I watched the cove in the hope that it would put me off dolphinaria, but it didn’t. I’ve never seen a dolphin enclosure that I’m completely happy with but I can’t bring myself to feel strongly against the keeping of cetaceans in captivity either. I hoped this film would persuade me against the keeping dolphins in captivity, but it didn’t
In fact, I found the message in this film to be confused. It started off arguing that the capture and sale of live dolphins to dolphinaria, subsidized the capture and killing of dolphins for food. The logic being that if dolphinaria stop buying dolphins, the capture of dolphins for food would also cease. It ended up saying that the Japanese killed dolphins (and continued waling) because they don’t like being told what to do by other nations; a kind of two figures (one finger if you’re not British) up at the world. In this case, a stop to the sale of live dolphins to dolphinaria would do nothing to stop the slaughter of dolphins for food. Thus the film ended up arguing against itself.
The film also claimed that one of the original Flippers committed suicide by holding its breath. This raises two points; 1) dolphins were once thought to be voluntary breathers but this is not now considered to be the case (I learnt that from this site. Maybe someone will confirm this). 2) If we accept that flipper hated captivity so much she killed herself, then we should also accept that all the dolphins that don’t kill themselves are happy in captivity.
One final (tongue in cheek) point. Some people talk about dolphins as if they’re so cleaver they’d put Einstein in the shade. If they’re so clever, why are they so willing to jump through hoops for a fish? I’m sure humans in the same situation would just refuse to perform and therefore, be of no entertainment value.