Status of Exotic Bears in U.S. Zoos

Granby Zoo keeps both Asiatic Black bear, as well as (potentially) Andean bear. My trepidation at the latter is because the bear in the south american area is labeled as another asiatic black bear for some reason.
On my visit today, there was a single condor in the exhibit rather then a bear, so the zoo doesn't have Andean/Spectacled bear.
 
San diego did exactly that and would have thought they would do something more interesting than red panda.

None of this shocks me about giving up giant pandas. Having friends/colleagues that worked with giant pandas at two of the facilities, it sounds like a much bigger headache (and expense) than dealing with the Hunts and Giant Eland. Atlanta makes sense given their breeding record and having funding more so than San Diego, Memphis and D.C. specifically for pandas but will be interesting what the future holds for them as well.
 
I sure hope that Memphis doesn't get more pandas. As beloved as they are with some members of the public, they're a species, in my opinion, not worth the cost of keeping (over a million a year!), and with little transparency as to where the funds go once in China. It would be one thing if the million dollar loan went to Panda conservation, but unfortunately the Chinese Government isn't very transparent about what the funds go to. Memphis (and Smithsonian and Atlanta) would be better off choosing different uses for their Panda complexes- whether it be swapping to a different species or re-theming the area altogether.
 
I haven’t been to Memphis so can’t comment on its ideal replacement. Atlanta, if they ever lose theirs, could retheme in the area easily enough. The Smithsonian couldn’t as they have a big (South)East Asia complex around it. Maybe they could move the sloth bears in or fill the space with Asian hoofstock, which they don’t have a great deal of.
 
San diego did exactly that and would have thought they would do something more interesting than red panda.

None of this shocks me about giving up giant pandas. Having friends/colleagues that worked with giant pandas at two of the facilities, it sounds like a much bigger headache (and expense) than dealing with the Hunts and Giant Eland. Atlanta makes sense given their breeding record and having funding more so than San Diego, Memphis and D.C. specifically for pandas but will be interesting what the future holds for them as well.

To be fair, SDZ didn't exactly have a great big space for them..

~Thylo
 
I will agree with the space size but red pandas are the new meerkats, ring tail lemurs, sloths etc
 
I will agree with the space size but red pandas are the new meerkats, ring tail lemurs, sloths etc

Won't disagree in general but at least San Diego keeps Chinese Red Panda, which is significantly rarer in zoos than the nominate (sub)species and also not kept in Europe.

~Thylo
 
I haven’t been to Memphis so can’t comment on its ideal replacement. Atlanta, if they ever lose theirs, could retheme in the area easily enough. The Smithsonian couldn’t as they have a big (South)East Asia complex around it. Maybe they could move the sloth bears in or fill the space with Asian hoofstock, which they don’t have a great deal of.
I've said this before, and I'll say it again, as much as I like Asian hoofstock, the ideal choice for National Zoo if they lose pandas is to move the tigers onto Asia Trail. Lion-Tiger Hill is one of the older, weaker exhibits in the zoo, and they'd benefit from giving a new, more modern home to their Tigers. With some slight renovations, the Panda space could become a great new home for Tigers, freeing up Lion-Tiger Hill for either a larger lion exhibit or some other sort of new development.
 
I haven’t been to Memphis so can’t comment on its ideal replacement. Atlanta, if they ever lose theirs, could retheme in the area easily enough. The Smithsonian couldn’t as they have a big (South)East Asia complex around it. Maybe they could move the sloth bears in or fill the space with Asian hoofstock, which they don’t have a great deal of.
The National zoo sloth bear habitat is already really good, arguably it would be a downgrade to move them over.
 
I feel like the National Zoo has built their whole brand around them having pandas, its their big selling point to tourists. Why should you spend some of your limited time in D.C. at the zoo over any of the museums/monuments/historic sites etc., especially since you likely have a local zoo already? Well to see the pandas obviously! I'm not saying there's zero chance they stop keeping pandas, I'd just think it'd be highly unlikely it was the zoo that made that decision.
 
Do you know what happened to all the bears At la zoo ? They seamed go have had all bears at one point .
 
Back
Top