Top Ten Zoos According to USA Travel Guide

Wow, groundskeeper, I was thinking I disagreed with you (again), but actually your attitude is PERFECT! I wish more shared it with you.

It's what it is. I don't have kids, so the bells and whistles don't do a lot for me. I just realize that unfortunately zoos need revenue from a wide swath of the public, not just people who are dying to see great exhibits and rare species.

Honestly I love the Northern and Midwestern zoos with the old European style architecture and cheesy imitation pagodas and mosques. I have to think that in the old days this was how they made zoos seem more adventurous and exotic as opposed to just a bunch of cages and pens. I really admire the efforts of places like Cincy and the Bronx to keep these buildings and updating the animal facilites rather than just tearing them down to expand. Madagascar at the Bronx is a good example. Cincy's Elephant House is another. It once held six large herbivore species incramped stalls and has been converted to an elephant only facility. The landmark building still stands, and the accomodations are improved. Lincoln Park's Kovler Lion House is a bad example of this, as it was updated long ago, but still has some awfully small exhibits for the big cats.
 
Lincoln Park's Kovler Lion House is a bad example of this, as it was updated long ago, but still has some awfully small exhibits for the big cats.

It was a real suprise to see this lion house and its incredibly small indoor enclosures! It reminded me of Philadelphia before the renovations. It seems absurd that zoos and major zoos at that. Still in this day have such poor enclosures.
 
Both zoos in MO sound much more appealing to me than the one in Omaha (No offense to the HDZ fans out there!) mainly because both have great exhibits for my favorite animals. The River's Edge in St. Louis has excellent exhibits for Black Rhinos, Hippos, and Asian Elephants, while the Kansas City Zoo has great exhibits for their African Elephants, Black Rhinos, Chimps, and Lions.
 
It's what it is. I don't have kids, so the bells and whistles don't do a lot for me. I just realize that unfortunately zoos need revenue from a wide swath of the public, not just people who are dying to see great exhibits and rare species.

Honestly I love the Northern and Midwestern zoos with the old European style architecture and cheesy imitation pagodas and mosques. I have to think that in the old days this was how they made zoos seem more adventurous and exotic as opposed to just a bunch of cages and pens. I really admire the efforts of places like Cincy and the Bronx to keep these buildings and updating the animal facilites rather than just tearing them down to expand. Madagascar at the Bronx is a good example. Cincy's Elephant House is another. It once held six large herbivore species incramped stalls and has been converted to an elephant only facility. The landmark building still stands, and the accomodations are improved. Lincoln Park's Kovler Lion House is a bad example of this, as it was updated long ago, but still has some awfully small exhibits for the big cats.

I'm right there with you. It really saddened me when the Bronx Zoo did a small renovation of their (then) Kodiak Bear area and demolished the original 1900-era bear cages to make way for a picnic area. Some of us fought to retain the cages and re-use them as a picnic area (whose captive now?), but we lost that one. The Zoo had a priority of removing any obvious cages from sight.
 
Both zoos in MO sound much more appealing to me than the one in Omaha (No offense to the HDZ fans out there!) mainly because both have great exhibits for my favorite animals. The River's Edge in St. Louis has excellent exhibits for Black Rhinos, Hippos, and Asian Elephants, while the Kansas City Zoo has great exhibits for their African Elephants, Black Rhinos, Chimps, and Lions.

And the third one has an excellent collection as well.
 
I'm right there with you. It really saddened me when the Bronx Zoo did a small renovation of their (then) Kodiak Bear area and demolished the original 1900-era bear cages to make way for a picnic area. Some of us fought to retain the cages and re-use them as a picnic area (whose captive now?), but we lost that one. The Zoo had a priority of removing any obvious cages from sight.

In this light, I really like what the Toledo Zoo did with their old Lion House, with its iron bar cages outside. They turned it into a restaurant, allowing diners to sit and eat in the former (but now spiffed up) feline cages.
 
Both zoos in MO sound much more appealing to me than the one in Omaha (No offense to the HDZ fans out there!) mainly because both have great exhibits for my favorite animals. The River's Edge in St. Louis has excellent exhibits for Black Rhinos, Hippos, and Asian Elephants, while the Kansas City Zoo has great exhibits for their African Elephants, Black Rhinos, Chimps, and Lions.

Once you actually go to Omaha, I think you'll be shocked at how great the Lied Jungle, Desert Dome, and Kingdoms of the Night exhibits are! They more than make up for their "average" exhibits for their elephants and rhinos.
 
I believe you Allen, and I have really wanted to see the Lied Jungle especially in person. I am just saying that if I had the choice to go to the St. Louis Zoo, Kansas City Zoo, or Henry Doorly Zoo, I would defintely choose Kansas City or St. Louis over Omaha.
 
In this light, I really like what the Toledo Zoo did with their old Lion House, with its iron bar cages outside. They turned it into a restaurant, allowing diners to sit and eat in the former (but now spiffed up) feline cages.

Memphis Zoo also turned their old big cat house into a cafe - very effective use of a historic building. And if you want to see some old style cages to see how far zoos have come, does everyone know about the remains of the old L.A. Zoo (aka Griffith Park Zoo)? They moved the entire L.A. Zoo to the current larger area in 1966 (I think), but part of the original smaller zoo is still there in Griffith Park. It's a picnic area and occasional movie and television ad set (if you saw the film "Anchorman" with Will Ferrell, it played the role of the San Diego Zoo). Maybe I'll post a couple photos when I get around to it.
 
Memphis Zoo also turned their old big cat house into a cafe - very effective use of a historic building. And if you want to see some old style cages to see how far zoos have come, does everyone know about the remains of the old L.A. Zoo (aka Griffith Park Zoo)? They moved the entire L.A. Zoo to the current larger area in 1966 (I think), but part of the original smaller zoo is still there in Griffith Park. It's a picnic area and occasional movie and television ad set (if you saw the film "Anchorman" with Will Ferrell, it played the role of the San Diego Zoo). Maybe I'll post a couple photos when I get around to it.

Yeah, the old LA Zoo cages and grottoes date back to 1912. It's amazing that everything is still there.

The LA Zoo has recently rescued some statues that were on the old Selig Zoo's entrance which date back to 1915. The Selig zoo was one of three zoos that LA had before the opening of the LA Zoo. The zoo is finishing putting them up by the "International Marketplace" and can't wait till they uncover them.
 
Back
Top