I was thinking a second otter species could be good - and considering the level of vegetation in the proposed location, why not the largest otter species to compliment the smallest species? Giant Otters are social and can live in groups as large as 15-20.
I agree that Komodo would be good to replace Tasmanian Devil. My thoughts would be the first larger exhibit could be joined with the empty water space for Southern River Otter (also benefits as being an addition of a South American predator). The second Tasmanian Devil enclosure could then be an outdoor enclosure for Komodo Dragon, with the Picnic Shelter behind this enclosure being renovated to be an indoor BoH for Komodo Dragon. The grassed area between the Main Trail and the Shelter could then also be a Main Trail facing outdoor exhibit for Komodo Dragon.
I would like to see a Phillipines Crocodile enclosure reestablished in this precinct too.
As for Asian small-clawed Otters - I still think that in the TOTE redevelopment that the otters there should also be given access to part of, or all of the lake in the middle of the precinct. This could either be a connected enclosure space or a second enclosure.
Giant otters are CITES I, so regional support would be required to bring them in. I’m thinking they’d also be a good fit for Auckland Zoo, whose South American precinct is greatly lacking.
Either way, it’d be good to see Melbourne Zoo take more of a lead role in the Asian small-clawed otter programme. At a minimum, they should have two exhibits. Their male, though paired with an ageing female is genetically valuable and could be re-paired following her death. This would be a good opportunity to undertake an import. Much of the regional population descends from Auckland’s breeding pair in the 1990’s (Wono and Jaya) and Perth’s new breeding pair are related. New bloodlines would be beneficial.
