Toronto Zoo Toronto Zoo Discussion Thread 2025

Sumatran Tiger - I have heard both they are staying and being phased out so who knows. Why go to all the expense of their new exhibits if you werent keeping them? They are both in their late teens.
Yeah it does seem odd to have a species which the zoo just made quite the investment on as a possibility to phase out. The others are a shame but I must ask... what exactly do you have against the Tur? Seems like such an odd species to have a desire to phase out :p
 
It definitely happened sometime this year in the Spring - I have pictures of one from May. As for the other Americas species in there, I must be misremembering something.
Might just be the fact that there is another South American bird currently in the pavilion, but not in that aviary. Nadine the Red-legged Seriema is living where the Komodo Dragon used to (and will likely soon again) live.
 
Yeah it does seem odd to have a species which the zoo just made quite the investment on as a possibility to phase out. The others are a shame but I must ask... what exactly do you have against the Tur? Seems like such an odd species to have a desire to phase out :p
If we don’t acquire more Sumatran’s once they pass I would expect that exhibit to be used for another impressive animal, likely another big cat or some other carnivore - perhaps Malayan tigers (although I don’t know if they’d be any easier to acquire than Sumatrans). I’m very intrigued to see what happens to Indomalaya as some of these species are phased out. I wouldn’t be one bit surprised if major changes come to the GOHR barn/outdoor exhibits and the Malayan woods pavilion once Olive (babirusa) and Vishnu (GOHR) and the clouded leopards are gone, respectively.
 
If we don’t acquire more Sumatran’s once they pass I would expect that exhibit to be used for another impressive animal, likely another big cat or some other carnivore - perhaps Malayan tigers (although I don’t know if they’d be any easier to acquire than Sumatrans). I’m very intrigued to see what happens to Indomalaya as some of these species are phased out. I wouldn’t be one bit surprised if major changes come to the GOHR barn/outdoor exhibits and the Malayan woods pavilion once Olive (babirusa) and Vishnu (GOHR) and the clouded leopards are gone, respectively.
Per the masterplan the zoo released, the GOHR barn and area are supposedly going to be utilized for further expansion of the Sumatran tiger habitat (hence why I am skeptical that the tigers are going to be gone upon the current pair's passing). As for the Malayan Woods, the same masterplan sees it replaced by a brewery.
If you'd like to take a look, the link is here -> https://www.torontozoo.com/!/pdfs/temp/TZ_MasterplanBooklet.pdf
And the general plan for the Indo-Malaya area is on page 47 of the total PDF
 
I do remember that about the GOHR space being used for the tigers, but I wonder if that is still the plan especially considering they may not be sticking around.
 
@Van Beal, good to know about the tree frogs. I had heard they were gone but I dont get to visit so probably was gone from where they were expected to be and the person didnt find them where they were now. Not the species I need to keep but one more in the kept category. Update my list complete.

With regards the the Sumatran tigers possible phase out Im in your camp. I dont get it. Thats a lot of money to spend on a very specialized exhibit for a species that could be gone at any point given Hari and Kemala's ages. I mean you could bring in sloth bears. Or put a top on the exhibit and let the gibbons outside but then why not just have included them in the orang exhibit and mix the species? Im perplexed by the idea of phasing them out. If you said the Amurs I would first off be mad because I prefer them and they are a day one species, but at least you could put Amur leopards in the exhibit, bring back pandas, still do sloth bears, move the snow leopards (why I dont know), but there are more options. The Sumatrans staying also makes more sense because the long term plan was to give them the Indian Rhino space. What are we to do with that space in their absence? You need more than just Orangs and gibbons to anchor the area. This one is puzzling.

The tur know what they did...Lol. Im sick of the zoo wasting time and resources on them. First off no one wants them. They are not an SSP species. We have no one that has wanted to take them until those three boys went to Winnipeg this year. If we cant transfer out our young why do we keep breeding? Just for cute babies every year? No thanks. Because the zoo doesnt need the babies they have taken a hands off approach to them. If they live they live and if the die the die, especially boys who arent really wanted or needed. I was at the zoo before the pandemic and arrived at the exhibit moments after a male kid was born. His mom rejected him instantly (an all too common thing with our tur). The keepers were there trying to get her to come over, checking him out, getting him on his feet. They said he likely wouldnt make it if she didnt take him back because they would just let nature take its course. They moved him under the mountain near a mom who had babies the day before in hopes she might take a third. She didnt and I found out from someone else a few days later he didnt make it through the next day. If you are not going to step up and care for every life you allow to be created in captivity my personal opinion is then dont create it. They didnt chose to be born. We as humans allowed it and we should value that life. Maybe he wouldnt have made it if they intervened, but at least he would have been given a fighting chance. And this incident isnt the only one I know of where they just didnt try. Furthermore because we have no one to trade the kids with and havent for a long, long time, do the math. We have been inbreeding for some time. This above all else ticks me off. We dont need to be inbreeding. We arent contributing to an SSP, or the population which I admit is endangered and if we were doing something to help I would stop complaining. We are not. I want them phases out ASAP. Transfer the whole herd to anywhere else. Heck pay for their upkeep there. Get rid of them and bring in something we can do good with. Give me takin or markhor. The tur are just stopping me from getting what I want. Oh the tur definitely know what they are doing to tick me off. Lol.

At this point guys remember the master plan is getting older. We wont see everything in it. I wouldnt be surprised if the last major project we see from it directly is the savanna pavilion. Im sure lots of other smaller projects like red pandas will happen but those easier to achieve than the major projects like the pavilion and the entrance, heck the orang outdoor. If you think about it we are still a year out from the Conservation Campus phase ones completion. They might be ready sometime in the summer of 2026. Progress seems to be major right now but winter can always play a massive factor one way or the other. I do think 2026 sometime is reasonable. Then given the new savanna barn being recently completed I think the zoo will be ready to break ground 2027 on the savanna pavilion which probably is a 2 year project opening 2028 or 2029. I believe the savanna barn was built with the purpose of moving as many species as they can to it during the construction because their barns will have to go. The exhibits will largely say intact. The zebra, eland, ostriches, maybe the kudu and other birds will go here. The kudu might go to the hippo barn or the giraffe barn or maybe the domain. The white rhinos will go to the Indian rhino exhibit as its the only rhino proof exhibit other than their own. Kifaru should be gone by then so it could easily house Tom, Sabi and Zohari as its held three full grown rhinos before. Babirusa Olive I would guess will join the gibbons or retire off display. What was my point? Right by 2029 the zoo will need a new master plan as this one will be about 10 years old. We might get one other big project but Im not sure what it will be. Probably the temple based on the phase out pattern there but wouldnt rule out the relocation of the Domain. For now though I think the last major project we will see is the savanna pavilion, maybe 4-6 medium projects like the red pandas and both tiger exhibits now done, and countless little to tiny projects like murals, better climbing structures, fencing, the on going bathroom upgrades, ect.
 
I agree that after the savanna pavilion it’ll be time for a new master plan. I also struggle to see them parting ways with the Sumatran tigers considering the work they just did on their exhibit and how specialized it is for them. As for the red panda expansion, there is actually signage by the current exhibit talking about it. I can’t remember if there is a date on it or anything like that.
 
@Van Beal, good to know about the tree frogs. I had heard they were gone but I dont get to visit so probably was gone from where they were expected to be and the person didnt find them where they were now. Not the species I need to keep but one more in the kept category. Update my list complete.

With regards the the Sumatran tigers possible phase out Im in your camp. I dont get it. Thats a lot of money to spend on a very specialized exhibit for a species that could be gone at any point given Hari and Kemala's ages. I mean you could bring in sloth bears. Or put a top on the exhibit and let the gibbons outside but then why not just have included them in the orang exhibit and mix the species? Im perplexed by the idea of phasing them out. If you said the Amurs I would first off be mad because I prefer them and they are a day one species, but at least you could put Amur leopards in the exhibit, bring back pandas, still do sloth bears, move the snow leopards (why I dont know), but there are more options. The Sumatrans staying also makes more sense because the long term plan was to give them the Indian Rhino space. What are we to do with that space in their absence? You need more than just Orangs and gibbons to anchor the area. This one is puzzling.

The tur know what they did...Lol. Im sick of the zoo wasting time and resources on them. First off no one wants them. They are not an SSP species. We have no one that has wanted to take them until those three boys went to Winnipeg this year. If we cant transfer out our young why do we keep breeding? Just for cute babies every year? No thanks. Because the zoo doesnt need the babies they have taken a hands off approach to them. If they live they live and if the die the die, especially boys who arent really wanted or needed. I was at the zoo before the pandemic and arrived at the exhibit moments after a male kid was born. His mom rejected him instantly (an all too common thing with our tur). The keepers were there trying to get her to come over, checking him out, getting him on his feet. They said he likely wouldnt make it if she didnt take him back because they would just let nature take its course. They moved him under the mountain near a mom who had babies the day before in hopes she might take a third. She didnt and I found out from someone else a few days later he didnt make it through the next day. If you are not going to step up and care for every life you allow to be created in captivity my personal opinion is then dont create it. They didnt chose to be born. We as humans allowed it and we should value that life. Maybe he wouldnt have made it if they intervened, but at least he would have been given a fighting chance. And this incident isnt the only one I know of where they just didnt try. Furthermore because we have no one to trade the kids with and havent for a long, long time, do the math. We have been inbreeding for some time. This above all else ticks me off. We dont need to be inbreeding. We arent contributing to an SSP, or the population which I admit is endangered and if we were doing something to help I would stop complaining. We are not. I want them phases out ASAP. Transfer the whole herd to anywhere else. Heck pay for their upkeep there. Get rid of them and bring in something we can do good with. Give me takin or markhor. The tur are just stopping me from getting what I want. Oh the tur definitely know what they are doing to tick me off. Lol.

At this point guys remember the master plan is getting older. We wont see everything in it. I wouldnt be surprised if the last major project we see from it directly is the savanna pavilion. Im sure lots of other smaller projects like red pandas will happen but those easier to achieve than the major projects like the pavilion and the entrance, heck the orang outdoor. If you think about it we are still a year out from the Conservation Campus phase ones completion. They might be ready sometime in the summer of 2026. Progress seems to be major right now but winter can always play a massive factor one way or the other. I do think 2026 sometime is reasonable. Then given the new savanna barn being recently completed I think the zoo will be ready to break ground 2027 on the savanna pavilion which probably is a 2 year project opening 2028 or 2029. I believe the savanna barn was built with the purpose of moving as many species as they can to it during the construction because their barns will have to go. The exhibits will largely say intact. The zebra, eland, ostriches, maybe the kudu and other birds will go here. The kudu might go to the hippo barn or the giraffe barn or maybe the domain. The white rhinos will go to the Indian rhino exhibit as its the only rhino proof exhibit other than their own. Kifaru should be gone by then so it could easily house Tom, Sabi and Zohari as its held three full grown rhinos before. Babirusa Olive I would guess will join the gibbons or retire off display. What was my point? Right by 2029 the zoo will need a new master plan as this one will be about 10 years old. We might get one other big project but Im not sure what it will be. Probably the temple based on the phase out pattern there but wouldnt rule out the relocation of the Domain. For now though I think the last major project we will see is the savanna pavilion, maybe 4-6 medium projects like the red pandas and both tiger exhibits now done, and countless little to tiny projects like murals, better climbing structures, fencing, the on going bathroom upgrades, ect.
Addressing the Tur, I was completely unaware of the conditions surrounding the herd we have. And, now that I do, I understand where you’re coming from and do totally agree. If the animals can’t be moved, and if breeding is ultimately doing more harm than good genetically (and ethically, which is odd for Toronto), then I say find someone who will take the whole herd and phase them out. Waiting for the herd to die off likely won’t work seeing as they seem to just keep breeding. And yes, something like a takin or markhor or goral would be nice. As much as I do love the tur, I will digress if their conditions are poor overall. Side note about Eurasia as well: are there any set-in-stone plans for that mountain habitat across from the snow leopard which has been empty since (afaik) the pandemic at least? Again, could definitely host some kind of hoofstock, just wish there was something. Empty habitats in the zoo kinda frustrate me because it feels like a waste of space (hence why I was actually excited when they moved the female Bald Eagle up to the former pheasant/snowy owl aviary).

Addressing the savanna plans, I honestly didn’t realize that the Savanna Pavilion plans were still actually going to be acted upon. Not that I’m complaining, although I didn’t totally understand what it was gonna do that the new barn wouldn’t do, with the exception of housing the white rhinos. Still don’t, in all honesty.
Also… I really wish the Olive Baboons weren’t on the phase-out list. Love them dearly. There is a certain cattle species I wouldn’t be too sore about losing (*cough cough* Watusi *cough*)

As for what comes after, I do hope that, at the very least, we might see the jaguar return. Regardless of whether that ultimately means the spider monkeys have to go (again…) so as to expand the former space into something more suitable for a big cat, I don’t think the Mayan Temple has been the same since Luca died. Other than that, I don’t really recall anything from that master plan which really stuck out as an “improvement” in my mind. And yes, that honestly includes the tiger expansion.

@Wesley Renaud In regards to the red pandas, I think the plan is to provide viewing both outdoors and indoors for them with the refurbishment of their habitat. Again, little things that might seem unnecessary to some, but do improve the space overall,
 
Yes they are adding indoor viewing to the red panda exhibit which should be nice, especially considering how they struggle with the heat.
As far as I know the savanna pavilion will provide holdings/indoor viewings for the rhinos, zebras, kudu, eland, ostriches? (not certain about this one because the male is kept in the habitat towards the domain which shouldn’t be directly accessible from the pavilion), and the other birds so they will be viewable year-round. Pretty much all of the animals on the inside of the big savanna loop if it helps to think about it that way. I wouldn’t be too upset about the baboons leaving because they will likely be replaced by another primate with an SSP like hamadryas baboons.
I still think it’s likely the jaguars make a return. Whenever they get around to redoing the temple I expect it in many ways to be unrecognizable from its current self. So much needs to change there. The waterfall is nice but the pathing up to it isn’t very accessible. The capybara exhibit isn’t the same without the macaws. The old flamingo exhibit isn’t currently being used due to avian flu. And the old jaguar exhibit needs an upgrade (if it is to hold jaguars again). My bet would be that most of the space would be used for the jaguars, and the flamingos will likely stay because they are very iconic. This is all according to the master plan.
 
Because the zoo doesnt need the babies they have taken a hands off approach to them. If they live they live and if the die the die, especially boys who arent really wanted or needed. I was at the zoo before the pandemic and arrived at the exhibit moments after a male kid was born. His mom rejected him instantly (an all too common thing with our tur). The keepers were there trying to get her to come over, checking him out, getting him on his feet. They said he likely wouldnt make it if she didnt take him back because they would just let nature take its course. They moved him under the mountain near a mom who had babies the day before in hopes she might take a third. She didnt and I found out from someone else a few days later he didnt make it through the next day. If you are not going to step up and care for every life you allow to be created in captivity my personal opinion is then dont create it. They didnt chose to be born. We as humans allowed it and we should value that life. Maybe he wouldnt have made it if they intervened, but at least he would have been given a fighting chance. And this incident isnt the only one I know of where they just didnt try. Furthermore because we have no one to trade the kids with and havent for a long, long time, do the math. We have been inbreeding for some time. This above all else ticks me off. We dont need to be inbreeding. We arent contributing to an SSP, or the population which I admit is endangered and if we were doing something to help I would stop complaining. We are not. I want them phases out ASAP. Transfer the whole herd to anywhere else. Heck pay for their upkeep there. Get rid of them and bring in something we can do good with. Give me takin or markhor. The tur are just stopping me from getting what I want. Oh the tur definitely know what they are doing to tick me off. Lol.

This is all a bit dramatic… This approach to animal management is actually quite common, specifically with hoofstock. Many facilities will not hand-raise many male hoofstock because of the danger they can pose to keeper staff if they lose their appropriate flight distance and see humans as equals — if the offspring can not survive in their natal herd, then they’d be euthanized. This policy would likely be no different for markhor or takin than it is for the tur. Inbreeding, while not ideal, is also not entirely unusual in populations in human care, either. Many populations are descended from a very limited number of founders — including the Sichuan takin, which was initially descended from 1.2 individuals (although a few new founders have been brought into the US in more recent years). Just trying to provide perspective that the “travesty” you have found in the Toronto Zoo’s tur population is not actually something that is uncommon in the wider zoo community.
 
Last edited:
Why you guys hate the Turs, they are impressive species especially males, I see several visitors enjoy watching them, especially watching them butting. and they can be displayed for entire years, unlike African hoofed animals that have to be off-displayed for half year.
 
Why you guys hate the Turs, they are impressive species especially males, I see several visitors enjoy watching them, especially watching them butting. and they can be displayed for entire years, unlike African hoofed animals that have to be off-displayed for half year.
As someone who just visited Toronto for the first time a little more than a week ago, my friends and I were so excited to see the tur. We are rare ungulate enthusaists, and we had never seen tur before. They also are not doing great in the wild with less than 4,000 left. I also don't really understand the hate here. Yes, there are other species of ibex that are more commonly displayed where offspring would likely be easier to move around, but it's really a shame more aren't focusing on tur and maybe if Toronto keeps their program going it will result in more zoos taking some eventually.
 
Why you guys hate the Turs, they are impressive species especially males, I see several visitors enjoy watching them, especially watching them butting. and they can be displayed for entire years, unlike African hoofed animals that have to be off-displayed for half year.
I have absolutely nothing against the Tur. I simply think that @TZFan made some points that I personally was unaware of (regarding the fact of the herd inbreeding). I do think having the tur is better than nothing, but at the end of the day if the herd isn't going to be genetically valuable among an already sparse North American population (we're one of 3 holders according to ZTL, and the only holder in Canada, something that does factor into their overall value), then I think that ultimately it would be better to bring in a species with an SSP that is actively in use in North America, like the markhor or takin, and potentially move the turs, whether it be on the continent or off to Europe where holdings are (while still limited) more prevalent.
That in mind, I do agree with @Mary in that it would be nice to see their population expand, but at the end of the day that would likely require a) expansion that quite a few zoos simply don't have the resources for, b) alteration of plans to acquire SSP-managed species to suit the tur, or c) the all-out phasing-out of another species (which would likely be SSP)
 
Oh I purposely was being overly dramatic. I was jokingly asked why I had something against the tur. So I chose to be a little more dramatic because we were having a light hearted conversation, or so I thought. Next time I choose to answer someone I'll just answer the question privately if I want to have any fun with my response to a friend.

And you guys are all entitled to your opinions on animal management, as am I. I just happen to believe that if we as humans keep animals in captivity and allow them to breed it is our duty to ensure they are all given their best chance at life. I'm not saying you make an animal suffer just to keep it alive. There needs to be a balance. But when we are talking about a baby who is otherwise healthy and its mom just said no thank you to, that baby deserves a shot. We chose to let it exist. All it takes is separating the sexes during breeding season and you dont end up with kids you dont want. Or neuter the males. Its simple.

I do know all species there is varying degrees of inbreeding. Thats obvious. But the problem I have specifically with Toronto's tur is they are doing it with no purpose in mind. There is no SSP. They are not participating in a conservation program with any possible hope of future release. There are no other zoos asking to take the offspring produced. There is no hope of new bloodlines, or even less represented bloodlines coming in to help mitigate the ever increasing amount of relatedness. The herd is already seeing the effects of inbreeding. Lots of stillbirths, high infant morality (even when they do intervene), tons of rejected babies, and its starting to effect adult health or at least was when I was last told about it by someone who worked for the zoo. I just dont see the purpose of it when you are seeing negative effects of inbreeding and there is no purpose in continuing to do it. We could take that exhibit put an SSP species in it and then breed to contribute to a genetically healthy population, or even pick a non SSP species that other Canadian zoos have and we could swap animals with.

That said if you disagree with me thats fine. Thats your opinion and you are entitled to it. I can respect it. I just went overly dramatic because my friend was asking me a question in a funny way. Next time I will just give my answer privately if I want to be a sarcastic goof. Message was received that its not appreciated. I do apologize to those I offended.
 
A few notes/things of interest from my trip yesterday:
- The crimson rosella is now in with the rest of birds in the main aviary in the australasia pavilion.
- There is construction in the main Amur tiger habitat (although I’m not sure exactly what is being done at the moment), and a handful of signs around advertising that the zoo is updating their space and bringing in more tigers.
- The underwater viewing for the polar bears is closed, and the pool has been drained - I assume they are making the switch to saltwater? No bears were in that part of the exhibit.
- Despite a post on the zoo’s socials about Petal the river hippo being off exhibit because of changes in her behaviour and appetite, both her and Perky were on exhibit. Petal was browsing for food and knocking some of out a ball tied to chain for a few minutes while I was at the exhibit.
- Zwalani the new silverback gorilla was once again in the day room, but this time the girls were actually outside. Only Charlie and Nneka though, and without their mom they were being quite mischievous chasing each other around the exhibit.
 
Back
Top