On a financial side the zoo will probably never be better run than in the days of the Founders running it,as tld said I would say 75% of the zoo problems stem from the days of Boardman,how anyone can justify a foot path cost 1 million pounds is beyond me,but the footpath down the back of the Elephants came close to costing that,plus if staff didn't do things her way,a piss poor reason was found to get rid of them or force them out,the prime example of that was the Elephant keepers that when told they were to change from Free Contact to Protective Contact,they said no because they had not been consulted next minute they are suspended because of abusing the Elephants which was utter ********,just to get them out of the door.I could go on and on over the problems that woman caused the zoo,but I suspect i would lose the will to live long before its finished!!The other 25% of the zoo's problems stem from the founders and there penny pinching ways,like the Lion enclosure that they built that was barely fit for purpose due to the small size of house and enclosure and lack of space to split animals if needed,but it did mean that Boardman had millions to waste!When the current person in charge took over the collection the zoo was about a month or 2 away from having no money at all to pay for anything!So to have done what they have done since then,just shows what a good job they have done as they have done some,very small changes that haven't cost much like the extending of the Giant Tortoise indoors and outdoor enclosure,plus the building of the Gibbon Forest and the Butterfly House.