I must admit I am surprised to see such a positive review from you
If you re-read my overview, you'll see that I mentioned problematic issues in 4 of the 7 aquarium sections I described in some detail. That hardly qualifies as overwhelmingly positive. In fact, it appears several of your concerns were the same I raised: rather empty main tank at this point, land part of African Great Lake section, artificial appearance of land Amazon section, sea lions (evidently designed for sea otters, sharing features with various N.American sea otter exhibits) and pillar 'cliffs' in Faroese sea. However, I'm certainly not as strongly negative about most aquarium exhibits as it appears you are, and stand by my recommendation in the final part of my earlier overview. Regardless, my favorite aquarium in N. Europe remains Nordsoen Oceanarium but this is primarily because of their large cold-water ocean tank. In my rating of aquariums worldwide, no European facility comes close to Okinawa (my favovorite in salt water) or Shedd (fresh water). Replies to some of your comments:
there seemed to be a lot of wasted space inside the building?
Definitely lots of space. In some parts they could actually place medium-small exhibits in the middle of the walkway and still have enough space for people. Elsewhere I've seen similar space used for amphibian/arthropod sections. Whether this could be done without destroying the light effects is unclear, but I guess that is irrelevant to most hardcore zoo fans.
isn't it [the coral tank] just one long square box? No immersion effect at all
Here we evidently focused on separate things. I mainly on the inhabitants and if the aquarium has the potential to make them thrive.
[the main tank] isn't that big
Whether just above 4 mio. litres is "big" can be discussed, but if it isn't there are very few big ocean tanks for sharks/rays. Worldwide I can only think of seven with 6+ mio l. (post #23; I did forget South Korea's Jeju + Valencia in that list, and the Atlantis Bahamas 3 mio l. shark lagoon shouldn't be included). Among these Georgia and Valencia are the only outside Asia.
those yellow fake corals [in the main tank] are GHASTLY.
I strongly dislike fake corals, fake gorgonians and similar, but this is something you'll find to various extent in most (but not all) larger ocean tanks around the world. I said it before in another thread:
Sure aquariums with ocean tanks can add a a bit of pseudo-reef or a sunken ship, but for the large, continuously swimming oceanic species they're just obstacles that take up valuable swimming space.
Admittedly, I have essentially given up on commenting on such fakes, as it appears to be a lost cause. I don't remember the last time I visited a big aquarium facility without them (disregarding aquariums with only fresh/cold water exhibits, of course). The only place where I feel OK about them are in coral reef tanks with corallivores. Based on the comments I've heard at several aquariums around the world, most ordinary visitors think the brightly coloured fakes are pretty
That brings up another pet peeve of mine (in general, not specifically related to Blue P): I suspect many aquarium visitors around the world think a typical deeper Amazon habitat has many aquatic plants and/or big bundles of dead tree roots all over the place. They'd be surprised if they actually visited the Amazon and saw how barren most deeper sections are in real. Even worse and done many places: Mixing Central American cichlids with Amazon species. Different water parameters, and many Central American cichlids are too aggressive/territorial/strong compared to most (but not all) similar-sized Amazon fish.
Last edited: