i agree. cubs would probably be just a tourist attraction and with so many generic hybrid lions around the U.K would seem bizarre to introduce more. why is it noone seems to breed pure lion subspecies other than asiatic and the seemingly mythical "barbary"?
There are two major problems:
- availability - there aren't many African lions of known origin in Europe, and the biggest populations are the potentially-impure
bleyenberghi (Angolan) population and the White lions, which are all pure
krugeri but which aren't always taken seriously as they are a bit gimmicky (I suspect a mixed population of tawny and white
krugeri would be much popular with the major zoos, but the only ones that get imported are the white ones)
- taxonomic uncertainty - it's far from certain that are
any valid lion subspecies beyond a simple split into Asian and African. If there
are only two subspecies, then any African Lion that hasn't got any Asian blood is pure - including all the Barbaries, Angolans, White (South African) and the other few oddities that are about (Basel's Kalahari Lions,
vernayi, and a single Somali Lion,
somaliensis at Kerkrade) as well as all the 'zoo' African lions - so it's quite possible everywhere is breeding pure subspecies lions after all! Until there's more of a consensus on this I'd be surprised if there are any more large-scale efforts to split up the African forms