The ten people that have most influenced the development of the modern zoo

This is amazing, great to see some women in the list, and for me it is encouraging to see some who have been influenced by the training course in Jersey Zoo

Yes , in the case of both Erika and Cecilia and many others the training course in Jersey was instrumental in improving ex-situ conservation at these respective zoos. I'd even say that without the help of the Durrell trust in capacity building and training in Latin American zoos I'm certain that a lot of species just wouldn't still be with us and the focus on conservation would definitely not be a priority.

Relations are pretty cordial and quite a lot of current and ex Jersey staff still stop by and visit both these zoos. In fact I've met a colleague of yours , a former bird keeper and conservationist from Jersey zoo on his visit to Brazil last summer , very nice guy, I believe (not 100% sure though) he may have been involved with your work in Mauritius.

Believe it or not there are also a few animals that were originally born in Jersey in some of these zoos too. There was (I think he recently passed away) / is a rather elderly spectacled bear , "Charlie" , at Chapultepec zoo who was sent over as a cub by Gerald Durrell in the late 80's.
 
The ten people who have most influenced the development of the modern zoo. Zoos have developed from the menageries of the 19th century, that were cabinets of living curiosities, to those of today that at their best fulfil roles in exhibition, education, science and conservation. Most readers on this forum would largely agree with a few I have selected, although there could be considerable debate over some of the others.

There are inspirational zoo directors who showed the way forward, but also those from outside the zoo community who have influenced thinking. For example Jane Goodall, due to her work with chimpanzees, has changed the way we think about, and care for them in captivity. Virginia McKenna has been a huge influence upon zoos in the late 20th and early 21st centuries due to her anti-zoo sentiments. The organisations she helped found, Zoo Check and the Born Free Foundation, have contributed to driving up standards of zoo animal care.

My top ten are:

Carl Hagenbeck, an animal dealer turned zoo director who brought performing animals into the zoo and developed new techniques of exhibiting animals in naturally landscaped enclosures separated from the public by moats.

Lutz and Heinz Heck, directors of Berlin and Munich zoos who pioneered the idea of back breeding old breeds of cattle to recreate the Auroch and the back breeding of horses to recreate the Tarpan. These back bred animals bear a superficial resemblance to the extinct species that are known as Heck Cattle and Heck Horses. Heinz Heck also established the first studbook for a wild animals when he set up a studbook for European Bison in 1923.

William Temple Hornaday, the first director of the National Zoo and the Bronx Zoo, and a visionary conservationist who is best known for his efforts to save the American Bison by implementing perhaps the first ever conservation-driven reintroduction effort.

Heini Hediger, director of Basel and Zurich zoos and universally accepted as the father of zoo biology who applied science to understanding the behaviour and needs of zoo animals and published important books on the care and behaviour of captive animals.

Desmond Morris, author, broadcaster, zoologist and artist, a former curator of mammals at the London Zoo, who popularised zoos and zoo biology with his children’s programme Zoo Time (1956-1968). Morris is an ethologist by training and wrote many important papers on animal behaviour including some on zoochosis and how it may be avoided.

John Aspinall, an unorthodox zoo owner, known for establishing captive populations of many endangered or challenging species, including gorillas. His philosophy often encouraged the close relationship between keeper and animal - sometimes with revolutionary success, sometimes with tragic results.

Peter Scott, the greatest conservationist of the late 20th century and the founder of the Wildfowl and Wetland Trust. A pioneer of a specialist animal collection (wildfowl) with a focus upon conservation.

David Hancocks, zoo director, architect and author of two influential books on zoos, with strident views on aesthetics and the quality of housing. Spearheaded the revolution within North American zoos, with emphasis on immersive exhibits that created contextual environments for both animal and visitor.

Gerald Durrell, the author and naturalist who considered that the primary role of zoos should be conservation and they should establish self-sustaining captive populations of the most endangered species. He founded the Jersey Zoo which specialises is conservation and education and has its own training school to train people in zoo conservation.

Others that could have made the list, if I was in a different mood: Jimmy Chipperfield for his work developing safari parks, Bill Conway the visionary director of the Bronx Zoo, Steve Martin from Natural Encounters, for his work developing bird shows and positive training techniques for managing zoo animals, and Steve Irwin a showman, herpetologist and zoo owner who advocated a hands on approach in his relationship with his animals, and of course there are many more that could be mentioned…..
I really do not think that J.Chipperfield or S.Irwin should be compared to the others you have named. Both were really showmen. Steve Irwin did a wonderful thing for animals, both in captivity and wild, by bringing attention to them from many, many people who are now rather more interested in animal life. For this he is due a lot of respect, but that does not put him in the same class. Jimmy Chipperfield belonged to a circus family and I believe that,to him, money was of the most importance. Having said that I should point out that these are my thoughts and that I have often been found to be wrong!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: MRJ
Jimmy Chipperfield belonged to a circus family and I believe that,to him, money was of the most importance.

Maybe not 'modern zoos' but J .Chipperfield was certainly instrumental in developing the Safari Park concept, he almost invented it I think and then sold it to the Marquis of Bath at Longleat. But, yes, it was profit-motivated.
 
There have been many great zoo / collection directors. Who are the people who have developed the vision for the modern zoo.

The Chipperfields developed the idea of the Safari Park which was a big influence on modern zoo thought. Who is driving specialist collections and are we seeing any significant advances?
 
Quetzal Dwyer and Ari Flagle of Reptilandia and Ty Park of Iguanaland are noteworthy founders and leaders of reptile specialist collections. Reptilandia and Iguanaland house some of the rarest reptiles in US public collections and also have some pretty innovative reptile exhibits. Iguanaland is noteworthy for its rare iguanas, monitor lizard, and turtle species and large outdoor enclosures for monitors, iguanas, turtles, and tortoises. Reptilandia has a number of very rare lizards and snakes as well as two story monitor lizard exhibits and a two story turtle exhibit that consists of a pool and a large ramp that leads up to a nesting area. Ari Flagle, their curator, recently said that they are expecting breeding success with fly river turtles in the near future thanks to this setup which would be pretty interesting to see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JVM
Quetzal Dwyer and Ari Flagle of Reptilandia and Ty Park of Iguanaland are noteworthy founders and leaders of reptile specialist collections. Reptilandia and Iguanaland house some of the rarest reptiles in US public collections and also have some pretty innovative reptile exhibits. Iguanaland is noteworthy for its rare iguanas, monitor lizard, and turtle species and large outdoor enclosures for monitors, iguanas, turtles, and tortoises. Reptilandia has a number of very rare lizards and snakes as well as two story monitor lizard exhibits and a two story turtle exhibit that consists of a pool and a large ramp that leads up to a nesting area. Ari Flagle, their curator, recently said that they are expecting breeding success with fly river turtles in the near future thanks to this setup which would be pretty interesting to see.

While I have a lot of respect for them and their facilities, I do not really feel like they have done anything revolutionary or paradigm shifting in the zoo field. Reptile specific facilities have been around forever. I mean St. Augustine opened in 1893
 
While I have a lot of respect for them and their facilities, I do not really feel like they have done anything revolutionary or paradigm shifting in the zoo field. Reptile specific facilities have been around forever. I mean St. Augustine opened in 1893
Fair enough. I personally feel that their collections and their even more so their exhibitry are pretty noteworthy, especially at Reptilandia.
 
Fair enough. I personally feel that their collections and their even more so their exhibitry are pretty noteworthy, especially at Reptilandia.
I agree that the exhibitry at Reptilandia is generally very good (although I'd argue they would benefit from having a life support/filtration specialist for their aquatic enclosures).

I do not feel that way about Iguanaland at all though. While I feel that Iguanaland's enclosures look perfectly sufficient or even excellent from a husbandry perspective, I do not see them as an example of good exhibitry.

I maintain that neither facility is "influential" though. Both are keeping reptiles in ways that they've been kept for decades. I certainly feel that both facilities take excellent care of their animals and I expect both to be quite prolific when it comes to breeding as their collections mature. I just don't see how doing something that's already been done is influential to the field.
 
Maybe not 'modern zoos' but J .Chipperfield was certainly instrumental in developing the Safari Park concept, he almost invented it I think and then sold it to the Marquis of Bath at Longleat. But, yes, it was profit-motivated.

Does being driven by the necessity of making a "profit", to whatever extent that may have been, make him less worthy?

Without money/profit absolutely nothing happens in this world.
 
Does being driven by the necessity of making a "profit", to whatever extent that may have been, make him less worthy?

Without money/profit absolutely nothing happens in this world.
This is a big debate with no easy answer. What is the primary purposes of animal collections? Making money is necessary but is it at the top of the list?
 
This is a big debate with no easy answer. What is the primary purposes of animal collections? Making money is necessary but is it at the top of the list?

Maybe there needs to be dead heat for top of the list?

Whatever the motive for establishing an animal collection, that collection can't be established, and certainly can't be sustained, without money/profit.

If not it's own then somebody else's.
 
One issue in compiling a list is that individual choice favours people who are familiar to you, more than likely from the same country, and certainly speaking the same language. Often an innovative idea arrives without any understanding who was behind it. And personally, I have not kept up much with what happens in the northern hemisphere in recent years.

So, I will restrict myself to mentioning an Australian and a New Zealander.

Firstly, someone who I must admit is a very close friend, so I may be prejudiced. Graeme Phipps, the former Principal Curator of Taronga Zoo, introduced his REGASP software in 1988, and in doing so introduced the concept of species management across all species in multiple collections. Prior to that, population management had been limited to select species, as he likes to say, "Directors toys".

The second is Professor David Massey formerly of Massey University in New Zealand, who introduced the Five Domains model of animal welfare. This model is changing the approach to zoo animal welfare globally.
 
Doug Richardson deserves a mention for reinventing Polar Bear containment

Did he though? The polar bear enclosure in Kolind, Denmark, has a quite similar set-up and was opened several years before the one at HWP.

This is a big debate with no easy answer. What is the primary purposes of animal collections? Making money is necessary but is it at the top of the list?

Arguably the 3 zoos that have had the biggest impact on modern natural zoo enclosures in Europe were privately owned and (at least nominally) for profit. The families Rensen (Noorder Dierenpark Emmen), van Hooff (Burgers' Zoo) and Gay (Bioparc Doué) probably couldn't have realized what they did if they had been forced to sell their ideas to a board of trustees... Those boards typically don't like the Pippi Longstocking approach of "I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that".

Another recent name that hasn't been mentioned is Helmut Pechlaner, former director of Tiergarten Schönbrunn, Vienna. Under his watch the zoo transformed from a nearly bankrupt and badly outdated place to the Schönbrunn we know now. He was aided with serious governmental support at the time, but under his watch the zoo transformed from run-down and nearly shut down to a European frontrunner. Their biggest contribution has been to show that 18th and 19th century monumental buildings can be transformed into modern 21st century exhibits, turning a liability into a strength. In their wake other city zoos have followed. He probably didn't do it alone, and I am not sure whose idea e.g. the carnivore exhibits and bird house were, but it happened under his watch.

The latest frontier seems to tackle captive breeding of marine fish and invertebrates. Many zoos and aquaria are trying it, but most successful seems to be the partnership between Oceanopolis Brest & the company My Ecoreef Solutions. Hard to put a single name on that one though. But it fits the trend that nowadays big breakthroughs often come from consortia instead of single people.
 
Fleay was actually the last person to film the last Thylacine. The last known photo of it is the one taken by Ben Sheppard, and now reliably dated as May 1936, a few months before its death. This is the only one proven to have been taken after Fleay's photos in December 1933, taken at the same time as his short film. Other photos of him do exist, but with unsubscribed dates.

Just re-reading this thread and I noted this statement I made back then in 2019, which is now known to be incorrect. In 2020 an old Tasmanian travelogue film by a film-maker named Sidney Cook, was re-discovered. The 'Cook film' contains about 20 seconds of good footage, complete with commentary, of the same male Thylacine at the Domain Zoo in Hobart.
 
Last edited:
Does being driven by the necessity of making a "profit", to whatever extent that may have been, make him less worthy?

Without money/profit absolutely nothing happens in this world.

Indeed that's true and I realised same when I wrote it. I think perhaps where Chipperfield is less relevant to this list perhaps is that Safari Parks are an offshoot or at a tangent to mainstream zoos? The Conservation ethic was entirely lacking at their inception too, with mainly common, non-endangered species used to fill the reserves, while husbandry standards were comparatively low in the earliest decades too. Of course nowadays the distinctions have become far more blurred. Some large zoos have a 'drive-through' area, and many safari parks these days have a 'walk-through' area too. While in many places (such as Australia) there are 'open -range' zoos that contain elements of both.
I believe standards in Safari Parks are much higher nowadays too and many hold some rare or endangered species in their collections.
 
Last edited:
I think Wim Mager should be an honorable mention for playing a role in improving primate husbandry and breeding along with the evolution of primate walkthrough enclosures.
 
Just re-reading this thread and I noted this statement I made back then in 2019, which is now known to be incorrect. In 2020 an old Tasmanian travelogue film by a film-maker named Sidney Cook, was re-discovered. The 'Cook film' contains about 20 seconds of good footage, complete with commentary, of the same male Thylacine at the Domain Zoo in Hobart.

Forgot the most salient point, the Cook film was shot in 1935.
 
Back
Top