I have finally got around to posting a few thoughts after a recent visit to Twycross on 10/06/18.
The past
In the past I have never really enjoyed a visit to Twycross. I’ve always found it to be a zoo with some great species and an admirable breeding record, but predominantly a combination of a boring, uninspiring, depressing and downright frustrating experience.
Before June 2018, the last time I had visited was nearly 4 years ago in October 2014. I came away then thinking that, in a zoo full of primates, the butterfly walkthrough, elephants (outdoors), snow leopards and the flamingos were the only exhibits of any quality, the rest mostly being very poor, and I didn’t envisage visiting again for the foreseeable future.
There were so many of what you’d consider to be major enclosures, old and new, that I just found so poor…
- Monkey and lemur cages: Very difficult to see the animals indoors and out. Outdoor areas are small, boring, indistinguishable, cuboidal cages with little foliage. Indoor areas are small, clinical-looking, tiled rooms.
- Amur leopard cages: Extremely ugly and uninteresting. An ok size but contain little foliage or decent climbing opportunities.
- Lorikeet walkthrough: Very badly thought out. Open to the elements. Most of the plants inside are dead/stunted through lack of light or water, as well as exposure to frost.
- Elephant house: Small, outdated and unfit for purpose.
- Borneo longhouse: Looks run down and forgotten about. I don’t really see the point of it. Is there supposed to be a conservation message of some kind?
- Gorilla enclosure: Outdoor area is small, stark and boring, with an obvious lack of climbing opportunities, cover and privacy.
- Old chimp enclosures: Were tiny and outdated, indoor and out. Lack of climbing opportunities.
- Orang-utan enclosure: Had a small indoor area. Only one small outdoor area.
- Bonobo enclosure: Very small outdated indoor areas, that look full to capacity. Small outdoor area.
- Penguins: Small land area, murky green water.
Despite all this, I have been observing on Zoochat, with a keen interest, all the large impressive developments that have been taking place at the zoo over recent years, particularly the construction of the new chimpanzee complex, wondering if another visit could change my opinion…
The present
So, after visiting a few weeks ago, I was pleasantly surprised by how much I had enjoyed my day. The excellent big 3 new developments, i.e. chimp Eden, gibbon islands and giraffe house/paddock, since my previous visit have not only improved the overall average exhibit quality, but also dramatically improved the ’feel’ of the zoo by adding a certain new dynamism. It feels so much less like a grid full of small, poor, outdated, monotonous square enclosures in a flat, mostly empty, square field. It now has some character and has finally taken its first steps towards looking like a modern zoo.
My opinions of the amur leopard cage, lorikeet walkthrough, monkey cages, gorillas, Borneo longhouse, bonobo enclosure and penguin pool remain, but at least the elephants are leaving, the orangs have a bigger house and the chimps have a new home. I am sure that many of those enclosures listed above will be included in future development plans.
A few further points from my recent visit…
The foliage in the snow leopard enclosure had grown quite a lot since my last visit. I thought they would have kept in down to keep it looking like a rocky habitat. It doesn’t look bad, it’s just that personally I preferred it as it was. However, if that’s how they want it to look or if there’s a good reason for it, for example to give the animals more privacy, then fair enough.
There were a number of empty enclosures around the zoo. One by the tapirs and at least 2 or 3 more by the tufted deer, however I understand these may be sites of future development.
Chimp Eden. Wow, what an enormous improvement! Wonderful to see the chimps in there. I like how the zoo identified their weakest area and dealt with it in a big way.
The Jurassic Park-esque wall surrounding the outdoor area has received negative comments from some zoochatters, including from myself, but honestly when you’re there in person, fascinated by all the natural behaviour and social group interactions of the chimps in their new environment, you barely even notice it and forget it’s there. I think the outdoor area is smaller than it looks in photos and the climbing structures aren’t extensive, but who cares when it’s such a massive improvement on what they had before.
There was one chimp, who I think was the new male Kibale, that was displaying now and again. However, his displays weren’t hugely impressive and didn’t last long. The other chimps didn’t pay much attention to him. I don’t know how old he is, but I thought he looked like he’s got a bit of growing to do too.
With regards to the theming of the indoor viewing area, it’s very very plastic and average in quality, but I disagree with comments saying it would be better if they hadn’t bothered. I think the jungle theming creates a sort of ‘atmosphere’ while you’re standing there watching the chimps, so I think it manages to feel immersive despite the chimp indoor area being completely un-naturalistic.
The only problem is the narrowness of the path through the indoor viewing area. Fine if you get there early, but I imagine a nightmare later in the day, despite the windows being fairly large.
It will be interesting to see what they do with the old chimp enclosures. The ‘brick one’ by the gorillas looked vacant, the one by the prairie dogs (i.e the original gorilla enclosure) currently contains mara and coati, which seems quite an odd place for them. I didn’t see any chimps in the old enclosure by the nyala and the indoor area was closed, but I did see lots of fresh wood wool strewn around the outside, so I presume it was still occupied. I’d prefer that they demolish all the old enclosures, but if they do decide to keep them then let’s hope they do a better job of converting them for new occupants than they did when converting the ‘green mile’ cages for Amur leopards.
Something I noticed this time was the bad situation with the bonobos. They seem to be separated into two groups. It looks like each group has a small indoor area to themselves but are having to rotate for access to the outdoor area; not great during the hot weather at the moment. It would be great if another collection in the UK would go into holding bonobo (Yorkshire I’m looking at you).
Orangs. I couldn’t tell the exact group setup, but they appeared to be in two separate groups. They’ve done a decent job improving/extending the indoor areas, however, they still aren’t huge considering the number of orangs they have. They could really do with having another outdoor area as well, as they currently only have one.
To conclude
I was impressed, and pleasantly surprised. As has been discussed here and in previous threads the zoo still has
a lot of major issues that need work, but I am looking forward to seeing what the future holds for them. And I think the more they stride away from their contentious history the better.
So yes, my opinion has changed for the better and I would like to visit again, but maybe in a year or two.