It's to kill the rabbits instead. With any of these cryptids nobody ever seems to consider the obvious sign nobody finds. A dead specimen. Eventually these things die and surely someone would come across a dead one.Obviously the Australian military is training them all in captivity to launch another assault on the emus
Brindled Greyhound?From last month, apparently a thylacine was seen in Melbourne. Because why not.
Category: | Herald Sun
A Melbourne man is convinced he has spotted a Tasmanian tiger roaming the area.
Greg, who did not want his surname published, said he was driving with his family when they spotted the supposedly extinct creature at about 6.30pm.
He initially thought it was a greyhound, but his children exclaimed “it’s got tiger stripes on the back”.
“There’s no doubt in my mind,” Greg told the Leader.
“I had never in my life seen anything like this — it was strolling across the road.
“It had a long, straight rod of a tail.
“I thought ‘that’s strange’.”
In the latest issue of Zoo Grapevine & International Zoo News (Issue 44, Autumn 2017) there is a fascinating 5-page article titled 'The History of the Thylacine in Captivity' by Erik Block. Tidbits of information include such facts as: Bostock's Scottish Zoo in Glasgow, which was only around from 1897-1909) at one time had a Thylacine in its collection. Or that Adelaide Zoo had 22 Thylacines at one time or another over the years.
Here is the link to the glossy, full-colour, quarterly zoo magazine:
http://www.izes.co.uk/
I wonder if this will be from primary, or secondary sources. Seeing the reference to Bostock's I wonder if it isn't very influenced by Sleightholme and Campbell. How do you get hold of a copy?
They seem to sell individual issues for £8, that's probably the way to go for me, whether they're selling this one yet or not is another matter.Other than subscribing then I suspect that you might be out of luck. I know of several zoo directors and zoo employees that order copies for staff members, but the vast bulk of the subscribers are zoo enthusiasts.
They seem to sell individual issues for £8, that's probably the way to go for me, whether they're selling this one yet or not is another matter.
Have you read it? As a matter of interest, does it mention City Park in Launceston?
You wouldn't happen to have the precise pagination of the article would you?In the latest issue of Zoo Grapevine & International Zoo News (Issue 44, Autumn 2017) there is a fascinating 5-page article titled 'The History of the Thylacine in Captivity' by Erik Block. Tidbits of information include such facts as: Bostock's Scottish Zoo in Glasgow, which was only around from 1897-1909, at one time had a Thylacine in its collection. Or that Adelaide Zoo had 22 Thylacines at one time or another over the years.
Here is the link to the glossy, full-colour, quarterly zoo magazine:
http://www.izes.co.uk/
The 5-page Thylacine article in the new magazine (pages 29-33) includes 8 photos and does indeed mention the City Park Zoo in Launceston, Tasmania. There is at least one paragraph about the zoo and this interesting sentence: "It is believed that this zoo had the last two Tasmanian Emus (Dromaius novaehollandiae diemenensis) ever exhibited."
I would recommend to anyone interested in zoos to order a single copy of Zoo Grapevine & International Zoo News and then if they are impressed (and I'm sure that they will be!) to spend the money on a subscription.
Do you have a source for this?Tassie devils and the local Aboriginals used to share the same caves, which makes you wonder how dog domestication began. Usually the idea of dog ancestors as scavengers is rejected, because villages did not exist in the Pleistocene to provide a niche for new scavengers round rubbish dumps: but native Tasmanians coexisted with a carnivorous mammal at their living shelters, and presumably the devils were attracted to something like scraps left by man.
Trying to track down specifics: it seems to be Owen and Pemberton, who attribute it to a food taboo among native Tasmanians. Sounds like the devils were an incipient domesticate via a commensal pathway initiated by the animals, one that failed owing to their having an unsociable temperment, so this was probably tolerance of scavenging and nothing else, with their being no use to local people. As you know I take an interest in prehistoric domestications, and what was and wasn't, and who did and didn't. So, I'm trying to trace moar as Australia is neglected in studies of domestication (sources still repeat the aboriginals did not hunt with dogs, or that none of them had crops). And the four-way interactions between humans, dingos and the two marsupial carnivores, need to be understood to understand what was going on in the Holocene, and why the devils are not extinct after dogs were finally introduced to Tasmania.Do you have a source for this?