The only zoo in the United States to see...

In March I went to Naples Zoo and saw one single Dorcas Gazelle. Micanopy no longer has Forest Buffalo but Safari Wilderness has three(all females). Roger Williams Park Zoo has Chinese Alligator. I can say firsthand that Southwick's Zoo does not have Red-Faced Spider Monkey. They used to have Black Spider Monkey, but not anymore.
@Thylacine- I couldn't find Red Faced listed on their website. Where was it listed?

Gaur is right. I have been to Southwick at least once a year for the last 23 years and never saw one. They do have the only "red bat" I have ever seen lol
 
Gaur is right. I have been to Southwick at least once a year for the last 23 years and never saw one. They do have the only "red bat" I have ever seen lol

Like I said, they list their Black Spider Monkeys as A. paniscus, which is the scientific name for the Red-Faced Spider Monkey. Whether they really have/had them? I don't know.

What's a "red bat"?

~Thylo:cool:
 
:rolleyes:The "Red Bat" is extremely threatened by habitat loss and is only native to Mendon,Massachusetts. The specimen they have is over 40 years old.
 
:rolleyes:The "Red Bat" is extremely threatened by habitat loss and is only native to Mendon,Massachusetts. The specimen they have is over 40 years old.

Is it suppose to be an Eastern Red Bat? Do you have a photo?

Also, when you Google Black Spider Monkey, you get results only for the Red-Faced Spider Monkey. Even National Geographic and the WWF list Red-Faced SMs as Black Spider Monkeys so I believe they're the same species. So congrats on seeing them! If they aren't at Southwick's anymore, I doubt I'll be seeing them, not in the U.S. anyway.

~Thylo:cool:
 
On the zoo's Black Spider Monkey page, they have the scientific name as Ateles paniscus, which is the same one for the Red-Faced Spider Monkey, though you say they no longer hold the species...

~Thylo:cool:

Black Spider Monkey and Red-Faced Spider Monkey are two names for the same species (Alteles paniscus)
 
Hey, Wikipedia says its the only one, so it must be true!

Wikipedia is correct here.

You know, just because someone once and a while comes along and makes up some stuff doesn't mean that the whole site is unreliable. While I have learned false facts on a few occasions, Wikipedia is still general my first resource when researching something.

~Thylo:cool:
 
Wikipedia is correct here.

You know, just because someone once and a while comes along and makes up some stuff doesn't mean that the whole site is unreliable. While I have learned false facts on a few occasions, Wikipedia is still general my first resource when researching something.

~Thylo:cool:

I've had my experience with editing on Wikipedia and if you don't have a reliable source with your statement then it will be deleted.
 
You know, just because someone once and a while comes along and makes up some stuff doesn't mean that the whole site is unreliable. While I have learned false facts on a few occasions, Wikipedia is still general my first resource when researching something.

I love Wikipedia and use (and update) it regularly. But for my purposes, I just want to expand my knowledge, and if I learn something that is not quite true once in a while, it's no big deal. It's not good for serious research, but it's a great starting point.

But in this case, I joked about it because I was unable to verify the statement on any authoritative source. I found almost the same exact words on several sites, but none of them were sites that I trusted to really know what they were talking about. So my joke about Wikipedia was saying I believe this is true, but I can't prove it.
 
On one page about a some mona monkey species, I found a random sentence that kind of sounded like a rant saying that several sources claim a person named ____ _____ (don't remember, sorry!) discovered the species but "that's a lie as ____ _____ is a 15 year-old middle school students who likes to post false information on Wikipedia!":p

That's the kind of stuff you must look out for. I mean, that could be true, but it's just a bit odd. You do have to be careful, though, I got a bit of my early Bronx Zoo history all messed up because someone posted false info. on the site.

To get back on track, how many zoos in the U.S. have Murray River Turtles? I know Smithsonian does (they list them as "Australian Big-Headed Turtles") but I haven't heard of any others with them. And are San Diego and Smithsonian the only U.S. zoos (AZA at least) with Indian Flapshell Turtles? I haven't been able to locate any others in the U.S.

~Thylo:cool:
 
On one page about a some mona monkey species, I found a random sentence that kind of sounded like a rant saying that several sources claim a person named ____ _____ (don't remember, sorry!) discovered the species but "that's a lie as ____ _____ is a 15 year-old middle school students who likes to post false information on Wikipedia!":p

That sounds like something you would do. :D I know I've never seen anything like that on any animal-related Wikipedia pages.
 
That sounds like something you would do. :D I know I've never seen anything like that on any animal-related Wikipedia pages.

I have no need to edit on Wikipedia. I know if I change something so it's correct, someone will eventually change it back. That's really the only bizarre thing I've seen on an animal-related page.

~Thylo:cool:
 
Sitka Blacktailed Deer - Alaska Zoo and Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center. I'm reasonably sure they are not displayed elsewhere. It's a Mule Deer subspecies-but fairly distinct. Similar to the dynamic between the Key Deer and the Whitetailed Deer. I believe Northwest Trek in Washington State exhibits Columbian Blacktailed Deer (which I would guess may be displayed in a few more west coast facilities).
 
And also the last herd of European bison (Bison bonasus) in the United States is at White Elk Ranch

That is a travesty (though I guess they are doing well in their native range, so it's not really a conservation issue)...but typical of the decline in hoof stock variety at American Zoos. I'd love to get them here in Alaska. We'd then have all three extant Bison in the state.
 
I know Shadow Nursery had a herd of, at least, four back n 2006. I know GiantEland recently visited and can tell us if they're still around.

~Thylo:cool:

Unfortunately Shadow Nursery does not have European bison any longer, they didn't seem to being doing well there and that is why they were shipped out
 
Back
Top