outstanding. The bonobos in particular could have used more space.
Animals of the Night - after Omaha every single nocturnal house is now going to appear tiny and obsolete, but Memphis has one of the better ones in existence. Nicely detailed exhibits, and my only major beef is the combination of some of the species. A New Guinea cuscus in the same habitat as a South American coatimundi? An Australian wombat in the same exhibit as a pair of mongoose lemurs? Does the zoo just throw in whatever animal they feel like?
Reptile House - average at best. A small paddock for aldabra tortoises and another set of exhibits for komodo dragons are also average habitats.
Tropical Bird House - average, and full of mainly tiny species of bird.
African Savannah - bongo (with two youngsters), Grant's gazelle, african crowned cranes and ostrich share a large enclosure. Nearby are separate paddocks for bontebok, scimitar-horned oryx, giraffe, etc. Nothing too special here.
The Worst:
Hippo Pool - abominable disgrace, but in less than 2 years they will have a glorious new enclosure. The current one consists of a tiny pool that doesn't look like it allows the two hippos to completely submerge, and is barely big enough for them to take a handful of paces. The entire exhibit is concrete and was probably there when the zoo opened 102 years ago. This pool gives the San Francisco Zoo a run for its money in terms of an award for worst North American hippo enclosure.
Aquarium - tiny, outdated and due for a visit from the friendly neighbourhood bulldozer. It was built in 1949, and so for its 50th anniversary next year I propose that someone sneak in there and blow it up!
Round Barn - gerenuk, red river hogs, warthogs, african crowned cranes, and a couple of species of antelope reside in this curiously inadequate section of the zoo. The setup is bizarre, with long paddocks surrounding a brick building that was literally built in 1923.
Overall:
I was expecting more from Memphis in both length of stay (only 4 hours) and quality of exhibits. The old aquarium, round barn and hippo pool are awful, but the 2003 CHINA and 2006 Northwest Passage habitats are the best that the zoo has to offer. Is that showing bias against older enclosures? Nope, that's the obvious truth to anyone that visits the zoo. The 1993 big cat section still holds up well, and the felines have a better set of exhibits here than at most other zoos. The nocturnal house is well done, and the primate collection is impressive although the exhibits could have had many more climbing opportunities. Hopefully the 2009 and 2010 mega-budget habitats improve the zoo considerably, as the zoo can't keep enticing visitors with the promise of giant pandas. Unless that pair breed or artificial insemination works, then who knows if the pandas will stay for longer than the 10 year loan?
The Memphis Zoo was a little disapointing, as only 4 hours is a much shorter time than many of the larger zoos that I've seen on this road trip. Seeing the new Northwest Passage set of habitats, as well as a pair of giant pandas, was worthwhile, but the zoo's potential for the future outweighs the present.
There were a handful of large billboards advertising upcoming exhibits, and the next couple of years appear to be potent for the zoo. In the spring of 2009 "Teton Trek" opens, with a massive Yellowstone Lodge (I have a photo of the finished frame), grizzly bears, timber wolves, trumpeter swans and a herd of elk. Then in the spring of 2010 "Zambezi River Hippo Camp" opens, with underwater viewing of hippos and nile crocodiles, as well as flamingo and okapi. I'd like to revisit this zoo in a few years to see just how good the new habitats are, as they are certainly promoting them in at least 4 different sections of the zoo.
The Best:
Northwest Passage - opened in 2006, and it shows because everything is still so shiny. The totem poles are gorgeously painted, the gift shop has that fresh smell, the glass windows in the underwater viewing pavilion are crystal clear of algae, and this section of the zoo seems to have only opened to the public yesterday. The highlight of the entire zoo visit was seeing the 3 massive polar bears interacting with each other in their large pool. Two of the bears literally swam around and around a bunch of rocks, biting and playfully squabbling and seeming to be having a blast. The third bear would sometimes dive into the water and pretend to attack the other two, but they were only fake attacks and no actual biting occured. The sea lions across the hall in the beautiful building were also a delight to watch, and these two enclosures were very well done. Of course after Detroit everything else is downhill in terms of polar bear exhibits, but Memphis has staked a claim to the #2 slot. There were the usual rocky cliffs and deep pool, but also a set of substrate in the form of dirt and some type of gravel around one section of the enclosures. Black bears and bald eagles complete this area of the zoo. The "Teton Trek" set of habitats is being built practically right next to the "Northwest Passage", and so clearly this eastern edge of the zoo has been revitalized.
CHINA - the walk-through temple is amazing, the short film is informative, the beautiful Chinese symbols and designs are immersive and quite wonderful to see, and the gibbons, asian small-clawed otters, pere davids deer, pheasants, francois' langur and other bird aviaries are all pleasant and impressive. However, no matter how great it was to see the pair of giant pandas, their particular exhibit was the weakest section of the CHINA experience. The National Zoo in Washington D.C. has an amazing Asian section, with 3 massive panda enclosures with rocks, hills, valleys, a stream, a pool, misters, long grass, etc....and Memphis has a basic habitat that is tiny and offers nothing that anyone's not seen before. The lead-up to the pandas is outstanding from a visitor perspective, the surrounding animal exhibits are all excellent, and the pandas have been shafted. It was so blazing hot that they were each in their separate indoor room, which allowed for some terrific photos and close-up views but doesn't offer the giant pandas much in the way of space. Mixed review of this set of habitats.
Cat Country - after seeing Cincinnati's terrible small cat house and cat canyons, Toledo's awful snow leopard cages, Pittsburgh's tiny leopard mesh pits, and Omaha's brutally barren big cat complex....Memphis had a surprise in store for me. Nothing spectacular by any means, but every one of their extensive collection of cats had an outdoor exhibit with grass, shade, poles for climbing and cool pools for relaxing from the heat. After never once seeing a tiger use its pool, for the second time in a week I viewed a swimming tiger! Great collection of cats in a decent set of naturalistic habitats.
The Average:
Basically the rest of the zoo!
Elephant and rhino - average, sterile, dusty, small paddocks. However, the two african elephants on display did have a massive pool.
Primate Canyon - orangutans, bonobos (nearby), gorillas and a number of monkeys and gibbons in a large section of the zoo. All of the exhibits are average to good, but nothing outstanding. The bonobos in particular could have used more space.
Animals of the Night - after Omaha every single nocturnal house is now going to appear tiny and obsolete, but Memphis has one of the better ones in existence. Nicely detailed exhibits, and my only major beef is the combination of some of the species. A New Guinea cuscus in the same habitat as a South American coatimundi? An Australian wombat in the same exhibit as a pair of mongoose lemurs? Does the zoo just throw in whatever animal they feel like?
Reptile House - average at best. A small paddock for aldabra tortoises and another set of exhibits for komodo dragons are also average habitats.
Tropical Bird House - average, and full of mainly tiny species of bird.
African Savannah - bongo (with two youngsters), Grant's gazelle, african crowned cranes and ostrich share a large enclosure. Nearby are separate paddocks for bontebok, scimitar-horned oryx, giraffe, etc. Nothing too special here.
The Worst:
Hippo Pool - abominable disgrace, but in less than 2 years they will have a glorious new enclosure. The current one consists of a tiny pool that doesn't look like it allows the two hippos to completely submerge, and is barely big enough for them to take a handful of paces. The entire exhibit is concrete and was probably there when the zoo opened 102 years ago. This pool gives the San Francisco Zoo a run for its money in terms of an award for worst North American hippo enclosure.
Aquarium - tiny, outdated and due for a visit from the friendly neighbourhood bulldozer. It was built in 1949, and so for its 50th anniversary next year I propose that someone sneak in there and blow it up!
Round Barn - gerenuk, red river hogs, warthogs, african crowned cranes, and a couple of species of antelope reside in this curiously inadequate section of the zoo. The setup is bizarre, with long paddocks surrounding a brick building that was literally built in 1923.
Overall:
I was expecting more from Memphis in both length of stay (only 4 hours) and quality of exhibits. The old aquarium, round barn and hippo pool are awful, but the 2003 CHINA and 2006 Northwest Passage habitats are the best that the zoo has to offer. Is that showing bias against older enclosures? Nope, that's the obvious truth to anyone that visits the zoo. The 1993 big cat section still holds up well, and the felines have a better set of exhibits here than at most other zoos. The nocturnal house is well done, and the primate collection is impressive although the exhibits could have had many more climbing opportunities. Hopefully the 2009 and 2010 mega-budget habitats improve the zoo considerably, as the zoo can't keep enticing visitors with the promise of giant pandas. Unless that pair breed or artificial insemination works, then who knows if the pandas will stay for longer than the 10 year loan?