I was just wondering how many of the five remaining tiger subspecies do we have in UK zoos?
I know we have Sumatran at London Zoo (and many other zoos) and Amur at Whipsnade Zoo (and many other Zoos) but I was wondering about the rest.
This is why I get so cross about white Tigers (and now Lions) - or to be precise, the dorks who breed them. These animals are taking up space that cats of genuine conservation importance require.
All White Lions are pure,just very inbred from about 4 animals!Afaik, the White Lions are pure Transvaal Lions (Panthera leo krugeri), aren't they?
If they are "natural" mutants from the same subspecies, they have - imo - their "value" for pure-line-breeding in captivity
If they are "natural" mutants from the same subspecies, they have - imo - their "value" for pure-line-breeding in captivity AS LONG as the goal isn't "White Lions only". You wont stop breeding with a - say - pure Javan or Ceylon Leopard only because it is black (melanistic), would you?
Malayan, Indochinese and Javan tigers have all been held at London Zoo in the distant past
Haven't the foggiest; this was over a century ago I believe. The fact that it is known they also held Malayan suggests to me that someone has already worked out that particular holding was indeed Indochinese.
Afaik, the White Lions are pure Transvaal Lions (Panthera leo krugeri), aren't they?
Being as these individuals were later selectively bred together to produce a "bred-back" individual later claimed by first Sandown and then later Wildlife Heritage Foundation to have been a pure Bengal Tiger, it wouldn't have been the last time they were passed off as something more prestigious than they actually were![]()