The German Adventures Of A Tea-Loving Dave - April 2014

They certainly did at my first visit (2005) but the current species were in place when I was there in 2011.

I should be at Leipzig again this week, all being well, so it's very tempting to write up my own review of the rest of the zoo to post when I get back and steal TLD's thunder - he'd only have himself to blame! :D
Actually I would more than welcome any updates you could give to my account of Leipzig and - as I believe you are visiting there too - Magdeburg, in order that any changes in the status quo over the past 12 months can be discussed :) after all, part of my aim in writing these reports is to give a picture of the collections for anyone wanting to visit them!

And with luck I will get Leipzig finished before you get back anyhow ;) :p
 
The wolves were still there I think in 2007, prior to wolves and coati which have been living there since at least 2001, I recall seeing tigers and even lions here from when I was very young. By next year the snow leopards should live here...

The roe deer have left the collection recently by the way ;)

I have been visiting the Leipzig zoo quite a few times between 1995 and 2007, when I was young (since then I have only been there in 2012 and I will return in 2 months).

The zoos has hugely improved over the last 15 years and there are less and less spots that have remained the same. Much enclosures I do not really miss, except the red-necked gazelles and the rest of the African section, where there is only elephants now and the rocky mountain goats who were kept on the place of the current tiger enclosure. I also have fond memories of the rosental-Frei-anlagen, 3 large hoofstock enclosures, that now comprise the Kiwara savanne and the newly built rhino enclosure.

It is great to see this zoo improving more and more, but the Zoo Leipzig of my childhood is disappearing more and more, which feels strange, and Leipzig Zoo feels more and more a different zoo then it was when I was young and the atmosphere that was, is getting lost. It made me feel a bit disoriented when I visited in 2012 and will be even more the case in 2015 I think...
 
Your reports on your trip have been interesting. I first visited zoo's in what was the DDR in the 80's. There was poverty everywhere you looked, but the zoopeople I met were really professional. On a visit in 2003 I was given the Enlish edition of the Leipziger Blatterspecial edition on the the 125th anniversary of Zoo Leipzig. This is a fascinating account of the zoo, its masterplan for 'the zoo of the future' and its plan to transform the zoo by 2014,which it has done. I can only imagine what it will do over the next 14 years. As an older zoochatter, I should like to remind all you younger ones is that all the maor zoo improvements COST a lot of money.
The booklet was published by Kulturstiftung, Leipzig zoo. There is also a book on Gondwana land, but I have only seen it in German.
 
Your so lucky, I hope to visit Berlin this summer but I am somewhat restricted by age and family :(
 
Part IV: Gondwanaland: Introduction, Volcano Tunnel and South America

In order to cover Gondwanaland, which for all intents and purposes is the centrepiece of Zoo Leipzig, it is probably wisest to divide this account into three sections; first I shall give a little background information on the house, before then giving a walkthrough account of our time in Gondwanaland before finally offering my final thoughts and opinions on the house as a whole.

Opening in July 2011, the Gondwanaland tropical house at Zoo Leipzig is one of the six themed areas which form the "Zoo Of The Future" masterplan which has been underway at the collection since 2000. Constructed along the lines of "immersion" exhibits from the USA such as Lied Jungle at Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo, and one of the largest such tropical houses in the world, Gondwanaland is intended to emulate the natural habitat of taxa from the various regions of the world which once partially comprised the Gondwana supercontinent. As such, the house comprises four distinct sections; a "Primeval Volcano Tunnel" intended to represent primitive taxa similar to those present on the supercontinent millions of years ago, followed by South American, African and finally Asian walkthrough exhibits. This means that one tropical biome once part of Gondwana - Australia - is not represented whatsoever, barring those taxa held within the volcano tunnel. More interesting, however, is the presence of an Asian biome when one considers that barring the Indian subcontinent, this continent was not part of Gondwana, rather being part of the northern supercontinent Laurasia. The lack of any Antarctic taxa, naturally, can be excused :p

Of the 27,000 sq. metres covered by the Gondwanaland house as a whole, the public portion of the house comprises roughly 16,500 sq. metres, the vast majority of this comprising the central tropical hall. The main path running through the three zones reaches an approximate length of 650 metres, with an additional 90 metres forming a loop running to and from a high viewing point at the centre of the hall via suspension bridges. Officially speaking, the central hall is said to be kept at a constant temperature of roughly 28°C, with humidity varying between 65-75% depending on external factors - this is largely intended to maintain the vast amount of trees and other vegetation planted throughout the house, the vast majority of which are native to the regions represented. However, I rather suspect that the true figure for both the temperature and humidity levels is rather higher.

Before entering Gondwanaland, having been warned by other Zoochatters about the extreme heat and humidity, and the lack of anywhere to purchase refreshments once we had started making our way around the house, we each retrieved bottles of water from our bags which we had packed for this express purpose and placed them into pouches on the exterior of our rucksacks for ease of access. We then made our way into the "Volcano Tunnel", the first area of the house which we would pass through and the only one not tied to a specific geographic location. Rather, it contained a selection of taxa from throughout the landmasses which once comprised Gondwana which are close in morphology to some of the animals which had lived during the time of the supercontinent, many of which are from zoological groups described by some as "living fossils". As the name would suggest, this portion of the house was designed to resemble an empty and cooled magma tunnel, dimly lit in places and with projected images of cool solidified lava on the floor, which presumably were tied into pressure or vibration sensors which would "melt" the lava as it was walked on, before cooling once again. Various tanks and enclosures were dotted throughout the walls.

The first such tank contained two fish taxa belonging to the Centrarchidae; Pumpkinseed Sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus) and Flier (Centrarchus macropterus), something which struck me as doubly-unusual. Firstly, these fish belonged to a group which is very recent in geological terms, having arisen in the Miocene period over 100 million years after the breaking of Gondwana. Secondly, and perhaps even more importantly, this group is - and always has been - restricted to North America, which geologically was never part of Gondwana, having been part of the northern supercontinent Laurasia. Considering the vast amount of emphasis given in both the zoo guidebook and the guidebook devoted to Gondwanaland to the fact that this area was devoted to "living fossils" representing taxa present on Gondwana itself, this did not strike me as a good start! The only saving grace was the presence of a third taxon, Spotted Gar (Lepisosteus oculatus); although again belonging to a group restricted to North America, in this particular case the presence of gar can be justified through the fact that fossils attributable to this group have been found worldwide, and in rock dating back to the Early Cretaceous - roughly speaking, contemporaneous with the breakup of Gondwana.

The second tank, however, was much more suitable for the theme and setting of Gondwanaland; containing as it did Eastern Long-necked Turtle (Chelodina longicollis), Australian Lungfish (Neoceratodus forsteri), McCullochs Rainbowfish (Melanotaenia maccullochi) and Duboulay's Rainbowfish (Melanotaenia duboulayi), all of which are Australian endemics and as such suitable for the setting. Moreover, the turtle and lungfish are important representatives of groups which have remained near-unchanged for millions of years; in the case of the turtle, a Gondwanan-specific clade of turtles among the most basal of all chelonians. The taxonomic importance of the lungfish as representatives of the Sarcopterygii, and as such very akin to the progenitors of the first tetrapods, is further underlined by the fact that the next two tanks also contained examples of this group; first a tank containing South American Lungfish (Lepidosiren paradoxa), followed by a tank containing West African Lungfish (Protopterus annectens) and a species of African Jewelfish (Hemichromis letourneuxi). It was quite satisfying to see three different lungfish taxa in such close proximity; even moreso considering the fact the Australian taxon is somewhat unusual in captive collections. However, the display could have been better served by displaying one of the lesser-known African taxa, for instance Marbled or Slender, rather than the near-ubiquitous West African. However, this is just a minor point compared to my more well-founded reservations about the taxa displayed in the first tank of this area.

The final tank in this section contained Mangrove Horseshoe Crab (Carcinoscorpius rotundicauda), a south-east Asian taxon which I was quite pleased to see, as this represented a species of horseshoe crab which to my knowledge I had not seen previously. We then reached a mid-size enclosure, lightly dotted with vegetation and various logs and branches along with prolific use of mock rock, which contained a pair of young female Komodo Dragon (Varanus komodoensis); informational signage explained that they were, as yet, too young and small in size to risk mixing with the large adult male held elsewhere in Gondwanaland. Turning a corner from here, we came to a long dark corridor which was much-less well-lit when compared to the portion of the "Volcano Tunnel" we had walked through thus far.

The first, and largest, enclosure in this portion of the Volcano Tunnel was filled with numerous logs, branches, nestboxes and low-lying vegetation, and contained several Eastern Quoll (Dasyurus viverrinus) of both colour-morphs. Leipzig was the first European collection to hold this taxon since a single individual at Budapest passed away in 1993, the last survivor of a short-lived population which was found in a handful of collections over the prior decade or so, having imported six individuals from Melbourne Zoo in 2011. In the intervening time, the species has bred profusely and has been dispersed to a number of other European collections - however I fear that this population will prove as short-lived as the previous attempt, as the last of those individuals originally important have now passed away and no further imports have taken place. As such, if breeding falters at Leipzig - the only European collection currently holding the taxon to have successfully bred them thus far - the short lifespan inherent to dasyurid taxa and inbreeding depression is liable to cause the population to crash. This will be a shame, of course, as I have a fondness for dasyurid marsupials and feel they are under-represented in captive collections. The next enclosure contained Pygmy Slow Loris (Nycticebus pygmaeus); a nice neough taxon but one which, if I am to be honest, rather failed to keep my attention when compared with the taxa housed on other side. The Eastern Quoll I have of course already discussed, along with my distinct fondness for dasyurid taxa. This latter point rather came into play once again, as just beyond the Pygmy Slow Loris was a small and rocky glass-fronted enclosure which contained Kowari (Dasycercus byrnei), yet another member of this unusual group of carnivorous marsupials. As such I found myself flitting between the two enclosures holding these marsupials, in order to view both to my satisfaction. Pleasingly, both taxa were very active and visible; although the dim light conditions meant that I was unable to obtain particularly good photographs of either, I was entirely happy to content myself with viewing the animals scurry to and fro for a time. This portion of Gondwanaland did, at one point, contain a third taxon which would have attracted my attention to an equal or - possibly - greater extent; Virginia Opossum. However, the individuals held at Leipzig are long-since deceased, opossum taxa having an even more brief lifespan than dasyurids - as such the group is even more scarce in European collections than the latter group, and I have still never seen any opossum taxon :p A pity, but there you go.

Soon, we emerged back into the light, and a wave of overwhelming heat and humidity hit us as we entered the "Mubaan Village" plaza, which marked both the start and end of the visitors footpath through the three geographic zone, and we finally got our first view of the tropical hall of Gondwanaland. At least, Chris did - the rest of us immediately had to remove our glasses to wipe away the sudden condensation which had formed, before we were able to view the hall ourselves. The plaza was designed to look like a south-east Asian village in terms of architecture, and contained a gift shop, restaurant and - most importantly for our needs - lockers in which we were able to place our excess bags and coats. This was also the point where, if we so chose, we would be able to embark upon the boat ride through the tropical hall - something which we decided we would leave until last before deciding whether to do so or not, as we thought it more prudent to prioritise making our way around Gondwanaland on foot. There was a great deal of vegetation dotted throughout the village, with more visible as far as our eyes could see; the overwhelming sound was the roaring of the waterfall present at the far end of the building, flowing into the canal which wove its way through the three zones. Curiously, we were unable to hear a single bird calling; nor could we see any free-flying birds at this point in time, although we knew they were present.

Having decided, as noted, to embark upon our way through the three major zones of Gondwanaland rather than using the boat ride, we now started to walk along the path which took us into the South America zone. The vegetation was thick and omnipresent, and the path took a weaving route around and over the canal, giving views of the boats slowly crawling along in the water. The first major feature we reached was a bridge over the water onto a small island, which was signposted as holding free-roaming Common Squirrel Monkey (Saimiri sciureus), a taxon which in my experience is seldom unwilling to venture near people in walkthrough enclosures, to the point that they can be quite a problem! However, very unusually, the inhabitants of this exhibit seemed extremely nervous, restricting themselves to the highest possible points of the enclosure when they even dared to venture onto the publicly-accessible island itself; the majority of individuals remaining on a neighbouring thickly vegetated island which contained their living quarters.

As we moved along the path further, we reached a crossroads - to our left was a route which travelled a low route through an "Amazon Grotto" tunnel before coming back onto the main path to our right, whilst travelling straight on would bypass this area. Naturally, we turned left, and came to a window which granted us views across a steep and well-vegetated enclosure containing Ocelot (Leopardus pardalis), a taxon of which I am rather fond. Due to the thick vegetation and high level of climbing opportunity present within the enclosure, it took quite some time before we were able to spot the inhabitant of the enclosure; it was quite satisfying to find an enclosure which gave the ocelots the chance to hide away from the public gaze, although the counterpoint must be made that the prolonged period of time we spent examining the enclosure allowed us to notice that it was rather smaller than it seemed, with the thickness of the vegetation and the fact we were looking upwards into the enclosure creating an impression of depth which would lead the casual observer to overestimate the enclosure space. That said, the beneficial effect of being able to hide away hopefully would compensate for the inhabitants having little space.

The next enclosure we reached was a mid-size enclosure filled with low-lying vegetation and open areas of exposed soil, with a large pond taking up approximately half of the exhibit as a whole. As the gradient of the tunnel we were walking through sloped downwards, windows gave us an underwater view of this pond. Signage on the walls told us that the land portion of this enclosure held Greenish Acuchy (Myoprocta pratti), whilst the pond contained Arrau River Turtle (Podocnemis expansa), Arapaima (Arapaima gigas), Redtail Catfish (Phractocephalus hemioliopterus), Ripsaw Catfish (Oxydoras niger), Barred Sorubim (Pseudoplatystoma fasciatum) and Pacu (Colossoma macropomum). Overall, I thought that this comprised a very well-stocked representation of Amazonian river taxa, kept in a decent replication of a submerged forest environment. The one major taxon which one might have expected to see in such an exhibit - Red-bellied Piranha (Pygocentrus nattereri) - was housed in a separate and rather smaller tank opposite.

The next notable point we reached was the underwater viewing for the Giant Otter (Pteronura brasiliensis) enclosure, which we would view in more detail from a different point on the path. However, I did notice at this point that the water level seemed rather lower than I would have expected as suitable for this taxon; certainly it was rather shallower than the similar underwater viewing window for Giant Otter with which I was familiar at Chester Zoo. Continuing on, we reached a point from which we were able to look across the canal to a very well-vegetated island which was signposted as containing Linnaeus' Two-toed Sloth (Choloepus didactylus). This enclosure was quite pleasant in appearance, containing as it did numerous climbing opportunities for the inhabitants; however it did seem a little empty, quite possibly due to the fact that it was originally intended and designed to hold multiple species, including Azara's Agouti and Southern Tamandua as well as the Linnaeus' Sloth. Of these, the agouti has left the collection since Gondwanaland opened and has never been replaced with an alternate taxon, whilst the Tamandua has never gone on-display despite this having been alleged to be imminent at several points in time - to the point that it is mentioned in the Gondwanaland guidebook as being on-display!

We then rejoined the main path and ascended past the enclosure containing the Green Acouchy, which quite satisfyingly was active and readily visible - this taxon was one which I had never seen prior to my trip to Germany, yet I had obtained only the merest glimpses at Zoo Berlin and Magdeburg. As such I was pleased to get the opportunity to photograph the individual on-display in Gondwanaland. We next passed the main body of the Giant Otter enclosure; at first glance it looked excellent, being thickly planted with vegetation on the land portion of the exhibit, with logs forming a "bridge" of sorts over the water, and with the pool within the enclosure being quite sizable in area - albeit rather shallow as far as we could tell. However, when we looked closer it was apparent that much of the enclosure was, in fact, hotwired to prevent access by the giant otters - presumably due to the fact that the vegetation and trees at one end of the enclosure formed part of another exhibit; as such the large enclosure was only half the size it seemed, with a portion being merely for decoration and another segment actually forming another enclosure entirely. In fact, I was informed at a later date that the concealed restriction of the enclosure space extended even further than I had realised. Overall this struck me as quite a pity, as aesthetically the enclosure looked great and very naturalistic - but as already noted, I had already noticed that superficial aesthetics often seemed to take priority over enclosure quality elsewhere in the collection. As such, I was not unduly surprised to notice details such as this, and the use of perspective to hide an overly small - in my opinion - Ocelot enclosure. I had also noticed by now that the lack of birdsong or visible free-flying birds was not restricted to the area around the Asian village plaza; as such I was starting to wonder whether the numbers of free-flying birds had been deliberately kept low to prevent any risk of the carefully maintained and pristine looking trees and vegetation within Gondwanaland being altered or damaged, and furthermore to prevent the paths and visitor areas from any chance of being fouled by visible bird droppings.

As the path curved around, we reached a batch of signage detailing the inhabitants of the aforementioned enclosure semi-concealed in such a way as to appear part of the giant otter enclosure; White-faced Saki (Pithecia pithecia) and Silvery Marmoset (Mico argentatus), neither of which were visible at this point in time. However, it could be argued that this was a positive point, being a reflection of just how thick the vegetation within Gondwanaland was, and moreover the fact that both taxa within the enclosure were small primates rather explained the reason the giant otters were prevented from making use of much of the land area; it would be very easy for predators such as these to kill and feed upon their neighbours were they to gain the opportunity. However, a counter-argument could be put forward that there was no reason why these taxa had to be housed in this particular enclosure, both being more than suitable to be mixed with the squirrel monkeys on their pair of islands had the design taken this into account. This would have permitted the giant otters a much larger exhibit, and potentially improved the quality of the walkthrough primate exhibit - which as already mentioned was slightly diminished by the reluctance of the squirrel monkeys to actually access the walkthrough area. Before leaving the "South America" portion of Gondwanaland, we finally passed the upper level of the Ocelot enclosure we had viewed previously. This permitted us much-closer views of the inhabitants of the enclosure, but moreover made it all the more apparent just how small the enclosure really was.

(Attached are images of the Komodo Dragon enclosure in the Volcano Tunnel, a Fire Safety plan of Gondwanaland, the Squirrel Monkey enclosure, the Boat Jetty viewed from a bridge, the island enclosure for Linnaeus' Two-toed Sloth and a view across Gondwanaland from the Ocelot enclosure)
 

Attachments

  • DSCF1813.jpg
    DSCF1813.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 19
  • DSCF1847.jpg
    DSCF1847.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 19
  • DSCF1851.jpg
    DSCF1851.jpg
    2.1 MB · Views: 18
  • DSCF1853.jpg
    DSCF1853.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 16
  • DSCF1872.jpg
    DSCF1872.jpg
    2 MB · Views: 19
  • DSCF1885.jpg
    DSCF1885.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 17
Last edited:
Part V: Gondwanaland: Africa, Asia And Overall Thoughts

The first enclosure we encountered within the "Africa" area was a rather small exhibit, albeit relatively thickly planted, which was labelled as containing South African Bat-eared Fox (Otocyon megalotis megalotis). This taxon tends to be quite shy and retiring, so it was little surprise that we failed to spot the individuals held within the enclosure despite how small said enclosure was. The enclosure itself was nothing special, making little impression on us. A little further along the path, it split into two sections; the first continued on the main route around Gondwanaland which we had followed thus far, whilst the second led to the "Treetop Walk" which would take us across suspension bridges to a pair of high-level viewing points housed at the top of two towers at the rough central point of the tropical hall as a whole. Needless to say, we took the latter of these routes.

After a short path leading through the vegetation, this route took us to the first suspension bridge leading to one of the pair of viewing towers. As one would imagine, we took our time walking across the bridge in order to make the most of the view; this, quite frankly, was excellent. We were able to look across the entirety of the central hall of Gondwanaland, looking back upon the areas we had already viewed and forward to those we were yet to reach, marvelling at the sea of vegetation dotted with signs of animal enclosures and the replica Asian village at the entrance, with the boat-ride canal weaving in and out of the tree cover. The view from the first tower and the bridge connecting it to the second tower was no less awe-inspiring. However, one thing was even more noticeable from up above the tree cover than it had been on the main path; the lack of free-flying birds, or indeed the vocalisations of these birds. No matter which direction I looked, nor how long I watched, there was no apparent sign of any birds flying to and fro. Having spent many a happy hour within the tropical house at Chester Zoo, and having also spent time in the similar house at Paignton Zoo, I was very familiar with the usual sound and sight of a tropical exhibit containing free-flying taxa.... yet here, I could hear nothing but the roaring of the waterfall, and the distant sounds of other people speaking here and there. Naturally, one would not have expected any free-flying birds to be constantly visible in such a large house..... but surely at this elevation, and with a view of the entire house, one would see something?

As chance would have it, the second of the viewing towers shed some light on the matter; it contained a laminated book detailing the various taxa which were said to be free-roaming within Gondwanaland as a whole. As I had purchased the most recent Annual Report for Zoo Leipzig on entry to the collection - which contained a stocklist of species and thus gave details of how many individuals of each taxon were held - I was therefore able to compare the list of taxa in the viewing tower with the number of individuals held in the collection. As such, the following list not only details the species held as free-roaming taxa within Gondwanaland, but also gives the most recent figures for individuals held. The label "X" indicates a holding where due to the vagaries of breeding and loss a specific number of individuals is not known:

Chinese Water Dragon (Physignathus cocincinus) - 2,2,0
Common Green Iguana (Iguana iguana) - 0,0,4
Cuban Brown Anole (Anolis sagrei) - 0,0,X
Greater Madagascar Day Gecko (Phelsuma grandis) - 0,0,X
Golfodulcean Poison Dart Frog (Phyllobates vittatus) - 0,0,X
Greenhouse Frog (Eleutherodactylus planirostris) - 0,0,X
Dyeing Dart Frog (Dendrobates tinctorius) - 0,0,7
Australian Green Tree Frog (Litoria caerulea) - 0,0,X
-----
Lesser Brazilian Teal (Amazonetta brasiliensis brasiliensis) - 1,0,0
Fulvous Whistling Duck (Dendrocygna bicolor) - 3,3,1
Blue-backed Grassquit (Volatinia jacarina) - 0,0,6
Madagascar Fody (Foudia madagascariensis) - 5,6,0
Masked Lapwing (Vanellus miles) - 1,0,0
Sunbittern (Eurypyga helias) - 1,0,0
Nicobar Pigeon (Caloenas nicobarica) - 2,1,6
Crested Wood Partridge (Rollulus rouloul) - 7,10,0
Brahminy Starling (Sturnia pagodarum) - 4,2,0
Red-whiskered Bulbul (Pycnonotus jocosus) - 2,3,0
Hartlaub's turaco (Tauraco hartlaubi) - 1,0,0
White-rumped Shama (Copsychus malabaricus) - 1,2,0
Cuban Grassquit (Tiaris canorus) - 3,3,0
Pied Imperial-Pigeon (Ducula bicolor) - 1,1,0

Disregarding any young birds which may or may not have survived, or indeed been recorded, this would suggest a total of 68 individual birds free-flying within Gondwanaland - however this does not take into account the possibility that some of the species above may have been held in multiple locations in Zoo Leipzig. I would later learn that at the very least, some Crested Wood Partridge and Madagascar Fody were held in the Bird House. As such the true figure was liable to be somewhat lower. In any case, this figure is significantly lower than one would expect for a tropical house of this size and scale - 4.5 acres of public area - and rather accounts for my failure to observe any free-flying birds; they are quite simply spread thinly enough to escape notice. This strikes me as quite a waste; a building of this size and scale could easily sustain three or four times as many individual free-flying birds without significantly overwhelming the experience as a whole. As a result I rather fear that the hypothesis I earlier voiced - that the number of free-flying birds has been kept deliberately low to keep the vegetation looking as perfect as possible, the paths free of droppings and overall to retain the polished perfection of the "immersive experience". If this is indeed the case, it rather illustrates one of the issues I was developing with the approach taken by Leipzig as a whole; the attempts to create a sense of immersion felt too perfect and idealised, and as a result stripped any such sense away, much like how I had felt the theming of the "African" portion of the zoo as a whole had felt soulless and lacking in a definable sense of character.

The final suspension bridge leading back to the main footpath through Gondwanaland took us to only a dozen or so metres further down the path from where we had left it; just opposite were viewing windows into a pair of enclosures. The first enclosure was a small but well-vegetated enclosure holding a group of Hamlyn's Guenon (Cercopithecus hamlyn) along with Kirk's Dik-dik (Madoqua kirkii). As has been noted in the past, the former taxon is a particular favorite of mine and one whose slow loss from European collections I have been keeping track of with a sense of sadness; certainly it is a taxon which I do not expect to see within European collections in another decade, much like many other guenon taxa which are clinging on by a thread. The enclosure was decent but, as noted, a bit small for the inhabitants in my opinion - especially considering the vast amount of space with which the designers of Gondwanaland had to play with. A similar impression was given by the enclosure visible through the opposite window, signposted for yet another guenon species - Diana Monkey (Cercopithecus diana) - along with Western Pygmy Hippopotamus (Choeropsis liberiensis liberiensis). Although larger than the previous enclosure, it was still rather small when one considers the needs of the latter taxon in particular; moreover although a large pool was present for the Pygmy Hippo to retreat to there was surprisingly little climbing opportunities granted to the Diana Monkeys. The path continued around this latter enclosure, heading towards the large waterfall whose roaring we had been able to hear throughout our time in the tropical hall of Gondwanaland. As it drew level with the waterfall, the path took us into a spacious cave which contained a viewing window into the swimming area for the Pygmy Hippopotamus, as well as a hole in the wall of the cave which granted a view *through* the waterfall itself. This latter feature was, quite frankly, a godsend; although we had packed multiple litre-bottles of water for our time in Gondwanaland, and had been drinking from them as we walked along the footpath and watched animals within their enclosures, we were finding the heat and humidity almost overwhelming at this point - sweat was pouring constantly into our eyes, and the humidity was such that no cooling effect from the evaporation of our sweat was possible. The cave was cooler than the open area of the tropical hall, but not sufficiently so to grant us succor. As such, we each took turns in passing our cameras and extraneous equipment to one another to hold, as we each in turn stuck our heads as far into the waterfall as we possibly could - in doing so cooling our scalps and faces, washing the worst of the sweat from our heads and thus managing to find relief - which was marked and instantaneous. We noted ruefully that this cave area was large and empty enough that it would have been ideal for a small drinks stand, or even a vending machine, to allow people some means of cooling down and quenching their thirst were they not so prepared as we had been. Another example, sad to say, of the desire not to break immersion having compromised the quality of the house.

This cave also marked the boundary point between the "Africa" zone of Gondwanaland and the "Asia" zone, which would comprise the rest of the building through to the Asian Village where we had entered. The small size of the "Africa" zone - only three exhibits - did not escape our attention; nor had the fact that the largest portion of the tropical hall was given over to a landmass which - barring the Indian subcontinent - had never been part of the Gondwana supercontinent, something which seemed somewhat wrong when one considers how rigorously the "hype" and narrative of the Gondwanaland house is focused upon this landmass. But I shall have more to say on this matter anon.

The first "Asian" enclosure was a small vivarium at the exit to the cave, containing Black-spotted Rock Frog (Staurois guttatus), an unusual and attractive taxon which we had not previously seen. A little further along, we came to a somewhat small and bare enclosure for Fishing Cat (Prionailurus viverrinus); barely a dry muddy platform with a few bushes, and a pool of water at the front of the enclosure for the inhabitants to access if they so desired. The vegetation here rather looked like it had seen better days; from photographs of this same enclosure which I had seen in the past, it once was rather more verdant than it is now. No sign of the inhabitants could be seen - considering how little cover there was within the enclosure now, it would not surprise me to learn they were choosing to remain in their off-display housing rather than be constantly exposed to the public gaze.

The next enclosure - and the largest we had seen within Gondwanaland by far - contained Malayan Tapir (Tapirus indicus). The size and scale of this enclosure is hardly surprising when one considers that the original plan was to hopefully house Sumatran Rhinoceros within this exhibit, due to the heavy involvement which Zoo Leipzig has in the in-situ conservation programme revolving around this taxon; in point of fact this enclosure was specifically designed to hold said taxon as the centrepiece and crowning glory of Gondwanaland. Sad to say, not only will this never come to pass, but I fear that the taxon's days are now irrevocably numbered. As far as potential substitute taxa go, the Malayan Tapir *is* quite a good choice; certainly the inhabitants were making good use of their enclosure. However, once again this enclosure was significantly less well-vegetated and lush than I am given to understand it once was; whereas previously it was thickly vegetated with a grassy substrate, and from photographs could almost have passed for an outdoor exhibit, it now stands as bare muddy scrub, with only sporadic and small patches of grass remaining. What other vegetation there was seemed in many cases to be drying up and faltering, barring the largest trees and bushes. We wondered, therefore, whether this was due to the actions of the inhabitants, or due to an issue with the plants chosen for this enclosure and the neighbouring Fishing Cat enclosure. It is a shame that this enclosure has become quite bare and ugly-looking, all things considered, for it holds great potential and is still very obviously intended to be an important and integral part of Gondwanaland.

The next enclosure was a small and - I hate to say it - rather ugly enclosure for Asian Short-clawed Otter (Aonyx cinerea), comprising a collection of ponds nestled between buttresses of mock-rock and fake logs; it rather struck me as an afterthought, something thrown together at the last minute when the designers of Gondwanaland realised they just *had* to have the nigh-ubiquitous ASCO somewhere within their exhibit. I may well even be correct. Not far from here was another small enclosure, a series of muddy terraces bordered by logs and bushes, which was signposted for Asian Giant Tortoise (Manouria emys emys); not a bad enclosure all things considered, but nothing special by any stretch of the imagination.

We next reached a viewing point looking out over a very large enclosure comprising large expanses of water, along with a long, narrow stretch of dry muddy ground which rather seemed designed to emulate a river bank, with lush vegetation overhanging both land and water. This enclosure was signposted for Sunda Gharial (Tomistoma schlegelii), a species which as already noted in these accounts I am extremely fond of, and which I am always very pleased to be able to view at length. I was particularly pleased with how numerous, and large, the individuals held within this enclosure were; I counted 7 or 8 individuals within the enclosure, all rather larger than most crocodilians I had seen in the past, but none reaching the size nor scale that this taxon is capable of. One individual in particular was an impressive size; as such I suspect this may have been an older animal when compared with the other individuals within the enclosure.

Just opposite this enclosure was a small but well-planted aviary for Wrinkled Hornbill (Aceros corrugatus) - a pleasant enough taxon but a somewhat uninspiring one compared to some of the other mid-size hornbill taxa which would have fit the geographic remit of the exhibit. The aviary seemed to be missing something, but I could not quite put my finger on what; it didn't give the same sense of being an afterthought that I had gained from the Short-Clawed Otter enclosure, but neither did I get the sense that it *belonged* where it was. Some way further down the path, which was sweeping around the perimeter of the Gharial exhibit, we came to a set of viewing windows looking into an enclosure for Komodo Dragon (Varanus komodoensis); this enclosure was very much akin to that we had seen within the Volcano Tunnel, albeit somewhat larger and rockier, and with less vegetation visible. The inhabitant of this enclosure was equally rather larger than those we had seen previously; as noted before, the eventual plan is for the pair of females within the Volcano Tunnel to move into this enclosure once they are large enough for their safety around the existing large male to be more assured.

Just opposite the Komodo Dragon enclosure, there were underwater viewing windows into the Sunda Gharial enclosure - this gave us significantly better views both of those individuals within the water, and those which were hauled out onto dry land. Moreover, a signpost next to these viewing windows informed us that the Sunda Gharial enclosure also held a number of Malaysian Giant Pond Turtle (Orlitia borneensis). I found myself thinking that this enclosure - the last full enclosure we would see within the central hall of Gondwanaland - was the best one we had seen thus far. Not only was it spacious, like the Malayan Tapir enclosure, but it still looked rather attractive and most importantly, from my point of view, it *fit* with the feel of the environment and did not feel forced.

At this point, the path took a winding route through thick vegetation before returning to the Asian Village where we had entered the tropical hall; having decided that we had spent enough time in the overwhelming heat and could live without embarking on the boat-ride, we decided to leave Gondwanaland. Retrieving our bags and coats from the lockers, we made our way towards the exit. As we did so, we reached one final set of enclosures; a pleasant little vivarium containing Eyespot Gecko (Gonatodes ocellatus), Yellow-banded Poison Dart Frog (Dendrobates leucomelas), Golden Mantella (Mantella aurantiaca) and Yellow-headed Day Gecko (Phelsuma klemmeri).

Overall, then, my impressions of Gondwanaland were very much mixed. As an achievement of architectural design and engineering, it is unmatched in my (admittedly relatively limited) experience. It was far and away the largest zoological structure I had ever spent time in, and the amount of thought and planning that has gone into achieving it is mind-boggling. However, as a zoological exhibit...... I was not entirely convinced. As noted already, it seemed to me that all-too-often the "look" of the thing was deemed more important than actually achieving an enclosure which not only looked good, but actually *was* good. A tropical house which covers 4.5 acres of public area, with an acre or two inaccessible to the public, should not contain fewer individual free-flying birds than many small pet shops do, never mind approximately one-third the number of birds that an ageing tropical house like the one at Chester Zoo - a structure which is perhaps a tenth the size of Gondwanaland - manages to display in a free-flying situation without compromising on welfare. Equally, enclosures should not be hotwired in such a way that their inhabitants are kept out of large portions of the enclosures in order that these same enclosures continue to look pristine for the public. Even the little things.... like not thinking to include opportunities for people to cool down with a drink at some point in their journey around Gondwanaland. Considering the path is one-way, and the only drinks stand is at the entrance to the building as a whole..... it's a bloody long time to go without a drink if you don't realise just how hot it is going to get, or just how long it will take to go around the house adequately; in our case, well over 2 hours, not far off 3 hours.

Just as damning, in my eyes, is the hypocrisy of the "immersion theming" as a whole. Having a theme designed around the old supercontinent of Gondwana, whose constituent landmasses comprise the vast majority of tropical environments in the present day, is a good idea. A great idea, in point of fact. Trying to achieve a feeling of complete immersion in the world whose "story" is being told through the narrative of the Gondwanaland structure is just as valid. But omitting huge swathes of the landmasses in question, yet devoting large portions of the house to taxa and regions which have nothing to do with Gondwana..... this I find harder to accept. The largest continent which formed Gondwana - Africa - is the basis for the smallest of the three zones within the tropical hall, with only three enclosures based around the fauna of this landmass. For comparison, the Asia zone - based around a landmass very little of which was part of Gondwana - contained eight enclosures to my reckoning. If one recalls that the Indian subcontinent was indeed part of Gondwana, the figures are not much better; only the Fishing Cat, Asian Giant Tortoise and Asian Short-clawed Otter are native to the subcontinent. I rather get the feeling that the house was always intended to comprise Asian, African and South American zones, and that the concept of "Gondwanaland" was an afterthought. Of course, even Africa is given more representation than the Australian landmass is; a handful of native taxa shunted into the Volcano Tunnel along with a handful of other assorted species including taxa from North America - somewhere that is neither Gondwanan nor tropical!

It wouldn't have been so hard to achieve something better; a Gonwanaland which contained more free-flying birds, took advantage of some of the fauna from Australia, Madagascar and the Indian subcontinent which deserve special focus, and wasn't quite so concerned about keeping itself looking pristine and perfect - an aim which, as noted before, has now failed in the Fishing Cat and Malayan Tapir enclosures in any case - could have been great.

Imagine the Sunda Gharial enclosure..... but with Ganges Gharial.
Imagine a species of Tenrec or Mouse Lemur in the Volcano Tunnel instead of a Pygmy Slow Loris.
Imagine, instead of a Malayan Tapir enclosure, a large exhibit for one of the Semnopithecus complex.
So many options, so little thought.

I must emphasise: I didn't dislike Gondwanaland per se, not really; I was just disappointed by so many facets where so much promise and opportunity had either been wasted, or never noticed in the first place. Flash and glamour won out over substance and quality too many times. Not every time; maybe not even the majority of times. But when a house is this hyped, and is held up by so many people as an example of what zoological design *should* be - with the implicit suggestion that less-flashy or non-immersive exhibits, no matter how good they are nor how much they suit the welfare of their inhabitants, are what zoological design should *not* be - it will never measure up.

At least, not for me.

(Attached are images of a panorama view of Gondwanaland from the "Treetop View", a view of the Malayan Tapir enclosure from the "Treetop View", the Pygmy Hippo and Diana Monkey enclosure, a Zoochatter trying to cool down, the Malayan Tapir enclosure and the Wrinkled Hornbill aviary)
 

Attachments

  • DSCF1897.jpg
    DSCF1897.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 19
  • DSCF1899.jpg
    DSCF1899.jpg
    2 MB · Views: 21
  • DSCF1916.jpg
    DSCF1916.jpg
    2 MB · Views: 20
  • DSCF1943.jpg
    DSCF1943.jpg
    702.3 KB · Views: 26
  • DSCF1955.jpg
    DSCF1955.jpg
    2 MB · Views: 25
  • DSCF1974.jpg
    DSCF1974.jpg
    2 MB · Views: 20
I very much enjoyed those last two posts. The lack of birds is indeed peculiar, and in fact when you got to the bit about the hornbill aviary I immediately thought why not have hornbills free-flying in all that space? Especially if they don't have many smaller birds. Some of the comments reminded me of Singapore Zoo too, in the way the enclosures look great but aren't necessarily very big.

In the below quote (from the first post) is there a sentence missing in the middle, or is it just an errant word from the editing process?
TeaLovingDave said:
....The one major taxon which one might have expected to see in such an exhibit - Red-bellied Piranha (Pygocentrus nattereri) - was housed in a separate and rather smaller tank opposite. One

The next notable point we reached was the underwater viewing for the Giant Otter (Pteronura brasiliensis) enclosure.....
 
The trees and plants in the background of the Giant otter enclosure belong this enclosure and are used by the monkeys, the otters are allowed to use the entire area of water and land - the best otter enclosure I have ever seen.
 
The lack of birds is indeed peculiar, and in fact when you got to the bit about the hornbill aviary I immediately thought why not have hornbills free-flying in all that space?

As I said, I fear the answer may be that they don't want to risk anything damaging the pristine-looking vegetation :p which I must emphasise *was* great - I've never seen so many pineapples, cinnamon trees, banana plants and vanilla orchids outside of a botanical garden before.

In the below quote (from the first post) is there a sentence missing in the middle, or is it just an errant word from the editing process?

Errant word :p I'll just fix that!
 
@TLD, I think you based these numbers on the Annual report of 2012, as the one from 2013 wouldn't have been published at your visit. The bird numbers have been low in the beginning, which was indeed because they also wanted the vegetation to develop first. By now there should be many more free flying birds, they have been adding new species regularly over the last few years. I've heard that the cuban grassquits are dominating the gondwanaland at the moment ;).

Gondwanaland was supposed to be the centrepiece of Leipzig zoo and was developed to be the merging point of the 3 continents that are represented in the long-term plan of Zoo Leipzig (Africa, South America, Asia), that will explain the presence of all the Asian taxa...

What I find striking at your review is that you are remarkably positive about many enclosures in both Berlin Zoos, that I find not that good, but you seem to be extra critical about the ones in Leipzig zoo.

Although I enjoyed Gondwanaland more than you did, I would rank it lower than the 2 other major tropical forest domes in Europe in Arnhem and Zürich. I am curious how it developed in the past 3 years ;).
 
@TLD, I think you based these numbers on the Annual report of 2012, as the one from 2013 wouldn't have been published at your visit. The bird numbers have been low in the beginning, which was indeed because they also wanted the vegetation to develop first. By now there should be many more free flying birds, they have been adding new species regularly over the last few years. I've heard that the cuban grassquits are dominating the gondwanaland at the moment ;)

Looking at ZTL, which appears to have more up-to-date figures, the numbers from 2013 are scarcely any higher.... which doesn't really surprise me considering the fact I neither saw nor even *heard* any free-flying birds whilst there in April 2014. Comes to something when the only free-roaming animal you spot is one of the tiny and unobtrusive Greenhouse Frogs!

So if the situation is different now, they must have imported a *lot* more birds in the past 11 months :p which I kind of hope they have; I wanted to like Gondwanaland a lot more than I ended up doing.

Gondwanaland was supposed to be the centrepiece of Leipzig zoo and was developed to be the merging point of the 3 continents that are represented in the long-term plan of Zoo Leipzig (Africa, South America, Asia), that will explain the presence of all the Asian taxa...

I know this; my point is more that there are ways they could have achieved this whilst still retaining the "theme" of the house without the theme being a shallow affectation - had the Asian area contained more Indian taxa, and the African area been a bit larger and including Malagasy taxa, it would have felt more genuine and less like "We want a big centrepiece with these three continents, let's just slap it all together and call it Gondwanaland" :p

I would rank it lower than the 2 other major tropical forest domes in Europe in Arnhem and Zürich. I am curious how it developed in the past 3 years ;).

Both of which I definitely want to visit eventually - especially Arnhem.
 
the waterfall itself. This latter feature was, quite frankly, a godsend; although we had packed multiple litre-bottles of water for our time in Gondwanaland, and had been drinking from them as we walked along the footpath and watched animals within their enclosures, we were finding the heat and humidity almost overwhelming at this point - sweat was pouring constantly into our eyes, and the humidity was such that no cooling effect from the evaporation of our sweat was possible. ... We noted ruefully that this cave area was large and empty enough that it would have been ideal for a small drinks stand, or even a vending machine, to allow people some means of cooling down and quenching their thirst were they not so prepared as we had been. Another example, sad to say, of the desire not to break immersion having compromised the quality of the house.

Blimey and, ever wonder if this is all an elaborate plan to ensure people don't hang around too long and cause bottlenecks at peak times?
 
Blimey and, ever wonder if this is all an elaborate plan to ensure people don't hang around too long and cause bottlenecks at peak times?
remember he is English. I don't like to think how he would cope if he ever went to Singapore! :D
 
Part VI: Bird House and Parrot Aviaries

Having left Gondwanaland, we decided to visit the Bird House which lay just opposite.

Running alongside much of the exterior of the house was a reasonably large enclosure for Cape Fur Seal (Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus); although slightly less of the enclosure comprised dry land than I would have liked for an enclosure displaying fur seals - which by their nature are slightly more terrestrial than phocid seals - the pool area was spacious and reasonably deep, with underwater viewing windows provided. What dry land there was comprised sandy and pebbled areas, interspersed with rocky outcrops.

The Bird House at Leipzig comprises two separate areas; an entrance plaza which is surrounded by various aviaries and enclosures, with interior doors leading into a large free-flight walkthrough aviary. The first aviary we saw within the former area held Brazilian Tanager (Ramphocelus bresilius) and Golden-heart Dove (Gallicolumba rufigula), and was thickly planted with vegetation, with a woodchip substrate and a number of tree trunks and logs - both artificial and genuine - dotted around the enclosure. Overall I thought this was a relatively nice aviary - nothing earth-shattering but pleasant to look at and suiting the needs of the inhabitants, and most importantly providing them with a decent amount of space. The next enclosure held Southern Three-banded Armadillo (Tolypeutes matacus) and Black-necked Aracari (Pteroglossus aracari), and was a shade larger and more thickly planted than the previous enclosure, with significantly more vegetation visible at ground level - presumably to give the armadillo plenty of opportunity to hide away from the public gaze. Again, I thought this enclosure was quite pleasant, if nothing unusual, and suited the inhabitants well.

Along with these two larger enclosures, there were three smaller aviaries in this entrance area, holding the following taxa:

Asian Blue Quail (Coturnix chinensis) and White-rumped Shama (Copsychus malabaricus)
Turquoise Tanager (Tangara mexicana mexicana) and Barred Buttonquail (Turnix suscitator)
Red-throated Parrotfinch (Erythrura psittacea) and Asian Blue Quail (Coturnix chinensis)

These aviaries were rather simpler in both design and furnishings than the others, and significantly smaller, but no less pleasant. The opportunity to see a Buttonquail - a representative of a group of birds which I had hitherto never seen - was also quite pleasing. Overall, then, the entrance area to the Bird House had left me quite satisfied - although significantly more "old fashioned" than many of the enclosures I had seen thus far, the Bird House already seemed to be kept in good condition and the enclosure standards maintained to present-day levels without losing the overall feel and character of the house. However, we were yet to view the main body of the house, the large free-flight walkthrough aviary which comprised approximately two-thirds of the house as a whole - as such, I knew that any sweeping judgement of the house would have to wait.

The free-flight aviary within the Bird House had the following taxa signposted:

Southern Luzon Giant Cloud Rat (Phloeomys cumingi)
Oriental Magpie Robin (Copsychus saularis)
Pekin Robin (Leiothrix lutea)
Asian Fairy-bluebird (Irena puella)
Vietnamese Small Flying Fox (Pteropus hypomelanus condorensis)
Lesser Whistling Duck (Dendrocygna javanica)
Asian Black Bulbul (Hypsipetes leucocephalus)
Yellow-crowned Gonolek (Laniarius barbarus)
Water Rail (Rallus aquaticus)
Crested Quail-dove (Geotrygon versicolor)
Sclater Crowned-pigeon (Goura scheepmakeri sclateri)
Blue-crowned Laughingthrush (Dryonastes courtoisi)
Crested Wood Partridge (Rollulus rouloul)
Luzon Bleeding-heart (Gallicolumba luzonica)
Red-crested Turaco (Tauraco erythrolophus)
Asian Glossy Starling (Aplonis panayensis)

On entering the walkthrough enclosure, I was immediately - and to my great gratification - met by the sight and sound of many birds; a very welcome change when compared with the complete dearth of any such experience within Gondwanaland. The enclosure itself was bright and airy, with tall mature trees stretching several metres to the roof - which was entirely comprised glass panes and hence let in plentiful daylight - and areas of thick, lush vegetation snaking their way around the path. In the rough centre of the house, there were small pools surrounded by rockwork, which many of the birds seemed to be making use of to clean themselves. Near the entrance to the walkthrough, there were nestboxes for the Cloud Rat - a particular highlight of the house for me, as this was the last of the three cloudrat taxa found within European collections which I was yet to see. Within I could see a single individual; if I recall correctly, although the species has bred at Leipzig on a number of occasions this individual is now all that remains, another individual having died shortly before my visit. As the population in other European collections is declining, I fear this taxon will not be viewable within Europe for much longer. However, this is not to say that this was the only taxon of merit within the walkthrough; there were a number of species which I had either never seen previously, or had seldom had the opportunity to view. As such, I relished the chance to spend a prolonged period of time within the exhibit, watching carefully and making notes of which taxa I had observed - ultimately managing to spot every species which was signposted.

Resolving to make our way towards the combined Aquarium and Vivarium, we left the Bird House with the distinct sense of satisfaction at a walkthrough bird exhibit which had not left us feeling robbed in some indefinable way, as Gondwanaland had in this regard. Just opposite the entrance to the Bird House, we saw a small but quite pleasant enclosure for three European species of duck; Smew (Mergellus albellus), Eurasian Green-winged Teal (Anas crecca crecca) and European Eider (Somateria mollissima mollissima), all of which are species of which I am quite fond. The Eider, in particular, is a taxon which although rather commonplace in captive collections I never grow weary of, and take particular delight in viewing in the wild. The enclosure itself was, as noted, quite pleasant although nothing we had not seen before; like many such enclosures, wild herons were present within, although their activities seemed to be making little to no impact on the well-being of the designated inhabitants. Certainly we viewed the Eiders coming close to the wild herons without hesitation or signs of discomfort at their presence.

The next enclosure we reached was a mid-size aviary, largely comprising scattered sub-mature trees, stretches of grass and ponds set within rockwork, which held Scarlet Ibis (Eudocimus ruber) and Black-faced Ibis (Theristicus melanopis). The enclosure was pleasant and seemed to suit the inhabitants well, but at first glance was of little note; both taxa, although pleasant enough, are species which I have viewed on a number of occasions and as such do not always attract my attention. However, it was satisfying to observe that both species seemed to be breeding well within this aviary, another potential indication that it suited their needs well.

We then came to a row of various small to mid-size aviaries, mostly containing parrot taxa, and which seemed somewhat less well-kept than those within the Bird House; they were very much more akin to the aviaries found in the region of the Snow Leopard cages, at the other end of the zoo, although looking much more functional and less aesthetically pleasing. Of course, they were infinitely more attractive and suited to their inhabitants than the big cat cages themselves had been, but nonetheless they were another sign that portions of the zoo were being left to stagnate whilst the crowd-pleasing "themed" areas of the collection were being given all the focus and investment.

These aviaries held the following taxa:

Scarlet Macaw (Ara macao)
Von der Decken's Hornbill (Tockus deckeni)
Mexican Green Military Macaw (Ara militaris mexicana)
Hyacinth Macaw (Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus)
Palm Cockatoo (Probosciger aterrimus)
Cuban Amazon (Amazona leucocephala leucocephala)
Citron-crested Cockatoo (Cacatua sulphurea citrinocristata)
Kea (Nestor notabilis)

The generally poor state of repairs which I found these aviaries in was all the more of a shame when one considers that the above list comprises a very pleasant collection of parrot taxa, many of which are unusual in captive collections and two of which - the Kea and Hyacinth Macaw - are among my favorite bird species. With a little more care taken of these aviaries to keep them in good condition, more well-vegetated and in general looking less neglected, this could so easily have been one of the highlights of the collection; even moreso had space to enlarge aviaries been opened up by reducing the number of taxa displayed through the removal of the Hornbill and, possibly, the Scarlet Macaw.

We now approached the complex of enclosures for Sloth Bear, on the other side of which we would find the Aquarium.

(Attached are images of the Armadillo and Aracari enclosure, the Ibis enclosure, the Cuban Amazon aviary and the Kea aviary)
 

Attachments

  • DSCF2007.jpg
    DSCF2007.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 8
  • DSCF2106.jpg
    DSCF2106.jpg
    2.1 MB · Views: 6
  • DSCF2117.jpg
    DSCF2117.jpg
    2 MB · Views: 8
  • DSCF2122.jpg
    DSCF2122.jpg
    2 MB · Views: 7
There were two Southern Luzon Cloud Rats on display two weeks ago. :)
 
Back
Top