Another new species (and genus) for the thread, with Cave Nectar Bat Eonycteris spelaea uploaded by @ronnienl (on page 2 of this thread).
Cave Nectar Bat - ZooChat
Cave Nectar Bat - ZooChat
No, but thanks.Would even museum skulls or skeletons be useful if there is no photo? I was thinking on my next trip to Paris I could see if I could take a few pics of some of the rarer taxa's skeletons and mounts and try and contribute to these wonderful threads where photos are lacking. Would this be useful?
No, but thanks.
Skulls and skeletons are not much use for these threads because the photos used are for depicting how the species look in life. I do use taxidermy specimens (i.e. "stuffed animals") in my mammal threads, but live animals are obviously preferable and I tend to only use museum specimens if they are already in the photos galleries (that is, uploading lots of museum specimens for the threads isn't really something I'm too interested in happening).
Yes I would (probably) still use it - ideally it would have to be a good photo of course.If I were to find a taxidermy specimen of one of the species not previously photographed on Zoochat, would that be of use though?
The thread now depicts 137 species of bats, out of c.1300 species total. There's a long way to go still!
It's not a high number of photographed species, but it is still over ten percent of all the bat species in the world
Not even Adam West would have used that lineNot bat going, all things considered![]()